`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 64
`Entered: April 13, 2020
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`HUNTING TITAN, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`DYNAENERGETICS GMBH & CO. KG,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2018-00600
`Patent 9,581,422 B2
`__________________________
`
`Before ANDREI IANCU, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
`Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office,
`ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Commissioner for Patents, and SCOTT R.
`BOALICK, Chief Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`BOALICK, Chief Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00600
`Patent 9,581,422 B2
`
`
`I.
`INTRODUCTION
`The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently
`issued an opinion in Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG, No. 2019-1262, 2020 WL
`1802796 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 9, 2020). We determine that the holding in Nike is
`relevant to this proceeding and, therefore, request the parties to submit
`briefing on the impact of the Nike decision on this proceeding. Accordingly,
`we authorize each party to submit a supplemental brief no longer than five
`(5) pages, limited to discussing the impact of the Nike decision on this
`proceeding, due April 20, 2020. The parties are not authorized to submit
`new evidence.
`
`
`II. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Petitioner and Patent Owner are each authorized to
`file a supplemental brief, of no more than five (5) pages and limited to
`addressing the impact of the Nike decision on this proceeding, due April 20,
`2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00600
`Patent 9,581,422 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Jason Saunders
`jsaunders@arnold-iplaw.com
`
`Gordon T. Arnold
`garnold@arnold-iplaw.com
`
`Christopher P. McKeon
`cmckeon@arnold-iplaw.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Barry J. Herman
`barry.herman@wbd-us.com
`
`Preston H. Heard
`preston.heard@wbd-us.com
`
`Lisa J. Moyles
`lmoyles@moylesip.com
`
`Jason M. Rockman
`jrockman@moylesip.com
`
`3
`
`