`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 22
`
` Entered: May 6, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ZSCALER, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-00929
`Patent 6,285,658 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JEFFREY S. SMITH, BRYAN F. MOORE, and NEIL T. POWELL,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Dismissing the Petition Pursuant to Settlement
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.71(a), 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00929
`Patent 6,285,658 B1
`
`
`On February 6, 2019, pursuant to Board authorization, Petitioner and
`Patent Owner filed a joint motion to dismiss the Petition in the proceeding
`identified in the caption. Paper 18. Along with the motion, the parties filed
`a copy of a document they describe as a settlement agreement. Paper 18;
`Ex. 1019.
`
`The Board has issued a Decision to Institute, but has not yet issued a
`Final Written Decision on the merits of this proceeding. The parties state in
`the joint motion that they have settled their dispute and have reached
`agreement to terminate this inter partes review. Paper 18. We are
`persuaded that, under these circumstances, it is appropriate to dismiss the
`Petition in the proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(a). This Order does not
`constitute a final written decision pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`It is therefore
`ORDERED that the joint motion is granted and the Petition is
`
`dismissed in this proceeding.
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00929
`Patent 6,285,658 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jeremy Jason Lang
`Don Daybell
`Jared Bobrow
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP
`PTABDocketJJL2@orrick.com
`D2DPTABDocket@orrick.com
`PTABDocketJ3B3@orrick.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Chad C. Walters
`Kurt M. Pankratz
`Bryan D. Parrish
`Katherine A. Juffa
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`chad.walters@bakerbotts.com
`kurt.pankratz@bakerbotts.com
`bryan.parrish@bakerbotts.com
`katie.juffa@bakerbotts.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
