throbber
Artificial Organs
`26(5):420–429, Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
`© 2002 International Society for Artificial Organs
`
`Implications for the Establishment of Accelerated Fatigue
`Test Protocols for Prosthetic Heart Valves
`
`*Kiyotaka Iwasaki, *Mitsuo Umezu, *Kazuo Iijima, and †Kou Imachi
`
`*Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Science and Engineering, Waseda University; and †Department of
`Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
`
`Abstract: The goal of this research is to establish a reliable
`methodology for accelerated fatigue tests of prosthetic
`heart valves. A polymer valve was the subject, and the
`influence of various drive parameters on durability was
`investigated in three different machines. Valve lifetime
`was notably shortened by increasing the cyclic rate or
`stroke even though the maximum pressure difference at
`valve closure was maintained at 120 mm Hg. These results
`demonstrate that adjustment of the maximum transvalvu-
`lar pressure is not sufficient to ensure tests are conducted
`
`under the same conditions and indicate that measurement
`of the dynamic load would be more efficacious. Moreover,
`the locations of tears sustained in the accelerated tests
`differed from those encountered in an animal experiment
`although in both cases the locations were entirely consis-
`tent with the areas of strain concentration revealed by
`finite element analysis. These findings should be discussed
`during a revision of ISO 5840. Key Words: Accelerated
`fatigue test—Durability—Fracture—ISO 5840—Polymer
`valve—Jellyfish valve.
`
`Accurate estimation of durability in a timely man-
`ner is one of the most important unresolved issues in
`the basic research of artificial organs. ISO 5840 (Car-
`diovascular Implants) prescribes guidelines for ac-
`celerated fatigue test methods applied to heart
`valves (1), the assessment of durability by acceler-
`ated cycling having been widely accepted as an es-
`sential component in the developmental stage of
`prosthetic heart valves. However, in bioprosthetic
`heart valves especially, investigators have reported
`varying degrees of success in obtaining a correlation
`between the tears and perforations observed in clini-
`cal cases with those failure modes observed during in
`vitro accelerated fatigue tests (2–4). Furthermore, in
`the case of polymer valves that have been developed
`as alternatives to mechanical and bioprosthetic
`valves for use in artificial hearts, the optimal proto-
`col for accelerated fatigue tests has yet to be estab-
`lished. The authors are accumulating fundamental
`data on heart valve durability by means of three dif-
`ferent types of accelerated fatigue testers. The ulti-
`
`Received October 2001.
`Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kiyotaka
`Iwasaki, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Waseda Uni-
`versity, 3-4-1 #58-322 Ohkubo, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan.
`E-mail: iwasaki@umezu.mech.waseda.ac.jp
`
`mate goal of this research is to establish a reliable
`methodology for accelerated fatigue testing of pros-
`thetic heart valves. The aim of the current study is to
`investigate the influence of drive parameters on du-
`rability under the test conditions recommended by
`ISO 5840 and also to compare the fracture patterns
`of heart valves subjected to in vitro accelerated fa-
`tigue tests with an animal model.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Valves used in this study
`A polymer valve known as the Jellyfish valve,
`which has been developed for use in artificial hearts
`(5–6), was used as the test subject throughout this
`research. The main reasons why this valve was em-
`ployed are as follows. First, assessments of durability
`and the locations of membrane fracture have been
`obtained in experiments in goats in which Jellyfish
`valves were incorporated into blood pumps as shown
`in Fig. 1 (7,8); these results provide benchmarks for
`the accelerated fatigue tests. Second, the durability
`of the Jellyfish valve in these goat experiments was
`312 days, or approximately 10 months. This lifetime
`was considered to be more convenient, with regard
`to the prospective duration of the accelerated fatigue
`tests, than the lifetime that is typical of currently
`
`420
`
`WATERS TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
`EXHIBIT 1013
`
`PAGE 1 OF 10
`
`

`

`ACCELERATED FATIGUE TESTS FOR HEART VALVES
`
`421
`
`outer diameter of the valve seat was widened from
`20 mm to 28 mm to provide chuck-area for mounting
`in the test chambers; however, the flow field of this
`modified valve is the same as that of the normal (20
`mm) valve. The thickness of the Jellyfish valve mem-
`brane can be varied by changing the insertion vol-
`ume of liquid K-III that enters the casting mold. The
`thickness of the membrane in the Jellyfish valve that
`was fractured in the animal experiment was around
`60 ␮m. Thus, to ensure correlation between the ani-
`mal model and the in vitro accelerated fatigue tests,
`60 ␮m membranes were fabricated. And, further-
`more, only membranes with a maximum thickness
`deviation of ±10 ␮m at 24 measuring points (8 points
`each in the inner, middle, and outer areas of the
`membrane) were chosen in an effort to eliminate
`membrane thickness as an independent variable in
`the durability tests. The typical behavior of the Jel-
`lyfish valve in a pulse duplicator under physiological
`conditions is shown in Fig. 2.
`
`Accelerated fatigue testers for heart valves
`Three different types of accelerated fatigue testers
`were employed in this study as described below. A
`Helmholtz-type accelerated fatigue tester (Helm-
`holtz-Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Aachen,
`Germany) (10) is shown in Fig. 3. In this tester,
`transvalvular flow is produced by the combination of
`a rotary pump, located below, and a rotating disk
`
`FIG. 2. Typical behavior of the Jellyfish valve membrane in the
`outlet position of a pulse duplicator is shown. Mean transvalvular
`flow rate was adjusted to 5 L/min against a mean aortic pressure
`of 100 mm Hg.
`
`Artif Organs, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2002
`
`FIG. 1. A membrane fracture in the Jellyfish valve incorporated
`into a paracoporeal total replacement-type, pneumatically driven
`blood pump after 312 days of pumping is shown. The valve was
`explanted from the outlet position of the left-side pump.
`
`available clinical heart valves. Therefore, one experi-
`mental plot can be made available within 1 month at
`a cycling rate of 20 Hz whereas, generally speaking,
`a valve with an expected clinical durability of 10
`years would require about 6 months to yield terminal
`results under the same accelerated conditions. Third,
`thanks to well-established fabrication techniques
`and quality control procedures, these valves can be
`produced with a high degree of uniformity. Fourth,
`the polymer leaflet material exhibits viscoelastic be-
`havior that is not unlike that of the tissues used in
`bioprosthetic leaflets (9); therefore, it is reasonable
`to assume that data obtained from these polymer
`valves would be useful for understanding fatigue test
`results on bioprosthetic heart valves. For these rea-
`sons, the Jellyfish valve is seen not only as suitable
`but ideal in the context of this study.
`The Jellyfish valve consists of a flexible membrane
`and a rigid valve seat, both of which are fabricated
`by casting techniques. The membrane is made of a
`copolymer of segmented polyurethane named K-III
`(Nippon Zeon Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) that pos-
`sesses excellent blood compatibility. The valve seat
`is made of a two-component, room-temperature vul-
`canizing urethane (Quinnate CR330, Ciba Specialty
`Chemicals K.K., Tokyo, Japan) and then coated with
`K-III. Finally, the membrane is bonded to the valve
`seat at a central location, again using K-III. The 20
`mm size (which refers to the diameter of the mem-
`brane as well as the valve seat) was chosen, this hav-
`ing been used in the animal experiments. In the
`valves for use in the accelerated fatigue tests, the
`
`PAGE 2 OF 10
`
`

`

`422
`
`K. IWASAKI ET AL.
`
`FIG. 3. A Helmholtz Institute-type accelerated fatigue tester for prosthetic heart valves is shown.
`
`with a flow passage comprising one-third of the total
`cyclic area and located in the casing. When the ro-
`tating flow passage encounters the test chamber,
`flow rapidly opens the valve membrane, and it closes
`as soon as the flow passage rotates beyond the test
`chamber. Accordingly, the effective systolic fraction
`is approximately 33%. The maximum pressure gra-
`dient following valve closure was adjusted to 120 mm
`Hg as recommended by ISO 5840 (1). In addition to
`this condition, the mean outlet pressure of the valve
`was adjusted to 115 mm Hg because this fatigue
`tester allowed a variety of dynamic conditions to be
`obtained under a given maximum pressure drop.
`Moreover, the mean transvalvular flow rate was ad-
`justed to 5.0 L/min to ensure that the opening be-
`havior of the membrane was similar to that at physi-
`ological cycle rates. The temperature of the working
`fluid was maintained at 37°C throughout the study.
`Typical pressure waveforms in this machine are
`shown in Fig. 4. In this tester, durability tests were
`conducted under the cycle rates of 400, 500, and 600
`
`Artif Organs, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2002
`
`bpm. Thus, the influence of cyclic rate on durability,
`for a fixed maximum pressure difference at valve
`closure, was examined.
`Figure 5 shows a modified version of the commer-
`cially available Rowan Ash accelerated fatigue tester
`(Rowan Ash Ltd., Sheffield, England). The original
`tester was designed without a compliance element.
`The upper casing was flat, thus failing to model the
`elastic effects of the aorta. The preliminary experi-
`mental study indicated that this limitation resulted in
`an insufficient opening motion of the Jellyfish valve
`membrane. Therefore, the upper casing of the tester
`was modified to incorporate an air compliance
`chamber as shown in Fig. 5. Changes in pressure
`waveforms as a function of air volume under the
`same maximum pressure difference of 120 mm Hg at
`valve closure are shown in Fig. 6. In order to keep
`the same maximum pressure difference of 120 mm
`Hg, the amplitude of the sinusoidal stroke was con-
`trolled as shown in Fig. 7. The drive amplitude had
`to be increased after the inclusion of the air compli-
`
`PAGE 3 OF 10
`
`

`

`ACCELERATED FATIGUE TESTS FOR HEART VALVES
`
`423
`
`FIG. 4. Simultaneous pressure waveforms are shown in the
`Helmholtz-type accelerated fatigue tester under a cycle rate of
`500 rpm. The maximum pressure difference at valve closure was
`adjusted to 120 mm Hg under a mean flow of 5.0 L/min. Mean
`outlet pressure was adjusted to 115 mm Hg.
`
`ance element. Movement of the membrane is in-
`duced by the inertia of the fluid as the valves are
`sinusoidal displaced, on hollow pistons, by the stroke
`of a linear motor. The temperature of the test fluid
`did not need to be controlled because it was in a
`closed circuit and remained at room temperature
`(around 20°C). The cycle rate was adjusted to 1,200
`bpm, and the maximum pressure gradient at valve
`closure was maintained at 120 mm Hg. Then, the
`influence of air compliance on durability was inves-
`tigated.
`The Tsinghua-type accelerated fatigue tester
`(Tsinghua University, Beijing, China) is shown in
`Fig. 8. The motion of the valve membrane is ensured
`by the sinusoidal stroke of the linear motor located
`on the upper side of the test chamber. The valve is
`mounted in a holder and connected to the axially
`vibrating rod. The Tsinghua University machine has
`an open loop (the working fluid in the inflow side of
`the valve is open to atmosphere) unlike the Rowan
`Ash system. The Tsinghua University machine has
`the important advantage that the dynamic load act-
`ing on the valve can be measured by installing a load
`cell into the oscillating rods. The authors have been
`conducting preliminary experiments to investigate
`the influence of dynamic load on durability, the de-
`tails of which will be discussed elsewhere. In this
`paper, the maximum pressure difference at valve clo-
`sure was adjusted to 120 mm Hg to maintain equiva-
`lence among the three different accelerated test sys-
`tems. The temperature of the circulating water was
`
`FIG. 5. A modified version of the Rowan Ash accelerated fatigue
`tester for prosthetic heart valves is shown. A compliance element
`was added to the original system.
`
`maintained at 37°C by a heater. The test was con-
`ducted under a drive rate of 1,200 bpm. Simulta-
`neous pressure waveforms are shown in Fig. 9.
`
`RESULTS
`Influence of drive parameters on lifetime
`Accelerated fatigue tests were conducted by three
`different machines under the same maximum pres-
`
`Artif Organs, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2002
`
`PAGE 4 OF 10
`
`

`

`424
`
`K. IWASAKI ET AL.
`
`FIG. 7. Influence of inclusion of the air-compliance element on
`drive amplitude under three typical transvalvular pressures at
`closure are shown. In order to maintain the specified pressure
`drop, the drive amplitude was increased.
`
`creased stroke amplitude shortened valve lifetime
`despite inclusion of the compliance element in the
`outflow section which should have approached a
`more realistic simulation of normal valve motion. In
`
`FIG. 6. Changes in pressure waveforms are shown as a function
`of air-compliance volume at the outlet position of the valve. The
`maximum pressure difference at valve closure was maintained at
`120 mm Hg under a drive rate of 1,200 bpm. Inclusion of the
`air-compliance element increased the pulse pressure in the inlet
`position and also decreased that in the outlet position.
`
`sure difference (120 mm Hg) at valve closure. In
`addition, in the Helmholtz tester, the influence of
`cyclic rate on lifetime was investigated while, in the
`Rowan Ash tester, the influence of drive amplitude
`on lifetime was investigated. The results in the
`Helmholtz tester are shown in Fig. 10. The repetition
`numbers to fracture were 7.3 × 106 cycles, 7.9 × 106
`cycles, and 13.8 × 106 cycles under cycle rates of 600
`rpm, 500 rpm, and 400 rpm, respectively. These re-
`sults indicate that increased cycle rate shortens valve
`lifetime. Figure 11 shows the results in the Rowan
`Ash tester. The repetition numbers to fracture were
`8.3 × 106 cycles and 3.1 × 106 cycles under drive
`amplitudes of 0.4 mm (without air compliance) and
`0.9 mm (with air compliance), respectively. In-
`
`Artif Organs, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2002
`
`FIG. 8. A Tsinghua University type accelerated fatigue tester for
`prosthetic heart valves is shown.
`
`PAGE 5 OF 10
`
`

`

`ACCELERATED FATIGUE TESTS FOR HEART VALVES
`
`425
`
`FIG. 9. Simultaneous pressure waveforms are shown in the
`Tsinghua-type accelerated fatigue tester under the drive rate of
`1,200 bpm. Sampling time was 100 µs.
`
`the Tsinghua University tester, the repetition num-
`ber to fracture was 8.7 × 106 cycles.
`
`Membrane fractures in accelerated fatigue tests
`A typical fracture pattern in the accelerated fa-
`tigue tests is shown in Fig. 12. Tears always occurred
`alongside the edge of the spoke in the three types of
`accelerated fatigue testers. Figure 13 shows the frac-
`ture surface at the locations of A, B, and C in Fig. 12
`as observed by a scanning electron microscope.The
`fracture surface indicated that the crack initiated in
`location A in the outer area of the membrane.
`The fracture locations in the accelerated fatigue
`tests did not coincide with those in the animal ex-
`periment.
`
`FIG. 11.
`Influence of drive amplitude on durability under the
`specified maximum pressure difference of 120 mm Hg in the
`Rowan Ash accelerated fatigue tester is shown.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Differences in durability under pressure condition
`recommended by ISO
`The durability of polymer valves of consistent
`quality was compared under the same maximum
`pressure difference at valve closure as recommended
`by ISO 5840. The durability tests conducted using
`the Helmholtz-type tester indicated that an increase
`in drive rate shortens the lifetime of the valve. In the
`
`FIG. 10. Influence of cycle rates on durability under the specified
`maximum pressure difference of 120 mm Hg in the Helmholtz-
`type accelerated fatigue tester is shown.
`
`FIG. 12. Shown is a typical fracture pattern in the accelerated
`fatigue testers. Tears always occurred alongside the edge of the
`spoke.
`
`Artif Organs, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2002
`
`PAGE 6 OF 10
`
`

`

`426
`
`K. IWASAKI ET AL.
`
`FIG. 13. Scanning electron microscope views of the fracture sur-
`faces are shown. The crack initiated at location A and propagated
`toward locations B and C.
`
`Rowan Ash tester, it was shown that the increasing
`of the drive amplitude of the axially oscillating rod
`also shortens the lifetime. Figure 14 shows changes
`in maximum velocity during the closing phase of the
`Jellyfish valve membrane as a function of drive rate
`in the Helmholtz tester. The motion of the mem-
`brane was captured by a laser displacement sensor
`(LB-01, LB-60, Keyence Corporation, Osaka, Ja-
`pan). The maximal velocity during the closing phase
`was increased by increasing the drive rate. Figure 15
`shows a comparison of membrane surfaces along the
`spoke edge between two different test conditions in
`the Rowan Ash tester. Distinctly deeper abrasion
`was observed in the membrane surface that was
`tested under the drive amplitude of 0.9 mm (with
`compliance element) as compared with the surface
`that was tested under the drive amplitude of 0.4 mm
`(without compliance element). This difference could
`be explained by the fact that the maximal velocity of
`the rod under the drive amplitude of 0.9 mm was 9.3
`m/s which is 2.2 times faster than that under the
`
`FIG. 14. The graph shows changes in maximum velocity of the
`Jellyfish valve membrane during the closing phase as a function
`of drive rate in the Helmholtz-type accelerated fatigue tester. The
`maximum pressure difference at valve closure was maintained at
`120 mm Hg.
`
`Artif Organs, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2002
`
`FIG. 15. Comparison of membrane surfaces of the Jellyfish
`valve under the two different drive amplitudes in the Rowan Ash
`accelerated fatigue tester are shown. The right side represents a
`drive amplitude of 0.4 mm while the left side represents 0.9 mm.
`The maximum pressure difference at valve closure was main-
`tained at 120 mm Hg.
`
`drive amplitude of 0.4 mm. Apparently, the actual
`dynamic load conditions were different even though
`the pressure difference at valve closure was adjusted
`to the same value. This implies that different dura-
`bility results can be obtained by variation of drive
`conditions within the guidelines of ISO 5840. In
`other words, specification of only the maximum
`pressure difference drop at valve closure is not suf-
`ficient to ensure that tests are conducted under
`equivalent conditions. The results indicate that mea-
`surement of the dynamic load acting on heart valves
`would be of importance for the establishment of a
`reliable, standard test methodology. To this end, the
`authors have developed a technique for measuring
`dynamic loads in the Tsinghua tester (11), and the
`influence of dynamic load on durability is now under
`investigation.
`
`Comparison of fracture locations between the
`accelerated fatigue tests and animal experiment
`If in vitro accelerated fatigue testing could reliably
`predict in vivo failure patterns, it would indeed be a
`very powerful tool. In this study, the fracture loca-
`tions of Jellyfish valves obtained in three different
`accelerated fatigue-tests machines were compared
`with those observed in an animal experiment. All the
`membrane fractures occurred along the spoke edge
`in the accelerated fatigue tests while the membrane
`was fractured in the region between adjacent spokes
`in the animal experiment. The results showed that
`the fracture locations in the accelerated fatigue tests
`were not consistent with those in the animal model.
`In this study, the question of reproducibility of the
`single animal experimental result is of much impor-
`tance. However, accumulation of long-term animal
`experimental data (over 300 days, for example) is
`
`PAGE 7 OF 10
`
`

`

`ACCELERATED FATIGUE TESTS FOR HEART VALVES
`
`427
`
`extremely difficult. Therefore, in order to predict
`possible fracture sites in the Jellyfish valve from me-
`chanical considerations, the distributions of strain,
`deflection, and stress in the membrane were ana-
`lyzed using the finite element method. The analysis
`was performed on the closed phase of the Jellyfish
`valve. Because the membrane of the Jellyfish valve is
`not restrained during the opening and opened
`phases except at the central attachment to the valve
`seat, as shown in Fig. 2, the mechanical restraint of
`the membrane by the supporting valve seat was as-
`sumed to be the major factor for inducing the mem-
`brane fracture. Taking advantage of the axial sym-
`metry of the valve, the analysis was performed on
`only one of the twelve radial segments of the Jelly-
`fish valve. Figure 16 shows the analytical model with
`the applied boundary conditions. The model radial
`segment of the valve seat is contained within the
`area surrounded by bold lines. As indices of predic-
`tion of possible fracture sites in the Jellyfish valve,
`the distribution of equivalent elastic strain (␧e), de-
`flection, and equivalent Von Mises stress (␴e) were
`analyzed by the following equations:
`
`␴e =
`
`关共␴x − ␴y兲2 + 共␴y − ␴z兲2 + 共␴z − ␴x兲2
`
`公2
`2
`(2)
`+ 6共␶xy2 + ␶yz2 + ␶zx
`
`
`2 兲兴
`where ␧ is tensile strain, ␥ is shear strain, ␴ is tensile
`stress, and ␶ is shear stress. The results are shown in
`Fig. 17. Strain concentrations were observed in two
`distinct areas of the membrane: midway between ad-
`jacent spokes and adjacent to the spoke edges. The
`maximum strain occurred in the former region, cor-
`responding to the location of maximum deflection.
`The latter region was consistent with that of maxi-
`mum stress concentration.
`The fracture location in the animal experiment
`was clearly coincident with that of maximum strain
`concentration caused by the deep deflection of the
`membrane at valve closure. Therefore, it was con-
`firmed that the fracture location observed in the ani-
`mal experiment was predictable from a mechanical
`point of view. Furthermore, the fracture locations in
`the accelerated fatigue tests were consistent with the
`regions associated with stress concentration. Al-
`though the positions of fracture were different be-
`tween the accelerated fatigue tests and the animal
`experiment, they were, in both situations, entirely
`consistent with the regions of high strain concentra-
`tion. The difference in fracture locations could have
`been the result of changes in the viscoelastic prop-
`erties of the membrane in the physiological environ-
`
`1 2
`
`␧e =冋4
`
`9
`+ 1
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`共␧x2 + ␧y2 + ␧z2 − ␧x␧y − ␧y␧x − ␧z␧x兲
`
`2 兲册1
`
`
`
`共␥xy2 + ␥yz2 + ␥zx
`
`
`
`2
`
`(1)
`
`FIG. 16. The analysis model and boundary conditions for finite element analysis of the Jellyfish valve membrane are shown. Only one
`of twelve radial segments was treated, taking advantage of the axially symmetric shape.
`
`Artif Organs, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2002
`
`PAGE 8 OF 10
`
`

`

`428
`
`K. IWASAKI ET AL.
`
`ment. In vitro reproduction of the in vivo fracture
`locations is indispensable for the establishment of a
`reliable protocol for accelerated fatigue tests. There-
`fore, a method for compensating for the hypoth-
`esized difference in viscoelastic performance of the
`polymeric material in the accelerated fatigue tests
`could be one of the essential steps in the reproduc-
`tion of in vivo fracture modes. Whereas this study
`dealt with the durability of a polymer valve in the
`accelerated fatigue environment, the similarity in
`viscoelastic behavior of clinical bioprosthetic heart
`valves begs that further research should be con-
`ducted to extend the current protocol to biopros-
`thetic valves.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`The durability of a polymer valve was significantly
`altered by employing different drive conditions in
`accelerated fatigue tests even though all of these
`tests complied with the recommendations of ISO
`5840 (Cardiovascular Implants). Moreover, fracture
`locations between the accelerated fatigue tests and
`the animal experiment were not coincident although,
`in all cases, the fracture locations were consistent
`with the areas of high strain concentration as com-
`puted by finite element method. Further research
`should be conducted into the influence of the dy-
`namic load acting on valves and the differences in
`viscoelastic behavior between the physiological and
`accelerated-rate environments, especially for poly-
`mer and bioprosthetic heart valves. Discussion of
`these basic data would be useful in a revision of the
`durability test protocol prescribed by ISO 5840.
`
`Acknowledgments: This research was conducted with
`the aid of the following research funds: The Program for
`Promotion of Fundamental Studies in Health Science of
`the Organization for Drug ADR Relief, R&D Promotion
`and Product Review of Japan (No. 96-12); Grant-in-aid for
`Scientific Research of Japan (No. 09470288); Health Sci-
`ences Research Grants, Research on Pharmaceutical and
`Medical Safety (No. H-11-006); and Waseda University
`Grant for Special Research Projects, Individual Research
`(No. 2001A-865).
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. International Standards Organization. ISO5840: Cardiovascu-
`lar implants—Cardiac valve prosthesis (Committee draft).
`Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organization,
`1994;18–24.
`2. Clark RE, Swanson WM, Hagen RW, Beauchamp RA. Du-
`rability of prosthetic heart valves. Ann Thorac Surg 1979;26:
`323–35.
`3. Gabbay S, Bortolotti U, Wasserman F, Factor S, Strom J,
`Frater R. Fatigue-induced failure of the Ionescu-Shiley peri-
`
`FIG. 17. Distribution of the equivalent elastic strain, equivalent
`Von Mises stress, and deflection of the Jellyfish valve membrane
`under a pressure load of 90 mm Hg are shown.
`
`Artif Organs, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2002
`
`PAGE 9 OF 10
`
`

`

`ACCELERATED FATIGUE TESTS FOR HEART VALVES
`
`429
`
`cardial xenograft in the mitral position. J Thorac Cardiovasc
`Surg 1984;87:836–44.
`4. Nugent AH, Scotten LN, Walker DK, Brownlee RT. Accel-
`erated fatigue testing of heart valves. In: Schwartz MD, ed.
`Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference on Engineering
`Medicine and Biology. Bethesda, MD: Alliance for Engineer-
`ing in Medicine and Biology, 1984;149.
`5. Imachi K, Mabuchi K, Chinzei T, Abe Y, Imanishi K, Yon-
`ezawa T, Maeda K, Suzukawa M, Kouno A, Ono T, Fujimasa
`I, Atsumi K. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a jellyfish valve
`for practical use. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1989;35:
`298–301.
`6. Imachi K, Mabuchi K, Chinzei T, Abe Y, Imanishi K, Su-
`zukawa M, Yonezawa T, Kouno A, Ono T, Nozawa H, At-
`sumi K, Fujimasa I. Blood compatibility of the jellyfish valve
`without anticoagulant. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs
`1991;37:220–2.
`7. Abe Y, Chinzei T, Mabuchi K, Snyder AJ, Isoyama T, Imani-
`shi K, Yonezawa T, Matsuura H, Kouno A, Ono T, Atsumi K,
`Fujimasa I, Imachi K. Physiological control of a total artificial
`
`heart: conductance- and arterial pressure-based control. J
`Appl Physiol 1998;84:868–76.
`8. Imachi K, Chinzei T, Abe Y, Mabuchi K, Matsuura H, Karita
`T, Iwasaki K, Mochizuki S, Son YP, Saito I, Kouno A, Ono T.
`A new hypothesis on the mechanism of calcification formed
`on a blood-contacted polymer surface. J Artif Organs 2001;4:
`74–82.
`9. Vesely I, Boughner DR, Dietrich JL. Bioprosthetic valve tis-
`sue viscoelasticity: implications on accelerated pulse duplica-
`tor testing. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S79–83.
`10. Reul H, Eichler M, Potthast K, Schmitz C, Rau G. In vitro
`testing of heart valve wear outside of the manufacturers labo-
`ratory—requirements and controversies. J Heart Valve Dis
`1996;5(suppl 1):105–110.
`11. Iwasaki K, Umezu M, Wakui H, Kawada H, Fujimoto T, Ima-
`chi K. Improvement of dynamic conditions in the accelerated
`fatigue testing for prosthetic heart valves. In: Goh JCH,
`Nather A, eds. Proceedings of the 9th International Confer-
`ence on Biomedical Engineering. Singapore: National Univer-
`sity of Singapore, 1997;342–44.
`
`Artif Organs, Vol. 26, No. 5, 2002
`
`PAGE 10 OF 10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket