throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`
`
`
` Paper 39
`
` Entered: January 30, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`VF OUTDOOR, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`COCONA, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00190
`Patent 8,945,287 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before KRISTINA M. KALAN, CHRISTOPHER M. KAISER, and
`ELIZABETH M. ROESEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KALAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00190
`Patent 8,945,287 B2
`
`
`We instituted inter partes review in the above-referenced proceeding.
`Paper 14. The Scheduling Order set February 28, 2019 as the date for oral
`argument, if requested. Paper 15. Petitioner filed a request for oral
`argument pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), requesting one (1) hour for oral
`argument, including any time reserved for rebuttal. Paper 37. Patent Owner
`also filed a request for oral argument pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a).
`Paper 38. These requests are granted. We allocate each party one (1) hour
`of total argument time.
`The hearing will commence at 1:00 pm Eastern Time, on Thursday,
`February 28, 2019 and will be conducted at the USPTO Central
`Headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia (the ninth floor of Madison Building
`East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia, 22314). At least one judge
`may participate in the hearing via videoconference from a remote location;
`counsel for the parties, however, must appear in person. The hearing will be
`open to the public for in-person attendance that will be accommodated on a
`first-come, first-served basis.
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the claims at issue
`are unpatentable. Therefore, the arguments will proceed as follows:
`Petitioner will argue first and may present arguments with regard to the
`challenged claims. Petitioner may reserve up to half its allotted time for
`rebuttal. Patent Owner will then have the opportunity to respond to
`Petitioner’s arguments. Next, Petitioner may use any time it has reserved for
`rebuttal to respond to Patent Owner’s arguments. Lastly, Patent Owner may
`use any time it has reserved for a brief sur-rebuttal to respond to Petitioner’s
`arguments. No other arguments will be heard.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00190
`Patent 8,945,287 B2
`
`
`The Board will provide a court reporter, and the reporter’s transcript
`will constitute the official record of the hearing. The hearing transcript will
`be entered in the record of this proceeding.
`Petitioner has requested the ability to display demonstrative exhibits.
`Paper 37. Demonstrative exhibits are visual aids to oral argument and not
`evidence, and shall be clearly marked as such. For example, each slide may
`be marked with the words “DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT
`EVIDENCE” in the footer. Demonstrative exhibits may not be used to
`advance arguments or introduce evidence not previously presented in the
`record. See Dell Inc. v. Acceleron, LLC, 884 F.3d 1364, 1369 (Fed.
`Cir. 2018) (noting that the “Board was obligated to dismiss [the petitioner’s]
`untimely argument . . . raised for the first time during oral argument”).
`Instead, demonstrative exhibits should cite to the briefs and evidence in the
`record. The parties shall serve any demonstrative exhibits on opposing
`counsel at least seven (7) business days before the hearing and shall file
`them with the Board at least five (5) business days before the hearing.
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b).
`The Board expects that the parties will meet and confer in good faith
`to resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits, but if any objections
`cannot be resolved, the unresolved objections must be filed with the Board at
`least (2) two business days before the hearing. Any objection to
`demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered
`waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`demonstratives and portions thereof are subject to objection, and include a
`short (one sentence or less) statement of the reason for each objection. No
`argument or further explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00190
`Patent 8,945,287 B2
`
`
`objections and schedule a conference if the Board deems necessary.
`Otherwise, the Board will rule on the objections at the hearing.
`To aid in the preparation of an accurate transcript, each party shall
`provide a paper copy of any demonstratives to the court reporter on the day
`of the oral argument. Such paper copies shall not become part of the record
`of this proceeding. The parties are reminded that, during the hearing, the
`presenter should identify clearly each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or
`screen number) to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript
`and permit any judge participating from a remote location to follow the
`arguments.
`If the parties have questions as to whether demonstrative exhibits will
`be sufficiently visible and available to all of the judges, or the parties have
`questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment, the parties are invited
`to contact the Board at (571) 272-9797. Requests for audio-visual
`equipment are to be made five (5) business days in advance of the hearing
`date. The request is to be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not
`received timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the
`hearing.
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00190
`Patent 8,945,287 B2
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Kathleen Ott
`Marianne Timm-Schreiber
`Andrew Larsen
`Peter A. Gergely
`MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
`kott@merchantgould.com
`mtimm-schreiber@merchantgould.com
`alarsen@merchantgould.com
`pgergely@merchantgould.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Jason Jackson
`Jacob Song
`KUTAK ROCK LLP
`jason.jackson@kutakrock.com
`jacob.song@kutakrock.com
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket