throbber
IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`––––––––––
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`––––––––––
`
`TELESIGN CORPORATION
`Patent Owner,
`
`v.
`
`TWILIO INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`––––––––––
`
`Case IPR2017-01977
`Patent 8,755,376
`
`––––––––––
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SEAL PATENT
`OWNER’S RESPONSE and EXHIBITS 2025-2027, 2047-2054, and 2063-2066
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(1) and 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54, Patent
`
`Owner Twilio Inc. (“Patent Owner”) respectfully requests that the Board seal
`
`Exhibit 2025, “January 13, 2014 Email from Darren Berkovitz and Charles
`
`McColgan with attachment, bates stamped TLS_00022310-18,” Exhibit 2026,
`
`“November 21, 2011 Email from Charles McColgan to Maya Sudhakar, bates
`
`stamped TLS_00021739-41,” Exhibit 2027, “April 19, 2012 Email from Raman
`
`Dhillon, bates stamped TLS_00021863,” and portions of Exhibits 2047-2054 and
`
`2063-2066, all labeled “Twilio Salesforce Account Summary.” Patent Owner
`
`additionally requests that the Board seal portions of Patent Owner’s Response that
`
`contain information from these Exhibits. Sealing the material set forth below is
`
`appropriate and necessary to protect the non-public information of Petitioner
`
`TeleSign Corp. (“Petitioner”) and the confidential personal information of non-
`
`parties to this proceeding.
`
`I.
`
`Reasons for Relief Requested
`
`On June 21, the Board granted the parties’ Joint Motion for Modification of
`
`the Default Protective Order and entered the attached Stipulated Protective Order
`
`(Appendix A). See Paper 25. The Stipulated Protective Order grants the same
`
`permissions regarding filing documents under seal or filing redacted versions of
`
`documents containing both confidential and non-confidential as the Default
`
`1
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`Protective Order of this Board (Appendix B of the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48771 (Aug. 14, 2012)). The standard for granting a
`
`motion to seal is “good cause.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.54. The Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide provides that “the rules aim to strike a balance between the public’s interest
`
`in maintaining a complete and understandable file history and the parties’ interest
`
`in protecting truly sensitive information.” 77 Fed. Reg. at 48760. Those rules
`
`“identify confidential information in a manner consistent with Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), which provides for protective orders for trade secret
`
`or other confidential research, development, or commercial information.” Id.
`
`(citing 37 C.F.R. § 42.54). “Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all
`
`of the information submitted to the [Patent Trial and Appeal Board (‘PTAB’ or
`
`‘Board’)], the submitting party shall file confidential and non-confidential versions
`
`of its submission, together with a Motion to Seal the confidential version setting
`
`forth the reasons why the information redacted from the non-confidential version is
`
`confidential and should not be made publicly available.” Id. at 48770.
`
`Exhibits 2025-2027 are internal emails among Petitioner’s employees
`
`regarding product development. Petitioner produced these documents in this
`
`proceeding in response to the Board’s Decision Granting Patent Owner’s Motion
`
`for Discovery. See Paper 23. Petitioner marked the exhibits as “PROTECTIVE
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`ORDER MATERIAL” in accordance with the provisions of the Stipulated
`
`Protective Order. These documents are relevant to these proceedings as they
`
`demonstrate a long-felt need for Patent Owner’s inventions existed in the market
`
`and show Petitioner’s copying of Patent Owner’s products. In particular, these
`
`documents contain information showing Petitioner’s cofounder’s and other
`
`employees’ access of Patent Owner’s patented technology, how that information
`
`was used by Petitioner, customer requests for Petitioner’s resulting infringing
`
`products, efforts and time invested in Petitioner’s infringing product development,
`
`and customer requests that led to the product development. Petitioner asserts that
`
`these documents contain confidential information that would damage Petitioner’s
`
`business if it were made public. Good cause exists to seal these emails to allow
`
`submission of relevant evidence in this proceeding that has been deemed
`
`confidential business information by Petitioner.
`
`Exhibits 2047-2054 and 2063-2066 are reports from Patent Owner’s internal
`
`database showing the account status of various Twilio accounts opened by
`
`Petitioner. Pursuant to paragraph 5(A)(ii) of the Stipulated Protective Order, Patent
`
`Owner has submitted both confidential and non-confidential versions of these
`
`exhibits. In the non-confidential versions, Patent Owner has redacted certain
`
`personal identification information from these exhibits, such as email addresses,
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`account numbers, and names. These redactions are necessary to allow submission
`
`of relevant evidence in this proceeding while protecting confidential information of
`
`individuals, including non-parties.
`
`Patent Owner’s Response includes confidential information from the
`
`foregoing exhibits. See Paper No. 28 at 58-59, 64. Patent Owner requests that the
`
`unredacted copy of its Response be sealed as “PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`MATERIAL.” Pursuant to paragraph 5(A)(ii) of the Stipulated Protective Order,
`
`Patent Owner has filed a non-confidential redacted version of its Response as
`
`Paper No. 26. The confidential version of Patent Owner’s Response and Exhibits
`
`2025-2027, 2047-2054, and 2063-2066 are being filed as accessible to “Parties and
`
`Board Only.”
`
`II.
`
`Certification of Conference with Opposing Party Pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.54
`Patent Owner, in good faith, met and conferred with Petitioner regarding this
`
`motion to seal. Petitioner does not object to sealing Exhibits 2025-2027 that were
`
`produced by Petitioner under
`
`the “PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL”
`
`designation.
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`III. Conclusion
`Because good cause exists
`
`to seal Patent Owner’s Response and
`
`accompanying Exhibits 2025-2027, 2047-2054, and 2063-2066, Patent Owner
`
`respectfully requests that this Motion to Seal be granted.
`
`Respectfully submitted this 22nd day of June, 2018.
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
`/Wayne O. Stacy/
`Wayne Stacy
`Lead Counsel
`Reg. No. 45,125
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e), I hereby certify that on June 22, 2018,
`
`the foregoing document was filed with the PTAB through its E2E system and
`
`served via email on attorneys of record for the Petitioner at the following
`
`address:
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jesse J. Camacho
`Elena K. McFarland
`Christine Guastello
`Mary J. Peal
`SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP
`jcamacho@shb.com
`emcfarland@shb.com
`cguastello@shb.com
`mpeal@shb.com
`
`Date: June 22, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
`/Wayne O. Stacy/
`Wayne Stacy
`Lead Counsel
`
`1
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`
`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`US. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`APPENDIX A
`
`APPENDIX A
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`––––––––––
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`––––––––––
`
`TELESIGN CORPORATION
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TWILIO INC.
`Petitioner
`
`––––––––––
`
`Case IPR2017-01977
`Patent 8,755,376
`
`––––––––––
`
`STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`Protective Order
`
`This protective order governs the treatment and filing of confidential
`
`information, including documents and testimony.
`
`1. Confidential information shall be clearly marked PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`MATERIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`MATERIAL.”
`
`2. Access to confidential information marked as “PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`MATERIAL” is limited to the following individuals who have executed the
`
`Acknowledgment appended to this order:
`
`(A) Parties. Designated officers, directors, and employees of the
`
`Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary;
`
`(B) Outside Counsel. Outside counsel of record for a party in the
`
`Proceeding (and they shall have such access without the requirement to sign
`
`the Acknowledgement).
`
`(C) Experts. Retained experts of a party in the Proceeding who further
`
`certify in the Acknowledgement that they are not a competitor to any party,
`
`or a consultant for, or employed by, such a competitor with respect to the
`
`subject matter of the proceeding.
`
`(D) In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party.
`
`1
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`(E) Other Persons Associated With a Party. Consultants or other
`
`persons performing work for a party, other than in-house counsel and in-
`
`house counsel’s support staff, who sign the Acknowledgement shall be
`
`extended access to confidential information only upon agreement of the
`
`parties or by order of the Board upon a motion brought by the party seeking
`
`to disclose confidential information to that person. The party opposing
`
`disclosure to that person shall have the burden of proving that such person
`
`should be restricted from access to confidential information.
`
`(F) The Office. Employees and representatives of the Office who have
`
`a need for access to the confidential information shall have such access
`
`without the requirement to sign an Acknowledgement. Such employees and
`
`representatives shall include the Director, members of the Board and their
`
`clerical staff, other support personnel, court reporters, and other persons
`
`acting on behalf of the Office.
`
`(G) Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical staff, court
`
`reporters and other support personnel of the foregoing persons who are
`
`reasonably necessary to assist those persons in the proceeding shall not be
`
`required to sign an Acknowledgement, but shall be informed of the terms
`
`and requirements of the Protective Order by the person they are supporting
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`who receives confidential information.
`
`3. A party or non-party may designate certain confidential material as
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY MATERIAL,” by
`
`marking it as such, provided that the party or non-party has a good faith basis to
`
`believe that such information is particularly sensitive and a substantial competitive
`
`harm might result if it were made public. Access to any material marked as
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY MATERIAL” is
`
`limited to the individuals identified in subsections 2(F) and 2(G) and the following
`
`individuals who have executed the acknowledgment appended to this order:
`
`outside counsel of record for a party in this IPR Proceeding and the individuals
`
`identified in subsection 2(C). Nothing in this Order, or the parties’ consent thereto,
`
`should be construed to supersede or replace any other confidentiality obligations
`
`held by a disclosing party under a protective order entered by another tribunal
`
`including the International Trade Commission or any U.S. district court.
`
`4. Persons receiving confidential information shall use reasonable efforts to
`
`maintain the confidentiality of the information, including:
`
`(A) Maintaining such information in a secure location to which
`
`persons not authorized to receive the information shall not have access;
`
`(B) Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the confidentiality
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`of the information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those the
`
`recipient uses to maintain the confidentiality of information not received
`
`from the disclosing party;
`
`(C) Ensuring that support personnel of the recipient who have access
`
`to the confidential information understand and abide by the obligation to
`
`maintain the confidentiality of information received that is designated as
`
`confidential; and
`
`(D) Limiting the copying of confidential information to only those
`
`copies needed for conduct of the proceeding and maintaining a record of the
`
`locations of such copies.
`
`5. Persons receiving confidential information shall use the following
`
`procedures to maintain the confidentiality of the information:
`
`(A) Documents and Information Filed With the Board.
`
`(i) A party may file documents or information with the Board
`
`under seal, together with a non-confidential description of the nature
`
`of the confidential information that is under seal and the reasons why
`
`the information is confidential and should not be made available to
`
`the public. The submission shall be treated as confidential and remain
`
`under seal, unless, upon motion of a party and after a hearing on the
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`issue, or sua sponte, the Board determines that the documents or
`
`information do not to qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`(ii) Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of the
`
`information submitted to the Board, the submitting party shall file
`
`confidential and non-confidential versions of its submission, together
`
`with a Motion to Seal the confidential version setting forth the reasons
`
`why the information redacted from the non-confidential version is
`
`confidential and should not be made available to the public. The
`
`nonconfidential version of the submission shall clearly indicate the
`
`locations of information that has been redacted. The confidential
`
`version of the submission shall be filed under seal. The redacted
`
`information shall remain under seal unless, upon motion of a party
`
`and after a hearing on the issue, or sua sponte, the Board determines
`
`that some or all of the redacted information does not qualify for
`
`confidential treatment.
`
`(B) Documents and Information Exchanged Among the Parties.
`
`Information designated as confidential that is disclosed to another
`
`party during discovery or other proceedings before the Board shall be
`
`clearly marked as “PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL” or
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`MATERIAL” and shall be produced in a manner that maintains its
`
`confidentiality.
`
`6. If the producing party seeks to keep “PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`MATERIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`MATERIAL” sealed, the other party will cooperate in those efforts, including by
`
`not opposing a request by the producing party to keep the documents sealed.
`
`“Acknowledgement” of Protective Order. The following form may be used
`
`to acknowledge a protective order and gain access to information covered by the
`
`protective order:
`
`Dated: June 12, 2018
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/Wayne O. Stacy/
`Wayne O. Stacy
`
`Reg. No. 67,771
`
`COUNSEL FOR PATENT OWNER
`TWILIO INC.
`
`
`/Jesse Camacho/
`Jesse Camacho
`Reg. No. 51,258
`COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
`TELESIGN CORPORATION
`
`6
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`––––––––––
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`––––––––––
`
`TELESIGN CORPORATION
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TWILIO INC.
`Petitioner
`
`––––––––––
`
`Case IPR2017-01977
`Patent 8,755,376
`
`––––––––––
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR ACCESS
`TO PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL
`
`

`

`IPR2017-01977
`U.S. Patent No. 8,755,376
`
`Acknowledgment for Access to Protective Order Material
`
`I ________________, affirm that I have read the Protective Order; that I will
`
`abide by its terms; that I will use the confidential information only in connection
`
`with this proceeding and for no other purpose; that I will only allow access to
`
`support staff who are reasonably necessary to assist me in this proceeding; that
`
`prior to any disclosure to such support staff I informed or will inform them of the
`
`requirements of the Protective Order; that I am personally responsible for the
`
`requirements of the terms of the Protective Order and I agree to submit to the
`
`jurisdiction of the Office and the United States District Court for the Eastern
`
`District of Virginia for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Protective Order and
`
`providing remedies for its breach.
`
`By: _______________________
`
`Date:________________________
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket