throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`"
`
`TREASURY DEPARTMENT
`
`
`PUBLIC HEALTH '
`
`REPORTS
`
`ISSUED WEEKLY
`BY THE
`
`UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`
`CONTAINING INFORMATION OF THE CURRENT
`PREVALENCE OF DISEASE, THE OCCURRENCE
`OF EPIDEMICS, AND RELATED SUBJECTS
`
`VOLUME 39—PART 1 -
`NUMBERS 1—26
`
`JANUARY—JUNE, 1924
`
`
`
`WASHINGTON
`GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
`1924
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1014
`Page 1 of 13
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
`niQEWELfi
`
`L 47'
`
`1
`
`.a
`
`:325
`
`DOCUMfiNTb Diving"
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1014
`Page 2 of 13
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`EALTH REPORTS
` Mimic ii
`
`N0. 3
`JAN—UARY is, 1924'"
`WET—39
`
`
`A STUDY OF THE TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF
`PELLAGRA.
`
`Showing the Value of Fresh Meat and of Milk, the Therapeutic Failure
`' ents
`x,
`a
`.
`prujm
`he Preventive Failure of Butter and of Cod-Liver 011.
`of Gelatin, and t
`F.
`'I‘imxian, Surgeon, United Stutcs Public Health
`Sm'vivc.
`
`-
`In Jusnru GULUBERHEII, Surgeon, and \V.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[L win he recalled that a preventive feeding nxpm‘imenl. lit-gun in
`1511.1 hy (_}nl¢llnyrgr-i~, “Turing! 11ml Willi-win, and curried out. umnng
`instiluliniml hummus, resulted in dwmnstmling the.
`filJJJlIllPl-l-l pre-
`‘.-(‘.]ll[Ll).l1il-_\' u'l pellugru lay manna [if diet (I). The test. was of such
`a.
`t'.lll‘l.l'fl.l‘.Ll:I'.
`l.um-'uvur_.
`l-hul-
`it did nut.
`in itself reveal what.
`luud ur
`funds worn. ln ln‘. credited with the. fuvm'uhln result. At; must- it sug~
`goslm'l
`that. the fresh incul- and milk ill the till-3L were concerned in
`bringing ulmut
`the. pmlmzl...ive ufiut't-. This indiraliun war. strength-
`cued llY Llu! results uf a. study 01' the relutiun of diet, to pullugru inci-
`lll'lICL‘ inn:ng Imusvlmlds n'l curl-11in South ("urnlilni cuttun mill vil-
`lager; (:3).
`In [his study it mu; fuund not. only that pellugm murnrrml
`less froqumtllr m- nul ut all in lmusvholds having a (hilly .ininimum
`:n'rrngu supply of uppi'uximulvly a pint of milk or {if 30 grams ul'
`
`
`nun-a maul. nor udull- unit, hm; also that 1111 increasing supply of mull
`
`
`u'l these funds indi-[n‘lnlunt-ljgr of
`the other was dolinitraly :‘issmiriatt-‘d
`
`
`with :L
`(l(:(,-.I"u:1.'<iiij_r
`pull:v.j_j;ru
`lllt‘llll-‘llt'P.
`'l‘hose indicutinns of
`the
`
`
`I])I_'13;‘.(_Ell(‘.(‘f in lmlh moat. und mill; ml the essential pollzigru preventive
`
`
`‘l':,u_.u;)r or l'mtmrs guin udditinnul support from a further study of
`
`
`these funds, the rumlts ul' \rhirh study, with certain incidental obser-
`\'lell!]lti, \w (l(‘?~'il‘t‘ tn repurt ut- illis tinic.
`
`FRESH MEAT.
`
`
`
`("nu- study ml
`the value of fresh 1n mt apart from milk or other
`
`animal pi'Hlt'l]! l'tmd hu< hovn limited to its use as u thornpautin unfunt
`in tho trmrt melt ml" iu-ti've tunes; of the. diam“) at tho Georgia Smite
`fir‘riiihuriuiii. V‘i'u have, up to the presunt time, not attempted to test
`11$ \-’:l-ll.lt"- [mlplri'lzunirully.
`
`Julqlit \wllmnirlu-d, thnugh not vary severe (mainly dermal), (‘zlSOS
`lJI‘LVt-r SH lair lmvn treated with fresh hoof as the onlv known thorn-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1014
`Page 3 of 13
`
`

`

`.
`_
`.
`i-IiiL‘E-BC Cases:
`(Liter: I: A lt'i-yi-‘er
`turium July
`There was 111.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lam m 51'
`U1?“31‘14'3‘1 f0? 1111:.wide. of not less then about
`h If
`eivingwhen the utteehdeveluped
`Jummry 111. 11121;.
`88
`'
`v
`1
`.
`.
`__"
`'
`. .'
`‘
`..
`.
`-
`1
`_ 1
`.
`MP of hwina
`}
`_
`and heked in its own juiee. wes efl'ered daily 115 e supplement in the
`two end-UPI“ 11 mflll’t IS- 1111 the mineral-1111d-vitemine-enriehed diet.
`
`
`
`shown in Irl‘ehle IL
`1921. About Mereh 15, 1922, iimild pell11iii'hdiaagriiiiiiiifiitn 111111 Jlil'ly,
`white wumen 40 mini 01
`'
`'
`tienl- had been reeill 111111111111. el meet} er. in the ruse
`
`
`
`_
`.
`.
`.
`.d w
`diet which the 1111
`Case- 3: A
`t 11.1111rnxirneting
`the heguimng of e recurrence. made its efipeerenee.
`I'l‘hiia wiihxiii'g
`(whirh diet iiii'eeniy included it 51111
`of newly admitted pet-11:11.15, us 1111 edditien tn 11 die
`
`Gompenied by e slightst01n11t—1tle 111111 Was even {allowed by some linse-
`'
`' ed the}? had had hel'ure udinissiun 11nd 11f
`11,. type
`
`
`
`
`
`‘
`'_-h intramural 011505 1111111 hren ehserved to
`that. which it is heher
`
`
`fiess ef the barrels.
`011 1111111 7 treatment with e gehttin diet, (Tabb v) Was begun
`in assurie.
`11 sunnnery ef the signifleent rlinirul features of
`but this was take“ 5‘" lmm'ii’ that on April 13 11 chem-re, W119. 111111. e to
`dex'ehnp.
`the beef diet shown in Tehle VI. One week later t m “Nowmm of
`The inlluwing is
`he standard 200 grams by dieeontimfinfl‘ the
`'11s admitted Lu the seni-
`(1:111:11 ellowml by file-institution, leaving 1.110 diet as Shown in Tab-i6
`meet was reduced to 1.
`tliegimst-d August
`Peiiegre “'11s
`21, 102.2.
`21-11,
`11.1213.
`I. The appetite hi this petient continued poor to tho and of the
`histm'y vi :1 prex-inus uttulrk. Hhe 131111111 under our 11h-
`month, hut she relished the meet, of which .he am pI-Mtim‘uy an
`serVeliuu August .11], 11.12:}. at whwh time she presented ehe.1-:u-terist1e
`011 May 12
`flintofpredi Dut'ipgany 111111' eppetite improved
`heel; of the hands, :iit es of the neck. 11nd ever
`.1.
`.1
`11x111‘e11n1t1esu
`eme -'
`‘
`'
`-.
`.
`dieeuetmneduleevhig the diet
`shiniiiiiii’ml; WEI“;
`the i.1.1.11er melieelus ut' the left feet. The hewels tunded te siight ever—
`tantalum! to Improve so that by the beginning of June she ilvppflmia
`derlnei 11351111111; en the
`111glpreetieelly 111 the fund offered.
`.
`W's em”
`e I was 111-gun 011 Au gust
`urtit’ity. She Wes eenhised end delirimls.
`Treetn1enL with the beef diet shown in Tehl
`Within ten weeks i111-
`31)“ eheut the Initldle of May 11,11 evidence of the dermatit.
`1
`[mmwwmmmwrmwmm$$-
`1E1.
`tt-i‘i‘i. This she ate well from the first.
`eeiter eentinued progres-
`eptihle, and ther
`s ei the dermat-
`1
`.lti]111L(‘l_Y 1Iep1111ed. fi-Im weight, wluch hm. been
`sirely. 15yUntnhur3ti.0xceptit1rsnnie resulnel mark
`gustl-ogmmthm
`nit-rd n11 reengnmihle evulenee 11"1 pellegre. Between
`priwvmrnt hegnn tn he pere
`35101:.
`111111 Verr 1
`i,
`.
`-
`..
`.
`.
`_
`_
`.
`_
`'
`.
`.‘
`'
`i
`.
`.
`'
`l of
`tl'e11t111e11t—-
`l-M' the beef treatment W113 111-
`tending 11m1'11werd. hegen te go 1111 11
`1t increased from 35.2 tu 42.3
`Aug11st‘21 11.1111 Deeemher 31-—vthe end ei the permit
`stunted; hetWeen April 1]. 11nd July -1
`her weight inereesed from 34.5 to it kilns.
`_
`37 years nid. who Wes inimilted tn the
`kilns.
`t
`£11111]. 13. eensieting of 1111 inc-reuse in
`Thus the change in die
`seniterinm M11}?
`(5, 1922, with entire pellegre,
`111111111 under our ub-
`.
`1.111311111111111.
`'-
`I H
`I r '
`I
`I
`I
`Case :51: A white 11111111111,
`1
`I
`.11,- Imprevei'nent in her
`-
`1
`fiéfilhfiri 2‘11} pf
`11:. 511111 lesions, DI the stumefitis, endliif the
`the fresh meet, wile i'eil
`sel‘\‘1‘.-li011 {111 the seine dete.
`She presented :1 rather severe derma-
`[ the terminus,
`111111 1'.-1111si1.ler11hle
`11'
`e. gum in enetite
`l
`'
`'
`-'
`.
`1.111
`,
`..
`Worthv ef unte Llii‘it ti " 'i
`11 "I N am “might.
`“I H
`11:. 1111111'111-'11111ent. rentinu l " ‘ "
`'
`h
`.
`’
`.
`-.
`-
`The huWu-ls Were
`titis (11' the hands end lower pert (-1
`du
`‘ v '
`e: 111s.1te.ef
`'
`'4
`_
`.
`j
`Horns: 1pl 1111111111111» 111111 11111111111103 resultmg [rum the ei‘uintre elihhlle
`keretusis of the inrrheed. 11nd hruige 111
`the 11115111.
`ked. 1111111su1.
`She was week end 111
`1(-lusél/ 111 aelt'ihewn 1n Tnble Ill in that shnwn in Tehh
`I
`fly
`slightly louse. There wes 11111.1'
`-
`;
`i:
`11‘ 1.1 e 1.1."
`I
`II
`I!
`'
`-
`-
`--
`-
`i L11111'111e-e11r'11-l111d ward diet
`and rcvurrwtw .
`“emanlgi 511.11.»; old who had ielhwre.
`in 1913
`hed.
`en the minerel‘enduv
`lgoe'hémm uL-SIICILI 111-i, 1J4), 1913!,
`111111 11123
`The reci'urrm 1 in
`heei diet is] 11.11111
`.erted with the
`A'i'ter three dew;
`-'-‘
`s
`1.‘
`-11r1:1 29with fl
`1
`’
`"
`I
`16‘
`I
`leme 11 ts
`5111111111
`in Table ll, treatment- was st
`11 11nd Vii-111111116 supp
`the hands “In 1 u) I ‘
`I
`. 11. appeeiiuleu 11f
`11.1.1 ervtlieme
`isumrwrtermrhrrrdmrrme ‘
`'“m
`hne‘n in "l‘ehie IV. Her 11p-
`'111
`'l‘ehle lll.
`()11 Me};
`1‘3.-
`the 111i11er1
`1111d she 11.1.11 mere end more
`were disenntinued, enticing her diet es s
`t111d1et shown in Table V"
`lLlihliiK‘Dle‘i’ I]; mlc'flbu 6’ mm ma gala-
`_-
`.
`111111‘”.u
`v'
`-'
`'
`litien showed :1. wel «
`' etite, 11.1. lirst only l'uir. seen improved,
`)
`.
`~
`.
`.
`i
`'I: 33 "r
`I
`:
`I"
`u
`'
`I
`Wee good. she 11111
`this diet well
`L
`’ H13 1):“an b “imam;
`hi
`the. loud uttered lie-‘1'. By May .1? her 1111111
`i as 11111111 1.1:; when
`-
`‘ 1reugl1
`the nomml 0W1“ “I
`'1'
`‘
`lhe skin lemons pessed 1-
`1111?..1’lied eluuige [111' the better. 11111.: sin: (:(‘Illlil'lillfi
`the intuit-h, how-
`she reine under our c.d1srrw,tiei1. By the end ui
`ldmut April
`in. The
`s1}: thet they lied quite eieered 111 by
`..
`.
`we 1a..
`.anruV‘er. e1
`’7
`'
`'
`i
`I
`l]
`‘-
`ever, she Wes respunt‘l.i11§_r to simple questions end Wes up and 11i11.11.1t.
`ln unethur two Weeks her skin lesiuns heti entirely eleered uh, 11nd
`1h ‘3-llgllt H-lUuL'ttl-tih “21E: Uhh.{‘1 i‘. ll taU llilA' 0 '1le 1”iii.
`hy the end 111' June her mental um‘ulition slum‘ml runrhed "unpre‘re-
`ahl ill flu~
`II; Ll“ {I dili- fillet 111,," Uf "911.11" ‘1‘ 35‘! 1111 ll 31"“: [1
`lh‘.‘ {lth “I ItI‘Il e
`.
`'
`During this period of eight weeks she geined eppreximetely
`‘
`“11 It
`I] '
`I
`ll
`‘I
`II
`“I
`iUt? Hlll'i
`“HI ‘1‘ Hedi. q”
`0(1
`d..( 0],
`[1.11.
`illil
`‘
`110
`ii.
`I
`-'
`_ i
`'
`i
`i.
`L
`'h‘tl -
`I
`‘
`-
`n
`‘5.
`l
`.
`.
`1
`13 kilos in weight. She left the institution 1.111 hu-ieugh hie
`1.11 31111 gt'nllls t1ii11-‘(-_, eitheuei the diets
`I:
`.1e11.mlrss. eheut 1t] dew. 1,1,.
`f
`I
`."
`‘ """mlllt'tl to cut
`'
`lhl p 111111. hie.
`(151.
`. hurl
`I
`f
`l
`i
`.1 1W1-
`we” m” “I!
`111111111 es siirmn 11'1'111l1ie \11]
`eh:
`_
`-
`" 's
`e'-'\.
`'
`'1.” 1
`11 1'1" .1 ver' eleer evidence of
`11‘11‘1111.
`"‘- Ule dieti -.-
`,
`.
`..
`_
`-
`.
`.
`1.922.
`th t
`letwelr luv: his ene'ipared
`r95].- ‘101‘mni-Itis nppe-irbd
`'
`1' U—i' "‘i 19. “hunt Miw 21|Ea
`-
`'
`-
`.
`commuinu 1mm 1L
`I1111 the 1111111151 and. kernel-um 1101’. hm, ‘1‘
`.‘nn
`‘
`.
`..,
`L115 “ought. 1.11;“.
`‘11. might he am,
`It
`'
`“ h
`i1L.-ngeons t.”
`h
`-
`.
`'1‘} a
`
`.lie-Va:1 1s done (111 Maj. 3.1: the.._.-_. -
`
`
`1111 d 11111. rhed imprurei'ue uintherwise Were re
`
`{ .
`8.)
`
`Jenner: 13, 19:14.-
`
`'
`
`'
`
`I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I
`
`r'x
`
`-
`
`'
`
`111.11111ed 11111311, and aJULIt.
`
`I
`
`
`
`—uld eelnt'ed girl whn \1
`
`tit-is, she.
`
`'[Jl'L‘St
`
`_
`
`Lnent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘ I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ptemher 5,
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1014
`Page 4 of 13
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`January 18, 1.921.
`
`On June 0 a pellagrmie dermal patch appeared on the neck; on
`June 2!} an eryt-henla was found to have devehu‘ied about the knees;
`and on July 5 the skin on the heek ol' the feet was found. to be fillet-led.
`Sinee the I‘ClI‘LIJS.lI.‘l§_f dermal leaionu seemed to indirate a. failure. of
`gelatin to l’ai-‘oi'ubly inlluenee the progress of the disease, a. eliollgo
`wae made on July 7 to the heet' diet shown in Table
`Within :1
`month after this rhunge the patient-’3 emnlition had tluli.liil‘.el_‘,'
`lin-
`proved.
`ll}— t-he end of the first week of August; eh:- no longer pre-
`sented rwitleilee ol’ th 2 altar-l; err-opt, poseibly, that. her bowel. eel-ions
`Were gotta. She continued to improve in general appenrnnee and
`strength during a, further period of observation ending January ‘2.
`11123, although her bowels rontinued to not.
`irregularly. A fecal
`exumination on (}¢::tol'ie1' lit revealed Astra-rte urn. will worni era. and
`.S'treuyytoide.~i embryos Wlitt'll, in part, at. least, probah v explained the
`loose and irregular lmwolfi. Up to ulmut-the middle iii (Jetolaer this
`pntientfri weight was mainlaima'l at a level of l'ietweeu all and ~12 kilos.
`Afterthie it. went- up, so that by Januar ' 2:}, 11123 (the end of the prudent
`of treatment), she had gained 4.5 kilos.
`In summary it. appears; that during the six months (July? '37, 192-2,
`to January 2, 1923} following: the. inmiguration of the treat-ment- with
`200 grains o'l beef (Faith: 1):),
`this patient’e condition underwent
`definite improvement in marked eonli-ast with the nneatiefaetory
`pl‘ogl‘esu on the. gelatin (and mineral-and-ritamii'ie~enrirhedl diet.
`t’l‘ahlee V, VII, and VIII) during the inmiediately preceding period
`of three months.
`Gore .5: A white. Woman 46 yearn old who had pella-gra in 1013 and
`recurrence in 19“, 1913, 1921, and 11112.
`The recurrence in 1922 began to develop ahout Miu'eh 2-9 with the
`op iearanee of an ei'ythenia on the hands and torennns.
`‘reattineut with a. gelatin diet (Table. V) was hegun April T, but
`this was taken so poorly that on. April 13 a. ehange was amide to the
`beef sup demented ward diet (Table VI).
`A Weelk later the beef was reduced to 201.) grains by omitting the
`institution portion (Table III], and on May 1:3 the. mineral mixture
`and supplement of rertain 'i’itainineariel'i foods were discontinued, so
`that l-lle'l‘t‘tl-lt-fll' the diet was as slum-'11 in Tnble IV.
`She took the meat quite well, but her up wilt-e for the remaining
`portion of her diet eontiu'ued poor throuth J
`)t'll and "it-lay. During
`June her food intake lJE‘l'il'Illt‘. min-h inipruvet'
`.
`tip to April til her
`weight bad tended downward; after this, this; trend \roe arreeted and,
`
`it ain‘t-thing,
`turm-d in an upward dirertiou. Between April 1:} end
`duly -'l her Weight showed but. slight- rliz'tnge
`:1 rise from 45.5 to lit»!
`kilos.
`'i he heel. the (lt'l‘l'ilg'tl'ltlE; heal eleared
`
`l-‘Vlthin a. month after beginnin
`
`
`up, and (illl‘l‘.
`1‘.
`'eniahnlei
`'
`(3 period ol' treatn'zelil', ending July
`t!
`(3, 11-122,
`tin:
`llz‘ttll‘ilt 1‘t‘lllall11iul
`free time l't‘l".ltglllzzlldt‘ eridenee of
`
`lu‘llnnrz‘t.
`.3. while '\‘-..‘oma.n :'>:..’ _\'('.n'r:'<. old who had peliagra in 1911 end
`(Test- (3‘:
`reenrrenee in 1018. 11.1131. and 1922.
`The I'eeurrenm- of H322 began bet-weenMareh 13'.) and April 5 with the
`
`91
`
`January 18, 19241.
`
`somewhat increased, the resulting diet. being that shown in 'l‘ahle. VII,
`She continued to eat well, actually eoneuming a daily average. of,
`approximately 8Q grams of_ gelatin during the period May 13—31,
`and 79 vrams durinv the period June 1—2ti.
`_
`The iermntitio wrieh hogan hetween March 2!} and April 5 and
`which, at its height, involved the. hands, forearms, and feet, passed
`through the ordinal"),r cycle of pigmentation, keratoeie, nnd destiiiiinia—
`tion, reaching by June 14 the stage Irwhere there remained but a residual
`keretotie fringe on the foot.
`two weeks later, however,
`there
`up toured a fresh erythemn on he heck of each forearm, and by July
`5 i. re knuckles and haek of the hands were fl-lSO‘ll'n‘OlVLKl. There was!
`resent no other reeognizahle disturlninee.
`'lhroughout the ieriod
`annary 3 to July 5 the weight oeeillated between 5.3.5 ant no.5
`'JS.
`.
`*
`Lll’l‘he gelatin diet having, as in case 4,
`roved niadequntete rerent
`a. relapse of the dermal-inn, a. eh’a nge to t in beef treatment tingle IX)
`WILS made on July 1’. She continued to out well, and by the middle of
`September was :I'ree of active. pellagra, and 50 remained to Deeeniher
`2n, the end of the period of treatment. Between nuguet 1 and De-
`cember ‘26 her weig it. rose from 53.5 kilos to {51.5 kilos.
`_
`(has 1:": A white woman 39 years old who had pelliigra in 1917 and
`reem'renee in 1.918. 1921, and 1932.
`I
`" began about A ril 5 With the ni'ipearanee of
`The recurrent-e in 1212..
`an errtliema on the right
`form'irin.
`y Hey it)
`the pellagrous
`derinrititie had affected the. hands, loreamte, and forehead, and a mild
`etouiatilies was preeen‘t.
`_
`u
`v
`On Me}! 13 treatment woe begun With gelatin (Tal'ile '\ II). Her
`a. petite living exrellent. ehe consumed practically all. of the. food
`0 ‘ered. it being estimated that. during;r the period May 13 to June .ll]
`her eoiienmption of gelatin a proximate-ti an nrernge of 83 Irrnt
`(lull
`Notwithstanding thie,
`lU“’[-!Vt‘l', a fresh er_\_'t_hein'n dove oped
`durin June. eligl'it mental contusion heenme perceptible, and toward
`the e one of this month the bowels. developed a. elightly inrreaeed
`aotivitv. Autiril‘iljltgzlv, on. July 7 the treatment was (hanged to heel
`(Table le. Following this eliange,
`imiu‘or'elm'nl'a Stir
`511: 11ml
`*1”
`i'eeugnizahle cvidul'lllo of the altael; Lllrinppoarml by ubullt‘the oloee'of
`August. Up to about the middle of September her weight tended
`elightly downward, but after this time,
`to the end of the year, she
`nmint-aineil her weight. with but negligible oeeillntione.
`There woe in this (resin therefore, a. clearing up of the evidence of a
`reourn-nt- attark ol' pellagra following upon the inauguration of the
`beef lreu-lmenl, nltllmigh during the immediater pit-ending period of
`nlmut eight wet-lie. on a liberal gelatin diet, the Stine-l; had Shown a
`tt‘nt'leney to imrrea-a-d severity.
`It is. worth),r of note, also, that the
`improvement flSfir-ltlt'lzttfi'tl with the her-‘1' diet tools“ pint-1:, as in urine. 4,
`in Shite of the redneLion in the minerals and lrnmm i-itmuiiu-oi winn—
`dent with the ehange from the gelatin (Table VII) to the heel diet
`(initial. '{Z‘Kj‘
`Uri-w 5': A. white. wmnan ill years» old \i’lli) had ra‘llaagru in 191’:I and
`'i'oattirrenc-e in .t‘JlS. Jill-3t}. and .1922.
`A
`‘7
`I
`‘
`V
`I
`n
`w __ the 1
`'- rerurrentul. began some time hetWL'..en nhont. May 3 and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1014
`Page 5 of 13
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Janitor-118, 1021.
`
`the. month, but. the howela, which had been somewhat irregular even
`before the. appearance of the dermatitis, continued loo:~'.e.. Fecal
`examination made in May slum-rd Triehiiria ova, and, in June, some
`Aer-aria.
`She. maintained her Weight with, perhaps, a slight gain
`during tliia peril-d.
`ller condition having seemingly improved on
`illegela'lin diet, it was thought- that the indication in favor of gelatin
`would he. strengthenml if the, small allowance of l'wcf in the. haaic diet
`were eXeludt-d. This was accordingly done on July 7. at the same.
`time compensating for the eahn'ies by an ilhrl'l'nSe. in the allowance
`of butter {Table X).
`' Durng tlie'pericd July 7 to July 31 her food Consumption continued
`well nigh ctmiplete, an that it
`is (intimated that aha ingested an
`average of approximately 83 gl'étlflfi of gelatin daily. Notwith—
`standing this, however, a relapse of the dermatitia on her feet dove —
`oped between July 15 and July 19, which, after alibaiiling somewhat,
`flared up anew on August 2 and awain on August 0.
`'During this
`latter perital there was :iliiu some falling off in appetite.
`'lflua failure. to maintain the seemingly favorable. progress noted
`early in July led to a.
`ti! iange, on August 13, to the heel diet shown
`in Table IX. The change was follrm—‘ed by a return of appetite, a
`slight change. for the better in bowel activity, gain in weight. and
`clearing up of skin lesinna. Between August 2'3 and December 5
`her weight increased from 38.5 to 4-1.5 kiloa. On January 7, 1923,
`the close of the period of treatment, this patient— prewnteil no recog—
`nizable evidence of her recurrence, nnlesa a persistent t-hough reduced
`irrevularity of the bowels iii to he so regarded.
`’elatin
`ins, as in cases 4, G, and 7,
`a.
`liberal daily intake of
`failed to prevent a. relapse of the d erinal manileatatinne of the i. iseane,
`but definite. clinical
`iinn‘ovenient was noted lt_illt)1‘.7lllf§ the change
`to the treatment with met.
`It is;
`‘iin'ii'tliy' of note,
`too. that this
`improvement took place in Spite or"
`the. 1't‘(l11('l-ltl]1 in minerals and
`known vitainines associated with the change from the gelatin
`(Table X.) to the hut-f diet (Table 1X).
`It is seen, ill-"‘1
`that in all eight cases; well-marked and progressive
`
`
`clinical
`improvement folloveil
`the inauguration of
`the,
`treatment
`with l'reeh heel.
`’i‘liia is particularly significant
`in the four eases
`(Nos.
`4:1, 0, T, and 8)
`in each of which the treatment with beef had
`been preceded by a; considerable periml of treatment with gelatin
`which,
`though coupled with a mineral and 1ritaniino enriched basic
`
`diet, had failed to ::_i'i'e:-:.t
`the. pro:
`in oi"
`the. attack. This (entrust
`
`
`tenth-i
`to (3111pl11155l22t‘. on the. one nand,
`the inadaqna r of
`""L‘litldH,
`and, on the. other, Lie therapeutic potency of fresh heel.
`Taken liy itself. no restricted a lllfi"l':!]_)(‘lllll‘- t
`tan hardly be. more,
`
`live; but \=.-'hen (Ti')‘t1})li‘(l with the :‘1‘Cilll21lil0 evidmrcc oi"
`than saggy,
`
`.
`\‘zllltt‘,
`oi"
`l'resih inc"
`it st._i_'i.=n;gtheii.~=a
`the iiulications
`the.
`)1‘t‘\‘elil
` (Hill-5711114.
`that i‘i'efiu
`t-iie pellagra iiii'ci'eiitit'e factor or factors.
`BULK.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`January 18, 1024.
`a
`
`
`
`to pi'ei'cnt pellagra, nevertheless it seemed highly desirable to put
`
`this inference to direct
`test. This was done at the Georgia State
`
`'Sanitarium during 1022.
`In the rural areas of the South, milk is most commonly consumed
`as buttermilk. We therefore chaise buttermilk as the form of milk
`to use in this study.
`It was fresh,
`locally produced, and of fair
`quality. Analysis of a sample in the division of chemistry of the
`Hygienic Laboratory showed it to contain 2.88 per cent of protein
`(Nx {3.33). A daily allowance of approximately 1,200 grams (40
`fluid trauma) of this milk was offered each one of a group of 2‘.) colored
`female inmates of the sanitarium.
`It was well taken as a beverage
`at each one of the. meals. The approximate composition of the diet
`so supplemented is shown in Table XI.
`01' the 2%) patient-s constituting the group, 19 were. pollagrins and
`10 nonpellagrins. 0f the pellagrins, 16 remained in the test for
`one; year, to its termination on January 2, 1923. Three dropped out
`and passed from observation after shorter periods (63;, S, and 10
`months, respectively) by reason of the development of int-orcurrent
`illness necessitating transfer to other wards. 0f the. 10 nonpellagrins,
`‘.) remained throughout, 1 passing from observation on July 2‘3, after
`a period of over ("i-.1; months, on account of pulmonary tuberculosis.
`None of the. group of 22) patients; developed any evidence of pellagra
`at any time. duringr the ('il.)Si-.‘-1'Vzlthll period which, for 10' of the pcllag—
`rins and 0 ol the. nonpellaii‘rins, lasted one. year.
`Since our rather extei‘isive experience with this class of patients
`has em'ivinced us that without the buttermilk (or equivalent supple-
`ment) upward of ~10 or :30 per Cent. of the. group would with certainty
`have. derr‘eh'rped pcllagra. within a period of from three.
`to seven or
`
`eight merit-ha,
`the. ei_mi.J')lete al'isenco of any indication of the disease
`
`in any of the; group 1;,
`in our judgment, conclusive evidence of the
`
`prevei'itivc action of the lultterniilk.
`-
`.'
`'.,_.v-
`,
`I
`I
`.
`.
`.:.-‘
`
`:l'e hax e. more, then, and for
`the. hrst time, a direct demonstratron
`
`ot what- liei'elolurc has been an inference from indirect eyidenco~
`
`_l,1(l]i]._l_\r, that. milk coiita is tiu. essential pellagia pie\-ent1\*e factor or
`
`lactoi‘s.
`Inat'iuisrox.
`
`
`
`In
`The results; herein repmrted are. of interest in several respects.
`the. [ii-st. place they einpl'iasim anew the. importance of fresh 111 int and
`
`mill:
`in the treati'nent and prerentien of pellaara. This does not
`
`mean, as .llindhedo (it) has taken it to mean (in the. face of repeated
`
`\‘l‘ill‘lll
`
`to the. (.‘ontrary (53)) that these are the only foods possessing;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1014
`Page 6 of 13
`
`

`

`
`
` v 0
`
`
`
`January 18, 1021.
`9
` stunner than the maximum needed. for treatment would he adequ:‘de,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`January 18, W21.
`
`Judging- by our observation of a very high. incidence of the d isease
`asso./.-iated with such diet as that which was aupphrnienttal hy the
`heef in 'l‘ahles 1'. ill, IV, VT, and IX, and hy the huttermilk in Tahlo
`XI, it would :-:eei.'u as it this hasie diet.- ineluded hut. insignificant,
`il’
`any,
`]_')1'(‘-'\'t‘llli\'t‘. elements.
`(lur
`results with the heel and mill;
`supplen’ients are also of interest, therefore, in that they all‘ord some
`idea of the ei'l‘eetix’o (llttlllllt-y of these. foods.
`'.l.‘l.i:.-z determimition ol the quantity of heeP to he used in our study
`was largely arhitrar)‘. We \Wi‘e'guided in a 1n.e.~1.-<ure hy the ohs :r‘x-‘a—
`tion that. at the sanitarium the. [tllt'flVilllttt‘ of meat Whieh, so la' as
`We are ahh- to judge, has in the past. been the. pi'ine.i]_)al if not the. sole.
`prewutire element in the general diet, has not. heen adequate to
`prerent all reeurreinws oi the disease.
`Vr'e. 1'(-\a.~:<uiei.t
`that.J since the
`Vast majority of the inmates seemed to he pi'<.>te<'.t.ed, that i:::. showed
`no evidence of the disease, this quantity ol' m at. is. presumably only
`a little short of hemp; lull)? adequate.
`It seenuu‘l 1'i.~a>'scaial.)h.s to assume,
`t.l'ier4.|l'ore,
`that. twice. this.
`:‘tll(.‘l\,\'il1'.‘-.(.'t'r~-rl'hz'!t is to say. an allmvanr'le 01"
`CIA
`an r-(piiralent or" about. 100 'rranis ot' round .T't-(‘illiiV‘L-‘(iiiltl sulliee to
`prevent all hut very exeeptional eases.
`llut. sine-e for the. treatment.
`of active easea, partieularly ]‘(-'(ftl]'1‘(.‘1lt‘t'5 in patients oi" the. dilapidatt-a'l
`my
`physile and mental type “with whieh We. ‘were de-aliirr
`a quantity
`in exre-i's. of that sullieient for prevention would prohahly he. th.‘5l1'ill)lt.=
`if not
`ilt‘ljtti-iszll'y, We. druihhrd the. quantity we judgrd might he ade-
`
`quate lor preventimi, thus arriving at 1300 grams as the quantity to
`he tried in treatment.
`
`treatment: eren larger
`is possihle that for purposes of
`While it.
`quantities may in exeeptional insta tees he. neeeasar)‘. it; seems highly
`prohahle, it not certain, that for prerent-ive purposes a smaller quan—
`tity will he. ample.
`Indeed, the ex_p<-_~riein.te at the saanitarium. already
`reterrml to, suggests that
`the small tpiantity allowed as part- ot' the
`general diet of that institution is ‘.\'(_Ell~lll_‘_{ll sultieient, and. as has been
`:nwnt-ieu‘aal, We. think it. prohahle that. nor. more than ahout twiee this
`allo‘.\'z'l‘:11_‘<.~.~—thut. is, about. ltltl to 13.3 grainswru'ould he found entirely
`adequate. in all hut- '\.'ery ext'eptiomil instances...
`lai deehlilif." uhozi
`the all:.~=.ra11ee ei' hutterinilk to use in our test
`o1” iidea hy our t.~.:\;perieuee 'e'ith it in the treat-
`1
`-:
`\
`:5
`'
`'t" (‘."v.:§t'>i.
`
`.e had found. that. .1"
`to it) lluid ounees as a.
`
`
`suppleinem: to the
`f!-l‘\'\'.‘1.:\';"% seem adetpiate to :".1'1‘L‘:.§l?
`hasie diet did. not.
`«‘3
`in chants whieh cleared it) followin'r an increase to
`the pm {:31
`
`ounrxm.
`'zertzun that even this lat-3;; quantity \rill inva~
`
`
`. an attra‘k, for in a. reeent inst-ain'e, unique. in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`this priwe-d to he
`we decided to try 4-0 emu-ea. As. has; been seen,
`adequate in the. group studied hy us. and it 13 not unprehahlo that
`a somewl'iat smaller quantity might have. served equally wall.
`(Jon-
`sidering the restricted hasie diet and the type. of individuid1 with
`V
`’
`r."
`whieh we were thrsziliiw.
`it. seems prohahle that. no more, than H.113
`(“Bonitv will .suil‘iee in all hut very e.‘<er-:pt1onal instauees.
`
`Flor-r does freL-rh whole mill:
`in this; eonneetion the. due. .-
`.
`ai‘ir.
`“'ipare with huttermid; in potency!
`‘ We have made no direct eom—
`ptu'isuai. But it is of interest to imte that our experience with hatter
`as the. therapeut.ii.: and pi't‘.\'l‘lll-l\"t‘. element 111 the dial. hazs. her-n very
`dis-2apraanting.
`1‘ lthoug‘h we have tried it. repeatedly and in inereaa-
`ins:
`i.liaiiit.-iLie:<,
`the. enusuunptinn in several recent instances having
`eciualed a. daily average of apprnxhnately 13-35 to l-h") grams of fresh,
`lei-ally lH'iHlLUI‘L‘Jl hatter (ii-stiinntaal as representing ml)
`to lit) grams
`o!"
`tart-halal?)
`from cows largely pasture led,
`for periods of from
`thrmi‘.
`to umvards ot' tire months (the patients Weighing hetween 5.1
`and 57.51 lil_l(.lt.§)l,
`it. has 1)1".1(.‘.l.‘il':1ll:~," inrariahly failed to prevent reeur~
`renee oi'
`the. disease. And in paéwine; it may he remarked that the
`\ results of similar trials with mat—liver oil have. been erpially disap—
`‘
`.
`point-ng. Consumed in duz‘rntities of 128 grams (that is, in propor—
`tion ol' o\"('1'
`7-? grams per 1i lo ol' hodfir' Weight) daily for perior'ls as hing
`as: three, four, and il\'(.51111)11tl1.\', no preventive elteet. on the recurrence
`of the diseasar. was :1])])l'ti!('ltll)lt.‘.
`Since it. would thus appear that. the
`
`‘|:w'l.la.e;ra-pre\'enti\'e tantra is not J'nresent
`(in appreniahle amount) in
`lJLILlafitl‘:
`it;
`is- 1')(;'t'l'l‘.l]'):$ perniissihle to infer that Yv‘llt'lif. mill:
`is not ma—
`1 Wall'yrl.
`it} at. all, more. potent than huttermilk.
`So far, then, as the
`
`
`t-l"1;-zl'l'.ll
`jet and pu.'e\'<.‘ut_.ion oi pell en'a.
`tin the. speeiiie senael
`is eon-
`.ld'ti‘fil]. milk and. huttasrmilk mar he assumed to he quantita-
`e.(-:::r.ne<'|.
`tively in ten:haI'igeafhh'z.
`Our e:\';_'verinee with meat; and with mil: has naturall‘j :‘sliggestetl a
`it. .
`eonipariarai ol'
`t.llOiL"\";‘ll110.
`tintea‘ruuz el\_-’ our data are not. of sue-h a.
`el'iz'o'aeter as to permit us to torn-i snort-hing; more. than an impression
`with rerun-rt to illlE; ourstion.
`(Jor i.~.:\;periei.iee with these. i‘oode‘. has not a't'i‘orded us entimrl‘.’ eom-
`.l.’“"”l3’-l'3" "_|Mantitat-ive data. of their value in trtartment. and, as ahread‘f
`. -:
`1
`mated. no | 1.1m}. not, made. a direet. study of the 1.)]‘e\'euti\'e value. of
` 3'11 :3;
`my itself. Nevertheless, this experieinse and the rough e:;t.inie:rtes
`which h::a‘~.'e alreain heen discussed may he taken as [Ll-'llit'H'tllllg at least
`
`Il‘stiou oi the. eranparati‘ve value. of meat and huttei'inilk. Thus
`we. have. naind 300 grams oi" lean round steal; (3-12 grains; prom-in) to
`1,.‘..\.,.p'.'.‘:.,
`.‘
`I..i
`'
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Elysium Health Exhibit 1014
`Page 7 of 13
`
`

`

`January 18,10213
`
`
`
`January 18, 1934.
`
`97
`
`of an attack. We have had similar though, we have thought, not
`quite so prompt effects from 48 ounces of buttermilk (~13 grams
`protein). And we have estimated the approximately 1‘25 grams of
`lean round
`ink (‘27 grams protein) would probably be as efficient in
`prevention as the 4f) ounch of buttermilk (36 g‘ams protein) were
`found to be. These considerations lead to the. suggestion that gram
`for gram, on the basis of protein content, fresh beef is somewhat more
`efficient than buttermilk.
`
`Notwithstanding the possibly greater potency of fresh beef, milk,
`for purposes of treatment at least, must be regarded as the more
`*aluable, since, among other reasons, it has the practical ad ’antage
`that it needs no mastication, and can therefore be readily taken by
`patients in whom the condition of the mouth may render 111asti(,'a.t-i<_)n
`painful or impossible and can be easily given by tube in cases refusing
`nourishment.
`
`of interest, finally, as it bears on the. problem of the
`Our study
`identity of the essential preventive dietary factor or factors. Here
`it may be wort-11 recallng that six of the cases tr-‘ated with fresh beef
`had developed their attacks under our observation in spite of havng
`sul‘.>sisted for periods of not less than about two and one—half months
`on the mineral—and—vitamine—cnriehcd sanitarium diet
`shown in
`
`Table II. These cases harmed the principal subject of a previous
`report (3). As was there. stated, it would seem as if this diet must
`have yielded an abundance of the known vitamines and minerals,
`thus exclut‘ling deficit-hey of these and leaving the protein (amino
`acid) mixture of the diet, some as yet unrecognized dietary complex
`(possibly
`vitamine), or some Combination of these, for consideration
`
`in relation to the development of the dis
`.
`This interln'etatiim is s11].)portei.l and strengthened so far as con—
`cerns the antiophthahnie and the anti'racl'iitic complexes by the
`failure of butter and of coil-liver oil as preventives, and as concerns
`the antim-iuritie and the antiscorbutic complexes by the therapeutic
`e’lli(':.ieney, particularly under the conditions of our study, of a food
`(muscle tissue of heel) known to be relatively quite poor in these
`factors (1.)).
`"fit-h respect to protein it may be observed that the fail-
`
`
`"s in which beef was subse-
`uro of .jz;clati1‘1 in the. treatment of the c;
`quenth tried with markmlly lmnel'icial effect, would. seem to indicate
`that. the nitter result. can not be attril'aited to protein per so. This
`
`is in harmony with the. indi
`ion ali'orded by the. study of the diet
`of rellasrrous and nonpcllaggrous households (3:) of Sinith Carolina
`
`what. modified form adopted by Jobling; and Arnold (7), that the pro-
`duction of 'i'n-‘llagra is dependent on the excessive ccmsnmption of car-
`b<.)hydrate.
`laihile neither Decks nor .h'iblinggg and Arnidd tell us
`just what they mean by an “excess” of carbohydral‘es, we.
`IlGE\':‘!‘l-l'l(!-
`less find it diti'ieult to believe that the. diet shim-n in

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket