throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`___________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL
`AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________________________
`
`
`
`TransCore, LP
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Axcess International, Inc.
`Patent Owner
`
`_________________________
`
`Case IPR2018-00048
`Patent No. 7,286,158
`_________________________
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE INTER PARTES REVIEW
`PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317 AND 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`

`

`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00048
`Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`
`
`The Petitioner, TransCore LP and Patent Owner, Axcess International, Inc.
`
`(collectively referred to herein as “the Parties”) jointly request termination of inter
`
`partes Case No. IPR2018-00048 in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.74.
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner have agreed to settle all disputes between the
`
`Parties involving U.S. Patent No. 7,286,158 (the ‘158 patent), including all
`
`litigation and Patent Office proceedings related thereto. In particular, the Parties
`
`agreed to settle and dismiss their related district court litigation (Axcess
`
`International, Inc. v. TransCore, LP, Northern District of Texas Case No. 3:17-cv-
`
`01697-M).
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), the Parties’ settlement agreement made in
`
`contemplation of termination of the proceedings is in writing, and a true and
`
`correct copy of such document is being filed herewith as Exhibit No. 1014. No
`
`other such agreements, written or oral, exist between the Parties.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`II. BACKGROUND
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00048
`Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`
`
`On October 10, 2017, the Petitioner filed a petition for an inter partes review
`
`of claims 1-5, 8-12 and 19-21 of the ‘158 Patent.
`
`On October 18, 2017, the Board accorded a filing date to the Petition. The
`
`deadline for the Board to instate the IPR has not yet passed.
`
`On March 22, 2018, the Parties agreed to settle all of their disputes involving
`
`the ‘158 patent, including an agreement for the Patent Owner to file a dismissal
`
`with prejudice of all claims asserted by the Patent Owner in the pending litigation,
`
`and for the Parties to file a Joint Motion to Terminate IPR2018-00048.
`
`On March 23, 2018 the Board authorized the Parties to file a joint motion to
`
`dismiss the petition, and for the settlement agreement to be treated as business
`
`confidential information and kept separate from the file (Exhibit 1013; email from
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board dated March 23, 2018).
`
`
`
`III. TERMINATION OF THE IPR IS APPROPRIATE
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), an inter partes review shall be terminated with
`
`respect to a party upon such joint request “unless the Office has decided the merits
`
`of the proceedings before the request for termination is filed.” Termination of this
`
`proceeding is appropriate because the Board has not yet decided the merits of the
`
`proceeding. More specifically, the Board has not yet decided to instate IPR2018-
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00048
`Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`
`
`
`
`00048.
`
`As noted above, the Parties have reached a settlement agreement that
`
`resolves all disputes between the parties regarding the ‘158 patent. A true copy of
`
`the settlement agreement is filed concurrently herewith as Exhibit 1014. The
`
`settlement agreement requires, in part, that the Parties seek termination of this
`
`proceeding within five business days of the effective date of the settlement
`
`agreement. The settlement agreement further requires that the Parties seek
`
`dismissal of the related district court litigation within five business days of the
`
`effective date of the settlement agreement. Accordingly, the Petitioner and Patent
`
`Owner meet the statutory requirements for a “joint request” to terminate before the
`
`Office “has decided the merits of the proceedings.” 35 U.S.C. §317(a).
`
`Finally, there are strong public policy reasons to favor settlement between
`
`the parties to a proceeding.
`
`
`
`IV. RELATED LITIGATION
`
`As noted above, the Patent Owner brought an action for patent infringement
`
`with respect to the ‘158 patent in the Northern District of Texas. As part of the
`
`settlement agreement, the Patent Owner will file a termination of that proceeding
`
`within five business days of the settlement agreement.
`
`No other litigation or proceedings exist between the Petitioner and Patent
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00048
`Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`
`
`
`
`Owner.
`
`
`
`V. TREATMENT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AS
`
`BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner hereby request that the settlement agreement
`
`filed herewith as Exhibit 1014 be treated as business confidential information, and
`
`be kept separate from the file of the above identified IPR, and be available only to
`
`the Federal Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a
`
`showing of good cause pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`The settlement agreement contains confidential information that the Parties wish to
`
`remain private. The settlement agreement was executed with the intent that the
`
`contents thereof be kept confidential to the Parties. The settlement agreement has
`
`been filed for access by the “Parties and Board only” in view of this request.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`VI. CONCLUSION
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00048
`Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`
`
`For the reasons set forth above, the Parties respectfully request termination
`
`of this proceeding. The Parties further submit that the settlement agreement filed
`
`herewith should be treated as business confidential information.
`
`Please charge any shortage in fees due in connection with the filing of this
`
`paper, including extension of time fees, to Deposit Account 50-4752 and please
`
`credit any excess fees to such deposit account.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`SNYDER, CLARK, LESCH & CHUNG,
`L.L.P.
`
`By: /Glenn Snyder, Reg. No. 41,428/
` Glenn Snyder
` Reg. No. 41,428
` Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC
`
`By: /Neal Massand, Reg. No. 54,296/
` Neal Massand
` Reg. No. 54,296
` Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`Date: March 26, 2018
`950 Herndon Parkway
`Suite 365
`Herndon, VA 20170
`Telephone: (571) 323-5145
`Facsimile: (703) 439-2658
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket