throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 21
`Entered: July 12, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`STIHL INCORPORATED and ANDREAS STIHL AG & CO. KG,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ELECTROJECT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00018
`Patent 6,955,081 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JOSEPH A. FISCHETTI, MEREDITH C. PETRAVICK, and
`WILLIAM V. SAINDON, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SAINDON, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`CONDUCT OF THE PROCEEDING
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00018
`Patent 6,955,081 B2
`
`
`On July 3, 2018, the parties filed a motion to extend Due Dates 6 and
`7. Paper 19. The parties did not seek prior authorization to file any such
`motion, and the motion is denied. The parties are directed to 37 C.F.R.
`§§ 42.20(a) & (b), and the Scheduling Order (Paper 14), for the proper
`course of conduct required to file a motion. Namely, a party may not file a
`motion without prior authorization, and if prior authorization is not already
`provided by Rule or Order, it must be sought via a request for a conference
`call. Although the Scheduling Order permits stipulated changes to Due
`Dates 1–5, it specifically forbids stipulated changes to Due Dates 6 and 7.
`Paper 14, 7.
`
`Furthermore, On April 24, 2018, the Supreme Court held that a final
`written decision under 35 U.S.C. § 318(a) must decide the patentability of all
`claims challenged in the petition. SAS Inst., Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S.Ct. 1348,
`1355 (2018). In our Decision on Institution, we determined that Petitioner
`demonstrated a reasonable likelihood that it would establish all challenged
`claims of the ’081 patent are unpatentable over two grounds based on Abe,
`but not two grounds based on Ostdiek. Paper 13, 12–13. In light of the
`Guidance on the Impact of SAS on AIA Trial Proceedings posted on April
`26, 2018 (at https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/patent-trial-
`and-appeal-board/trials/guidance-impact-sas-aia-trial), we modify our
`Institution Decision to institute on all of the grounds presented in the
`Petition.
`
`It is so ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00018
`Patent 6,955,081 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Robert Hilton
`rhilton@mcguirewoods.com
`
`George Davis
`gdavis@mcguirewoods.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Thomas Lewry
`tlewry@brookskushman.com
`
`Michael MacCallum
`mmaccallum@brookskushman.com
`
`John Nemazi
`jnemazi@brookskushman.com
`
`John Rondini
`jrondini@brookskushman.com
`
`Mark Jotanovic
`mjotanovic@brookskushman.com
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket