`Paper No.
`Filed: September 11, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-01685
`U.S. Patent No. 7,804,948
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case No. IPR2017-01685
`Patent No. 7,804,948
`
`The Board tentatively scheduled oral hearing for this proceeding for October
`
`16, 2018. Paper 11. Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner requests oral
`
`hearing on the instituted grounds of unpatentability in this proceeding, including
`
`whether claims 1-4, 6-8, 18, 21, and 22 of the ’948 are unpatentable over Tanigawa
`
`and Liversidge. Petitioner also requests oral hearing on any issues raised by Patent
`
`Owner in its Request for Oral Hearing, as well as any issues raised in any motion
`
`to exclude.
`
`Today, Petitioner is also filing requests for oral hearing in two related cases:
`
`IPR2017-01684 (U.S. Patent No. 7,853,000) and IPR2017-01683 (U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,571,194). Because the three IPRs are related, Petitioner proposes 45 minutes per
`
`side for consolidated argument on all three patents, but if the Board chooses not to
`
`consolidate the arguments, Petitioner proposes 30 minutes per side for the closely
`
`related ’000/’948 patents (the -01685 and -01684 proceedings) and 30 minutes per
`
`side for the ’194 patent (the -01683 proceeding). In any event, Petitioner requests
`
`an amount of argument time equal to that granted to Patent Owner.
`
`Petitioner requests that four spaces be reserved at the oral hearing to
`
`accommodate its counsel and corporate representatives. Petitioner also requests
`
`that three of its attorneys be allowed to use computers.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case No. IPR2017-01685
`Patent No. 7,804,948
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By:/Jason Stach/
`Jason Stach (Reg. No. 54,464)
`
`
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 11, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case No. IPR2017-01685
`Patent No. 7,804,948
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Petitioner’s
`
`Request for Oral Hearing was served on September 11, 2018 via e-mail directed
`
`to counsel of record for the Patent Owner at the following:
`
`Brett Mangrum
`brett@etheridgelaw.com
`
`Sean D. Burdick
`sean.burdick@unilocusa.com
`
`Ryan Loveless
`ryan@etheridgelaw.com
`
`James Etheridge
`jim@etheridgelaw.com
`
`Jeffrey Huang
`jeff@etheridgelaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 11, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Lisa C. Hines/
`Lisa C. Hines
`Litigation Legal Assistant
`
`
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
