throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`'
`
`
`
`.1
`
`
`
`I
`
`TREASURY DEPARTMENT
`
`
`PUBLIC HEALTH
`
`REPORTS
`
`ISSUED WEEKLY
`BY THE
`
`UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`
`
`CONTAINING INFORMATION ON THE CURRENT
`PREVALENCE OF DISEASE, THE PREVENTION
`AND CONTROL OF DISEASE, AND
`RELATED SUBJECTS
`
`VOLUME 43—PART 1
`NUMBERS 1—26
`
`JANUARY—JUNE, 1928
`
`SE
`
`UNITED STATES
`GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
`WASHINGTON
`1928
`
`
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1015
`Page 1 of 38
`
`

`

` ADDITIONAL COPIES
`
`OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM
`THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
`U.S.t‘.0\'ERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
`WASHINGTOX. D. C.
`AT
`5 CENTS PER COPY
`
`I I
`
`
`
`“.HI _..
`
`“nirihrfis
`
`5"‘.C‘i".| i1.,'TT"f']'i"-'J "."Vl': "7"!
`
`Jcan"‘
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1015
`Page 2 of 38
`
`

`

`
`
`PUBLIC HEALTH REPORT
`
`VOL. 43
`
`JUNE 8, 1928
`
`NO. 23
`
`A STUDY OF THE BLACKTONGUE-PREVENTIVE ACTION
`OF 16 FOODSTUFFS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE
`IDENTITY OF BLACKTONGUE 0F DOGS AND PELLAGRA
`OF MAN
`'
`
`and R. D. LILLIE
`By JOSEPH GOLDBERGER and G. A. WHEELER, Surgeons,
`{End L. M. ROGERS, Passed Assistant Surgeons, United States Public Health
`i'e-rivicc
`
`
`CONTENTS
`
`Page
`Page
`Introduction ______________________________ ,.
`1385
`Beef....................................... --
`1424
`Methods and criteria..____
`..
`1387
`Pork liver _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _
`_ _ .. _ _ .
`l . l _ _ l _ __ _ .-
`1428
`
`1380
`Canned salmon
`Maize (and cornstarch)"
`11130
`143+
`1302
`Eggyolk.
`Wheat,,,,,,,, ,,
`1431
`
`Wheat germ. , _
`1394
`Tomatoes
`
`
`(Iowpea._,,
`1438
`1397
`Carrots
`.
`Soy bean _______________________
`1400 Rulahagascnun ,._,,..._...-
`_
`1443
`
`
`Relation of blacklongue to pellagra__...__--_ 144G
`Milk _____ __
`1402
`Summary and conclusions,"
`__
`Button“...
`1405
`1447
`
`References_________________________________ ..
`Cod-liver oil
`1420
`144s
`
`
`Cottonseed oil.___
`Tables ________ _.-___________________________ _..
`1422
`1440
`
`
`Some of the results of our study of the problem of an experimental
`animal for pellagra were briefly summarized in a communication
`published two years ago (1), and have been presented in detail in
`two recent publications.
`In the first of
`those Goldbergcr
`and
`Wheeler (2) reported the production in the dog, by feeding pellagra-
`producing diets, of a pathological condition considered by them to be
`identical with the spontaneously occurring canine disease known to
`American veterinarians as blacktongue.1 The clinical resemblance of
`this canine disease to pellagra in man was discussed and was consid-
`ered so striking as to be, in itself, practically conclusive of the identity
`of these two conditions.
`In harmony with and supporting this View
`was also the suggestion of a cOmmon etiology indicated by the success-
`ful production of the canine disease by feeding with pellagra—producing
`diets.
`In the second communication, Goldberger, Wheeler, Lillie,
`and Rogers (3) reported a series of feeding experiments with yeast
`from the results of which they concluded that experimental black-
`tongue is due to a deficiency in diet that is capable of being corrected
`by something present in abundance in yeast. This demonstration of
`the presence of the blacktongue preventive in yeast, a substance in
`which the pellagra preventive (factor P—P) was also known to be
`present in abundance (4), Was considered to increase somewhat the
`
`a1
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1015
`Page 3 of 38
`
`

`

`
`
`r)
`
`June 8, 1928
`
`In this connection it is of interest {to note: that Denton
`conditions.
`(5), in a study of the tissue changes in experimental blacktongue, has
`found that the lesions of the skin, mouth, pharyi'ix, esophagus, and
`colonin the canine disease are very similar to those in pellagra, and
`that histologically the lesions in experimental blacktongne duplicate
`those in pellagra.
`In the bodyr of this report reference will be made to differences
`between certain of the results of our study and those of an apparently
`similar study by Underhill and Mendel (6). The divergence in our
`results is of interest, since We have heretofore considered it highly
`probable that the pathological condition experimentally induced in
`the dog by Chittenden and Undcrhill and studied by Dnderhill and
`hieudel was identical with the experimental condition studlcd and
`identified by us as blacktongue (2). The extensive report ofltheir
`work (7) which has just come to our attention presents some clinical
`details which not only seem in themselves significant of a difference
`in the two pathological mnditions, but also suggest that we had here-
`tofore, perhaps, underestimated the significance of certain other clin-
`ical differences. Thus we find in this report that a “troublesome
`skin rash” appears to have been common in the condition with which
`Underhill and hlendid have worked.
`“To have encountered none
`
`such in our dogs. On the other hand, while we have observed a
`pellagra-like dermatitis of the scrotum in some 40 to 50 per cent of
`attacks in our male dogs, there is no mention of the occurrence of
`such an eruption in the condition studied by Underhill and Memlel.
`Again, in the condition studied by 11s%1111111elj,*, blacktongueithcro
`is a definitely marked febrile stage which does not seem to occur in
`the Chittendcn-Underhill syndrome stridied by Underhill and hien-
`del; for they nowhere make mention of it, not even in their fulllrepo'rt.
`These clinical differences seem to us of such importance that, in spite
`of the striking clinical similarity in certain other respects, doubt now
`arises as to the identity of the Chittenden-Underhill “pellagra-hkc’
`syndrome. Until this doubt is definitely resolved one way or another,
`it would seem premature to discuss, and we therefore do not attempt
`to discuss, the differences between the results reported by Underhnl
`and Mendel and those recorded by ourselves in the present and 111 a
`preceding communication (3).
`I
`‘
`f
`In the present communication we present some further i‘csnlt-slo
`our study of experimental blacktrmguc. These results deal With 1. in
`blacktongue preventive potency of cc1*tai1rscler_-rml
`f0?[‘lstllffil, p}
`number, with special reference to the relation of cxlml'lmen '35 b "*5 ‘-
`
`
`
`1387
`
`June 8,1028
`
`METHODS AND CRITERIA
`
`The general methods of caring for and feeding our experimental
`animals have already been described (2) (3). We may recall, how-
`ever, that the experimental diets were, as a rule, freshly prepared each
`day. The daily allowance of food was, in general, intended to he no
`more than enough for the maintenance of normal body weight. An
`exception was made in the case of young growing animals, to which
`more than this allowance was offered.
`It may be recalled, too, that
`it has been our practice to use our dogs repeatedly with or without
`intermediate periods of stock feeding as might he demanded by the
`purpose of the experiment.
`In stock feeding, a definite food mixture
`has been used, principally our diet No. 156,
`the composition and
`evidence of the adequacy of which have been given in a preceding
`communication (2).
`In testing for the .blacktongue preventive we have employed both
`the curative and the preventive procedure, singly or in combination.
`Since, as we have in a preceding communication (2), already indicated
`the clinical course of experimen tal blacktonguc, especially in the inva-
`sional stage, may normally be of an intermittent or relapsing char-
`acter, we attach no significance to a seemingly favorable therapeutic
`result in cases in which the treatment is begun early unless confirmed
`by the results of a preventive test. On the other hand, consistently
`unfavorable results of treatment under such favoring circumstances
`have hccn considered trustworthy indications of a poverty in or lack
`of the blacktonguc preventive, provided that the test dose has been a
`liberal one. Our experience with experimental blacktongue has led
`us to consider the rise in temperature which occurs in the advanced
`stage of the disease as a mark of gravity (2). Only very exceptionally
`does the attack normally remit after this temperature rise has taken
`place. We have, therefore, been disposed to consider clinical recovery
`from the attack (that is, disappearance of all manifestations of the
`disease with recovery of appetite) following treatment begun at. this
`advanced grave stage as significant, but have, nevertheless, always
`required confirmation by the preventive test before drawing final
`conclusions with respect
`to the presence of the preventive in the
`substance thus found to be active.
`Isolated cases of the apparent
`failure of treatment under these unfavorable circumstances have been
`considered as without significance.
`In testing the individual foodstuffs, one, or exceptionally both, of
`two types of test diet have been employed.
`In the first the com-
`
`i
`
`I
`
`|
`
`l|
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1015
`Page 4 of 38
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`June 8, 1928
`
`1388
`
`I
`‘
`basic diet sh-ould be kept in mind in eValuating and comparing the
`indications of preventive potency, since the results yielded by the
`former may probably be considered as due Virtually entirely to the
`action of the foodstuff tested, whereas those of the latter must be
`considered as a summation effect due to the combined action of the
`basic components and of the test foodstuff.
`So far be our data permit, an appraisal has been made of the
`blacktongue preventive potency of each foodstiifl’.
`In View of the
`lack of a better practicable standard for such purpose, our appraisal
`is simply a judgment, in broad terms, of the preventive adequacy of
`such a quantity as, according to conventional practice, represents
`the daily alloii-‘aiice for an average adult human male.
`.
`The exnerimental disease in the dog and its d1agnos1s have been
`describediin a preceding report
`(2); we need recall only that the
`earliest distinctive buccal signs are a vivid red 1n]cct1.on of
`the
`mucosa of the floor of the mouth or a peculiar reddening of the
`mucosa of
`the upper lip in the form of bilaterally symmetrical
`patches, or of both. We have considered the first appearance of
`these mouth lesions as marking the beginning of the attack of black—
`tongue. We have conformed to this rule in all cases, even'in those
`relatively few instances in which the pellagralilke dermatitis of the
`scrotum appeared in advance of the mouth les10ns._ 'l‘hris marked,
`the beginning of the experimental disease, when this IS‘ induced by
`feeding our basic diet No. 123 (or certain of its modifications, namely
`diets No. 209, No. 195, and N0. 268), is only 'very exceptionally de—
`layed beyond about 60 days after the beginning of the feeding (d).
`We have therefore been inclined to cons1der
`very notable pio—
`longation of this period, particularly when manifested in more tirin
`one of a group of test animals, as Significant of the presence in tie
`test diet of the blacktongiie preventive
`an amount that is spine-
`what larger than that presumably contained in our standaid )flSlO
`diet.1 Since other factors, not yet understood, such, for mistigrce, as
`self-imposed starvation or semistarvation and other possll" ymc:
`existing deficiencies or maladjustments of dietary essentla b; may
`and Probably d0 influence the duration of what for conipipencyecrds);
`be designated as the deprivation period, We have trier
`0 0.
`due caution in the interpretation of such indications.
`
`ontaln,wejiidge,
`r
`r
`-
`-
`_
`n iii-iiifiiiriiiiiiieiiiidtiiifi iiiiiifiidxiiiiifliidd13.3333riftiégfiiiiiiiiii. orlm‘limflr mm
`‘
`.
`_ 1th wlilc'h
`'
`'
`'
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`Jones, 1928
`
`1389
`MAIZE
`The idea that the maize in the diet is in some way concerned in
`the causation of pellagra has, as is wall known, been entertained by
`students of that disease almost from the time of its first recognition.
`It seems to have arisen in part, at least, because maize constituted a
`very large part of the diet of the populations among whom, in the
`Old World, the disease was endemic.
`In the United States, maize
`also is a conspicuous element in the diet of the population in the
`area where the disease is most prevalent. Both in the Old and in
`the New World, therefore, maize is more or less prominently asso—
`ciated with the occurrence of pellagra. While the extreme position
`of certain zcists that there is no pellagra without maize is now no
`longer tenable, the association is no doubt very common. One is
`justified in concluding, therefore, that maize is very poor in or lacks
`the pellagra preventive
`In constructing our experimental diets, based as they are on diets
`foimd in association with the occurrence of pellagra, maize was from
`the first included as a. conspicuous element. The basic dict most
`frequently used by us for the experimental production of blacktonguc
`(diet No. 123, shown in Table 1) contains 400 grams of maize meal
`per 2,400 calorie ration. This is a large amount of cereal, consti-
`tuting as it does two—thirds of the weight of the dry ingredients of
`the diet. Notwithstanding this, however, as has in a preceding coni-
`munication (3) already been set forth, dogs fed this diet (including
`certain of its Inmlilieations) have developed blacktonguc within a
`period which only exceptionally exceeded a duration of about 60
`days. This would indicate that, as measured by the requirements
`of the. dog, maize contains little if any of the blacktongue preveitive.
`Incidentally, it may be noted that cornstarch would also appear to
`he very poor or lacking in the blacktonguc preventive since, as pre—
`viralsly reported (3), two dogs fed a. diet (No. 281) containing 366
`grams of cornstarch per Alton-calorie portion promptly developed the
`disease.
`The maize men] used in our basic diet No. 12-3 (including its modi-
`float-ions) does not, however, represent quite the whole kernel, since
`a small part of the bran is removed by sifting as if for human con-
`sumption.
`It seemed desirable, therefore, to test a meal from which
`nothing had been taken away. But as it did not seem to us probable
`that the difference in the meal represented by the small amount of
`
`l
`'l
`
`II
`
`I:
`II-
`i
`
`!
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`E
`‘l
`ll
`,
`
`'
`
`II
`
`I
`
`'
`
`I
`
`l
`
`l
`
`'
`5'
`ll
`'l
`I
`
`-
`
`I
`
`'
`
`I
`
`i
`
`I
`
`l
`I
`
`,
`
`l
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1015
`Page 5 of 38
`
`

`

`
`
`1391
`
`June 8, 1928
`
`June 8, 1928
`
`EXPERIMENT 1
`
`This was a test of the blacktongue preventive action of Whole white
`maize meal which was incorporated in test diets N0. 149 and N0.
`149A.
`(Table 2.) - These diets, which are identical except that the
`butterfat of one is quantitatively replaced by cod-liver oil in the other,
`are a slight modification of a maize diet studied by hchollum, Sim-
`monds, and Pitz (8), and by them considered complete for normal
`growth of the rat to normal adult size, and for that reason selected
`by us for this study. Each contains 450 grams of whole—maize meal
`in a. ration of slightly less than 2,400 calories. Suitable portions of
`one or the other of these diets were offered daily to each of seven test
`animals, dogs 29, 40, 52, 54, 57, 65, and 73. One of these dogs served
`during two separate periods, so that eight tests in all are to be con—
`sidered. The significant details relating to each of the test animals
`are presented in the following:
`
`Dog ‘29.~Male. Acquired May 9, 1923, between which date and January 11,
`1924, served in a number of experiments and suffered four attacks of blacktongue,
`the latest of which began January 7, 1924. On a miscellaneous stock diet from
`January 11 to February 5, 1924.
`February 5, 1924: In good condition; weighs 11.1 kilograms; begins test diet
`N0. 149.
`(Table 2.)
`On February 17, 1924, at the end of a period of 12 days, pres'cnted the first signs
`of an attack of blacktongue, an injection of the floor of the mouth. Further
`history not relevant.
`Dog- 40.~Male. VVhelped in the laboratory June 26, 1923, and reared on a
`stock diet. Up to February 20, 1924, served in a number of experiments and
`suffered two attacks of blacktongue, the later One of which began February 19,
`1924. On a stock diet for reconditioning from February 20 to March 11, 1924.
`March 11, 1924: In good condition; weighs 9.2 kilograms; begins diet No. 149.
`On April 23, 1924', at the end of a period of 43 days, presented the first signs of
`an attack of blacktongue, an injection of the floor of the mouth. W'cight was
`11 kilograms. Further history not relevant.
`Dog 53.—Bitch. Acquired September 25, 1923. Up to February 20, 1924,
`served in a number of experiments and suffered two attacks of blacktongue, the
`later one of which began February 18:, 1924. On a stock diet for reconditioning
`from February 20 to March 11, 1924.
`March: 11, 1924:
`In- good condition; weighs 9.7 kilograms; begins test diet No. 149.
`On July 31, 1924, at the end of a period of 1—42 days, presented the first signs of an
`attack of blacktongue, an injection of the floor of the mouth. Weighs 10
`kilograms. Further history not relevant.
`Dog 54.—Bitch. Acquired September 25, 1923.. Up to January 11,. I924:
`served in a number of experiments and suffered an attack of blacktongue which
`began November 28, 1923. On reconditioning diets from January 11 to March
`25, 1924.
`March 25, 1924: In good condition; Weighs 8.1 kilograms; begins test diet N0-
`149A.
`(Table 2.)
`_
`On June 5, 1924, at the end of a. period of 72 days, presented the first s1gns 01' an
`
`Dot? §?.—Maic. Acquired September 25, 1923. Up to January 15, 1924,
`served 1n a. number of experiments and sufl'ered two attacks of lilacktongue, the
`latter of which began December 13, 1923. From January 15 to February 5, 1924,
`on 21 miscellaneous stock diet for reconditioning.
`Fellérruer-y 5, 1924: In good condition; weighs 9.7 kilograms; begins test dict
`. o. 149.
`On February 23, 1924, at the end of a period of 18 days, presented the first signs of
`blacktonguo, an injection of the floor of the mouth, of the mucosa of the
`checks, and of the anterior {social pillars. Weighs 10 kilograms. Begins
`reconditioning diet.
`February 25, 1924: Redness of mucosa of the floor and checks is less pronout'lced.
`February 26, 1924: Redness has practically completely faded. Weighs 9.9
`kilograms.
`March 25, 1924: In good condition; weighs 10.1 kilograms; begins test diet N0.
`149A.
`
`On April 11, at the end of a period of 17 days, presented the beginning signs of an
`attack of blacktongue, an injection of the floor of the mouth. Further history
`not relevant.
`-
`
`Dog 65.—Bitch. Acquired January 28, 1924. Kept on a. miscellaneous stock
`diet to February 5, 1924.
`February 5, 1924: In good condition; weights 6.7 kilograms; begins test diet
`No. 149.
`
`April 22: Weighs 7.7 kilograms.
`011 April 27, 1924, at the end of a period of 77 days, presented the first signs of an
`attack of hiaoktongue, a reddening of the mucosa of the floor of the mouth.
`Further history not relevant.
`Dog 23.——Bitch. Acquired March 19, 1924. On stock diet up to April 1, 1924.
`April 1, 1924: In good condition; weighs 7.7 kilograms; begins test diet No. 149A.
`July 8, 1924: Weighs 10.2 kilograms.
`On July. 12, 1924, or 102 days after beginning the test, this animal presented an
`inject-ion of the mucosa of the floor of the mouth suggestive of a, beginning
`attack of blacktongue. Tn'o days later this was no longer perceptible, nor was
`there any reappearance of signs of blacktonguo during a. further period of
`observation of 38 days which ended August 19, 1924, on which date this
`experiment was discontinued.
`
`Results and conclusionsr—Six of the seven dog's developed black-
`tongue in from 12 to 142 days after beghining the test. The. seventh
`(dog 73) presented evanescent evidence very suggestive but not con-
`clusive of blacktongue at
`the end of a period of 102 days. The
`observation of this animal was discontinued at the end of- 140 days,
`so that the possibility is not excluded that a definite attack of black-
`tongue would have developed had the observation period been longer.
`One of the test animals (dog 57) served during two separate periods
`and developed an attack of blacktongue in each. Thus the six
`animals in which definite evidence of blacktongue developed experi-
`enced,
`in all, seven attacks.
`Six of these appeared at the end of
`periods of not over 77 days in duration, and the seventh (dog 52)
`at the end of a period of 142 days.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1015
`Page 6 of 38
`
`

`

`
`
` June 8, 1928
`
`tion period in the latter was but 140 days, suggest, by contrast with
`our evperieuce with basic diet No. 123 (including cert-am of its
`modifications (3)), that the test diets under consideration may have
`poeseeeed slight preventive properties. The difierence is not very
`notable and, such as it is, can not be attributed, altogether at least,
`to the character and increased quantity of the maize, Since one of
`the test diets (No. 149), unlike our standard basic dict (No. 123),
`contained some butter, which, as will precontly be seen, while apoor
`Source is. not, entirely devoid of the preventive factor, a fact. that. was
`not \fully appreciated when this experiment; was planned:
`This
`experiment is {immune not conclusive. Notwithstanding this, hour-
`ever, the evidence quite clearljF indicates that, at boot, this cereal 13
`e ventr poor source of the blackt-ongue preventive.
`Recalling the indications of its poverty in or lack of the pollagra
`preventive it would appcar that maize, if it contains any, is a poor
`source of the preventive for both blacktongue end pellagra.
`WHEAT
`
`The import-ant place among the cereals held by wheel; and a desire
`to compare it with maize led us to test its blacktongue preventive
`potency. The following experiment was accordingly carried out.
`
`
`EXPERIMENT 2
`
`
`
`For the present purpose, wheel; ground in this laboratory into a
`meal was, without oilting, incorporated in e diet, No. 128, the coin-
`poeition of which is she“'11 in Table 3. This, as may be seen by refer-
`once to Table 1, is essentially dictNo. 123, the maize meal of which
`has been quantitatively replaced by the ground wheat, of which there
`are, therefore, 400 grams in. each 2,400-ealorie- portion. Some of Blue
`diet was daily offered to ench of eight test animals—dogs 5, 9, 13, 1.4,
`29, 38, 44, and '47. The significant details relating to each are bl'ltll'ly'
`as follows:
`
`Dog 5.——Bitch. Acquired November 8, 1921._ Has served in a. number-pf
`experiments and has suffered two attache of blacktongue, the Inter one of which
`began August 28, 1923.
`011 stock diet from September 8, 192.1, to January 29,
`1924. Whelped a litter of seven pups November 25, 1923, so: ol‘ wlucll eur-
`vived and were weaned in good condition January 17', 1112-1.
`I
`(Table 3.).
`January 29, 1924: In good condition; begins diet No. 123.
`On August 2, 1924, at the end of a. period of 136 clays, presented the first signs
`of l'Jlncktonguc, a. reddening of the Emotion. of the cheeks.
`lo this there was
`added on August 3 a reddening of the mucosa. of the floor of thcmoutli and of
`that of the upper lip on the leftr side.
`rumm- liiut-orv_ is not relevant.
`I
`I
`Dog {Fr—Male. Acqllired April 1, 192.1. Has served m 9 number of caper-
`merits and has suffered four attacks of blacktong'ue of wluclt the latest began
`
`1393
`
`Juno 8,1928
`
`On July 31, 1924, at the end of a period of 142
`days, presented the first signs of on
`attack of blacktongue, e reddench patch on the mucosa of the upper lip, in the
`region of the canines, on each side, and a slight reddening of the mucosa of the
`floor of thomouth. Further hietory in not relevant.
`Dear IS.——Melc. Acquired April 7, 1923. Up to November 28. 1923, served
`in several expel-fluorite and suffered three attacks of blacktonguo, of which the
`latest began November 2
`-
`4, 1923. On a reconditioning diet from November 28
`
`o pronounced the next day,
`out notable change for some
`:15 normal on February 25.
`142 days, preset: ted renewed
`the mucosa of the upper lip
`o canines coda slight reddening of the floor of the
`_
`mouth. Further hint-cry not relevant.
`Dog 14.—Mn[e. Acquired April 7, 1923. Up to November 23, 1923, served
`in several experiments and suffered four attacks of bleckionguc, of which the
`latest began October 30, 1923. On a reconditioning dict from November 28 to
`December 11, 1923.
`
`Ir‘urt-hcr ln'slrory not relevant.
`of the mouth,
`Dog 2.9.——Mnle. Acquired May 9, 19213.
`Up to November 27, 1923, served
`in several experiments and eulfercd three att
`acks of blacktongue, of which the
`laieat hogan October 18, 1923. On a recon
`ditioning dict from November 27
`To December 11, 1923.
`'
`December 11, 1923: In good condition; begins diet No. 128.
`011 January 7, 1924, at. the end of a period of 27 days, presented the first signs of
`an attack of blacklougue, a reddening of the women. of the floor of the mouth.
`Dag 38_—-\Iaio.
`li’helped in the laboratory Jone 26, 1923. Up to February
`20, 1924-, carved in several experiment-r. and suffered two attacks; of black-tongue,
`the second one of which began Feb'ruery 14, 1924. On a rt-leoudil'inuing dict from
`February 20 to March 11, 1924.
`March 11, 1924: In good condition; begins diet No. 128.
`Orr-June 24, 1924, at the end of a period of 105 cl
`ays, presented the first signs
`of on attack of blacktonguc, a reddening of the
`floor of the mouth. Further
`hintm‘y notrclevanls.
`Degas—Male. Whelped in the laboratory June 26, 1923.
`27, 1923, served in one experimeut'and suffered an atto '
`began October 23, 1923. On a reconditioning diet fr
`to January 29, 1924.
`January 29, 1924: In good condition,- begins diet No. 128.
`On August 13, 1924, 'at the end of a period of 197 days, presented the first signs
`of an attack of blacktonguc, roddcncd patches on the mucosa of the upper
`lip on each side.
`Furl-her history not relevant.
`Dog 4?.——Mn.lc. Acquired August 18, 1023. Up to Non-ember 28, 1923, served
`in an cum-intent cud suffered an attack of blacktongue, which began September
`
`
`
`'
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1015
`Page 7 of 38
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`June 8, 1928
`
`On January 7, 1924, at the end of a period of 18 days, presented the first signs
`of an attack of blacktongue, a reddening of the floor of the mouth. Further
`history not relevant.
`
`Results and concl'u.s'£ons.——As is evident, all eight of the test animals
`developed blacktongue.
`It is noteworthy, however, that in but two
`of the dogs did the attack have its onset at the end of periods shorter
`than 71 days.
`In five of the eight animals the first signs of the attack
`made their appearance at the end of periods varying between 105 and
`197 days—that is, after periods very definitely longer than is the
`rule in the case of dogs fed diet No. 123. This delay in the develop-
`ment of the disease would appear to indicate that diet No. 128 had
`exercised appreciable but incomplete lgalacktongue preventive action
`and, therefore, that whole wheat con tains the hiaektongue preventive,
`but in small amount. Compared with the result of the experiment
`with whole maize, the outcome of the test of whole wheat suggests
`that this is probably a slightly better source of the blacktongue
`preventive than is the maize.
`WHEAT GERM
`
`While the preceding experiment with whole wheat was under way,
`tests were made of the blacktongue—producing potency of a number
`of diets in which were included varying amounts of commercial
`wheat germ as u source of “vitamin B.” The results of one of these
`tests which happened to be with a diet that included an unusually
`large quantity of the wheat germ, suggested rather strongly that this
`germ might possess definite blacktongue-preventive action. This
`led us to carry out the following experiment:
`
`EXPERIMENT 3
`
`the blacktongue—preventive action of ether—
`This was a test of
`extracted wheat germ. The wheat germ was a. commercial product
`from which we had extracted the fat by percolation with ether
`(U. S. P.) at air temperature.1
`It was incorporated in a diet, No.
`197,
`the composition of which is shown in Table 4. As may be
`seen, each 2,400 calorie port-ion contains 180 grams of the extracted
`ge‘rm.
`It may be noted, too, that it contains a considerable amount
`of cornstarch; notably less, however, as was noted in the preceding
`section in connection with maize, than has been found to be lacking
`in appreciable blacktongue-preventive action. This diet is some-
`what similar to our basic diet No. 123 (Table 1), from WhiCh it differs
`notably, however,
`in that the wheat germ and the starch of
`the
`former completely replace the corn meal and cowpeas of the latter.
`
`1395
`
`June 8,1928
`
`ammals, dogs 54, 61, 65, 1’0, 71, 78, 86, 87, and 88. The significant
`details relating to each are presented in the following:
`magi. Elli—Bitch- Acquired September 25, 1923. Up to June 17, 1924 served
`seem 1c: experiments and suflered two attacks of blacktonguc of which the
`.
`it
`egan Juno :1, 1924. On stock diet for reconditioning from June 17 to
`July 23 1924.
`'
`'
`‘
`'
`July 23: 1924' tool;:31: Sgpiggental diet, which included some wheat germ, from-
`3Ia§ 21:, 1925: In good condition; begins wheat-germ diet No. 197.
`(Table 3 )
`n on ember '11}, 1925, at the end of 136 days, this animal g'ircseotcil a slight hut
`suggestive reddening of the mucosa of the floor of the month, which lit-aw-
`Elflcki: I‘ll) longer perceptible 2-1 hours later. No further evidence suggesting
`antler] Mifgagpplrgtrgt
`(11:21:11; the remainder of the period of observation, which
`germ dict.
`,
`..
`..
`good condttum at the and of one year on the wheat-
`Dug. 61,.—l\-Ialc.
`thlped in the Ialmmtory November 4 1923
`Up to May
`27, 1924, served in one experiment and suffered one attack of blacki
`ngue, which
`_
`D
`hogan May 21, 1924-. On rccondi-tionic
`3 dict from May 27 to Joly 23, 192-1.
`From July 23, 192-1, to May 26: 1925
`, on an. experimental diet, which included a
`considerable amount of wheat germ.
`May 26, 1925: In good condition; begins wheat-germ diet No 1!]?
`113n-..1anl‘.1ar,\r 5, 1926, or at the end of a. period of 224 days, there were noted th -
`gist Eight:
`an attack oi: lilaektonguo, which ended in death on .l'armary-‘ZU 1926a
`0m :{il}e1:Lme!:tchr. 1 Acquired January 23,
`.1924. Up to Mny 27. 192-1, smiled oi
`dim t.
`- f
`an suffered an attack of lJl'acktougu'c. On stock diet for recon--
`.
`mug rem May -7 to July 23, 1924. On an experimental diet, which included
`wheat germ from July 23, 192-1, to May 2li, 15-125.
`May 26, 1925: In good condition,- begins wheat-«germ dict No 197.
`On February 3, 1928, at the end of 253 days,
`I
`I
`this sniuml presented a eh i
`l
`“FE-game reddening of the mucosa of the floor of the mouth and of thvgeliiciilit
`w. itch, however, had completely faded 24 hours later. N0 further evidence sl: ‘3
`:liingiflftsfgiligpiiggfd during the remainder of the periml of ohservotioigi-
`,
`-'
`4'33"
`“I.
`In
`"
`I
`l
`Wheat-germ dict.
`,
`good condition at the end of one year on the
`Dog 20,—Ma1c. Whel-ped in the laboratory Novernbcr 25, 1923'. Up to Mar
`14, 192-1, served in one experiment and
`suffered an attack of blacktongl to, which
`began. May 13, 1924.
`(in stock diet for rec
`ondiiioning from May 14 to Julv 23
`1024. On an experimental diet, which ion
`hided wheat germ, from July 23-, 1924;
`to May 26, 1925.
`d‘ -.
`- J
`.
`-
`gIIlB that- o
`Mav 2d, 1925' In good condition- be '
`It: N“. 197-
`On September 15, 1925, or at the'end of
`g ml
`t
`I
`a period of 112 days presented the fi' t
`signs of an attack of blacktonguo, reddcncd lesions on the mucosa of the updfir
`hp pp
`‘
`d
`U
`031“; “la cmlmfi, a.”
`an 1319851011 or the {1001 of
`mull-“1..
`1".“ the:
`
`Dog 71 .-—Ms_le. Whelped in the laboratory November 25, 1923. Hear-ed on
`miscellaneous stock dicta. On an or
`perimcnt-al diet, which included wheat germ,
`from July 23, 192-1, to May 26, 1925.
`I
`May 26 1925- I11 good condiiinn- begi
`9
`,
`.‘
`,
`.nswheat-ermd‘.tN-.
`May 26', 1.923: Completes one year- on the wheat-g
`m
`0 I 7-
`I
`'
`_
`germ diet in good condit'ott‘
`'
`presented no recognisable Britten-cc of blacktoo'gue during the year
`1
`‘ has
`
`
`
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1015
`Page 8 of 38
`
`

`

`June 3, 1923
`
`a
`1096
`
`
`
`1397
`
`June 8, 1928
`
`On August 11, 1925, at the end of a period of 77 days, presented the first signs of
`an attack of blacktongue, which ended in death during the night of August
`22—23, 1925.
`I
`Dog 86,—Bitch. Whelped in the laboratory October 12, 1924. On stock diet
`to April 28, 1925. From April 28 to May 26, 1925, 011 an experimental dict; whlch
`included wheat germ.
`.
`'
`I
`MaV 26, 1925:
`In good condition; begins wheat-germ diet No. 197..
`On ‘December 27, 1925, at the end of 215 days, presented a suggestive reddening
`of the mucosa. of the floor of the mouth which gradually faded during the 5:110-
`ceedinv 48 hours. Presented no other evidence of blacktongue at any tune
`I:
`'
`‘
`durinrr a further period of observation which ended May 26, 1926.
`In good
`‘0'
`v
`)
`. -
`.
`diet.
`condItlon at the close of the year 011 the wheat ge1m
`‘
`.
`Dog S7'.—l3itch. Whelped in the laboratory October 12, 1924.
`011 stock diet
`up to April 28, 1925. From April 28 to May 26, 1925, on an experimental (llcl;
`which included wheat germ.
`'
`T.
`197
`.
`,
`May 26, 1925: In good condition; begins wheat—germ diet.1\o.
`May 26, 1926: Completes one year on the wheat-germ diet.
`Is In good eond1-
`tion. Has presented no recognizab

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket