throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 27
`
`Entered: July 13, 2018
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MONKEYMEDIA, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00059
`Patent 9,247,226 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before MARC S. HOFF, LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, and
`KAMRAN JIVANI, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HOFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`JUDGMENT
`Granting Patent Owner’s Request for Adverse Judgment
`37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)
`
`
`MONKEYmedia, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) has filed, with our prior
`authorization, a Motion for Adverse Judgment as to claims 1 and 7.
`Paper 25, 2–3 (“Mot.”). For the reasons discussed below, we grant Patent
`Owner’s request.
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00059
`Patent 9,247,226 B2
`
`
`BACKGROUND
`Unified Patents, Inc. (“Petitioner”), filed a Petition requesting inter
`partes review of claims 1–12 of U.S. Patent No. 9,247,226 B2 (Ex. 1001,
`“the ’226 patent”). Paper 2. On April 16, 2018, we instituted inter partes
`review of claims 1 and 7 on Ground 1 asserted in the Petition (obviousness
`over Lavallee, Gibson, Strickland, and Cohen), but declined to institute
`review on Grounds 2 and 3 asserted in the Petition (obviousness of claims
`1–10 over Davenport and Efrat, and obviousness of claims 11 and 12 over
`Davenport, Efrat, and Bartok). Paper 15, 36.
`On April 24, 2018, the Supreme Court issued its decision in SAS
`Institute Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S. Ct. 1348 (2018). Subsequent to that decision,
`Patent Owner filed a statutory disclaimer of claims 1 and 7 pursuant to 37
`CFR § 1.321(a). Paper 18; Ex. 2010.
`On May 15, 2018, the parties notified the Board by email that they
`had reached agreement to resolve this inter partes review. See Mot. 2.
`Specifically, the parties agreed that Patent Owner would request adverse
`judgment as to instituted claims 1 and 7, and that the parties would stipulate
`to a joint withdrawal/waiver of the currently non-instituted grounds and
`claims, thereby warranting termination of the IPR. See id. The Board
`authorized the parties to file such a joint Motion to Limit the Petition, and
`authorized Patent Owner to file a Motion for Adverse Judgment as to
`claims 1 and 7, in a teleconference on May 18, 2018. See id. The Board
`subsequently issued an order confirming that authorization. Paper 20.
`On June 5, 2018, upon authorization, the parties filed a Joint Motion
`to Limit the Petition. Paper 24. Patent Owner filed the instant Motion for
`Adverse Judgment one day later, on June 6, 2018. Concurrently with this
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00059
`Patent 9,247,226 B2
`
`Decision, we issue an Order granting the parties’ Joint Motion to Limit the
`Petition to remove Grounds 2 and 3 from this inter partes review, limiting
`the review to claims 1 and 7 on Ground 1 asserted in the Petition.
`ANALYSIS
`Rule 42.73(b) permits a party to “request judgment against itself at
`any time during a proceeding.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b). Patent Owner
`requests adverse judgment as to claims 1 and 7, challenged in Ground 1
`raised in the Petition, and subsequently statutorily disclaimed under 37
`C.F.R. § 1.321(a) by Patent Owner. Mot. 2–3. Under the circumstances
`presented here, we find it is appropriate to grant Patent Owner’s request for
`adverse judgment on the identified claims because doing so will achieve the
`parties’ joint objective of resolving this inter partes review.
`
`ORDER
`For the reasons discussed above, it is:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s request for adverse judgment
`(Paper 25) is granted, and
`FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered against Patent Owner
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b) with respect to claims 1 and 7 of the ’226 patent,
`the only claims at issue in this proceeding in light of our Order Granting the
`Joint Motion to Limit the Petition.
`.
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00059
`Patent 9,247,226 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Stuart A. Nelson
`W. Karl Renner
`Ryan Chowdhury
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`snelson@fr.com
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`rchowdhury@fr.com
`
`Ashraf Fawzy
`Jonathan Stroud
`UNIFIED PATENTS, INC.
`afawzy@unifiedpatents.com
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Jonathan D. Baker
`FARNEY DANIELS PC
`jbaker@farneydaniels.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket