`
`NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`UNILOC 2017 LLC,
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Appellee
`
`ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE
`FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER
`SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR
`INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF
`THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
`OFFICE,
`Intervenor
`______________________
`
`2019-2277, 2019-2307
`______________________
`
`Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017-
`01684, IPR2017-01685.
`______________________
`
`JUDGMENT
`______________________
`
`BRIAN MATTHEW KOIDE, Etheridge Law Group, South-
`lake, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES
`
`
`
`Case: 19-2277 Document: 74 Page: 2 Filed: 08/31/2021
`
`
`
`ETHERIDGE, RYAN S. LOVELESS, BRETT MANGRUM, JEFFREY
`A. STEPHENS.
`
` JASON E. STACH, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Gar-
`rett & Dunner, LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellee. Also
`represented by ERIKA ARNER, SYDNEY KESTLE, ANDREA
`GRACE KLOCK MILLS, Washington, DC; DANIEL CRAIG
`COOLEY, Fairfax, VA.
`
` MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United
`States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for
`intervenor. Also represented by SARAH E. CRAVEN, THOMAS
`W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.
` ______________________
`
`THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
`
` PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, PROST and
`TARANTO, Circuit Judges).
`AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
`
`
` ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
`
`
`
`
`August 31, 2021
`Date
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`