throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 7
`Entered: May 1, 2018
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`ENVIROLOGIX INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`IONIAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2018-00405(Patent 9,562,263)
`Case IPR2018-00406 (Patent 9,562,264)1
`_______________
`
`
`Before ULRIKE W. JENKS and CHRISTOPHER G. PAULRAJ,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`JENKS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Motion to Withdraw Counsel
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5, 42.10(e)
`
`1 This order addresses a similar issue in both cases. Therefore, we exercise
`discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. We refer to paper
`numbers in IPR2018-00405.
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00405(Patent 9,562,263)
`IPR2018-00406 (Patent 9,562,264)
`
`
`Patent Owner moves for the Board to allow David A. Casimir and
`Mary Ann Brow to withdraw as counsel in this proceeding. Paper 6, 2. We
`authorized Patent Owner to file the motion by email on March 20, 2018.
`Patent Owner represents that the motion is unopposed by Petitioner. Id.
`Patent Owner seeks to appoint lead counsel Aaron F. Barkoff and back-up
`counsel Christopher P. Singer, both of McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd. Id.
`Patent Owner intends to update Patent Owner’s Mandatory Notices and a
`Substitute Power of Attorney. Id.
`Counsel may withdraw from an inter partes review proceeding only
`with authorization from the Board. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(e); see also 37 C.F.R.
`§ 11.116 (regarding conditions for withdrawal). In that regard, “a
`practitioner may withdraw from representing a client if . . . [w]ithdrawal can
`be accomplished without material adverse effect on the interests of the client
`. . . .” 37 C.F.R. § 11.116(b)(1).
`We discern no reason to deny Patent Owner’s motion for counsel to
`withdraw. The change of counsel would not cause any prejudice to Patent
`Owner or unnecessary delays in the proceedings, as Patent Owner does not
`seek an extension of time. Id.
`Upon considering Patent Owner’s unopposed motion, we grant the
`motion.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion to Withdraw Counsel is
`granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that David A. Casimir and Mary Ann Brow
`are withdrawn as counsel for Patent Owner in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-00405(Patent 9,562,263)
`IPR2018-00406 (Patent 9,562,264)
`
`PETITIONER:
`Jonathan D. Ball
`Melissa Hunter-Ensor
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`ballj@gtlaw.com
`hunterensorm@gtlaw.com
`bosipmail@gtlaw.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`David A. Casimir, Ph.D.
`Mary Ann Brow
`CASIMIR JONES S.C.
`dacasimir@casimirjones.com
`mabrow@casimirjones.com
`docketing@casimirjones.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket