`
`
`
`IPR2018-00082
`U.S. Patent No. 6,088,802
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`SPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Patent No. 6,088,802
`Filing Date: June 4, 1997
`Issue Date: July 11, 2000
`Title: PERIPHERAL DEVICE WITH INTEGRATED SECURITY
`FUNCTIONALITY
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`Case No. IPR2018-00082
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00082
`U.S. Patent No. 6,088,802
`
`In view of the Board's denial of Petitioner Western Digital Corporation’s
`
`(“Western Digital”) motion for leave to file a reply under 37 C.F.R. 42.5, Patent
`
`Owner respectfully submits that there are no issues necessitating oral argument.
`
`Paper 32. To the extent the Board permits oral argument in this proceeding and
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s scheduling order (Paper 12),
`
`SPEX respectfully requests oral argument in IPR2018-00082, currently scheduled
`
`for January 14, 2019. Patent Owner requests thirty (30) minutes to present its
`
`arguments. Without intending to waive any issue not specifically identified below,
`
`Patent Owner identifies the following issues to be argued at trial:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`each ground of patentability upon which trial was instituted;
`
`the appropriate constructions to be given to the disputed claim
`
`terms;
`
`3.
`
`any issues specified by Petitioner in its request for oral
`
`argument;
`
`4.
`
`each argument presented or raised by Petitioner1 in briefing
`
`during this proceeding or at trial; and
`
`
`
`1 To the extent any joined petitioners are permitted to present oral arguments
`
`to the Board, SPEX reserves the right to respond to the joined petitioners’
`
`arguments and/or seek additional time.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`5.
`
`IPR2018-00082
`U.S. Patent No. 6,088,802
`any other issues the Board deems necessary for issuing a final
`
`
`
`written decision.
`
`To the extent the Board permits oral argument under the circumstances
`
`described above, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board provide audio-
`
`visual equipment configured to display demonstrative exhibits, including a
`
`projector and a screen configured to display documents from a laptop computer.
`
`
`
`Dated: December 3, 2018
`
`
`
`/Peter Lambrianakos/
`
`Peter Lambrianakos (Reg. No. 58,279)
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: 212-209-4800
`Facsimile: 212-209-4801
`Email: plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`
`Vincent J. Rubino, III (Reg. No. 68,594)
`Enrique W. Iturralde (Reg. No. 72,883)
`Back-up Counsel for Patent Owner
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Tel: 212-209-4800
`Fax: 212-209-4801
`Email: vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Email: eiturralde@brownrudnick.com
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00082
`U.S. Patent No. 6,088,802
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`A copy of Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument has been served on
`
`Petitioner’s counsel of record as follows:
`
`Brian Buroker
`Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20036-5306
`bburoker@gibsondunn.com
`
`Blair Silver
`Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20036-5306
`bsilver@gibsondunn.com
`
`Rustin Mangum
`Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
`3161 Michelson Drive
`Irvine, CA 92612-4412
`rmangum@gibsondunn.com
`
`December 3, 2018
`
`
`
`By:
`
`/Peter Lambrianakos /
`
`Peter Lambrianakos (Reg. No. 58,279)
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Tel: 212-209-4800
`Fax: 212-209-4801
`Email: plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
