throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 10
`Entered: January 19, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-02076
` Case IPR2017-020771
`Patent 8,531,971 B2
`____________
`
`Before PATRICK M. BOUCHER, JENNIFER MEYER CHAGNON, and
`MICHELLE N. WORMMEESTER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BOUCHER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Joint Motions to Terminate Proceedings
`35 U.S.C. § 317, 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The parties are not authorized to use this style of caption.
`
`

`

`IPR2017-02076
`IPR2017-02077
`Patent 8,531,971 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to our authorization, the parties filed Joint Motions to Terminate
`each of the captioned proceedings on January 18, 2018. Paper 8.2 The parties
`represent that they “have executed a settlement agreement that resolves all of their
`disputes concerning the ’971 Patent.” Id. at 1. With each of their Motions to
`Terminate, the parties filed what they represent is a “true and correct copy of that
`settlement agreement [as] Exhibit No. 1100.” Id. at 2. The parties additionally
`represent that “the document filed as Exhibit 1100 represents all agreements made
`in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of this proceeding” and
`that “[a]ll such agreements have been filed with the Board as required by
`[35 U.S.C.] § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b).” Id. The parties also request “that the
`settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information, be kept
`separate from the file of the involved patent[], and be made available only to
`Federal Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of
`good cause pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).” Id.
`The Office has not yet decided whether to institute these proceedings. We
`determine that good cause exists to terminate the proceedings with respect to all
`parties. After reviewing the parties’ settlement agreement, we find that the
`settlement agreement contains confidential business information regarding the
`terms of settlement. We determine that good cause exists to treat the settlement
`agreement as business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 Citations are to IPR2017-02076.
`
`2
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02076
`IPR2017-02077
`Patent 8,531,971 B2
`
`
`It is
`ORDERED that the joint Motions to Terminate are granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that these proceedings are hereby terminated as to
`both Petitioner and Patent Owner; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the filed settlement agreement (Ex. 1100 in both
`proceedings) be treated as business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`§ 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), and also remain designated as “Parties and
`Board Only” in PTAB E2E.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-02076
`IPR2017-02077
`Patent 8,531,971 B2
`
`PETITIONER
`
`Lori A. Gordon
`Daniel S. Block
`Tyler J. Dutton
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX
`lgordon-ptab@skgf.com
`dblock-ptab@skfg.com
`tdutton-ptab@skgf.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER
`
`Michael Hawkins
`Walter Renner
`Dan Smith
`Stuart Nelson
`Jun Li
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`hawkins@fr.com
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`dsmith@fr.com
`snelson@fr.com
`li@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket