`
`US. Patent No. 9,559,852
`
`Paper 8
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`InAuth, Inc.,
`Petitioner
`
`\V.
`
`mSIGNIA, Inc.,
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2018-00150
`
`US. Patent 9,559,852
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF
`
`,
`
`JASON T. LAO
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2018—00150
`
`US. Patent No. 9,559,852
`
`Pursuant to 37 CPR. § 42.10 and the Notice authorizing leave to file this
`
`motion (Paper No. 4), Patent Owner mSIGNIA, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) requests
`
`that the Board admit Jason T. Lao pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Statement of Facts Showing Good Cause for the Board to
`Recognize Counsel pro hac vice During the Proceeding
`
`In accordance with 37 CPR. § 4210(0), the Board may recognize counsel
`
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the
`
`condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner and to any other conditions
`
`as the Board may impose. Section 42.10(c) indicates that, “where lead counsel is a
`
`registered practitioner, a motion to appear pro hac vice may be granted upon a
`
`showing that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.” The facts here
`
`establish good cause for the Board to recognize Jason T. Lao pro hac vice during
`
`this proceeding.
`
`1. Lead Counsel, Thomas B. King, is a registered practitioner.
`
`2. Jason T. Lao is an experienced litigator and has an established familiarity with
`the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.
`/
`
`3. Attached to this motion as Exhibit 2002 is the Declaration of Jason T. Lao,
`
`where he attests, inter alia, that he is a member of good standing of the Bar for
`
`the State of California, US District Court for the Central District of California,
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2018—00150
`
`US. Patent No. 9,559,852
`
`US. District Court for the Southern District of California, US. District Court
`
`for the Northern District of California, and the US. District Court for the
`
`Eastern District of Texas.
`
`4. Mr. Lao further attests that he has been litigating patent cases for five years.
`
`5. Mr. Lao further attests that he is familiar with the subject matter at issue in this
`
`proceeding. He is counsel for Patent Owner in the underlying district court
`
`proceedings: Case No. 8: l7-cv-01289 in the Central District of California.
`
`6. In his Declaration, Mr. Lao also attests to each of the listed items required by 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`
`Conclusion
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board
`
`admit Jason T. Lao pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Date:
`
`January 1 8, 2018
`
`Respectfiilly submitted,
`
`/Thomas B. King/
`Thomas B. King
`Registration No. 69,721
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`
`600 Anton Blvd., Suite 700
`
`Costa Mesa, CA 92626
`Phone: (949) 202-3000
`Fax: (949) 202-3001
`thomas.king@haynesboone.com
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2018-00150
`
`US. Patent No. 9,559,852
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on this 18th day of January, 2018, a copy of the Patent
`Owner’s Motion For Pro Hac Vice Admission of Jason T. Lao, including the
`Declaration of Jason T. Lao In Support Of Patent Owner’s Motion For Admission
`Pro Hac Vice attached as Exhibit 2002, has been served in its entirety by electronic
`mail on counsel of record for the Petitioner to peterarmenio@quinnemanuel.com
`and matthewrobson@quinnemanuel.com.
`
`Date:
`
`January 1 8, 20 1 8
`
`Respectfully submitted
`
`/7710mas B. King/
`, Thomas B. King
`Registration No. 69,721
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`
`600 Anton Blvd, Suite 700
`
`Costa Mesa, CA 92626
`Phone: (949) 202-3 000
`Fax: (949) 202-3001
`thomas.king@haynesboone.com
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
