throbber
ARTICLES
`
`
`Rapid turnover of plasma virions and CD4
`lymphocytesin HIV-1 infection
`David D. Ho, Avidan U. Neumann‘, Alan S. Perelson’, Wen Chen,
`John M. Leonard’ & Martin Markowitz
`Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, NYU School of Medicine, 455 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA
`* Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501, USA
`+ Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
`{ Pharmaceutical Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park,Illinois 60064, USA
`
`Treatment of infected patients with ABT-538, an inhibitor of the protease of human immuno-
`deficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), causes plasma HIV-1 levels to decrease exponentially (mean
`half-life, 2.1 + 0.4 days) and CD4 lymphocyte counts to rise substantially. Minimum estimates
`of HIV-1 production and clearance and of CD4 lymphocyte turnover indicate that replication of
`HIV-1 in vivo is continuous and highly productive, driving the rapid turnover of CD4 lymphocytes.
`
`
`In HIV-1 pathogenesis, an increased viral load correlates with
`CD4 lymphocyte depletion and disease progression' °, but rela-
`tively little information is available on the kinetics of virus and
`CD4 lymphocyte turnoverin vivo. Here we administer an inhibi-
`tor of HIV-1 protease, ABT-538 (refs 10, 11), to twenty infected
`patientsin order to perturb the balance between virus production
`and clearance. From serial measurements of the subsequent
`changes in plasma viraemia and CD4 lymphocyte counts, we
`have been able to infer kinetic information about the pretreat-
`ment steady state.
`ABT-538 has potent antiviral activity in vitro and favourable
`pharmacokinetic and safety profiles in vivo'®. It was adminis-
`tered orally (600-—1,200 mg per day) on day 1 and daily thereafter
`to twenty HIV-1-infected patients, whose pretreatment CD4
`lymphocyte counts and plasmaviral levels ranged from 36 to
`490 per mm* and from 15x 10° to 554 16° virions per ml,
`respectively (Table 1). Post-treatment CD4 lymphocyte counts
`were monitored sequentially, as were copy numbersofparticle-
`associated HIV-! RNAin plasma, using an ultrasensitive assay
`(Fig.
`1 legend) based on a modification of the branched DNA
`signal-amplification technique'~'’. The trial design and clinical
`findings of this study will be reported elsewhere (M.M. efal.,
`manuscript in preparation).
`
`Kinetics of HIV-1 turnover
`Following ABT-538 treatment, every patient had a rapid and
`dramatic decline in plasma viraemia over the first two weeks.
`As shown using three examples in Fig.
`la, the initial decline
`in plasma viraemia was-always exponential, demonstrated by a
`straight-line fit to the data on a log plot. The slope ofthis line,
`as defined by linear regression, permitted the half-life (t,,.) of
`viral decay in plasma to be determined (Fig.
`|
`legend): for
`example, patient 409 was found to have a viral decay slope of
`—0.47 per day, yielding a t,,2 of 1.5 days (Fig. 1a). Hence the
`rate and extent of decay of plasma viraemia was determined for
`each patient. As summarized in Fig. 1b, in every case there was
`a rapid decline, the magnitude of which ranged from 11- to 275-
`fold, with a mean of 66-fold (equivalent to 98.5% inhibition).
`The residual viraemia may be attributable to inadequate drug
`concentration in certain tissues, drug resistance, persistence of a
`small long-lived virus-producing cell population (such as macro-
`phages), and gradual activation of a latently infected pool of
`cells. As summarized in Table 1, the viral decay slopes varied
`from —0.21 to —0.54 per day, with a mean of —0.34+0.06 per
`day; correspondingly, t),2 varied from 1.3 to 3.3. days, with a
`mean of 2.140.4 days. The latter value indicates that, on aver-
`NATURE - VOL 373 - 12 JANUARY 1995
`
`age, half of the plasma virions turn over every two days, showing
`that HIV-1 replication in vivo must be highly productive.
`The exponential decline in plasma viraemia following ABT-
`538 treatment reflects both the clearance of free virions and the
`loss of HIV-1-producing cells as the drug substantially blocks
`new rounds of infection. But although drug inhibition is prob-
`ably incomplete and virus-producing cells are not lost immedi-
`ately, a minimum valueforviral clearance canstill be determined
`(Fig.
`1
`legend) by multiplying the absolute value of the viral
`decay slope by the initial viral load. Assuming that ABT-538
`administration does not affect viral clearance, this estimate is
`also valid before treatment. As the viral load varies little during
`the pretreatmentphase (Fig. 1a, and data not shown), we assume
`there exists a steady state and hence the calculated clearance
`rate is equal to the minimum virion production rate before drug
`therapy. Factoring in the patient’s estimated plasma and extra-
`cellular fluid volumes based on body weight, we determined the
`minimum daily production and clearance rate of HIV-1 particles
`for each case (Table 1). These values ranged from 0.05 to
`
`2.07 x 10° virions per day with a mean of 0.68 + 0.13 x 10” virions
`per day. Although these viral turnover rates are already high,
`true values may be up to a few-fold higher, depending on the
`ty. of virus-producing lymphocytes. The precise kinetics of this
`additional parameter remains undefined. However, the mean ¢;/2
`of virus-producing cells is probably less, or in any case cannot
`be much larger, than the mean 1,2 of 2.1 days observed for
`plasma virion elimination, demonstrating that
`turnover of
`actively infected cells is both rapid and continuous. It could also
`be inferred from our data that nearly all (98.5%) of the plasma
`virus must come from recently infected cells.
`Examination of Fig. 1b shows that the viral decay slopes
`(clearance rate constants) are independent of the initial viral
`loads. The slopes do not correlate with the initial CD4 lympho-
`cyte counts (Fig. 2a), another indicator of the disease status of
`patients. Therefore these observations strongly suggest that the
`viral clearance rate constant is not dependent on the stage of
`HIV-1 infection. Instead, they indicate that viral load is largely
`a function of viral production, because clearance rate constants
`vary by about 2.5-fold whereas the initial loads vary by almost
`40-fold (Table 1).
`
`Kinetics of CD4 lymphocyte turnover
`After ABT-538 treatment, CD4 lymphocyte counts rose in each
`of the 18 patients that could be evaluated. As shownin three
`examples in Fig. 3, some increases were dramatic (patient 409,
`for example) whereas others (such as patient 303) were modest.
`Based on the available data, it was not possible to determine
`123
`
`Ambry Exhibit 1018
`
`Ambry Exhibit 1018
`
`

`

`ARTICLES
`
`
`
`
`lope:
`—0.
`
`ty: 2.2 days
`42
`‘
`
`
`
`Slope: 0.47 -
`fy: 1.5 days
`ri2ea:
`:
`
`409
`
`& 1,000
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`100
`
`10
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`— x E o
`
`oy
`
`A &Q
`
`a.
`Q0
`<
`~%
`
`Zm
`
`0.1
`-10 -5
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10 15 20 25 30
`
`-10 -5
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10 15 20 25 30
`
`-10 -5
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10 15 20 25 30
`
`Days
`
`
`
`load before and after ABT-538 treatment was
`FIG. 1 a, Plasma viral
`begun on day 1 for three representative cases. Plasma samples were
`tested with the branched DNAsignal-amplification assay as previously
`described*?**. Those samples with RNA levels below the detection sen-
`sitivity of 10,000 copies per ml were then tested using a modified
`assaydiffering from the original in two ways: hybridization of the bDNA
`amplification system is mediated by binding to overhangs on contiguous
`target probes; and the enzymatic amplification system has been
`enhanced by modification of wash buffers and the solution in which the
`alkaline phosphatase probeis diluted. The results of these changes
`are a diminution of background signals, an enhancementof alkaline
`phosphatase activity, and thus a greater detection sensitivity (500
`copies per ml). Linear regression was used to obtain the best-fitting
`straight line for 3-5 data points between day 1 andtheinflection point
`before the plateau of the new steady-state level. The slope, S, of each
`line represents the rate of exponential decrease; that is, the straight-
`line fit
`indicates that the viral
`load decreases according to Vit)=
`V(O) exp (—St). Given
`the
`exponential
`decay, VUts,2)=WO)//2=
`VO) exp (—St1,2), and hencetheviral half fife, t1,2=1n (2)/S. Before drug
`administration, the change in viral load with time can be expressed by
`1
`the differential equation, dV/dt= P—cV, wherePis the viral production
`rate, c is the viral clearance rate constant, and V is the number of
`plasma virions. During the pretreatment steady state, dV/dt=0, and
`hence P=cV. We havealso tested moreintricate models, in which the
`viral decay is governed by two or three exponential rates, namely the
`viral clearance rate, the decay rate of virus-producing cells, and the
`decay rate of latently infected cells. But there are insufficient data at
`this time to estimate the multiple parameters separately. Nonetheless,
`using the model in ref. 14, we find that if the death rate of latently
`infected cells is very small compared with the other two rates, then
`viral decay follows a simple exponential decline, with S=c, because
`the slow activation of a large numberof latently infected celis offsets
`the loss of actively infected cells. Irrespective of the model, on a log
`plot, S=—d(In V)/dt=c— P/V.If drug inhibition is complete and virus-
`
`0.1
`-10 5 0
`
`5
`
`10 15 20 25 30
`
`Days
`
`producing ceils are rapidly lost (so P=0), then S=c.If virat production
`continues, S is still <c, so the slope is a minimum estimate of the
`viral clearance efficiency. b, Decline of plasma viral load after ABT-538
`treatmentin all 20 patients. The slope for each case was obtained as
`already discussed, and the length of each line was determined by the
`initial viral load and the new steady-state level.
`
`10,000
`
`b
`
`S 1,000
`
`100
`
`10
`
`x =33
`
`6
`‘a°o
`Z
`
`with confidence whetherthe rise wasstrictly exponential (Fig. 3,
`top) or linear (Fig. 3, bottom). An exponential increase would
`be consistent with proliferation of CD4 lymphocytes in the per-
`iphery, particularly in secondary lymphoid organs, whereas a
`linear increase would indicate cellular production from a pre-
`cursor source such as the thymus'*. Given that the thymusinvo-
`lutes with age and becomes further depleted with HIV-1
`infection'®, it is more likely that the rise in CD4 lymphocytes is
`largely due to proliferation. Nevertheless, as both components
`may contribute, we analysed the obseved CD4 lymphocyte data
`by modelling both exponential and linear increases.
`124
`
`The slope of the line depicting the rise in CD4 lymphocyte
`counts on a log plot was determined for each case (Fig. 3, top).
`Individual slopes varied considerably, ranging from 0.004 to
`0.088 per day, with a mean of 0.047 per day (Table 1), corre-
`sponding to a mean doubling time of ~15 days (Fig. 3 legend).
`On average, the entire population of peripheral CD4 lympho-
`cytes was turning over every 15 days in our patients during the
`pretreatment steady state when CD4 lymphocyte production and
`destruction were balanced. Moreover, the slopes were inversely
`correlated with baseline CD4 lymphocyte counts (Fig. 26) in
`that patients with lower initial! CD4 cell counts had more pro-
`NATURE - VOL 373 - 12 JANUARY 1995
`Ambry Exhibit 1018
`
`Ambry Exhibit 1018
`
`

`

`TABLE 1 Summary data of H!V-1 and CD4 lymphocyte turnover during the pretreatment steady state
`
`Baseline values
`Kinetics of HIV-1 turnover
`Kinetics of CD4 lymphocyte turnover*
`Minimum
`Minimum
`
`production and destruction
`production and
`clearancet
`(virions per
`day x 10°)
`0.56
`0.26
`0.11
`0.54
`0.50
`1.27
`1.48
`1.85
`0.05
`0.51
`0.30
`0.88
`0.47
`0.21
`0.74
`1.06
`0.08
`0.08
`2.07
`0.53
`
`ARTICLES
`
`Slope
`0.070 (6.9)
`0.004 (0.5)
`0.005 (1.4)
`0.019 (1.9)
`0.055 (21.5)
`0.058 (25.7)
`0.020 (9.1)
`0.088 (11.8)
`0.038 (15.6)
`0.064 (11.0)
`0.048 (4.5)
`0.077 (5.9)
`NA
`0.014 (3.1)
`0.015 (2.4)
`0.080 (8.5)
`NA
`0.059 (3.4)
`0.073 (15.9)
`0.051 (5.6)
`
`Blood§
`(cells per day x 10°)
`21.7 (28.1)
`4.3
`(2.7)
`99
`(9.5)
`22.2 (13.0)
`108.0 (157.0)
`105.0 (150.0)
`55.9 (65.8)
`20.7 (56.6)
`71.0 (81.9)
`38.9 (62.8)
`17.0 (26.9)
`24.7 (40.5)
`NA
`13.4 (17.4)
`13.8 (18.7)
`24.6 (57.5)
`NA
`12.5 (19.7)
`35.3 (115.0)
`32.4 (34.5)
`
`Total ||
`(cells per day x 10°)
`1.1 (1.4
`0.2 (0.1)
`0.5 (0.5
`1.1 (0.6)
`5.4 (7.8
`5.3 (7.5)
`2.8 (3.3
`1.0 (2.8)
`3.6 (4.1
`2.0 (3.1
`0.8 (1.4
`1.2 (2.0
`NA
`0.7 (0.9
`0.7 (0.9
`1.2 (2.9
`NA
`0.6 (1.0)
`1.8 (5.7
`1.6 (1.7)
`
`
`
`cb4
`ceil count
`(mm7*)
`76
`209
`293
`174
`269
`312
`386
`AQ
`357
`107
`59
`47
`228
`169
`120
`46
`490
`36
`67
`103
`
`Piasma
`viraemia
`(virions per
`ml x 10°)+
`193
`80
`41
`121
`88
`475
`185
`554
`15
`130
`70
`100
`101
`55
`126
`244
`18
`23
`256
`99
`
`Patient
`301
`302
`303
`304
`305
`306
`308
`309
`310
`311
`312
`313
`401
`402
`403
`404
`406
`408
`409
`410
`
`tye
`(days)
`2.3
`2.6
`3.3
`2.5
`2.1
`1.3
`1.5
`2.4
`2.7
`2.4
`2.3
`1.3
`1.7
`2.5
`2.2
`2.6
`2.2
`2.8
`1.5
`1.9
`
`Slope
`0.30
`—0.27
`—0.21
`—0.28
`—0.33
`—0.52
`—0.46
`—0.29
`—0.26
`—0.29
`—0.30
`—0.54
`—0.40
`-0.28
`—0.32
`—0.27
`—0.31
`—0.25
`—0.47
`—0.36
`—0.214
`-0.54
`—0.34+0.06
`
`to
`
`Range
`Mean
`
`36-490
`
`180+46
`
`15-554
`134+440
`
`1.3-3.3
`
`2.1404
`
`0.05-2.07
`
`0.684 0.13
`
`0.004-0.088 (0.5-25.7) 4.3-108.0 (2.7-157.0)
`0.047 (8.6)
`35.1 (53.2)
`
`0.2-5.4 (0.1-7.8)
`1.8 (2.6)
`
`*The results for the kinetics of CD4 lymphocyte turnover generated by an exponential growth model are shown without parentheses; results generated by a linear
`production model are shownin parentheses.
`¥ Each virion contains two RNA copies.
`t Calculated using plasma and extracellular fluid volumes estimated from body weights, and assuming that plasma and extracellular fluid compartments are in
`equilibrium.
`§ Calculated using blood volumes estimated from body weights.
`|| Calculated on the assumption that the lymphocyte pool in blood represents 2% of the total population*®. NA, not analysed owing to large fluctuations in CD4cell
`counts.
`
`minentrises. This demonstrates convincingly that the CD4 lym-
`phocyte depletion seen in AIDS is primarily a consequence of
`the destruction of these cells induced by HIV-1 not a lack of
`their production.
`As ABT-538 treatment reduces virus-mediated destruction of
`CD4 lymphocytes, the observed increase in CD4 cells provides
`a minimum estimate (Fig. 3 legend) of the pretreatment CD4
`lymphocyte production rate, which in turn equals the destruction
`rate during the steady state. Minimum production (destruction)
`
`rates were calculated for each case by multiplying the slope,
`the initial CD4 cell count, and the estimated blood volume.
`The minimum numbers of CD4 cells in blood produced or
`destroyed each day ranged from 4.3 x 10° to 108 x 10°, with
`a mean of 35.1 x 10° (Table 1). Given that the blood lympho-
`cyte pool
`is about 2% of the total population'®,
`the overall
`CD4 lymphocyte turnover in our patients was calculated to
`vary from 0.2 x 10° to 5.4% 10° cells per day, with a mean of
`1.8 x 10 cells per day.
`
`constant) 0
`—Slope(HIVclearancerate
`
`
`
`300
`
`400
`
`500
`
`100
`
`200
`
`increase 0
`ExponentialslopeofCD4
`
`
`100
`
`200
`
`300
`
`400
`
`Baseline CD4 cell count
`
`Baseline CD4 cell count
`
`FIG. 2 a, Lack of correlation between viral decay slopes and disease
`status as
`indicated by baseline CD4
`cell
`counts. Correlation
`coefficient =0.05 (P value >0.1). b, Inverse correlation between the
`exponential CD4 increase slopes and baseline CD4cell counts. Correla-
`tion coefficient =—0.57 (P value <0.01). Such an inverse correlation
`
`would be expected if T-cell proliferation were governed by a density-
`dependent growth function (logistic, for example), in which the growth
`rate decreases with increasing population level, if T cells were produced
`from precursors at a constant rate or from a combination of these two
`effects.
`
`NATURE - VOL 373 - 12 JANUARY 1995
`
`Ambry Exhibit 1018
`
`125
`
`Ambry Exhibit 1018
`
`

`

`ARTICLES
`
`
`FIG. 3 Increase in CD4 cell counts after ABT-538 treatment plotted on
`a logarithmic (top) or linear (bottom) scale. Each slope was obtained
`from the best-fit line derived from linear regression on 2-4 data points.
`In the model for exponential
`increase, the doubling time was deter-
`mined by dividing In (2) by the slope. From the slope, we obtained
`minimum estimates of the CD4 lymphocyte production rate. The change
`in CD4 cell number over time can be described by the equation,
`dT/dt=P—pT, where T is the cell count, P is the cell production rate,
`and yu
`is the cell decay rate. The slope, S, on a Jog plot is thus =
`d(In T)/dt = P/T— py. Hence, S x T must be less than P, showing that our
`estimates indeed represent minimum CD4 lymphocyte productionrates.
`Using a similar argument, slopes derived from a model of linear
`increases are also minimum estimates of CD4 lymphocyte production.
`
`CD4cellcount(permm3)
`
`
`
`CD4cellcount
`
`409
`403
`303
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10 15 20 25 30
`
`
`
`
`(permm3)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`oti :|||islope : 15.9:
`
`10-5 0
`5
`10 15 20 25 30
`-10-5 0
`5S
`10 15 20 25 30 -10 5 0
`5
`
`
`
`Days
`
`the CD4 lymphocyte depletion
`regenerative process. Second,
`seen in advanced HIV-1 infection may belikened to a sink con-
`taining a low waterlevel, with the tap and drain both equally
`wide open. As the regenerative capacity of the immune system
`is not infinite, it is not difficult to see why the sink eventually
`empties. It is also evident from this analogy that our primary
`strategy to reverse the immunodeficiency ought to be to target
`virally mediated destruction (plug the drain) rather than to
`emphasize lymphocyte reconstitution (put in a second tap).
`
`The increase in CD4 lymphocyte counts following ABT-538
`administration was also modelled linearly (Fig. 3, bottom). The
`slope of the line depicting the increase for each case was deter-
`mined, and the values varied from 0.5 to 25.7 cells per mm°*per
`day, with a mean of8.6 cells per mm* per day (Table 1). Using
`the same argument as for the exponential case, minimum esti-
`mates of total CD4 production (or destruction) rates at baseline
`were determined to vary from 0.1 x 10° to 7.8 x 10” cells per day,
`with a mean of 2.6 x 10° cells per day.
`Although our two sets of CD4 lymphocyte analyses do not
`Discussion
`yield identical numericalresults, they are in close agreement and
`Webelieve our new kinetic data have important implications for
`emphasize the same qualitative points about HIV-1 pathogen-
`HIV-1 therapy and pathogenesis. It is self evident that, with
`esis. The number of CD4 lymphocyte destroyed and replenished
`rapid turnover of HIV-1, generation of viral diversity and the
`each day is of the order of 10’, which is strikingly close to
`attendant increased opportunities for viral escape from thera-
`estimates of the total number of HIV-1 RNA-expressing lym-
`peutic agents are unavoidable sequelae’””°. Treatmentstrategies,
`phocytes in the body determined using in situ polymerase chain
`if they are to have a dramatic clinical impact, must therefore be
`reaction and hybridization methods*'’. In addition, CD4 replen-
`initiated as early in the infection course as possible, perhaps even
`ishment appears to be highly stressed in many patients in that
`during seroconversion. The rapid turnover of HIV-1 in plasma
`the faster production rates are ~25-78-fold higher than the slow-
`also suggests that current protocols for monitoring the acute
`est rate (Table 1), which is presumably still higher than the as-
`antiviral activity of novel compounds must be modified to focus
`yet-undefined normal CD4 turnover rate. The precise mechan-
`onthefirst few days following druginitiation. Ourinterventional
`isms of CD4 lymphocyte repopulation, however, will have to be
`approach to AIDS pathogenesis has shown that HIV-1 produc-
`addressed in the future by studies on phenotypic markers and
`tion and clearance are delicately balanced but highly dynamic
`functional status of the regenerating cells. Nonetheless, the rapid
`processes. Taken together, our findings strongly support the view
`CD4 lymphocyte turnover has several implications. First, the
`that AIDSis primarily a consequence of continuous, high-level
`apoptosis commonly observedin the setting of HIV-1 infection"
`replication of HIV-1, leading to virus- and immune-mediated
`O
`killing of CD4 lymphocytes.
`may simply be an expected consequenceof an active lymphocyte
`
`
`IeSOBNDARWNE
`
`Received 16 November; accepted 15 December 1994.
`Weiss, R. A. Science 260, 1273-1279 (1993).
`Ho, D. D., Moudgil, T. & Alam, M. New Engi. J. Med. 321, 1621-1625 (1989).
`. Simmonds,P. et al. J. Virol. 64, 864-872 (1990).
`Connor, R.
`|., Mohri, H., Cao, Y. & Ho, D. D. J. Virol, 67, 1772-1777 (1993).
`. Patterson, B. K. et al. Science 260, 976-979 (1993).
`Piatak, M. et al. Science 259, 1749-1754 (1993).
`Pantaleo, G. et al. Nature 362, 355-359 (1993).
`. Embretson, J. et al. Nature 362, 359-362 (1993).
`. Wain-Hobson, S. Nature 366, 22 (1993).
`. Kempf, D. et af. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. {in the press).
`11. Markowitz, M. et a/. J. Virol. (in the press).
`412. Pachi, C. et ai. J. AIDS (in the press).
`13. Cao, Y. et al. AIDS Res. Human Retroviruses (in the press).
`
`126
`
`14. Perelson, A. S., Kirschner, D. E. & De Boer, R. J. Math. Biosci. 114, 81-125 (1993).
`415. Grody, W. W., Fligiel, S. & Naeim, F. Am. J. clin. Path. 84, 85-95 (1985).
`16. Paul, W. E. Fundamental immunology (Raven, New York, 1985).
`17. Haase, A. T. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 724, 75-86 (1994),
`18. Ameisen, J. C. & Capron, A. immun. Today 12, 102-105 (1991).
`19. Wain-Hobson, S. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 3, 878~883 (1993).
`20. Coffin, J. M. Curr. Top. Microbiol. immun. 176, 143-164 (1992).
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. Wethank the patients for their participation, Y. Cao and J. Wilbur for
`assistance with branched DNA assays, A. Hsu and J. Valdes for input on trial design, and J.
`Moore and R. Koup for helpful discussions. This work was supported by grants from Abbott
`Laboratories, the NIH and NYU Center for AIDS Research, the Joseph P. and Jeanne M.Sullivan
`Foundation, Los Alamos National Laboratory LRDR Program and The Aaron Diamond
`Foundation.
`
`NATURE - VOL 373 - 12 JANUARY 1995
`Ambry Exhibit 1018
`
`Ambry Exhibit 1018
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket