BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`Wayne O. Stacy (SBN 314579)
`Sarah J. Guske (SBN 232467)
`sarah.guske@bakerbotts.com
`J.B. Schiller (SBN 298747)
`jb.schiller@bakerbotts.com
`101 California St., Suite 3600
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: 415.291.6200
`Facsimile: 415.291.6300
`
`Michelle J. Eber (pro hac vice)
`michelle.eber@bakerbotts.com
`One Shell Plaza
`910 Louisiana Street
`Houston, TX 77002
`Telephone: 713.229.1223
`Facsimile: 713.229.7923
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`TWILIO INC.
`
`
`TWILIO INC.,
`
`vs.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE
`
`Case No. 5:16-CV-06925-LHK
`
`PLAINTIFF TWILIO INC.’S FOURTH
`AMENDED OBJECTIONS AND
`RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT
`TELESIGN’S FIRST SET OF
`INTERROGATORIES (NOS. 1-13)
`
`
`
`TELESIGN CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Twilio’s Fourth Amended Responses and Objections to First Set of Interrogatories
`Case: 5:16-cv-06925-LHK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
`
`
`TWILIO INC., Ex 2016, Page 1
`TELESIGN CORPORATION v. TWILIO INC.
`IPR2017-01977
`
`

`

`
`
`Discovery in this case is ongoing, and Twilio explicitly reserves the right to supplement
`
`or amend its response to this interrogatory as discovery and Twilio’s investigation in this case
`
`proceeds, including by supplementing this response in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(d).
`
`
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 13: Describe with Full Particularity Your claim that any Twilio
`
`products actually practice the claimed inventions, including charts identifying specifically, on a
`
`limitation-by-limitation basis, where and how each alleged claim is practiced, including each
`
`claim and each Twilio product identified in Twilio’s Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
`
`Infringement Contentions, p. 5.
`
`RESPONSE: In addition to the objections set forth in the General Objections, Twilio objects to
`
`this interrogatory as exceeding the number of permissible interrogatories. Twilio also objects to
`
`this interrogatory as overly broad, unduly burdensome, and not proportional to TeleSign’s needs
`
`in the case to the extent it seeks “all facts” and “all documents” (see definition of Full
`
`Particularity). To the extent TeleSign seeks “all facts” and “all documents” not in relation to a
`
`contention integratory, Twilio counts this as two separate interrogatories. Twilio further objects
`
`to this interrogatory as improperly seeking Twilio’s contentions. Twilio objects to this
`
`interrogatory as overly broad, unduly burdensome, and not proportional to TeleSign’s needs in
`
`the case to the extent it requires information on a limitation-by-limitation basis where a more
`
`general identification would suffice for TeleSign’s needs in the case.
`
`
`
`Twilio further objects to this interrogatory to the extent it requires expert opinion and
`
`analysis and to the extent it prematurely seeks expert discovery. Twilio will produce its expert
`
`reports in accordance with the scheduling order in this case.
`
`
`
`Twilio further objects to the extent this Interrogatory is compound. TeleSign requests
`
`that Twilio “[d]escribe with Full Particularity Your claim that any Twilio products actually
`
`practice the claimed inventions”, however Twilio’s Infringement Contentions identify 10
`
`separate products that practice the claimed inventions. As framed, Twilio counts one claim per
`
`product to be a separate Interrogatory. This Interrogatory is overly broad, unduly burdensome,
`
`and not proportional to TeleSign’s needs in the case to the extent it requests Twilio to create 240
`Twilio’s Fourth Amended Responses and Objections to First Set of Interrogatories
` Case: 5:16-cv-06925-LHK 38
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
`
`
`TWILIO INC., Ex 2016, Page 2
`TELESIGN CORPORATION v. TWILIO INC.
`IPR2017-01977
`
`

`

`
`
`
`claim charts.
`
`
`
`Twilio will not provide charts identifying specifically, on a limitation-by-limitation
`
`basis, where and how each alleged claim is practiced, including each claim and each Twilio
`
`product identified in Twilio’s Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions.
`
`Instead, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d), Twilio will identify relevant
`
`documents that describe each of Twilio’s products that practice the asserted claims. As such,
`
`Twilio states that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d), information responsive to
`
`this interrogatory may be found in the following documents:
`
`Twilio Product
`
`Bates Range
`
`Two Factor Authentication
`
`TW_00195069 - TW_00195081;
`
`TW_00223881; TW_00223886 -
`
`TW_00223888; TW_00223970 -
`
`TW_00223977; TW_00224052 -
`
`TW_00224054; TW_00224396 -
`
`TW_00224402; TW_00224515;
`
`TW_00224525 - TW_00224529;
`
`TW_00224946 - TW_00224986;
`
`TW_00226496 - TW_00226503
`
`TW_00226480 - TW_00226838
`
`TW_00195069 - TW_00195081;
`
`TW_00223600 - TW_00226107
`
`Notify
`
`Synch
`
`Elastic SIP Trunking
`
`TW_00222493 - TW_00222662
`
`Task Router
`
`TW_00147375 - TW_00147553;
`
`TW_00157573 - TW_00157668;
`
`TW_00158676 - TW_00158768;
`
`TW_00223889 - TW_00223894;
`
`TW_00224008 - TW_00224012;
`
`Twilio’s Fourth Amended Responses and Objections to First Set of Interrogatories
` Case: 5:16-cv-06925-LHK 39
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
`
`
`TWILIO INC., Ex 2016, Page 3
`TELESIGN CORPORATION v. TWILIO INC.
`IPR2017-01977
`
`

`

`TW_00224289 - TW_00224293;
`
`TW_00224885 - TW_00224885;
`
`TW_00225499 - TW_00225572;
`
`TW_00226739 - TW_00226739;
`
`TW_00227135 - TW_00227143
`
`Programmable Wireless
`
`TW_00228078 - TW_00228168
`
`Programmable Video
`
`Programmable Voice
`
`Programmable SMS
`
`Programmable Chat
`
`TW_00228359 - TW_00228417
`
`TW_00114081 - TW_00114255;
`
`TW_00147375 - TW_00147459;
`
`TW_00147460 - TW_00147553;
`
`TW_00222547 - TW_00222555;
`
`TW_00223130 - TW_00223153;
`
`TW_00223767 - TW_00223773;
`
`TW_00224858 - TW_00224860;
`
`TW_00225658 - TW_00225662;
`
`TW_00226809 - TW_00226811;
`
`TW_00227162 - TW_00227180;
`
`TW_00227222 - TW_00227261;
`
`TW_00227400 - TW_00227402;
`
`TW_00228229 - TW_00228235;
`
`TW_00228348 - TW_00228352
`
`TW_00226839 - TW_00227402
`
`TW_00154287 - TW_00154370;
`
`TW_00160901 - TW_00160984;
`
`TW_00161070 - TW_00161159;
`
`TW_00222663 - TW_00226479
`
`In addition to the following identifying documents, and pursuant the Court’s Order, ECF.
`
`Twilio’s Fourth Amended Responses and Objections to First Set of Interrogatories
` Case: 5:16-cv-06925-LHK 40
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
`
`
`TWILIO INC., Ex 2016, Page 4
`TELESIGN CORPORATION v. TWILIO INC.
`IPR2017-01977
`
`

`

`No. 159, Twilio “identi[fies] its products that it contends embody the asserted claims and which
`
`claims are embodied in which products” in the chart below. Programmable Wireless,
`
`TaskRouter, and Sync products can be implemented in conjunction with the products listed
`
`below.
`
`Twilio Product
`Programmable Voice
`
`Programmable Video
`
`Asserted Claims
`’376 Patent, Claims 1–3, 14, 17, 19
`’465 Patent, Claims 1–5, 9
`’021 Patent, Claims 1–3, 6, 7, 11
`’376 Patent, Claims 1-3, 14, 17, 19
`’021 Patent, Claims 1–3, 6, 7, 11
`’465 Patent, Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 9
`’376 Patent, Claims 1–3, 14, 17, 19
`’021 Patent, Claims 1–3, 6, 7, 11
`’465 Patent, Claims 1–5, 9
`’376 Patent, Claims 1–3, 5, 14, 17, 19
`’021 Patent, Claims 1–3, 6, 7, 11, 12
`’465 Patent, Claims 1–5, 9
`’376 Patent, Claims 1–3, 14, 17, 19
`’021 Patent, Claims 1–3, 6, 7, 11, 12
`’376 Patent, Claims 1–3, 5, 14, 17, 19
`’021 Patent, Claims 1–3, 6, 7, 11, 12
`’376 Patent, Claims 1–3, 5, 14, 19
`’021 Patent, Claims 1–3, 6, 7, 11, 12
`’465 Patent, Claims 1–5, 9
`Twilio further states that discovery in this case is ongoing, and Twilio reserves the
`
`Elastic SIP Trunking
`
`Programmable SMS
`
`Programmable Chat
`
`Notify
`
`Two Factor Authentication
`
`right to supplement or amend its response to this interrogatory as discovery and Twilio’s
`
`investigation in this case proceeds, including by supplementing this response in accordance with
`
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(d).
`
`
`
`
`
`Twilio’s Fourth Amended Responses and Objections to First Set of Interrogatories
` Case: 5:16-cv-06925-LHK 41
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
`
`
`TWILIO INC., Ex 2016, Page 5
`TELESIGN CORPORATION v. TWILIO INC.
`IPR2017-01977
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 18, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`WAYNE STACY
`SARAH GUSKE
`MICHELLE J. EBER
`J.B. SCHILLER
`
`
`
`/s/ Wayne Stacy______
`Wayne Stacy
`
`Attorneys for Twilio Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Twilio’s Fourth Amended Responses and Objections to First Set of Interrogatories
` Case: 5:16-cv-06925-LHK 42
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
`
`
`TWILIO INC., Ex 2016, Page 6
`TELESIGN CORPORATION v. TWILIO INC.
`IPR2017-01977
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are
`
`being served with a copy of this document via electronic mail on December 18, 2017.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Wayne Stacy______
`Wayne Stacy
`
`Twilio’s Fourth Amended Responses and Objections to First Set of Interrogatories
` Case: 5:16-cv-06925-LHK 43
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
`
`
`TWILIO INC., Ex 2016, Page 7
`TELESIGN CORPORATION v. TWILIO INC.
`IPR2017-01977
`
`