throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Patent Owner
`_________________________
`
`Case No. IPR2018-00082
`Patent 6,088,802
`_________________________
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop Patent Board
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`I.
`
`
`
`
`
`PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
`Pursuant to this Board’s Rules and the Federal Rules of Evidence (“FRE”),
`
`Petitioner moves to exclude the following exhibit, which Patent Owner submitted,
`
`and to which Petitioner timely objected.
`
`Exhibit No. Description
`2004
`Plaintiff SPEX Technologies, Inc. Disclosure of Asserted Claims
`and Infringement contentions
`
`In accordance with the Trial Practice Guide requirements, Petitioner
`
`(a) identifies where in the record Petitioner’s original objections were made,
`
`(b) identifies where in the record this exhibit was relied upon by Patent Owner,
`
`(c) addresses objections to the exhibit in numerical order (as only one exhibit is
`
`being challenged), and (d) explains the basis and grounds for each objection.
`
`II. EXHIBIT 2004 SHOULD BE EXCLUDED
`Petitioner timely objected to Exhibit 2004 as irrelevant under FRE 402 and 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.62; as unfairly prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and a waste of time
`
`under FRE 402; and as hearsay under FRE 801 and 802 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.62.
`
`Paper 14 at 2-3. Patent Owner relies on Exhibit 2004 in Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`
`Response at 8 in support of its argument that the Board should have exercised its
`
`discretion to deny the Petition. Paper 6 at 11.
`
`Exhibit 2004 is irrelevant under FRE 402 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.62 because
`
`neither it nor its contents are cited or discussed in the patent, file history, or instituted
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`references. Furthermore, the exhibit discusses subject matter unrelated to this inter
`
`partes review—allegations of patent
`
`infringement are
`
`irrelevant
`
`to
`
`these
`
`proceedings—and is dated many years after the priority date of the patent.
`
`Exhibit 2004 should be excluded under FRE 403 because reliance on
`
`irrelevant discussions of products accused of infringement is misleading, a waste of
`
`time, and risks confusing the issues in this proceeding. Exhibit 2004 is particularly
`
`misleading and unfairly prejudicial in this case because Patent Owner’s infringement
`
`allegations are not only unproven, they are also incorrect.
`
`Exhibit 2004 should be excluded also because it constitutes hearsay under
`
`FRE 801 and 802 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.62. Infringement contentions are out-of-court
`
`statements used for the truth of the matter asserted, and Exhibit 2004 contains
`
`unsworn representations from Patent Owner regarding products accused of
`
`infringement.
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`In view of the reasons explained above, Petitioner respectfully requests the
`
`Board exclude Exhibit 2004.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 30, 2018
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Brian M. Buroker/
`Brian M. Buroker (Reg. No. 39,125) (lead)
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036-5306
`Telephone: 202.955.8500
`Facsimile: 202.467.0539
`bburoker@gibsondunn.com
`Frank P. Coté (pro hac vice)
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`3161 Michelson Drive, Ste. 1200
`Irvine, CA 92612
`Telephone: 949.451.4090
`Facsimile: 949.475.4610
`fcote@gibsondunn.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Western Digital
`Corporation
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies service pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e) on the Patent
`
`Owner via e-mail a copy of this Petitioner’s Motion to Exclude Evidence on the
`
`following counsel of record for Patent Owner:
`
`Peter Lambrianakos, plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant, afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`
`Vincent J. Rubino, III, vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`
`Enrique W. Iturralde, eiturralde@brownrudnick.com
`
`DATED: November 30, 2018
`
`By: /Brian M. Buroker/
`
`
`
`Brian M. Buroker (Reg. No. 39,125)
`
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket