`571.272.7822 Entered: December 19, 2017
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`FEDEX CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case: IPR2017-02028 (Patent 6,909,356 B2)
`Case: IPR2017-02030 (Patent 8,494,581 B2)
`Case: IPR2017-02039 (Patent 7,199,715 B2)
`Case: IPR2017-02043 (Patent 9,047,586 B2)1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before DAVID C. MCKONE, BARBARA A. PARVIS, and
`JOHN A. HUDALLA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PARVIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Patent Owner’s Motions for Admission Pro Hac Vice
`of Lauren M. Nowierski
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`Patent Owner moves for pro hac vice admission of Ms. Lauren M.
`Nowierski. See, e.g., IPR2017-02028, Paper 6. Patent Owner indicates it
`
`
`1 This Order addresses the same issues in these inter partes reviews.
`Therefore, we issue one Order to be filed in all of the cases. The parties,
`however, are not authorized to use this style of filing in subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02028 (Patent 6,909,356 B2)
`IPR2017-02030 (Patent 8,494,581 B2)
`IPR2017-02039 (Patent 7,199,715 B2)
`IPR2017-02043 (Patent 9,047,586 B2)
`
`has conferred with Petitioner and Petitioner does not oppose Patent Owner’s
`Motions. Id. Patent Owner provides Declarations from Ms. Nowierski in
`support of its Motions. See, e.g., IPR2017-02028, Ex. 2101.
`Based on the facts set forth in the Motions and the accompanying
`Declarations from Ms. Nowierski, we conclude that Ms. Nowierski has
`sufficient legal and technical qualifications to represent Patent Owner in
`these cases, that Ms. Nowierski has demonstrated the necessary familiarity
`with the subject matter of these cases, and that there is a need for Patent
`Owner to have counsel with experience as a litigation attorney in patent
`matters involved in these cases. Accordingly, Patent Owner has established
`good cause for Ms. Nowierski’s pro hac vice admission. Ms. Nowierski will
`be permitted to appear pro hac vice in these cases as back-up counsel only.
`See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission
`of Ms. Lauren M. Nowierski (IPR2017-02028, Paper 6; IPR2017-02030,
`Paper 6; IPR2017-02039, Paper 6); IPR2017-02043, Paper 6 are granted;
`Ms. Nowierski is authorized to act as back-up counsel in these cases only;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in these cases;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Nowierski comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Nowierski is subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and to the USPTO
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02028 (Patent 6,909,356 B2)
`IPR2017-02030 (Patent 8,494,581 B2)
`IPR2017-02039 (Patent 7,199,715 B2)
`IPR2017-02043 (Patent 9,047,586 B2)
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jeffrey Berkowitz
`Jeffrey.berkowitz@finnegan.com
`Michael Young
`Michael.young@finnegan.com
`Daniel Tucker
`Daniel.tucker@finnegan.com
`Gracie Mills
`Gracie.mills@finnegan.com
`Alexander Boyer
`Alexander.boyer@finnegan.com
`Bradford Schulz
`Bradford.schulz@finnegan.com
`James Stein
`James.stein@finnegan.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Andrew Heinz
`aheinz@desmaraisllp.com
`Kevin McNish
`kmcnish@desmaraisllp.com
`Alan Kellman
`akellman@desmaraisllp.com
`Tim Seeley
`tims@intven.com
`James Hietala
`jhietala@intven.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`