throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SHENZHEN ZHIYI TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD., D/B/A ILIFE,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`IROBOT CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF STEPHEN A. MARSHALL IN SUPPORT OF
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-02061
`Patent 6,809,490
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`1 
`
`IROBOT 2016
`Shenzhen Zhiyi v. iRobot
`IPR2017-02061
`
`

`

`Proceeding No.: IPR2017-02061
`Attorney Docket: 44360-0004IP1
`DECLARATION OF STEPHEN A. MARSHALL IN
`SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC
`VICE ADMISSION
`
`I, Stephen A. Marshall, hereby declare the following:
`
`I am a member in good standing of the state Bars of the Commonwealth of
`
`
`
`1.
`
`Massachusetts and the District of Columbia, as well as the United States District
`
`Court for the Eastern District of Texas, United States District Court for the Eastern
`
`District of Wisconsin, the United States District Court for the District of
`
`Massachusetts, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, and the
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
`
`2.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied.
`
`4.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the Code of Federal
`
`Regulations.
`
`6.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`

`
`2 
`
`

`

`Proceeding No.: IPR2017-02061
`Attorney Docket: 44360-0004IP1
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice before the Office in any other
`
`7.
`
`proceedings during the past three years. I am also concurrently applying to appear
`
`in IPR2017-02137.
`
`8.
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney with nearly 12 years of experience
`
`representing clients in patent cases involving telecommunications, computer
`
`networking, embedded systems and software, and robotics. I regularly litigate
`
`patent cases in various forums including the United States Court of Appeals for the
`
`Federal Circuit, federal district courts, and the International Trade Commission.
`
`Through my experience in patent litigation matters, I have represented clients in
`
`many phases of litigation including discovery, Markman hearings, jury trials, and
`
`appeals. My biography is attached hereto as Exhibit A. I am serving as lead or co-
`
`lead counsel for iRobot in two related matters, Certain Robotic Vacuum Cleaning
`
`Devices and Components Thereof Such as Spare Parts, Inv. No. 337-TA-1057
`
`(Int’l Trade Comm’n), filed April 18, 2017 and iRobot Corp. v. Shenzhen Zhiyi
`
`Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a iLife, Case No. 1:17-cv-10652 (D. Mass.). These
`
`related litigations each involve the patent at issue in this inter partes review
`
`proceeding.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are true and
`
`that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true; and
`
`further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`

`
`3 
`
`

`

`Proceeding No.: IPR2017-02061
`Attorney Docket: 44360-0004IP1
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code and that such willful false
`
`statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patents issued
`
`thereon.
`
`
`
`
`Date: August 28, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Stephen A. Marshall/
`Stephen A. Marshall
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: 202-783-5070
`Email: smarshall@fr.com
`
`
`

`
`4 
`
`

`









`
`EXHIBIT A 
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`5
`
`

`

`Stephen A. Marshall | Attorney - Washington, DC | Fish
`
`
`
`Linked
`
`Twitter
`
`Facebo
`
`Google
`
`Bit.ly
`
`Email
`
`Addthis
`
` Menu
`
` Fish Team
`
`
`
` 
`
`Stephen A. Marshall
`Principal
`
` Washington, D.C.
`
`  202-626-6414
`
` smarshall@fr.com  Download vCard
`
`
`Background
`
`Steve Marshall is a Principal in the Washington, DC, ofce of Fish & Richardson. His practice focuses on complex patent
`litigation and counseling with an emphasis on embedded sysems and software, artifcial intelligence, and robotics. Mr. Marshall
`has litigated patent cases across a variety of indusries and technologies, including semiconductors, telecommunications,
`computer networking, optical data sorage, electro-optical/infrared countermeasures sysems, fre suppression sysems, and
`medical devices. Mr. Marshall has represented clients before U.S. Disrict Courts around the country, in the Court of Appeals for
`the Federal Circuit, and in Section 337 proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC).
`
`Mr. Marshall’s patent litigation experience covers all major aspects of litigation. He is experienced in pre-fling invesigations,
`case management, all phases of fact and expert discovery, including taking and defending depositions, motion practice, claim
`consruction, including arguing terms during Markman proceedings, summary judgment, trial, and appeal. He has been an
`active member of trial and appellate teams, and has taken tesimony at trial.
`
`Steve was previously a Summer Associate with the frm (2005). Mr. Marshall’s technical experience includes work as an
`Integration Engineer in EMC Corporation’s eLab (2000-2003), SAP Basis Adminisrator with The Gillette Company (1999), and
`an Analys in the SAP Solution Center at Andersen Consulting, LLP (1998-1999).
`
`Education
`J.D., Wake Fores University School of Law 2006
`
`Research Editor, Wake Fores Law Review
`cum laude, Order of the Coif
`
`B.S., University of Notre Dame 1998
`
`Computer Science
`cum laude, Tau Beta Pi
`Notre Dame Scholar
`
`Admissions
`• Massachusetts 2006
`• District of Columbia 2013
`
`https://www.fr.com/stephen-a-marshall/[8/22/2018 3:53:10 PM]
`
`6
`
`

`

`Stephen A. Marshall | Attorney - Washington, DC | Fish
`
`• U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`• U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
`• U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
`• U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
`• U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
`
`Other Disinctions
`Accolades
`
`Named a 2012 and 2014-2016 “Rising Star” by Super Lawyers Magazine
`
`Selected Publications
`
`“Enfsh and TLI: A Study of the CAFC’s Recent Section 101 Opinions ,” Fish Litigation Blog (May 31, 2016).
`
`“The Alice-Efect: An Empirical Study of Section 101 Motion Practice,” Fish Litigation Blog (March 9, 2015).
`
`Speaking Engagements
`
`Straford Webinar, “Patent Prosecution and Defeating Absractness: Minimizing the Risk of Section 101 Rejection,” (November
`10, 2016).
`
`Fish Insights Webinar, “Alice and Octane Fitness: Patent Reform in the Federal Judiciary,” (May 20, 2015).
`
`Experience
`Certain Robotic Vacuum Cleaning Devices and Components Thereof Such As Spare Parts; Inv. No. 337-TA-1057 (ITC) – Lead
`attorney representing Complainant iRobot in an invesigation relating to robotic vacuum cleaners, autonomous behavior, and
`embedded sysems processing.
`
`01 Communique Laboratory, Inc. v. Citrix Sysems, Inc. (N.D. Ohio) – Representing defendant Citrix in a case relating to remote
`computer access technology. Obtained jury verdict of non-infringement.
`
`Parallel Networks Licensing, LLC v. Microsoft Corp. (D. Del.) – Representing defendant Microsoft in a case relating to load
`balanced processing of dynamic Web page requess.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`view all
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Services
`
`
`
`• Litigation
`
`
`
`• ITC Litigation
`
`
`• Patent Litigation
`
`
`Indusries
`
`
`
`
`
`
`• Consumer Products
`
`
`
`
`
`
`• Electrical and Computer Technology
`
`
`
`• Hardware
`
`• Software
`• Telecommunications
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`What's trending with Steve
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Filter by
`
`Show All
`
`News
`
`
`
`
`
`Events
`
`Blogs
`
`
`
`
`
`Fish Litigation Blog
`Event
`Fish Litigation Blog
`Event
`November 10th, 2016
`| 1:00 pm EST
`May 31, 2016
`May 20th, 2015
`| 1:00 pm EDT
`March 9, 2015
`
`
`
`Straford Webinar: Patent Prosecution and DefeatingEnfsh and TLI: A Study of the CAFC’s Recent SectionINSIGHTS Webinar: Alice and Octane Fitness: PatentThe Alice-Efect: An Empiric
`Motion Practice
`
`Absractness: Minimizing the Risk of Section 101101 Opinions
`Reform in the Federal Judiciary
`Rejection
`
`Speaking Engagement Webinar
`
`
`Webinar
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`https://www.fr.com/stephen-a-marshall/[8/22/2018 3:53:10 PM]
`
`7
`
`

`

`Stephen A. Marshall | Attorney - Washington, DC | Fish
`
`News
`January 8, 2014
`Fish Elevates 14 Attorneys to Principal
`
`Press Release
`
`Author: Stephen A. Marshall
`
`News
`IP Litigation Federal Circuit
`
`January 21, 2009
`Fish settles patent case for Repligen
`
`Articles
`
`Author: Stephen A. Marshall
`
`IP Litigation
`
` load more topics
`
`MENU
`
` Careers
` News & Events
` Contact Us
`
` Austin
` Delaware
` New York
` Twin Cities
`
` Services & Industries
` Clients & Cases
`
`
`
`
` Boston
` Houston
` Silicon Valley
` Washington, D.C.
`
`Menu
`
`Quick Links
`
`People
`About Fish
`Offices
`
` Contact Us
`
`Atlanta
`Dallas
`Munich
`Southern California
`
` Global Reach
`
`© 2018 - Fish & Richardson
`
`Privacy Policy
`
`
`
`
`Disclaimer
`
`
`
`
`FISH On the Go
`
`
`
`
`Fish Internal
`
`
`
` 
`
`   
`
`
`
`
`https://www.fr.com/stephen-a-marshall/[8/22/2018 3:53:10 PM]
`
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket