`Tel: 571.272.7822
`
`Paper 10
`Entered: February 21, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`INAUTH, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`MSIGNIA, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00150
`Patent 9,559,852 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before TREVOR M. JEFFERSON, JAMES B. ARPIN, and
`GREGG I. ANDERSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ARPIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`of Kenneth G. Parker and Jason T. Lao and Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Matthew D. Robson
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00150
`Patent 9,559,852 B2
`
`
`Having considered Patent Owner’s unopposed1 Motions for Pro Hac
`Vice Admission of Kenneth G. Parker and Jason T. Lao (Papers 6 and 8);
`Petitioner’s unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Matthew D.
`Robson (Paper 7); and the Declarations of Mr. Parker (Ex. 2001), Mr. Lao
`(Ex. 2002), and Mr. Robson (Ex. 1029), filed in support, it is:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s unopposed Motions for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Kenneth G. Parker and Jason T. Lao are granted; Mr. Parker
`and Mr. Lao are authorized to represent Patent Owner only as back-up
`counsel in the above-captioned proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s unopposed Motion for Pro
`Hac Vice Admission of Matthew D. Robson is granted; Mr. Robson is
`authorized to represent Petitioner only as back-up counsel in the above-
`captioned proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner and Petitioner shall
`continue to have a registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the
`above-captioned proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Parker, Mr. Lao, and Mr. Robson
`shall comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s
`Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of
`Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Parker, Mr. Lao, and Mr. Robson are
`subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a),
`
`
`1 We instruct each party that, before filing any authorized motion, the parties
`must confer and shall inform us whether the motion is unopposed. A party
`may inform us that a motion is unopposed by including the word
`“Unopposed” in title of its motion.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-00150
`Patent 9,559,852 B2
`
`and the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R.
`§§ 11.101–901.
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Peter J. Armenio
`Matthew D. Robson
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP
`peterarmenio@quinnemanuel.com
`matthewrobson@quinnemanuel.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Thomas B. King
`Kenneth G. Parker
`Jason T. Lao
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`Thomas.king@haynesboone.com
`Kenneth.parker@haynesboone.com
`Jason.lao@haynesboone.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
