throbber
SHORT COMMUNICATION
`
`Minisatellite "lsoallele" Discrimination in Pseudohomozygotes
`by Single Molecule PCR and Variant Repeat Mapping
`
`DARREN G. MONCKTON AND ALEC J. JEFFREYS1
`
`Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester L£1 lRH, United Kingdom
`
`Received April 1, 1991
`
`The DlS8 hypervariable minisatellite MS32 has a het(cid:173)
`erozygosity of 97.5% based on detectable differences in al(cid:173)
`lele length using standard Southern blot analysis. It has
`previously been shown that the basic repeat unit is in itself
`variable and that this may be used to map the internal
`structure of an allele. This method has already been used to
`establish that alleles of the same length may have differing
`internal structures between nonrelated individuals. We
`now extend this approach to demonstrate that two appar(cid:173)
`ently homozygous individuals are in fact heterozygotes.
`For each individual the two comigratory alleles were sepa(cid:173)
`rated, without cloning, using single molecule dilution
`(SMD) of genomic DNA and recovery with PCR. Mapping
`of the variant repeat units revealed highly diverged inter(cid:173)
`nal structures and, for one individual, a size difference of
`one repeat unit (29 bp). SMD and PCR recovery provide an
`efficient system for separating co migratory alleles without
`prerequiremen.t for knowledge of sequence differences.
`© 1991 Academic Pre .. , Inc.
`
`Minisatellite or variable number tandem repeat
`(VNTR) loci have proven to be of considerable im(cid:173)
`portance in a wide range of genetic applications, espe(cid:173)
`cially in the areas of individual identification (Jef(cid:173)
`freys et al., 1985) and gene mapping (Nakamura et al.,
`1987). The primary reason for their widespread use as
`genetic markers is their often very high level of allele
`polymorphism and resulting heterozygosity (Wong et
`al., 1987; Nakamura et al., 1987). Allelic state is
`usually determined by the measurement of DNA frag (cid:173)
`ment length estimated from Southern blot hybridiza(cid:173)
`tion of genomic DNA. This system is however limited
`by the resolving power of agarose gel electrophoresis,
`not only for distinguishing small differences in allele
`sizes between individuals, which can lead to spurious
`
`1 To whom correspondenr.e should be 11ddressed. •
`
`departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Dev(cid:173)
`lin et al., 1990), but also for discriminating between
`true and false homozygotes. However, allele length is
`not the only criterion by which minisatellite loci may
`be distinguished. DNA sequencing of human mini(cid:173)
`satellites has revealed repeat unit sequence variabil(cid:173)
`ity at almost all loci so far investigated (see Jeffreys et
`al., 1990). This additional level of polymorphism
`greatly extends the potential resolving power of mini(cid:173)
`satellite loci allowing alleles of similar, or even identi(cid:173)
`cal, size to be distinguished on the basis of internal
`structure.
`The DIS8 minisatellite (MS32) comprises a 29-bp
`repeat unit and has a reported heterozygosity of
`97.5% based on allele length (Wong et al., 1987). Se(cid:173)
`quencing of DIS8 has revealed an A toG transition in
`approximately 70% of the repeat units, resulting in
`the presence or absence of a Haeiii restriction site
`(Wong et al., 1987). In contrast, all repeat units are
`cut by the restriction enzyme Hinfi. The location of
`variant repeat units can be mapped in alleles ampli(cid:173)
`fied by PCR. Partial digestion of end-labeled alleles
`with Hinfi followed by gel electrophoresis and autora(cid:173)
`diography produces a continuous ladder of labeled
`DNA fragments from which the number of repeat
`units can be determined. Comparison of Haeiii and
`Hinfi partial digests enables each repeat unit to be
`scored as to whether or not it is cleaved by Haeili.
`Internal maps, or minisatellite variant repeat (MVR)
`haplotypes, thus generated can be simply encoded as a
`binary string of repeats cleaved or not cleaved by
`Haeiii (Jeffreys et al., 1990). We have previously
`shown that alleles of the same length shared by unre(cid:173)
`lated individuals may have widely differing internal
`structures, suggesting relatively distant genealogical
`origins (Jeffreys et al., 1990).
`Screening of D 1S8 across large panels of unrelated
`people revealed two individuals (AS89 and MACH, of
`Pakistani and Chinese descent, respectively) who by
`
`465
`
`GENOM!CS 11, 465-467 (1991)
`0888-7543/91 $3.00
`Copyright© 1991 by Academic Press, Inc.
`All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
`
`The Johns Hopkins University Exhibit JHU2008 - Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`466
`
`SHORT COMMUNICATION
`
`B
`
`A. 0 M A
`
`. .
`
`2.45-
`
`A
`
`kb
`4.361-
`
`2.322-
`2.027-
`
`lOx 6pg DNA
`lOx 3pg DNA
`lOx zero DNA
`kb ~~~
`--+++---+--+-++---+-----------
`
`AS89
`
`1··:.' • •
`
`MACH
`
`!Ox 6pg DNA
`lOx 3pg DNA
`lOx zero DNA
`kb ~~~
`-+-+-+-+-+------+-------------
`
`2.45-
`
`I • • • • •
`
`FIG. l. Separation of minisatellite alleles in pseudohomozygotes by single molecule dilution and PCR. (A) DlSB alleles amplified from
`total genomic DNA. For each individual 20 ng blood DNA was PCR amplified in a 10-)ll reaction using the nested primers Cl and D
`corresponding to the fianking region of the D1S8 minisatellite (Ref. (3)). Amplified allele~> were electrophoresed through a 1% agarose gel
`;>.. Hindlli marker DNA; 0, zero DNA negative control; M, amplified alleles from
`and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Lanes: >-.,
`individual MACH; A, amplified alleles from individual AS89. (B) Allele separation by single molecule dilution. For each individual, genomic
`DNA was diluted in 5 mMTris-HCl (pH 7.5) in the presence ofO.l !lM PCRprimers. Ten 10-111 PCRreactions containing either 6, 3, or 0 pg
`DNA were amplified for 28 cycles using the D1S8 minisatellite flanking primers A plus B. Products were detected by Southern blot
`hybridization. Primer sequences are given in Ref. (3). Derivatives Cl and Dl incorporate a 5' extension containing nn EcoRI restriction site
`that was used to generate end labeled PCR products.
`
`Sau3AI restriction digestion and Southern blot analy(cid:173)
`sis appeared to be homozygous for an approximately
`2.5-kb allele at D1S8 (data not shown), PCR amplifi(cid:173)
`cation of DlS8 from total genomic DNA revealed a
`single band on an ethidium bromide-stained gel for
`each individual (Fig. lA). To determine if these indi(cid:173)
`viduals were indeed true humozygotes we attempted
`to map the internal structures of these alleles. Inter(cid:173)
`nal mapping fro!ll total genomic DNA produced an
`ambiguous autoradiograph with widely differing band
`intensities, presumably reflecting a composite inter(cid:173)
`nal map derived from two comig:ratory but discrete
`alleles (Fig. 2, lanes marked T). Since the alleles were
`inseparable by standard agarose gel electrophoresis,
`the individual alleles were separated by single mole(cid:173)
`cule dilution (SMD) of genomic DNA (Jeffreys et al.,
`1990; Ruano et al., 1990) and recovery with PCR
`(Saiki et al., 1988) \ISing PCR primer pair A plus B,
`which correspond to the flanking sequence of the
`D1S8 minisatellite and allow amplification of the en(cid:173)
`tire minisatellite allele (Jeffreys et al., 1990). After 28
`cycles of amplification a 5-~1 aliquot was removed,
`electrophoresed, and Southern blot hybridized (Fig.
`1B). Internal nested primers C plus D were used to
`reamplify the alleles from each of the presumptive
`single molecule-positive reactions up to a level visible
`on an ethidium-stained gel. All four alleles were com(cid:173)
`pletely mapped from both ends using DNA derived
`from at least three separate single molecule reactions
`for each allele (Fig. 2).
`
`Individual AS89 was found to have two alleles of
`identical size, containing 71 repeat units, but of
`widely differing internal structures. One allele shares
`a 5' MVR haplotype common to many individuals
`(unpublished data). The other allele belongs to an(cid:173)
`other previously characterized set of homogeneous al(cid:173)
`leles composed almost entirely of repeats cleaved by
`Haelll. This individual is therefore a true heterozy(cid:173)
`gote at this locus. Analysis of the second individual
`MACH, of Chinese origin, revealed this person to be a
`compound heterozygote at this locus, each allele hav(cid:173)
`ing widely diverged internal structures and a length
`difference of 1 repeat unit (allele lengths 72 and 73
`repeat units). Both alleles describe new 5' haplotypes
`previously unseen in our studies on Caucasian individ(cid:173)
`uals (Jeffreys et al., 1990).
`Our method for internal mapping does not involve
`cloning of single amplified molecules (minisatellites
`are frequently unstable on cloning in Escherichia
`coli), but samples the average properties of the entire
`amplified pool of PCR products. For each allele at
`least three separate single molecule amplifications
`were performed and in no case was any MVR map
`discrepancy found between them. As noted in pre(cid:173)
`vious experiments (Jeffreys et al., 1990), it appears
`that Taq polymerase-induced misincorporation
`errors are not a problem with single molecule mini(cid:173)
`satellite mapping. Finally, in each case the superim(cid:173)
`position of the two separated alleles gave rise to the
`same composite map as derived from total genomic
`
`The Johns Hopkins University Exhibit JHU2008 - Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`SHORT COMMUNICATION
`
`467
`
`AS89
`
`MACH
`
`T
`A
`B
`,.........,,.........,,.........,
`F lf F H FH
`
`B
`A
`T
`·~~~
`FH
`I'll FH
`
`A
`
`B
`
`A589 allele B
`
`tYuuu.auuua.aoa• ........ ua-.aa.aaao.a&&euu~u~·.uaataaatt
`
`MA.Cti allele A
`
`tttaatu.~~tautu.t.taattt:aaauaaatantt41•t.taaatt.4a attaaatt.atttattatataatat
`
`DNA, confirming that the single molecule alleles
`recovered were the true alleles present in each indi(cid:173)
`vidual.
`Single molecule dilution and PCR recovery is a
`quick and efficient method for separating comigra(cid:173)
`tory alleles of the same locus. Moreover it has several
`further advantages over cloning direct from a geno(cid:173)
`mic library, requiring a very minimal quantity of in(cid:173)
`put DNA, as well as a suitability for isolation of prod(cid:173)
`ucts unstable in a bacterial host. Likewise, it offers
`advantages over cloning from a PCR-derived library
`in that it has very low probability of incorporating
`polymerase errors and removes the potential problem
`of heteroduplex-derived chimeric «alleles." It also as(cid:173)
`sumes no knowledge of internal sequence difference
`and thus allows isolation of uncharacterized polymor(cid:173)
`phisms.
`Internal mapping of minisatellites greatly en(cid:173)
`hances the effective resolution of an already highly
`informative set of markers, as demonstrated here by
`its ability to distinguish pseudohomozygotes from
`true homozygotes. D1S8 is one of the few minisatel(cid:173)
`lites for which an efficient internal mapping strategy
`has been developed so far, but work is in progress to
`increase the number of loci to which internal mapping
`can be applied. Internal mapping not only improves
`the general informativeness of minisatellite loci, but
`also provides important clues as to the evolution and
`generation of new alleles at these, some of the most
`invaluable, markers in the human genome.
`
`Internal mapping of PCR-amplified D1S8 alleles. In(cid:173)
`l<'IG. 2.
`ternal mapping of all alleles was performed as previously described
`(3). (A) End-labeled products were partially digested with Hinfl
`(F) or Hae!II (H), electrophoresed on a 1.2% agarose gel, dried, and
`autoradiographed. Lanes marked A and B are single molecule-de(cid:173)
`rived alleles; lanes marked T are internal maps derived from total
`genomic DNA. (B) Encoded maps of all four single molecule-de(cid:173)
`rived alleles, where A = repeat unit cleaved by Haelll and T = re(cid:173)
`peat unit not cleaved by Haeiii.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`Thanks are given to John Keyte for oligonucleotide synthesis,
`Mao Chen for supplying blood samples, and John Armour for tak(cid:173)
`ing them. This work was supported by grants to A.J.J. from the
`Medical Research Council and Wolfson Foundation. A.J.J. is a
`Lister Institute Research Fellow. D.G.M . is a Medical Research
`Council Research Student.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`2.
`
`1. DEVLIN, B., RISCH, N ., AND ROEDER, K. (1990) . No excess of
`homozygosity at loci used for DNA fingerprinting. Science
`249: 1416-1420.
`JEFFREYS, A. J., WILSON, V., AND THEIN, S. L. (1985). Individ(cid:173)
`ual-specific "fingerprints" of human DNA. Nature 316: 76-
`79.
`JEFFREYS, A. J., NEUMANN, R., AND WILSON, V. (1990) . Re(cid:173)
`peat unit sequence variation in minisatellites: A novel source
`of DNA polymorphism for studying variation 11nd mutation
`by single molecule analysis. Cell60: 473-485.
`4. NAKAMURA, Y., LEPPERT, M., O'CONNELL, P., WOLFF, R.,
`HOLM, T., CULVER, M., MARTIN, c., FUJIMOTO, E., HOFF, M.,
`KUMLIN, E ., AND WHITE, R. {1987). Variable number of tan-
`
`3.
`
`dem repeat markers for human gene mapping. Science 235:
`1616-1622.
`5. RuANO, G., Kmo, K. K., AND STEPHENS, J. C. (1990). Haplo(cid:173)
`type of multiple polymorphisms resolved by enzymatic am(cid:173)
`plification of single DNA molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
`USA 87: 6296- 6300.
`6. SAIKI, R. K., GELFAND, D. H ., STOFFEL, s., ScHARF, s. J.,
`HIGUCHI, R., HORN, G. T ., MULLIS, K. B ., AND ERLICH, H. A.
`(1988). Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA
`with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239: 487-491.
`7. WONG, Z., WILSON, V., PATEL, 1., POVEY, S., AND JEFFREYS,
`A. J. (1987). Characterization of a panel of highly variable
`minisatellites cloned from human DNA. Ann. Hum. Genet.
`51: 269-288.
`
`The Johns Hopkins University Exhibit JHU2008 - Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket