throbber
United States Patent
`Higsonetal.
`
`1:5
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45]
`Date of Patent:
`
`4,976,259
`Dec. 11, 1990
`
`[54]
`
`[75]
`
`ULTRASONIC NEBULIZER
`
`Inventors:
`
`James R. Higson, Santa Barbara;
`David A. D’Alfonso, Goleta; Robert
`R. Walls, Santa Barbara,all of Calif.
`
`[73]
`
`Assignee:
`
`Mountain Medical Equipment, Inc.,
`Denver, Colo.
`
`[21]
`
`[22]
`
`Appl. No.:
`Filed:
`
`266,823
`
`Nov.2, 1988
`
`[63]
`
`[51]
`[52]
`
`[58]
`
`[56]
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`Continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 944,203, Dec. 22,
`1986, abandoned.
`
`Unt, CLS oo. ceceecesessessetsccercetssscesssseees A61M 11/00
`US. Cl, esesecsscsssescseeseveees 128/200.18; 128/200.16;
`128/200.14; 238/107.1
`Field of Search................::000 128/200.14, 200.16,
`128/200.18; 239/102.1, 102.2
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3/1969 Scarpa ....escsersserercsecreeeseeres 259/1
`3,433,461
`3,774,602 11/1973 Edwards ...cssssesereesere 128/194
`
`8/1974 Buchet al. vss 239/102.2
`3,828,773
`
`1/1975 Harris et al. csccscecesenven 128/194
`3,861,386
`2/1975 Denton.........
`239/102.2
`3,866,831
`3,989,042 11/1976 Mitsui et ale scsccccssssessen 128/194
`4,001,650
`1/1977 Romain vvecscsscsceseusess 317/41
`4,094,317
`6/1978 Wasmich ssssssssssscsssssssen 128/194
`4,109,863
`8/1978 Olsonet al.....
`239/102
`4,113,809
`9/1978 ~- Abair etal.
`. 261/81
`4,646,967
`3/1987 Geithman. ...........eee 239/102.2
`
`
`
`
`
`Primary Examiner-—Randall L. Green
`Assistant Examiner—K. M.Reichle
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—JohbnE.Reilly
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`An ultrasonic nebulizer is of the type having a piezo-
`electric transducer communicating with a fluid reser-
`voir and is characterized by having a protective cover
`of a predetermined wavelength which is superimposed
`on the transducer, an elastomeric boot in surrounding
`relation to the coverto preventfluid loss from the inter-
`face between the cover and transducer, and an oil cou-
`pling medium is disposed in the interface for coupling
`the ultrasonic energy from the transducerto the cover.
`
`10 Claims, 6 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`PRIOR ART
`
`DPpe|
`
` 0
`
`INTLit
`TTDIMIM MEM
`
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 001
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 001
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 11, 1990
`
`Sheet 1 of 6
`
`4,976,259
`
`LUVYOldd
`
`gbud
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 002
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 002
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dee. 11, 1990
`
`Sheet 2 of 6
`
`4,976,259
`
`94
`
`90
`
`92
`
`86
`
`ao
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ioRSgoeNGal Y
`°6
`.Fug. 8
`
`60
`
`58 52
`
`54
`
`\64
`
`\66
`
`58
`
`
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 003
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 003
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 11, 1990
`
` LLLLLELLLLLLLLLLLLELLLLELELLLLLLLLLLLLLL
`
`
`SARA,
`.O04
`
`
`0&
`
`7,
`
`89
`
`LUVYOldd
`
`
`
`LLLLLELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLo
`
`
`Sheet 3 of 6
`
`4,976,259
`
`OP
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 004
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 004
`
`
`
`

`

`Sheet 4 of6
`
`4,976,259
`
`US. Patent
`
`Dec.11, 1990
`
`
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 005
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 005
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Dec. 11, 1990
`
`Sheet 5 of 6
`
`4,976,259
`
`Pug.
`
`10
`
`PRIOR ART
`
`LAA
`
`
`
`LLLLLLLLLLLL
`
`Pug. 7
`
`Petitioner
`
`Puzhen- Ex. 1014, p. 006
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 006
`
`
`

`

`
`
`US.Patent—Dee. 11, 1990 Sheet 6 of 6 4,976,259
`
`
`
`160
`|
`sa |
`
`feAS cI
`i52
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` =3 Sa
`
`
`Es
`
`
`
`
`
`eo
`
` RSS}
`
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 007
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 007
`
`

`

`4,976,259
`
`1
`
`ULTRASONIC NEBULIZER
`
`CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`This is a continuation-in-part application of Ser. No.
`944,203, filed Dec. 22, 1986, now abandoned by James
`R. Higson et al, and assigned to the assignee of the
`present invention. This invention relates to medical
`devices for the inhalation of medication and, morepar-
`ticularly, to a novel and improved nebulizer which is
`specifically adapted for use in the inhalation of medica-
`tion but having useful application on other devices em-
`ploying a piezoelectric crystal for ultrasonic stimulation
`and excitation such as emulsifiers, cleaners and thelike.
`
`BACKGROUND AND FIELD OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`Pulmonary drug delivery systems, commonly re-
`ferred to medically as nebulizers, come in various
`forms. These, in turn can be broken downinto various
`sub-groups. For example, the atomizer type of device
`uses the venturi principle of air passing across a pipe or
`orifice to draw liquid medication from a storage recepti-
`cal and atomizeit into small particles. Such devices can
`be operated by squeezing a bulb or with a pressurized
`container.
`When ultrasonic energy of the right frequency and
`poweris applied to a liquid, a very fine particle mist is
`released from the surface. At the frequency required to
`convert liquids, such as, water to a mist, the ultrasonic
`energy can be produced by electrically exciting a
`piezoelectric-material, such as, lead zirconate titonate,
`and mechanically coupling that material to the liquid.
`Of the total energy which enters a system of this type,
`some is converted to heat in the piezoelectric material,
`some may be converted to heat in the liquid, and the
`remainder is consumedat the liquid surface in the pro-
`cess of breaking away particles to form the mist.
`In a medical application, this process is called nebuli-
`zation and is used to convert medication to a mist for
`inhalation in the treatment.of respiratory disease. In
`orderto do this most effectively, the medication should
`be nebulized into particles or droplets of a particular
`size range and, as a general rule, the smaller the parti-
`cles the better the penetration of the particles into the
`lungs and the bronchial passageways.
`Earlier versions of ultrasonic nebulizers were in-
`tendedfor use primarily in the home or medical facility
`- environment. However, miniaturization and the avail-
`ability of small, highly efficient, rechargeable battery
`packs makeit highly desirable to provide portable ultra-
`sonic nebulizers which can be hand-carried and used as
`required in the treatment of respiratory disease.
`In the past, ultrasonic nebulizers which have em-
`ployed a piezoelectric material have encountered nu-
`merous problems, among which is the tendency of the
`material to rapidly degrade owing to the generation of
`heat, cavitation of the liquid caused by the high acoustic
`energy level, and chemical attack of the surface by
`medications and cleaning agents. Each time that acous-
`tic energy crosses from one material to another, someis
`passed and someis reflected. Any material positioned
`between the transducerand the liquid for-protecting the
`surface should possess high energy transmission effi-
`ciency and low energy reflection back to the trans-
`ducer. It has been found that this condition can be cre-
`ated by providing a thin coating or plating of approxi-
`
`20
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`mately 1/100 W,such as, teflon, polyimide or gold, or
`providing a cover having a thickness of W/2 or a multi-
`ple thereof, such as, W, 3W/2, 2W attachedto the trans-
`ducer surface where ¢Weo is the wavelength of the
`excitation signal. Glass is a preferred material for such a
`cover because it presents an easily cleaned and durable
`surface to the liquid and can tolerate high temperatures.
`Nevertheless, a coupling agent is required to bridge the
`air gap between the two surfaces. In U.S. Pat. No.
`4,109,863 to Olson et al, it was proposed to employ
`adhesives for this purpose. However, high temperatures
`tend to weaken the bondof the adhesive and cause poor
`acoustic coupling and increased reflected energy. Olson
`et al proposed to solve the problem of high tempera-
`tures at the transducer surface by circulating a cooling
`water over the transducer and glass, but this methodis
`not feasible for a portable handheld device and has the
`additional undesirable effect of acoustically damping
`the back side of the transducer and thus reducing the
`efficiency of the nebulizer system.
`Wehavefoundit desirable to employ oil of the cor-
`rect viscosity and temperature capability as a coupling
`agent. The oil tends to migrate toward the high energy
`density center of the transducer/glass interface and
`occurs even after high temperatures have forced some
`of the oil to the periphery. In order to overcome any
`tendency ofthe oil film to be too thin, causing reduced
`nebulization, the gap between the protective cover and
`the transducer surface must be so shaped as to provide
`an optimum oil film thickness thereacross which will
`avoid regularly generated reflections. Also it is impor-
`tant to contain the oil so that gravity and capillary
`forces do not carry it away from thegap during periods
`ofinactivity. Accordinglyit is important that the oil be
`confined or sealed in such a wayas to assure thatit will
`migrate towards the center of the gap when energyis
`applied. Moreover, another problem associated with
`the use of oil as a coupling agent is the presence of
`entrapped gas which, when released during operation,
`may displace the oil and uncouple the glass cover. It is
`therefore desirable to minimize the amountof entrapped
`gas present in the oil in the process of assembling the
`elements of the nebulizer and to make provision for
`accumulation of any entrapped gas which may escape
`from the transducer surface during its life.
`Amongvarious other prior art techniques, U.S. Pat.
`No.3,433,461 to Scarpa employs a piezoelectric crystal
`bonded to a support layer. Both the crystal and the
`support layer were chosen to be one-half wavelength in
`thickness and bonded together with an adhesive to form
`a composite structure one wavelength in thickness. This
`structure is supported aroundits periphery and contains
`a thin web between the vibrating center and supported
`periphery to prevent support structure loading whichis
`counter productive to efficient high energy vibration.
`Other patents of interest are U.S. Pat. No. 4,094,317 to
`Wasnich and U.S.Pat. No. 3,861,386 to Harris where an
`acoustic wave form is shaped to perform ultrasonic
`nebulization of the liquid andtoisolate the liquid from
`the piezoelectric crystal and prevent dry operation of
`the device.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`It is therefore an object of the present invention to
`provide for a novel and improved ultrasonic nebulizer
`whichis capable ofefficient acoustical coupling of en-
`ergy from a piezoelectric crystal into the medication
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 008
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 008
`
`

`

`4,976,259
`
`4
`mined wavelength superimposed on the transducer, the
`cover member and transducer having generally planar
`confronting surfaces and a common interface therebe-
`tween, annular sealing means in outer surrounding rela-
`tion to the cover member to prevent the loss of fluid
`from the interface, and oil coupling meansin the inter-
`face for coupling the ultrasonic energy from the trans-
`ducer to the cover member. Most desirably the trans-
`ducer is a piezoelectric crystal having a top electrode
`extending down the sides and wrapping around the
`bottom edge and a bottom disc electrode of substan-
`tially smaller diameter than the diameter of the piezo-
`electric crystal whereby the electrical contact to the
`bottom of the piezoelectric crystal thereof is adjacent to
`the center thereof.
`
`3
`being nebulized without significant attenuation and
`wherein the crystal itself is protected from undesired
`early destruction.
`Another object of the present invention is to provide
`in an ultrasonic nebulizer for a novel and approved
`piezoelectric transducer and wherein the means for
`acoustically coupling the ultrasonic energy from the
`piezoelectric element to a face plate is a liquid; and
`further wherein the gap formed betweenthe face plate
`and piezoelectric element is so formed that the energy
`transfer is maximized and heating minimized so as to
`avoid the necessity for external means of cooling.
`A further object of the present invention is to provide
`in an ultrasonic nebulizer for a novel and improved
`method and means for mounting a piezoelectric crystal
`and protective cover and face plate which will maintain
`an optimum gap between the elements notwithstanding
`pressure increases created by thermal expansion of the
`coupling fluid; and further wherein the mounting means
`will act as a reservoir for the coupling fluid and retain
`any entrapped gases therein so as to prevent decay of
`the coupling efficiency otherwise resulting from gas
`build up.
`It is an additional object of the present invention to
`provide for a method of assembly of a piezoelectric
`crystal
`in an ultrasonic nebulizer
`to minimize the
`amount of entrapped gases in a coupling fluid between
`the crystal and face plate and to effectively seal the
`crystal and the face plate along with the coupling fluid
`for most efficient energy transfer between the crystal
`and the face plate.
`It is still an additional object of the present invention
`to provide for a novel and improved nebulizer which
`will maximize the isolation and removal of optimum
`size particles for inhalation by the user as well as to
`more effectively collect and renebulize larger particles
`in such a way as to minimize clogging or impaction of
`the particles.
`In accordance with the present invention, the forego-
`ing objectives have been attained in an assembly having
`a cavity therein for holding a liquid medication to be
`nebulized by a piezoelectric crystal disposed in commu-
`nication with the cavity and separated from medication
`contained in the cavity by a thin cover of a material
`having characteristics for allowing it to match acousti-
`cal impedances withoutsignificant attenuation, such as,
`those possessed by glass,
`the crystal being disposed
`adjacent to the cover; a thin film of an energy-coupling
`fluid interposed between the cover and the surface of
`the crystal; and, sealing means for the cover and the
`surface of the crystal for preventing loss of fluid from
`between the cover and the surface of the crystal.
`In one embodiment, the cavity has a hole in the bot-
`tom thereof communicating with the surface of the
`crystal; and, the cover comprises a sheet of glass, or the
`like, disposed over the surface of the crystal.
`In a second embodiment, the cavity has a hole in the
`bottom thereof communicating with the surface of the
`crystal; and, the cover comprises the bottom ofa uni-
`tary bowlinsert of a glass-like material inserted into the
`cavity. In a third embodiment, the bowl unit is of uni-
`tary construction and the cover comprises the bottom
`of the cavity which is formed therein.
`In a preferred apparatus for the ultrasonic nebuliza-
`tion of fluids wherein a piezoelectric transduceris dis-
`posed in communication with a reservoir for nebulizing
`liquid medication in the reservoir,
`the improvement
`comprises a protective cover member of a predeter-
`
`20
`
`25
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG.1 is a partially exploded, simplified, cutaway
`drawing of a prior art ultrasonic nebulizer;
`FIG.2 is a drawing ofthe prior art nebulizer of FIG.
`1 shown assembled and showing its manner of opera-
`tion;
`FIG.3 is an enlarged, detailed, cutaway drawing of
`the bowl portion of a nebulizer according to the present
`invention in a first embodiment thereof;
`FIG. 4 is a simplified cutaway drawing through a
`piezoelectric crystal as employedin prior art ultrasonic
`nebulizers showing the mannerof vibrational propaga-
`tion therethrough;
`FIG. 5 is a simplified cutaway drawing through a
`piezoelectric crystal as employedin the ultrasonic nebu-
`lizer of the present invention with its protective cover-
`ing and showing the mannerofvibrational propagation
`therethrough; -
`FIG. 6 is an enlarged, detailed, cutaway drawing of
`the bowl portion of a nebulizer according to the present
`invention in a second embodimentthereof;
`FIG. 7 is an enlarged, detailed, cutaway drawing of
`the bowl portion of a nebulizer according to the present
`invention in a third embodiment thereof;
`FIG.8 is a simplified cutaway drawing through a
`prior art vibrational surface specially shaped to direct
`the energy waves toward the center thereof;
`FIG. 9 is a simplified cutaway drawing through a
`prior art composite structure for a piezoelectric crystal
`wherein the crystal is adhesively attachedto a vibrating
`support structure and the virbating portion is decoupled
`from the actual support area;
`FIG. 10 is a simplified cutaway through a prior art
`structure wherein the liquid to be nebulized is contained
`in a separate container;
`FIG. 11 is a sectional view of a preferred form of
`portable nebulizer unit in accordance with the present
`invention;
`FIG.12 is a detailed view in section of the piezoelec-
`tric transducer assembly; and
`FIG. 13 is a bottom view of the preferred form of
`crystal employed in accordance withthe present inven-
`tion.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
`
`65
`
`Asa setting for the present invention, prior art nebu-
`lizers, such as, that generally indicated at 10 in FIG. 1 in
`exploded view, comprise a power pack 12 containing
`batteries, not shown,
`if it
`is a portable unit, or are
`adapted to be plugged into a wall outlet in the case of
`non-portable units. The power pack 12 is connected by
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 009
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 009
`
`

`

`4,976,259
`
`5
`powercable 14 to the nebulizing unit 16. The nebulizing
`unit 16, in turn, comprises a bowl portion 18 over which
`a cover 20 is adapted to be positioned. The cover 20 has
`a mouthpiece mounting tube 22 through the sidewalls
`thereof into which mouthpiece 24 can be pressfit. For
`ease of manufacture and assembly, the bowl portion 18,
`cover 20, tube 22 and mouthpiece 24 are usually cylin-
`drical in cross section. The same components are also
`typically made of high impactplastic for light weight,
`ease of cleaning, and non-contamination. The bowl
`portion 18 contains a bowl-shaped cavity 26 in the top
`thereof into which the liquid medication 28 (see FIG.2)
`is poured. A piezoelectric crystal 30 is positioned under
`the cavity 26 and the bottom of the cavity 26 has a
`circular hole 32 therein communicating with the top of
`the piezoelectric crystal 30. To activate the unit, the
`button 34 on the top of the power pack 12 is depressed,
`causing the piezoelectric crystal 30 to have power ap-
`plied thereto. That, in turn, causes the crystal 30 to
`vibrate at ultrasonic frequency and nebulize a portion of
`the liquid medication disposed within the hole 32 and on
`top of the surface of the piezoelectric crystal 30. The
`atomized droplets 36 produced are inhaled through the
`mouthpiece 24 in combination withair, indicated by the
`arrows38, which is drawn in through the entry pipe 40
`in the top of the cover 20 provided for that purpose.
`Suchprior art devices made and operating according
`to the foregoing description work adequately for their
`intended purpose with a major shortcoming that the
`piezoelectric crystal is rapidly destroyed in the process.
`This, of course, requires frequent and costly repair or
`replacement of the bow] portion 18. One problem with
`using a bare crystal is that the plated electrode thereof
`is attacked by someofthe cleaning solutions(e.g., vine-
`gar). Another problem arises because of the wide differ-
`ence between the acoustical
`impedances of a water
`based liquid (i.e., the medication to be nebulized) and
`air. If the acoustical impedances are properly matched,
`then the acoustical energy is radiated; if not, a majority
`of the energy is reflected back into the crystal. When
`the energy is reflected back,it is in a very small region
`and produces high localized temperatures. These high
`temperatures tend to cause the crystal material, along
`with its plated electrode,
`to rapidly degrade. When
`there is medicine present, a good acoustical impedance
`match exists and there is good nebulization. When the
`medicine is not present or exists in only a thin layer, a
`poor acoustical impedance match exists, causing very
`destructive conditions for the crystal. When the bare
`crystal fails due to the acoustical impedance mismatch,
`the high energy densities locate in the interface between
`the plated electrode and the piezo crystal itself. This
`develops thermal gradients which, in turn, cause the
`plating to develop pin holes therethrough. Once the pin
`holes appear, the plating quickly degrades as the medi-
`cine seeps in. Additionally, cavitation effects accelerate
`the destruction once the holes appear.
`Attempts at coating the piezoelectric crystal have
`met with little or no success to date. Either the ultra-
`sonic vibration of the crystal is not coupled into the
`covering, or poorly coupled, such that nebulization is
`inefficient or nonexistent; or, the coating is simply de-
`stroyed in the same manner, followed shortly thereafter
`by the crystal itself. For example, with a coating, such
`as, Teflon or a high temperature polyimide as previ-
`ously employedin the art, the same impedance problem
`is encountered; except, it is complicated by the coating
`having its own characteristic acoustic impedance as
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`well. Now, the energy is concentrated in the interface
`between the electrode and the coating. Subsequently,
`the coating sees the high energy densities and associated
`thermal gradients. Failure is quite similar to the bare
`crystal. Small bubblesfirst begin to appear in the center
`of the assembly, i.e., the most active portion. Once a
`bubble appears, the assembly quickly degrades in the
`manner described above.
`In the prior art structure of FIG. 9, the piezoelectric
`crystal 88 is bonded to a support layer 90 which actually
`contacts the liquid. Both the crystal 88 and the support
`layer 90 were chosen to be one-half wavelength in
`thickness and then bonded together with an adhesive 92
`to form a composite structure 86 one wavelength in
`thickness. The composite structure 86 is supported
`aboutits periphery and contains a thin web 94 between
`the vibrating center portion and the supported periph-
`ery 96 to prevent support structure loading thereof
`which is counterproductive to efficient high energy
`vibration.
`Asdepicted in FIG.8, a vibrating surface is shown on
`whichthe liquid to be nebulized is in contact in order to
`focus the energy waves towardsthe centerofthe liquid
`in a concentrated energy area. Thus, for example, the
`vibrating surface 98 in FIG.8 is in the form of a Fresnel
`lens, which aims or directs the vibrational energy,indi-
`cated by the dotted lines 100, towards a plane passing
`through the center.
`A second technique is shown in simplified form in
`FIG. 10 and comprises placing the liquid to be nebu-
`lized 102 in a smail container 104 having a thin, vibrat-
`able bottom surface 106 and placing the small container
`104 in a large container 108 filled with liquid 110 (such
`as water) and having the piezoelectric crystal 30 at the
`bottom thereof. In this manner, the crystal 30 is always
`liquid-covered. When the crystal 30 is vibrated,
`the
`energy wavestravel through the liquid 110 in the large
`container 108 and strike the bottom surface 106 of the
`small container 104, causing it to vibrate an amount
`sufficient to nebulize the liquid 102 and cause the drop-
`lets 112.
`_

`.
`The improved bowlportion ofan ultrasonic nebulizer
`similar to the prior art nebulizer of FIGS. 1 and 2 and
`modified according to the present invention is shown in
`detail in FIG. 3 and labelled therein as 18’. It is designed
`to be used in conjunction with a power pack 12 and
`cover 20, as previously described with respect to FIGS.
`1 and 2, and in the interest of simplicity and the avoid-
`ing of redundancy in the description and drawings,
`those portions will not be shownor described hereinaf-
`ter.
`
`to a piezoelectric crystal con-
`The improvement
`structed assembly of the present invention as used in a
`nebulizer, for example, includes a protective covering
`for the piezoelectric crystal and a revised construction
`ofthe crystal itself. As best seen in the detailed cutaway
`view of FIG.3, the piezoelectric crystal 30’ of the pres-
`ent invention in the first embodiment thereof has a pro-
`tective pyrex glass covering 42 disposed over the sur-
`face thereof and under the hole 32 in the bottom of the
`cavity 26. As an indication of the sizes involved in the
`apparatus being described, in a tested embodiment of
`this embodiment whichis to be commercially manufac-
`tured and sold by the assignee of this application, the
`piezoelectric crystal 30’ is 0.77 inches in diameter and
`the glass covering 42 is 0.61 inches in diameter. The
`glass covering 42 is one-half wavelength of the crystal’s
`frequency in thickness, which was found to give pre-
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 010
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 010
`
`

`

`4,976,259
`
`7
`ferred coupling to the medication 28 shownin FIG.2.
`Since the frequency being employedis about 1.65 MHz,
`the thickness of the glass covering 42 is approximately
`0.064 inches. It should be noted at this point that while
`the tested example being described here employsa pro-
`tective pyrex glass covering, other materials known to
`those skilled in the art could, of course, be employed.
`For example, certain plastics and ceramic materials
`would undoubtedly make good substitutes. Likewise,
`while a circular disc is shown and preferred for ease of
`manufacture, other shapes could, of course, be used and
`the term “disc” is not to be construed as a limitation, but
`rather, a term of convenience only.
`Employing a glass covering over the piezoelectric
`crystal bonded by adhesive would not improve greatly
`over the prior art approaches mentioned above and
`would suffer from the same problems. Such approach
`was initially tried by the applicants herein with the
`expected results, or lack thereof. Primarily, there is a
`major loss of acoustic coupling of the ultrasonic energy
`into the glass cover as the adhesive bond deteriorates.
`Oneof the possible solutions to the non-coupling prob-
`lem which was tried was the use ofa thin film of com-
`monly available fluids, such as, water as a coupling fluid
`between the surface of the crystal 30’ and the glass 42.
`While, initially, these fluids would cause coupling of the
`energy into the glass cover 42, these common coupling
`fluids were quickly destroyed in operation, resulting in
`failure of the unit by loss of acoustic coupling of the
`energy. Extensive testing finally lead to the discovery
`of certain fluids which, underinfluence of the ultrasonic
`vibration, acted exactly contrary to the other, normally
`thought of, coupling fluids, which had disintegrated in
`use; that is, while the other, non-useful fluids had mi-
`grated to the edges of the glass 42 and crystal 30’ and
`away from the central active zone of vibrational trans-
`fer,
`the workable coupling fluids discovered by the
`applicants herein tended to migrate to the center under
`vibrational stimulation and, thereby, effect maximum
`energy transfer from the crystal 30’ into the glass cover
`42. Again, it is worthy of note at this point that while
`fluids of a particular type and exhibiting particular cou-
`pling characteristics are described hereinafter by way of
`example,
`those skilled in the art will recognize and
`appreciate that there are other materials, which could
`be easily overlooked in the broad classification of “flu-
`ids”, which could be substituted as the coupling fluid.
`Wherethe term “fluid”is used in the descriptions herein
`and in the claims appendedhereto,it is the applicants’
`intent that it be considered in its broadest sense as in-
`cluding other coupling fluids possessing the necessary
`qualities and characteristics as set forth in detail herein-
`after. As to some of the fluids which were tested and
`found to be unsuitable, some were quickly destroyed
`while others were not. When destruction was immedi-
`ate, i.e., in less than ten uses, no amount of time was
`enough to recover the ability to effectively pass the
`ultrasonic energy into the medicine bowl. Such fluids
`included silicone as well as Teflon-based oils and
`greases. Other fluids failed because of migration out
`from under the glass. This resulted in excessively long
`“warm up” times to produce nebulization, which al-
`lowed the fluid to go to the center of activity and for
`electrical conduction through the film of oil between
`the brass connector ring and the wrap-around elec-
`trode. The “oil” fluids ultimately employed by the ap-
`plicants as a film between the crystal and its closely
`adjacent, spaced, protective cover have the property of
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`8
`being “self protecting and self healing”; that is, when
`destructive conditions appear,theoil film will move out
`of the most active (and destructive) areas. After the
`detrimental conditions haveleft; i.e., there is medicine
`in the bowl and a good impedance match,
`the oil
`“pumps”itself back into the necessary areas to allow
`good acoustic coupling.
`Thecritical properties of acoustic coupling fluids
`which are appropriate include—viscosity, viscosity
`breakdown, temperature stability, acoustic impedance,
`chemical stability, and molecular composition. These
`properties will now be addressed individually.
`Viscosity: Through empirical analysis, the applicants
`herein were able to determine the workable limits of
`viscosity. Bounding the low endis the ability to manu-
`facture the assembly. If the fluid is too thin (under 1
`centistoke at 100° C. foroil), it is very difficult to inti-
`mately join the crystal and the glass without excessive
`air entrapping itself (enough to significantly decrease
`life or couple effectively). On the high end (above 100
`centistoke at 100° C. for oil), the fluid still passes the
`acoustical energy; but, attenuation becomessignificant.
`The higher viscosity fluids tested produced lowerout-
`put as comparedto thefluid viscosities. It is desirable
`for the fluid to have a viscosity curve whichis as flat as
`possible. This provides uniformity as the temperature of
`the system changes. The preferred viscosity range is
`between 4 and 10 centistoke at 100° C. for an oil cou-
`pling. In this range, there were no detectable differ-
`ences in either coupling orlife.
`Viscosity Breakdown: Because of the high energy
`densities of the reflected acoustic wave when imped-
`ances are mismatched(i.e., air only, no medicine) corre-
`sponding high temperatures are found in the interface
`between the crystal and the glass containing the fluid.
`To maintain the desired viscosity range and reasonable
`life, the fluid should not undergo permanent changesin
`viscosity when exposed to the high temperature and
`energy densities involved.
`Temperature Stability: As previously mentioned, the
`fluid is subject
`to very high temperature gradients.
`Therefore, the fluid needs to have high operating tem-
`perature limits as well as a reasonably flat viscosity
`curve. Temperature requirements are met if the flash
`point is above 200° C. and there is no viscosity break-
`downafter repeated thermal cycling.
`Acoustic Impedance: The fluid must also have an
`acoustic impedance whichis acceptable to the assembly
`system at
`the desired frequency without significant
`attenuation. Ideal
`impedance matching between the
`crystal and coveris difficult to attain; however, through
`empirical testing, the applicants were able to determine
`that the window of acceptability was fairly large in a
`given family of fluids.
`Chemical Stability: Some ofthe fluids tested failed to
`pass the acoustic energy after a limited numberofuses.
`It is hypothesized that the high energy densities and
`thermal gradients caused the fluids to change chemical
`composition. Therefore,
`the fluid needs to maintain
`chemical composition when exposed to high tempera-
`ture and energy densities. Synthetic oils appear to have
`the ability to take the harsh conditions and maintain
`their initial properties.
`Molecular Composition: Some of the fluids which
`met the abovecriteriastill failed to pass enough acous-
`tic energy to be effective. The applicants’ best guess in
`this regard is that the molecular composition is such -
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 011
`
`Petitioner Puzhen - Ex. 1014, p. 011
`
`

`

`4,976,259
`
`9
`that these fluids’ molecular composition outweighed the
`characteristics of the above properties.
`Preferred Fluid: The fluid preferred by applicants, as
`a group, is synthetic oil based. The preferred embodi-
`ment as presently employed by the applicants in the
`commercial embodiments of the present invention is an
`8 centistoke (at 100° C.) Polyalphaolefin base oil.
`While the discovery of a workable class offluids to
`effect coupling was a major breakthroughin the devel-
`opmentof a long-lasting ultrasonic nebulizer,it, in turn,
`created new problemsto be solved in the overall design
`of the bowl portion 18’. Because of the close spacing
`employed between the glass cover and the crystal, one
`of the problem phenomena wascapillary action of the
`fluid during periods of non-use; that is, the fluid simply
`moved to the outer edges of the glass and was lost due
`to capillary action. There are also transition periods
`whenthe unit is turning on and off. During these times,
`the assembly is attempting tostabilize to th

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket