throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K.K.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SEMICAPS PTE LTD.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR Number: IPR2017-02110
`
`Patent No. 7,623,982 B2
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO PATENT OWNER’S EVIDENCE
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`John G. Smith (Reg. No. 33,818)
`William S. Foster (Reg. No. 51,695)
`Christopher Bruenjes (Reg. No. 62,941)
`Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
`1500 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005-1209
`Phone: (202) 842-8800 (reception)
`Fax: (202) 842-8456
`Email:
`john.smith@dbr.com
`william.foster@dbr.com
`christopher.bruenjes@dbr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Petitioner Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.
`
`makes the following objections to the evidence submitted by Patent Owner
`
`SEMICAPS Pte Ltd. in support of its Patent Owner Preliminary Response (Paper 7).
`
`These objections are being timely filed and served within ten business days after the
`
`institution of trial, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1).
`
`Exhibit No.
`2009
`
`2012
`
`2014
`
`Basis of Objection
`Federal Rule of Evidence 106 – Patent Owner only included two
`pages of this book, and did not include the entire “Pulsed and
`Continuous Output” section or “Introduction & Overview”
`chapter in which the submitted pages are included. Petitioner
`requires that Patent Owner include at least the entire chapter
`because “in fairness [it] ought to be considered at the same time”
`as the portion that was submitted.
`Federal Rule of Evidence 106 – Patent Owner only included one
`page of this book, and did not include the entire “Pulsed Laser
`Beam Traits” section or chapter in which the submitted page is
`included. Petitioner requires that Patent Owner include at least
`the entire chapter because “in fairness [it] ought to be considered
`at the same time” as the portion that was submitted.
`Federal Rule of Evidence 106 – Patent Owner only included one
`page of this book, and did not include the entire section or chapter
`in which the submitted page is included. Petitioner requires that
`Patent Owner include at least the entire chapter because “in
`fairness [it] ought to be considered at the same time” as the
`portion that was submitted.
`
`Dated: April 2, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
`
`
`By:
`/John G. Smith/
`John G. Smith (Reg. No. 33,818)
`
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, I hereby certify that on this 2nd day of April,
`
`2018, I caused the foregoing document to be served via electronic mail on counsel
`
`for record for the Patent Owner as follows:
`
`David D. Schumann
`Hector Ribera
`Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang LLP
`548 Market Street, Suite 36117
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`david@martonribera.com
`hector@martonribera.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/John G. Smith/
`
`John G. Smith
`Reg. No. 33,818
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket