throbber
LETTERS TO NATURE
`
`Clonal expansion of p53 mutant
`cells is associated with
`brain tumour progression
`David Sldransky*, Tom Mikkelsent,
`Karl Schwechhelmer:j:, Mark L. Rosenblum§,
`Web Cavaneet & Bert Vogelstein*ll
`
`" The Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of
`Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA
`t Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Montreal, Province of Quebec,
`H3A 1A1, Canada
`; Abteilung Neuropatologl Pathologlscher lnstltut,
`Albert Ludwigs Universitat, Frieberg, Germany
`§ Brain Tumor Research Center, Department of Neurological Surgery,
`University of California Medical Center, San Francisco,
`California 94143, USA
`
`TUMOUR progression is a fundamental feature of the biology of
`cancer'. Cancers do not arise de novo in their final form, but begin
`as small, Indolent growths, which gradually acquire characteristics
`associated with malignancy. In the brain, for example, low-grade
`tumours (astrocytomas) e~olve into fa.'ltcr growing more dysplastic
`and invasive high-grade tumours (gliublas!omas)b. To define the
`genetic events underlying brain tumour progression, we analysed
`the p53 gene in ten primary brain tumour pairs. Seven pairs
`consisted of tumours that were high grade both at presentation
`and recurrence (group A) and three pairs consisted of low-grade
`tumours that had progressed to higher grade tumours (group B).
`In group A pairs, four of the recurrent tumours contained a p53
`gene mutation; In three of them, the same mutation was found In
`the primary tumour. In group 8 pairs, progression to high grade
`was associated with a pS3 gene mutation. A subpopulation of cells
`were present in the low-grade tumours that contained the same
`pS3 gene mutation predominant in the cells of the recurrent
`tumours that had progressed to glioblastoma. Thus, the histologi(cid:173)
`cal progression of brain tumours was associated with a clonal
`expansion of cells that had previously acquired a mutation In the
`p53 gene, endowing them with a selective growth advantage. These
`experimental observations strongly support Nowell's clonal
`evolution model of tumour progression4
`•
`Brain tumours, like most other tumour types, are associated
`with several genetic changes. Among these, loss or mitotio re(cid:173)
`7
`combination of chromosome 17p is common 5-
`• Furthermore,
`10
`in several glioblastomasK, as in many other tumour typcs9•
`,
`loss of one I7p allele correlates with mutation of p53 in the
`remaining allele. To evaluate the relationship between p53 and
`astrocytoma progression, tumour pairs were obtained from
`patients with brain tumours that had been surgically removed.
`Tumours were carefully dissected to ensure optimal removal of
`contaminating normal tissue. A portion of the p53 gene, includ(cid:173)
`ing exons 5-8, was amplified by the polymerase chain reaction
`(PCR) and subcloned into a phagemid vector; pooled clones
`were sequenced as previously described 11
`• Four group A tumours
`contained p53 mutations at recurrence and, in three, the identical
`p53 mutation was seen at initial presentation (Table 1 ). All were
`missense mutations resulting in nonconservative amino-acid
`changes. From the ratio of wild-type to mutant p53 alleles in
`the sequencing gels, it was clear that all group A tumours with
`p53 gene mutations had lost the wild-type allele.
`All three of the advanced tumours from group B (Fig. 1) had
`a p53 gene mutation. Again, all mutations were missense muta(cid:173)
`tions resulting in nonconservative amino-acid changes (Table
`1). Two of the three high-grade tumours (from patients 88 and
`89) had lost the wild-type allele. No evidence of these mutations
`was observed in the less advanced tumours of the pairs in the
`sequencing assays. But were these mutations present in a small
`
`II To whom correspondence shoulli be addressed
`
`846
`
`fraction of cells in the initial tumour, in a proportion not
`detectable by sequencing? We used a sensitive plaque assay to
`identify a potential cell minority containing p53 mutations
`among a majority of cells with normal p53 genes. The p53 gene
`was amplified through PCR as described above and the PCR
`products subcloned into a phage vector. Specific oligonucleo(cid:173)
`tides that recognize a mutant base pair in the p53 gene were
`then used to probe filter lifts of the phage plaques.
`Specific oligonucleotides were synthesized that would detect
`the mutations seen in the tumours of patients B8 and 89 and
`used to probe the cloned PCR products of the low grade tumours .
`A small number of positive plaques were seen in the low-grade
`tumours (Fig. 2). Positive plaques were picked and the phage
`DNA sequenced to confirm the presence of the mutation. Blots
`were then stripped and hybridized with a probe detecting all
`p53 clones (mutant plus wild type) to calculate the percentage
`of mutant p53 genes in the low-grade tumours. This showed
`that 8% and 21% of the tumour cells from patients 88 and 89,
`respectively, contained a mutant p53 gene. The high-grade
`tumours from both patients consisted of cells in which over 95%
`contained mutant p53 genes as assessed by the same assay.
`Histological sections were examined and all tumours were found
`to be contaminated by <10% noma! cells (Fig. 1).
`The low-grade component of the tumour from patient 810
`contained a p53 mutation at codon 253 and a light mutant band
`at codon 273 when pooled clones were sequenced, whereas the
`high-grade component was found to contain mutant bands of
`equal intensity at codons 253 and 273 (Table 1 ). After subcloning
`
`FIG. 1 Micrographs of tumours from patients in group B. The tumour from
`patient 10 had two distinct patterns (a and b). Most of the neoplasm was
`moderately cellular with a dense feltwork of glial processes. The nuclei of
`the glioma cells in a were mildly to moderately pleomorphic. Mitotic figures
`were rare and no vascular endothelial proliferation was identified. This region
`was classified as a moderately anaplastic astrocytoma. Sharply demarcated
`from this region and Invading the leptomeninges was a more cellular
`component of the neoplasm with larger nuclei, nuclear pleomorphism and
`multiple mitotic figures (b, small arrows). The glial feltwork was less exten(cid:173)
`sive and vascular endothelial proliferation (large arrow) was evident. This
`latter region was classified as glioblastoma multiforme. Both regions were
`glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) immunopositive, an indicator of their glial
`origin. The tumours in c and e also had features of low-grade glial tumours,
`whereas those in d and f had features of glioblastoma multiforme. a, c.
`and e, Initial low-grade tumours from patients B8, B9, and B10, respectively;
`b, d. and f. high-grade tumours from the same patients.
`
`NATURE · VOL 355 · 27 FEBRUARY 1992
`
`«:> 1992 Nature Publishing Group
`
`The Johns Hopkins University Exhibit JHU2011 - Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`Patient
`
`Initial
`tumour grade
`
`Initial tumour mutation•
`
`Time to
`progression
`(months)
`
`Progressed
`tumour
`grade
`
`TABLE 1 Mutations In each tumour
`
`Group A
`81
`82
`83
`84
`85
`86
`97
`Group B
`B8
`89
`810
`
`IV
`IV
`IV
`IV
`IV
`IV
`IV
`
`I
`II
`
`Codon 173 GTG-+ ATG, Val-+ Met
`Codon 244 GGC -+ AGC, Gly--> Ser
`Codon 248 CGG .... TGG, Arg-+ Trp
`None
`None
`None
`None
`
`None
`None
`Codon 253 ACC-> ATC, Thr--> Leu
`
`7
`13
`9
`11
`5
`9
`7
`
`15
`28
`0
`
`IV
`IV
`IV
`IV
`IV
`IV
`IV
`
`IV
`IV
`IV
`
`LETTERS TO NATURE
`
`Progressed tumour mutation
`
`Codon 173 GTG-+ATG, Vai-+Met
`Codon 244 GGC--> AGC, Gly .... Ser
`Codon 248 CGG-+ TGG, Arg .... Trp
`Codon 281 GAG-+ GAA, Asp-> Glu
`None
`None
`None
`
`Codon 27 3 CGT-> TGT, Arg .... Cys
`Codon 270 Tn-> Ctt, Phe .... Leu
`Codon 253 ACC-> A TC, Thr -+ Leu
`Codon 273 CGT-> TGT, Arg-+ Cys
`
`Group A tumours consisted of glioblastoma at both presentation and recurrence, whereas group B tumours were low-grade (I and 1\) at presentation and
`high-grade (Ill and IV) at recurrence. DNA was isolated from tumours and exons 5-8 of the p53 gene were amplified by the PCR, subcloned Into lambda
`Zap, and sequenced as described previously11 . The tumour from patient 810 contained two components, histologically and mechanically separable, from
`the same tumour.
`* As assessed by sequencing (see text).
`
`amplified DNA, individual clones were sequenced and these
`two mutations were found to reside on separate alleles. Using
`the oligonucleotide-specific hybridization method described,
`
`Low grade
`
`Tumour
`
`High grade 0 Coni 0 Coni
`
`FIG. 2 Clonal expansion of p53 mutant cells. Over 95% of the clones obtained
`by PCR from low-grade and high-grade tumours in patients 98 (top) and 99
`(bottom) hybridized to an oligonucleotide probe detecting all p53 clones
`(Tot). An oligonucleotide probe specific for mutant p53 at codon 273
`hybridized to only a small number of plaques (8%) In the \ow-grade tumour
`from patient 98 (top left), but hybridized to the majority of plaques (99%)
`in the high-grade tumour. A mutant-specific oligonucleotide probe for the
`high-grade tumour in 99 also hybridized to 21 o/o of clones in the low-grade
`tumour (bottom left) and 95% in the high-grade tumour. Neither of the
`mutant-specific probes hybridized to control plaques (far right) from another
`glioblastoma which contained a p53 mutation at a different codon.
`METHODS. Tumour DNAs were amplified using PCR, ligated to lambda Zap
`arms (Stratagene), packaged, plated at a density of 200-500 plaques per
`plate, and the plaque DNAs transferred to nylon membranes as described11
`.
`Mutant-specific o\igomers corresponding to the mutant sequences in the
`high-grade tumours were synthesized to recognize a mutation at codon 273
`(5' -TIGAGGTGTGTGTTIGTG-3') for tumours of patient 98 and 910; a mutation
`at codon 270 (5' -GGAACAGCCTIGAGGTGC-3') for tumours in patient 89; and
`a mutation at codon 253 (5'-CATCCTCATCATCATCAC-3') for the tumour in
`patient 910. As a control, the filters were rehybridized to an oligonucleotide
`probe for the wild-type sequence at codons 243 to 248 (5'-ATGGGCGGCAT(cid:173)
`GAACCGG-3'), which would identify all p53 clones (mutant or wild type, Tot).
`The oligomers were labelled with [32P]ATP and T4 kinase to a specific activity
`of 5 x 108 d.p.m. Hybridization with o\igomers was at 45 oc for 1 h. After
`hybridization, the membranes were rinsed in 3 xSSC (450 mM NaCI, 18 mM
`sodium citrate, 1 mM Tris, pH 7.2), 0.1% SDS at room temperature for 5 min
`and then washed at 2-5 •c below the calculated melting temperature. The
`blots were then briefly dried and exposed to film . For the one-allele tumours
`from patients 88 and 89, the percentage of mutant cells was calculated by
`counting the mutant clones and dividing this number by the total number
`of clones that contained p53 sequences. we assumed that the subset of
`cells in the \ow-grade tumours which contained a p53 gene mutation also
`had a concomitant deletion of the wild-type allele. as was found in the
`high-grade tumours of these patients.
`
`NATURE · VOL 355 · 27 FEBRUARY 1992
`
`phage plaques from low- and high-grade components were
`probed with an oligonucleotide specific ror the codon-253 muta(cid:173)
`tion, an oligonucleotide specific for the 273 mutation, and a
`normal oligonucleotide detecting all p53 clones (mutant and
`wild type). This analysis revealed that 60% of the cells in the
`low-grade component contained one allele which was wild type
`and one allele that was mutant at codon 253, whereas both
`alleles were mutant (one at codon 253 and one at codon 273)
`in 40% of the cells. Virtually all of the cells in the high-grade
`component contained
`two mutant alleles. Thus progres(cid:173)
`sion appeared to be associated with mutation of the second
`allele at codon 273 in a cell with a pre-existing mutation in the
`first allele.
`Nowell postulated that a cell acquiring a genetic change might
`acquire a selective growth advantage•. Clonal expansion of this
`cell, driven b.,Y succes ive mutation , would lead to tumour
`progression•·•-- Although the occurrence of evcral mutations
`1
`1
`has been observed in human tumours 13
`, evidence for clonal

`'
`expansion of a subpopulation of cells with a specific endogenous
`mutation has until now not been available. The data presented
`here suggest that mutation of p53 leads to a selective growth
`advantage in vivo that seems to be a critical step in transforma(cid:173)
`tion from low-grade to high-grade tumours. This provides a
`direct experimental demonstration of clonal expansion in a
`human tumour: a rare cell carrying a specific change in a critical
`gene became the dominant cell type as the tumour progressed.
`This concept will probably be useful in understanding the role
`of various oncogenes and suppressor gene mutations in the
`pathway to malignancy.
`0
`
`Received 8 November; accepted 12 December 1991
`1 Foulds, L Neap/liStie Development Vols 1 and 2 (Academic, London, 1969 and 1975)
`2 SCherer, H J A mer. J. Cancer 40, 159-198 (1940).
`3. Russel. D. S. & Rubenstein, L J In Pathology of Tumors of the Nervous System 4th edn 226-228
`(Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1977)
`4 . Nowell, p_ Science 194, 23-28 (1976).
`5. James, C. D ot ol. Cancer Res. 48, 5546- 5551 (1988)
`6 Blgner. 5 H era/. Cancer Res 48, 405-411 (1988).
`7 James, C. D eta/. Proc. naln. Acad. Set. U.S.A 86, 2858-2862 (1989).
`8_ Nigro, J. M et a/. Nature 342, 705-708 (1989)
`9 Baker, S. J. et at. Science 244, 21/- 221 (1989)
`10. Hollstein, M , Sidransky, 0 , Vogelstein, B. & Harris. C. C Science 263, 49-53 (19911.
`11. Sidransl<y, D. er at. Science 2112, 706- 709 (19911
`12 Kerbel R. S. Adv. Cancer Res 56, 87-132 (19901.
`13 Bishop. J. M Cell 64, 235-248 (1991).
`14. Fearon. E. R & Vogel stein, B Cell 81, 759-767 (1990)
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thari< S J Armond for photomicrographs and pathological description of
`the tumour In patient 810. J T Vogel stein for reading, and T. Gwiazda for preparation of the manuscript.
`Supporled by the Preuss Foundation and the NIH.
`
`847
`
`cC 1992 Nature Publishing Group
`
`The Johns Hopkins University Exhibit JHU2011 - Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket