throbber

`
`
`
`TREASURY DEPARTMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`PUBLIC HEALTH
`
`REPORTS
`
`ISSUED WEEKLY
`BY THE
`
`UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`
`
`CONTAINING INFORMATION ON THE CURRENT
`PREVALENCE OF DISEASE, THE PREVENTION
`AND CONTROL OF DISEASE, AND
`RELATED SUBJECTS
`
`VOLUME 43—PART 1
`NUMBERS 1—26
`
`J ANUARY—J UNE, 1928
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES
`GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
`WASHINGTON
`1928
`
`
`
`
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1013
`Page 1 of 22
`
`

`

`
`
`ADDITIONAL COPIES
`OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM
`THE SUPEIUNTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
`17.S.GO\'ERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
`WASHINGTON, D. c.
`AT
`
`5 CENTS PER COPY
`
`i
`(
`,
`-
`1
`
`_
`
`l LL
`
`I.
`
`,g
`
`1
`
`-—
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1013
`Page 2 of 22
`
`

`

`
`
`PUBLIC HEALTH REPORT§
`
`
`I’OL. 43
`MARCH 23, 1928
`N0. 12
`
`
`PREVALENCE OF SMALLPOX IN THE UNITED STgTES
`The reports indicate that smallpoxis more prevalent in the United
`States than it was at this time last year or in 1926. For the week
`ended March 10, 19:38, 42 States reported 1,161 cases of smallpox.
`For the corresponding week of 192? these States reported 876 cases,
`and in 1926 they reported 864 cases for the week. "
`In 1925 the peak of the smallpox curve was reached about the
`middle of January; in 1926 the greatest number of cases was re-
`ported during the second week of February, and in 1927 the peak
`came after the middle of M nreh.
`Some decrease in the incidence of
`smallpox is to be expected, but health officers should be constantly
`on the alert.
`V
`
`A FURTHER STUDY OF EXPERIMENTAL BLACKTONGUE
`WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE BLACKTONGUE
`PREVENTIVE IN YEAST
`
`By JOSEPH GOLDBERGER and G. A. WHEELER, Surgeons, and R. D. LILLIE and
`L. M. ROGERS, Passed Assistant Surgeons, United States Public Health Service
`
`
`CONTENTS
`
`Introduction. _______________________________
`Methods ____________________________________
`Blacktongue-producing potency of a basic
`experimental diet and of three 01' its modifi-
`cations:
`Basic diet No. 123 _______________________
`Basic diet No. 200. .
`
`Basic diet No. 195. ____
`Basic diet No. 258 _______________________
`
`Page
`657
`658
`
`The blacktongue preventive:
`Dried brewers' yeast____________________
`Xeast extract powder____________________
`Seidell‘s activated solid__________________
`Yeast charcoal ___________________________
`P—P activated fuller’s earth _____________
`Seven and a half hour autoclaved yeast._
`Identity ol the blacktongue preventive. _____
`Summary and conclusions ___________________
`References“.-. . .. ..-_____.._._.___-..--.__.
`Tables ......................................
`
`
`659
`661
`663
`664
`
`Page
`
`667
`672
`G74
`677
`681
`683
`684
`688
`680
`600
`
`in a previous 001111111111ieetion, G-oldherger and Wheeler (1] pre—
`sen Led some of the results of a study of the problem of an experimental
`animal for pelingre. They reported the prodmrtion in the dog,
`
`
`
`
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1013
`Page 3 of 22
`
`

`

`March 23,1923
`
`658
`
`of this experimental disease. to human pellagra was pointed out, and
`was considered so striking as to bc well~nigh conclusive of the identity
`of the two conditions, This view was supported, they believed, by
`the suggestion of a common etiology indicated by the successful
`production of
`the condition (blacktonguc) in the dog by feeding
`with pcllagra-producing diets.
`In the present paper we desire to
`report some further results of the same study.
`METHODS
`
`Our methods of horn-sing, caring for, and feeding ihc experimental
`animals have been described in a preceding communication (1).
`It
`may be noted that the experimental ration was offered each animal
`once a day and, as a rule, freshly prepared. The amount offered
`was, in general, all that the dog would eat. At first, to insure this,
`the attempt was made to offer an excess; but in order to minimize
`waste this practice was, after a time, modified so that, except for a
`young growing animal, only enough food for the maintenance of
`normal body weight was offered. The animals were weighed once
`a week.
`It may be here recalled, too, that it has been our ' ractice
`to use our dogs repeatedly. Depending on the purpose of the experi-
`ment, the animal was or was not reconditioned by a period of stock
`diet feeding between successive experiments, for which purpose our
`stock diet No. 156 (1) was the one most frequently used.
`In what
`follox's, details of this nature will be noted in connection with the
`presentation of the pertinent parts of the history of each experimen tal
`animal. The diagnostic criteria of experimental blacktongue have
`bccn presented in a preceding article (1). Here we will say only
`that the earliest distinctive buccal lesions are a vivid red injection
`of the floor of the mouth or an erythcma of the mucosa of the upper
`lip in the form of bilaterally symmetrical patches or both.
`
`BLACKTONG-UE-PRODUCING POTENCY OF A BASIC EXPERIMENTAL
`DIET AND OF CERTAIN OF ITS MODIFICATIONS
`
`The composition of the diet with which Goldbcrger and Wheeler
`(1) first successfully induced experimental blacktongue is shown in
`Table 1. This diet was constructed as a somewhat simplified replica
`of the type of diet found associated with, and, unless suitably sup-
`plemented, believed to be responsible for, the occurrence of pcllagra.
`After a number of modifications of the diet shown in Table 1 had
`been tested, the diet No. 123, shown in Table .2, was constructed and
`subsequently used as the basic blacktongue-producing diet in many
`of our experiments.
`It seems desirable, therefore, to summarize Our
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`March 23, 1923
`
`
`r609
`
`Basic Diet N0_ 123
`EXPERIMENT 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The blacktongue—producing potency of diet N0. 123 (Table 2)
`has. been tested in a cons1derable number of animals and under
`J
`7
`various conditions. We shall consider here only those tests howevcr
`that were carried out either in animals after a period of reconditioninO'
`following a previous experiment and thus presumably in norlnaol
`condItlon, or in such as were not previously subjected to experiment
`and were not known to have ever suffered from blacktongue. Such
`tests. were performed in a total of 14 dogs,
`the significant details
`relatlng to each of which are as follows:
`
`Do(g'713.iMalc. Acquired April 7, 1923, between which date and November
`18, 1.).16, served 111 several experiments and suffered seven attacks of experimental
`blacktongue, the latest of which began July 31, 1925. Was on stock diet N0
`-
`156 for recond1t10ning from November 18 to December S, 1926
`December 8
`1 26:
`'
`'
`-
`'
`'
`'
`‘
`'
`N0. 123.
`,
`9
`In good conditlon, weight, 10.1 k1lograms; begins test dict
`On January 25, 192:7,lat the end of a period of 48 days, noted the first signs of
`b‘lacktongue,1 an-1niection of the floor of the mouth. Weight 9.4 kilograms
`Confirmatory evrdence of blacktonguc noted on February 10, 1927. Course of
`the attack wasrennttent or relapsing in character, accompanied by self-imposed
`partial starvation. Killed with illuminating gas April 28, 1927.
`wDog. 1.1.—Ma-le. Acquired April 7, 1923. Between that date and September
`{0’ 192.3, scgg'cd in two expernnents and suffered a relapsing attack of blacktonwue
`)cginning
`ay 18, 1923.
`011 stock diet N0. 34C for rc'o i'
`'
`'
`'
`'6
`tember 25 to October 16, 1923.
`J
`L m ltmmng’ hem EM)-
`Octobcr 16
`1923: I
`-
`'
`'
`'
`'
`'
`'
`‘
`"
`150.123"
`11 good condition,
`\\e1ght, 9.3 kilograms; begins test diet
`On October 30, 1923, at the end of a period of 14 days noted the first signs of
`blacktonguc, an 1n]ectIon of the floor of the mouth and a. patch of redness on
`thelniucosa 0f. the upper lip opposite the base of the canine tooth on each side
`.
`\Ve1ght, 9.2 kllogranis. Further history not relevant.
`0 Dog 15.—Male. Acquired April 1-1, 1923. Between that date and September
`-5, 192.3, served in two experiments and suffered a relapsing attack of blacktongue
`boglnmng August 7, 1923.
`011 stock dict No. 34C, for reconditioning from
`September 25 to October 16, 1923.
`'
`October 16
`192°: I
`'
`1'
`'
`v
`'
`.
`"
`'
`N0. 123.,
`o
`11 good condltion,
`\\ eight, 9.1 kIlograms; begins test diet
`On October 27, 1923, at the end of a period of 11 days, noted the first signs of
`blacktonguc. an Injection of the floor of the mouth and slight reddening of the
`glucosa of {lilo upperhp.
`\Veight, 9.3 kilograms. Further history not relevant
`'
`cg 50.——l‘ ale. Acquired September 25 192”. O "t "-k U *'
`{9“}
`“V
`OCtObcr 16) 1923'
`,
`o
`11 s cc
`dict No. 34C to
`Octobc
`16 D2 :
`'
`"'
`'
`'
`'
`'
`NO. $23.,
`.) 3
`In good conditlon, “eight, 9 kilograms: begins test diet
`On October 27, 1923, at the end of a period of 11 days, noted the first signs of
`blacktonguc, a definite reddening of
`the floor of the mouth. Wciglii
`3 S
`lnlograms. Further history not relevant.
`[A l
`
`’
`
`
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1013
`Page 4 of 22
`
`

`

`March 23, 1028
`
`March 23, 1928
`
`660
`
`661
`
`Dag 51.——Biteh. Acquired September 25, 1923. On stock diet No. 340 to
`October 13 1923.
`.
`.
`.
`,
`.
`p
`Y
`October 18: 1923: In good condition; weight, 7.3 kilograms; begins test diet l\.o.
`123.
`.
`On October 30, 1923, at end of a period of 12 days, noted first signs: of blacktongue,
`an injection of the floor of the mouth. Weight, 7.8 kilograms. Further history
`not relevant.
`.
`L d. t
`Dog 5.3.—Bitch. Acquired September 25, 1923. On a miscellaneous stock ie
`to October 22 1923.
`.
`p
`.
`October 22, 1923: In good condition; weight, 8.5 kilograms; begins test diet No.
`123.
`L
`.
`‘
`On November 27, 1923, at the end of a. period of 36 days, noted the first Signs of
`blacktongue, an injection of the floor of the mouth. Weight, 8.5 kilogiams.
`
`Further history not relevant.
`.
`.
`k 1'
`1;
`Dog 55‘. Bitch. Acquired September 25. 1923. On a miscellaneous stoc
`( 1e
`to October 22 1923.
`.
`.
`October 22, 1923: In good condition; weight, 5.7 kilograms; begins test diet No.
`123.
`'
`
`E
`.
`November 20, 1923: Weight, 5.8 kilograms.
`On November 27, 1923, at the end of a period of 36 days, noteo the first Signs 0
`blacktongue, an injection of the floor of the mouth and of the mucosa of the
`cheeks. Further history not relevant.
`.
`-
`. t
`Dog 5.4.—Bitch. Acquired September 25, 1923. On a miscellaneous stock die
`to October 22, 1923.
`1H1 N
`'
`.
`'
`October 22, 1923: In good condition; weight, 6.2 kilograms; begins test ( ic
`o.
`123.
`f l I
`k
`'
`On November 28, 1923, at end of a period of 37 days, noted the tirst Signs 0
`) ac -
`tongue, an injection of the floor of the mouth. Weight, 6.7 kilograms. Further
`history not relevant.
`I
`_
`,
`n]
`‘
`Dog 57.—Male. Acquired September 25, 1923. On stock diet No. 340 to
`October 16 1923.
`.
`'
`.
`October 16: 1923: In good condition; weight, 7.7 kilograms; begins test diet No.
`123.
`.
`‘
`On November 2, 1923, at the end of a period of 17 days, noted the first Signs of
`blacktongue, an injection of the floor of the mouth.
`\Veiglit, 8.8 kilograms.
`Further history not relevant.
`L
`.
`-
`a]
`Dog 58.4Biteh. Acquired September 27, 1923. On SLOC'k diet l\o. 040 to
`October 16 1923.
`'
`.
`..
`.
`October 16,, 1923: In good condition; weight, 13. 5 kilograms; begins test diet No.
`12”.
`L
`.1 .~
`On November 1, 1923, at the end of a period of 16 days, noted ihe first signs of
`blacktonguc, an injection of the floor of the mouth. Weight, 14.3 kilograms.
`Further history not relevant.
`.
`‘ L
`.
`M
`Dog 7'9.——Bitch. Acquired June 9, 1924. On stock (llCLv No. .100 to December
`J
`-‘
`J
`‘
`16 1994 during which period was bred and whclped a litter oi five pups which
`were successfully weaned.
`-
`.
`.
`.
`7‘
`.
`L
`.
`December 16, 1924: In good condition; weight, 5.3 kilograms; oegins test dict N0.
`123.
`r 1 ‘1
`'
`..
`‘
`.
`_
`January 27 1925: Weight, 5..)
`(1 ograins.‘
`On February 7, 1925, at the end of a period of 03 days, noted tne fiist signs of
`
`
`
`
`
`November 21, 1924: I11 good condition; begins test diet N0. 123.
`November 25, 1924: Weight, 9.4 kilograms.
`011 December 27, 1924, at the end of a period of 36 days, noted the first signs of
`blacktonguc, a reddening of the floor of the mouth and of the mucosa of the
`checks. Weight, 10.4 kilograms. Further history not relevant.
`Dog 8:3.—Bitch. Acquired October 13, 1924.
`011 stock diet No. 156 to
`November 21, 1924.
`November 21, 1924: In good condition; weight 10.7 kilograms; begins test diet
`No. 123.
`
`On December 23, 1924, at the end of a period of 32 days, noled the first signs of
`blacktongue, reddened bands 011 mucosa of the upper lip on each side; reddening
`of mucosa of the cheeks, reddening of the floor of the mouth. Weight 11.5
`kilograms.
`Treated and used in a study of tomato juice from January 3, 1925, to November
`18, 1926, during which period she had an attack of blacktongue beginning March
`8, 1925.
`
`On stock diet No. 156 for reconditioning from November 18, 1926, to December
`8, 1926. Un December 7, 1926, weighed 14.8 kilograms.
`December 8, 1926: In good L'Ulldllitl'il; begins a second period of test diet No. 123.
`December 14. 1926: Weight, 13.9 kilograms.
`January 18, 1927: Weight, 13.9 kilograms.
`{In January 22, 192?,
`:it- the end of a period of 45 days, noted the first signs of
`hiacktongue, reddened patches on mucosa of the upper lip in region of canine
`teeth of each side; reddening of mucosa of. the cheek, and reddening of the
`floor of the mouth.
`A rapidly progressive attack, untreated, terminating in
`deal-h January 29730, 1927.
`Dog 109.——Biteh. Acquired October 29, 1926.
`December 8, 1926.
`Dermnber R, 1926: In good condition; weight, 7.1 kilograms; begins diet No. 123.
`December 28, 191-36: “might, 7.9 kilograms.
`On December Jill, 1926, at the. end of a period of 22
`days, riot-er] the first. signs of
`liizwhtongne, an injection of the ilnnr of the month. The attack took ri slowly
`progreflssive. romiilent or relapsing course. aeron'ipnnicd by self-iu‘iposed partial
`starvatism; untreated. inhibition] in death April 20, 1927. Weight- on day
`preceding death, 3.3 kilograms.
`Thus. all 14 of
`the test animals developed blarktonguc, the first
`distinctive signs of which appeared within not to exceed 53 days after
`beginning the test diet. Allowed to Lukeitscoursewithont therapeutic
`in ti-'i'l‘oi'oiii,-i=. in two of the dogs, it. ended in the death of both iilliii'lals.
`(Inc of the animals; (dog 32) was subjected to the.
`test. during two
`ii'itlcly separated periods: and responded with liliickti'inguo beginning
`at the end of 3:3 days in the first and at the. and of 45 days in the
`second period.
`
`011 stock diet No. 156 to
`
`Basie Diet No. 209
`
`"
`
`In dict No. 123 (Table 2) the principal component, quaill-itativeiy,
`is white corn meal, which forms 66 per cent of the. weight of the dry
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1013
`Page 5 of 22
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`March 23, 1923
`
`662
`
`N0. 123 of yellow corn meal for the white would have on the black-
`tonguc-producing potency of that diet. Accordingly the following
`test was made:
`
`EXPERIMENT 2
`
`Six dogs, numbered ~14, 52, 60, 63, 04, and 73, were each offered a.
`suit-able daily portion of diet No. 209, the composition of which is
`shown in Table 3. By comparison with Table 2 it may be seen
`that this differs from diet No. 11-33 only in that yellow corn meal is
`usedinstcad of white. The significant facts in relation to each of
`the test animals are briefly as follows:
`Dog 44-—Mnle. W11clpl:d in the laboratory June 26, 1023. Up to J1113‘ 1?,
`1925. served in a number of feeding experiments and suffered two attache nf
`blaekttmgue, the bites! of which began December 27. 1921.
`011 stock diet
`No. 156 for reconditioning from July 17', 1925, to August 11, 1925.
`August 11, 1925: In good condition; weight, 12.9 kilograms; begins icst diet
`No. 2119.
`
`t signs
`On September 1, 1925, at the end of a period or 21 days, noted the
`of blncklonguc, a reddening of the mucosa of the upper lip and afijection
`of the floor of the mouth. Weight, 13.3 kilograms. Further history not
`relevant.
`
`Dag 53,—Bitcl1. Acquired September 25, 1923. Between that date gml
`Jlily 17, 1925, served in several experiments and had four a l' tacks of black-tongue,
`the latest of which began March 21, 1925.
`(in stock diet No. 150 for recondition-
`ing from July 1?, 1925, to August-11, 1925.
`August 11, 1926: In good condition; weight, 10.8 kilograms; begins test diet
`No..209.
`
`On October 6, 1926, at the end of a period of 56 days, noted the first signs of
`blacktongue, an injection of the floor of the mouth.
`\Veight, 9.8 kilograms:
`Further history nor relevant.
`Dag Gar—Male.
`thlped in the laboratory November 4, 1923. Up to July
`17, 11-125, served in a feeding experiment- :md suffered an attack of blacktonguo,
`which began July 1-1, 1025.
`(in stock diet No. 156 for reconditioning from
`July 17, 1925, to August 11. 1925.
`August 11, 1925: In good condition; weight, 7.2 kilograms; begins test diet
`No. 209.
`
`On September 13, 1925, at the end of a. period of 33 days, noted the first signs
`of- biaektongnc, an injection of the floor of the mouth and a flushing of the
`mucosa. of the choc ks. Weight- on September 15, 1925, ?.4 kilograms. Further
`history not relevant.
`laboratory Noven'lber 4, 1923. Up to
`Dog (7'3.—«Maie. Wheiped in line
`July 17, 1935, served in two experiments and snfl'ererl two attacks of b'lecktongne,
`the later one of which began March 5, 1925.
`(in stock diet No. 156 for recon-
`ditioning from July 17, 1925, to August 11, 1925.
`August 11, 1925:1[1 good condition; weight, 7.]. kilograms; begins 'l-Pst diet
`N0. 209.
`
`On August 29, 1925, at the end of a period of 18 days, noted the first signs of
`biacktoogue, a reddening of the floor of the mouth. Weight, 7.5 kilograms
`
`
`
`663
`
`March 23, 1928
`
`which was in evidence June 27, 1925. On stock diet No. 156 for reconditioning
`from July 17 to August 11, 1925.
`August 11, 1925: In good condition; weight, 6.6 kilograms; begins test diet
`No. 209.
`On September 12, 1925, at the end of a period of 32 days, noted first signs of
`biaektongue, a reddening of the faucial pillars,
`the pharynx, and the floor
`of mouth. Weight, 6.7 kilograms. Further history not relevant.
`Dog ?'3.-—Bitch. Acquired March 19, 1924. Up to July 17, 1925, suffered
`two uncertain, evanescent attacks of blacktongue, the second of which was in
`evidence July 12, 1925.
`011 stock diet No. 156 for reconditioning from July 17
`to August 11, 1925.
`August 11, 1925: In good condition; weight, 10.7 kilograms; begins test diet
`N0. 209.
`
`On December 17, 1925, at the end of a period of 128 days, noted the first signs
`of blacktongue, a reddening of the Diocese. of the upper lip and of that of the
`cheeks. Weight, 8.3 kilograms. Further history not relevant.
`All six dogs developci'l hlacktongne, the first distinctive signs of
`which appeared within not
`to exceed 56 days aft-er beginning the.
`test diet in five, and at the end of a period of 128 days in one of them.
`It would appear,
`then, that the substitution of yellow for white
`corn meal made no significant difierence in the blacktongue-produc-
`ing potency of the test diet.
`
`Basic Diet No. 195
`
`In diet No. 123 and its modification, diet No. 209, sodium chloride
`and calcium carbonate are used to supplement the inorganic, “ash, ”
`constituents furnished by the other components of
`the ration.
`It
`was thought desirable to determine what effect, if any, on the black-
`tongue-producing potency of diet N0. 123 would be produced by the
`substitution of a “complete” salt mixture for the sodium chloride
`and the calcium carbonate. For that purpose experiment 3 was
`carried out.
`
`EXPERIMENT 3
`
`Five dogs, numbered 9, ‘29, 83, 84, and 85, were each offered a. suit-
`able daily portion of diet No. 195, the composition of which is shown
`in Table 4. As may be seen by reference to Table 2, this (lifi'ers from
`dict No. 123 only in that the well known “complete” salt mixture
`of Osborne and Mendel (3) replaces the sodium chloride and calcium
`carbonate of the latter diet. The significant facts in relation to each
`of the test animals were, in brief, as follows:
`Dog 9.—l\lalc. Acquired April 1, 1923, between which date and ngruary 28,
`1925, served in a number of experiments and suffered seven attacks of black-
`tongue, the latest of which began February 24, 1935.
`011 stock diet No. 156
`
`
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1013
`Page 6 of 22
`
`

`

`
`
`March 23,1928
`
`664
`
`On May 31, 1925, at the end of a period of 60 days, noted the first signs of black-
`tongue, a reddening of the mucosa of the upper lip in the region of the canine
`teeth of each side, and an injection of the floor of the mouth. Weight, 11.4
`kilograms. Further history not relevant.
`Dog 39.—Malc. Acquired May 9, 1923, between which date and February 28,
`1925, served in a. number of experiments and Bull'crod nine attacks of blncktnngue,
`the latest of which began I"E'lJrIIa-l‘,}' 6, 1925. On stock dict No. 156f01'1'ccomlition-
`ing from February 28, 1925, to April 1, [925.
`April 1, 1925: In grand condition; Weight, 11.7 kilograms; begins diet No. 195.
`On April 17, 1925, at end of a period of .16 days, noted the first signs of. black-
`tongue, a reddening of the mucosa of the upper lip and of the floor of the mouth.
`Weight, 11.1 kilograms. Further history not relevant.
`Dog SJ.~Bitch. Acquired February 20, 1925, from which date to April 1,
`1925, was on stock diet No. 156.
`April 1, 1925: In good condition; weight, 6.8 kilograms; begins test diet No. 195.
`On April 18, 1925, at the end of a period of 17 days, noted the first signs of black-
`.
`tongue, a reddening of the floor of the mouth. Weight, 7.3 kilograms. Further
`history nor relevant.
`' Dog Sit—Male. Acquired March 2, 1925, from which date to April 1, 1925,
`was on stock diet No. 156.
`
`April 1, 1925: In good condition; weight, 7.8 kilograms; begins test diet N0. 195.
`On April 23, at the end of a. period of 22 days, noted the first signs of blacktongue,
`rcddened patches on mucosa of the upper lip opposite the canine teeth of
`each side. Weight, 9.1 kilograms. Further history not relevant.
`Dog 85,—Male. Acquired March 2, 1925, from which date to April 1, 1925,
`was on stock diet No. 156.
`
`April 1, 1925: In good condition; weight, 6.9 kilograms; begins test diet N0. 195.
`On April 16, 1925, at the end of a period of 15 days, noted the first signs of black-
`tongue, reddening of mucosa of the upper lip, of that of the cheeks, and of
`the floor of the mouth. Weight, 6.8 kilograms. Further history not relevant.
`I All five test animals developed blacktongue,
`the first distinctive
`signs of which appeared within not to exceed 60 days afterbeginning
`the test diet.
`I
`'
`
`The substitution of the “complete” salt mixture for the sodium
`chloride and calcium carbonate of diet No. 123 made, thus, no sig-
`nificant difference in its blacktongue-preducing potency.
`Basic Diet No. 268
`
`Although diet No. 123 (and its modifications, No. 209 and No.
`195) contains a considerable amount of protein, fully one—half of
`which is from casein, it was thought, nevertheless, that the biological
`quality of the protein mixture might, perhaps, be improved by increas-
`ing the casein component, a view that was strengthened by the. results
`of some growth tests in rats (unpublished).
`It seemed desirable,
`therefore, to determine what effect, if any, an increase in the casein
`cmnponent of diet No. 123, and thus, presumably, an improvement
`
`
`
`665
`
`EXPERIMENT 4
`
`March 23, 1928
`
`Eight dogs, numbered 62, 69, and 101 to 106, inclusive, were each
`offered a suitable daily portion of diet No. 268, the composition of
`which is shown in Table 5. As may be seen, this diet differs from
`No. 123 (Table 2) in containing 50 per cent morn. casein; it differs
`from No. 123 also in that it contains a “complete” salt mixture in
`the. place of sodium chloride and calcium carbonate. This experiment
`may be considered, therefore, as n. test of the effect not only of a.
`substantial increase in protein, but also of the- use. at the. some time,
`of a'complcte salt mixture on the blacktonguc-producing potency of
`that diet.
`
`In this coniunwtion, it may he stated that this experiment was
`planned to serve one other purpose—namely, to secure tissues suit-
`able for histnpnthological study. Believing that diet No. 268 was
`more nearly complete——at least for maintenance—than N o. 123 or
`its other modifications with respect to all known dietary essentials
`except the specific factor or factors related to blacktongue} it was
`thought that animals fed with it when killed at suitable intervals
`would furnish tissues which might show a sequence of histopatho—
`logical changes which would thus be relatable to the specific dietary
`defect.
`
`The significant facts in relation to each of the test animals, except
`as concerns the histopathology, which will form the subject of a
`separate report by Dr. James Denton, are briefly as follows:
`Dog 6'2.—Ma1e. Whelped in the laboratory November 4, 1923. Up to May 26,
`1926, had one evanescent attack of blacktongue which was in evidence March
`24—27, 1925.
`011 stock dict No. 156 May 26 to June 12, 1926.
`June 12, 1926: In good condition: weight, 8.8 kilograms; begins test diet No. 268.
`On June 26, 1926, at the end of a period of 14 days, killed with illuminating gas
`for histopathclogicnl study. He presented no signs of blacktongue. Weight,
`SIS-kilograms.
`Dag 6‘9.——Malc. Whelped in the laboratory November 25, 1923. Up to May
`26, 192i}, served in two experiments. but showed no evidence of blacktongue.
`On stock dict No. 156 .froln May 2!} to June 12, 1926.
`June 12, 1936: In good condition; weight, 8.8 kilograms; begins test diet No. 268.
`July 27, 1926: Weight, 8.7 kilograms.
`-
`July 2‘3, 1926. at the end of a period of 46 days, noted first signs of blacktongue,
`a slight injection of the floor of the month which became more definite .‘on
`August 6, and on the following day (August 7) there was noted in addition a
`slight reddening of the mucosa of the cheeks and of the upper lip in the region
`of the canines.
`
`Animal killed with illuminating gas for histopathological study on August 7,
`1926.
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1013
`Page 7 of 22
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`March 23, 1928
`
`666
`
`June 12, 1926: In good condition; weight, 7.7 kilograms; begins test diet No. 268.
`On July 10, 1926, at the end of a period of 28 days, noted first signs of black-
`t-ongne, an injection of the floor of the mouth. Weight, 7.9 kilograms. Attack
`slowly progressed. Animal killed with illuminating gas for histopathologieal
`study on August 7, 1926.
`Dog 102.—Male. Whelped in the laboratory December 9, 1925. Reared on
`stock diet No. 156.
`June 12, 1926: In good condition; begins test diet No. 268.
`June 15: Weight, 6.10 kilograms.
`July 6, 1926: Weight, 6.7 kilograms.
`On July 10, 1926, at the end of a period of 28 days, noted first signs of black-
`tongne, an injection of the floor of the month. Attack progressed rapidly.
`Animal killed with illuminating gas for histopathologieal study on July 20,1926.
`Dog IOS.——Mnle. Wlielped in the laboratory December 9, 1925. Reared on
`stock diet No. 156.
`June 12, 1926: In good condition; begins test diet No. 268,
`June. 15: Weight, 6.7 kilograms.
`July 6, 1926: Weight, 6.4 kilograms.
`On July 10, 1926, at the end of a period of 28 days, noted first signs of black-
`tongue, an inject-ion of the. floor of the mouth. Attack was progressive with
`remissions. Animal killed for histopathologioal study August F, 1926.
`Dog 104.—Bitch. Whelped in the laboratory December (I, 1925. Rented on
`stock diet N0. 156.
`
`June 12, 1926: In good condition: begins test diet No. 268.
`June 15: Weight, 5.7 kilograms.
`On July 6, 1921‘), at the end of a period of 24 days, noted first signs of black-
`tongue, :1 reddening of the Horn of the mouth, of the faucial pillars, and of the
`mucosa of the upper lip. Weight, 5.6 kilograms. Animal killed for histopatho-
`logical study July 10, 1926.
`'
`Dog. 105.—Bitch. Whelped in the laboratory December 9, 1925. Real-ed
`on stock diet N0. 156.
`
`Julie 12, 1926: In good condition,- begins test diet No. 268.
`June 15: weight, 4.9 kilograms.
`On July 15, 1926, at the end of a period of 33 days, noted first signs of black-
`tongue, an injection of the floor of the mouth. Weight, 5.2 kilograms. Attack
`mild, relapsing. Animal killed August 7, 1926, for histopathological study.
`Dog Ind—Bitch.
`thlped in the laboratory December 9, 1925. Reared'r-on
`stock diet No. 156.

`June 12, 1926: In good condition; begins test dict N0. 268.
`June 15:
`\Veight, 4.3 kilograms.
`On June 26, 1926, at the end of a. period of 14 days, killed for histopathological
`study. Had presented no signs of blacktongue. Weight, 4.5 kilograms.
`Of the eight test animals, two were killed at the end of a test period
`of 14 days for the purpose of histopathologiesl study. Neither ani—
`mal had shown any evidence of blacktongue. The period of obser-
`vation was so brief that these two animals can not properly be con-
`sidered in appraising the blacktongue-producing potency of the diet.
`The remaining six animals all developed blacktongue, the first (lis-
`
`667
`
`March 23, 1928
`
`use of "complete“ salt mixture was without significant effect on tho
`blacktongne—producing potency of that diet as judged by the attack
`rate and duration of the feeding period before the appearance of the
`first. distinctive signs of the disease.
`In the foregoing series of tests of the pellngrmproducing potency
`of diet No. 123 and its modifications, :1. total of 33 dogs were used as
`test- animals, and blacktongne was induced in all but two of them.
`The two that escaped Were the two that were killed at the end of a
`feeding period of 14 days for the purpose of histopnthoiogiocl study.
`Disregarding these as not having had a full opportunity for the devoi-
`opment of the disease, blacktonguc was induced in every one of the
`other 31 test annuals.
`In (111611 of two of these the disease was induced
`on two separate occasions, so that 33 separate. attacks of black tongue
`were induced in the 31 animals under r.:onsidoration in this series of
`experiments. These 33 attacks developed at the end of feeding pc-
`riods that varied between 11 and 128 days in duration, but only one
`oft-ho attacks developed at the end of a period of over 61 days.“
`
`THE BLACKTONGUE PREVENTIVE
`
`Dried Brewers’ Yeast
`
`It may be recalled that Goldbcrger and Wheeler’s first. success in
`experinumtnlly inducing blacktongue was with a diet that differed
`from that previously tried without success by Goldberg-er and Lake
`in that it included no milk and was not supplemented with’ yeast (.1).
`The difl’ercnee in outeomcled us to suspect that this might be related
`to tho diti'erencc in the diets used. There was already reason to believe
`that milk possessed pellngra-prerentiro properties (4) (5) and thus,
`possibly, also blacktmigue-prcventivo properties; but, as the amount
`of milk contained in the diet tested by Goldberger and Lake was very
`small, it seemed improbable that their failure was attributable, at
`least to an important degree, to the. milk. Up to this time we had had
`no suspicion that yeast might possess: pellogre-preventive properties;
`but in seeking for the explanation of the difi'ercnce in results under
`consideration it seemed much more likely that,
`if Goldberger and
`Luke’s failure. was due to the preventive act-ion of either food,
`this
`failure was due to the action of the yeast rather than to that of the
`milk. Reasoning thus, it was decided to test this View; and after
`some preliminaiy trials which it seems superlhunis to detail, the fol-
`lowing experiments werc poi'i'ori'ncd:
`
`EXPERIMENT 5
`
`
`
`
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1013
`Page 8 of 22
`
`

`

`
`1111111123, 1928
`668
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 669 March 23, 1928
`
`
`diet No. 155, the composition of which is shown in Table 6, 01' was fed
`separately in gelatine capsules as a supplement to basic diet No. 123.
`Comparing dict No. 155 (Table 6) with diet No. 123 (Table 2) it
`will be seen that, so far as it is possible to judge, yeast-containing
`test dict. No. 155 differs from basic lllacktnngue—produsing diet No.
`123 significantly only in that 5 per cent of the weight of the solids of
`the fol'n'ier Consists of dried yeast.
`Five animals, dogs 15, 30, 35, 46, and 50, were used in this experi-
`ment. The essential facts pertaining to each of the test animals are
`presented in the following:
`
`Dog I5.—Male. Acquired April 14, 1923. By reference to experiment 1 it
`will be seen that this dog developed an attack of blacktongue 011 diet N0. 123,
`the first signs of which were noted on October 27, 1923. On October 30 treat-
`ment was begun by supplementing diet N0. 123 with 5.4 grams (approximately
`1 per cent of the dry ingredients of diet N0. 123) of the dry brewery yeast. Not-
`withstanding this, however, a relapse of
`the signs of blacktongue appeared
`November 24, 1923. Accordingly, 011 November 26 the amount of yeast there-
`tofore included in diet N0. 123 was doubled. On December 27, 1923, a small
`further increase in the yeast was made, and on March 11, 1924, a still further
`increase was made which, after slight compensatory adjustment, made dict
`N0. 155.
`
`The evidence of the relapse noted 011 November 24, 1923, faded in a few days
`and thereafter to November 21, 1924, the dog continued in good condition without
`presenting recognizable evidence of blacktonguc.
`.
`On November 21, 1924, yeast-containing test

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket