`
`DECLARATION OF MR. JAMIE B. BEABER IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS
`FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.68, I, Jamie B. Beaber, hereby attest to the
`following:
`
`1. I am a member in good standing of the District of Columbia Bar (2003) and
`
`the Michigan Bar (2001), as well as the following Federal Courts:
`
`a. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (2003)
`
`b. District of Columbia Court of Appeals (2003)
`
`c. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (2013)
`
`d. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (2013);
`
`2. I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body;
`
`3. I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied;
`
`4. I have never had sanctions or contempt citations imposed by any court or
`
`administrative body against me;
`
`5. I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.;
`
`6. I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`11.19(a);
`
`1
`
`Huawei v. Maxell
`IPR2018-00233
`Maxell Ex. No. 2004
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`7. I am currently applying to appear pro hace vice in IPR2018-00209,
`
`IPR2018-00210, and IPR2018-00233. I have not applied to appear pro hac
`
`vice before the Board in connection with any other proceedings in the last
`
`three years.
`
`8. I am an experienced litigation attorney and have been involved in numerous
`
`patent infringement cases in the U.S. International Trade Commission and in
`
`federal District Courts across the country. I have experience in various
`
`aspects of patent infringement matters including trials, Markman hearings,
`
`and summary judgment hearings.
`
`9. I am lead counsel for the plaintiff, which includes Patent Owner Maxell, Ltd.
`
`in a co-pending litigation (Maxell, Ltd. v. Huawei Device USA Inc., et al.,
`
`Case No. 5:16-cv-00178-RWS (ED. TX.)) in which at least U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,396,443, 7,509,139, 6,754,440, 6,928,292, 7,203,517, and 7,671,901 are
`
`asserted. I have reviewed and am familiar with the asserted patents, the
`
`infringement theories, the prior art references, and invalidity claim charts in
`
`the co-pending litigation. Further, I have been involved and am familiar
`
`with the factual and legal arguments at issue in the co-pending litigation.
`
`Accordingly, I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding
`
`for the patent at issue.
`
`2
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`10.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
`
`correct.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: February 28, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`Jamie B. Beaber
`Mayer Brown LLP
`1999 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20006
`(202) 263-3153
`
`3
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`