`
`Barrier Glands Made Easy
`
`The Fast Curing, Gas Blocking, Liquid Resin Seal
`
`CMP
`
`CMP PRODUCTS
`
`Cooper v CMP; IPR2018-00994
`CMP Ex 2009; page CMP0850
`
`
`
`Sealing cables in explosive atmospheres
`
`Cooper v CMP; IPR2018-00994
`CMP Ex 2009; page CMP0851
`
`
`
`Sealing cables in explosive atmospheres
`
`Cooper v CMP; IPR2018-00994
`CMP Ex 2009; page CMP0852
`
`
`
`RapidEx
`IN
`
`Air
`Out
`
`Easy Mix
`Bag
`
`Perfect Seal
`Every Time
`
`Cooper v CMP; IPR2018-00994
`CMP Ex 2009; page CMP0853
`
`
`
` OSA
`
`
`
`
`
`Fewer stepsin the installation process
`Traditional epoxy/clay based compound
`5 Fill interstitial spaces
`1 Prepare cable
`6 Pack around cores externally
`
`Fel eeeacetalslel ile
`
`
`de Va
`= — SE
`¥.
`
`.
`
`RAPID ‘>> Liquid pour resin
`
`1 Prepare cable
`
`cs
`
`2 Clamp armour
`
`CM ieee ie me-iie
`
`4 Pour resin
`
`SU eeEERCeUeRenea
`eMacMetseeece UPae
`eeeMee MealteEeeCOLcoir]Coe
`
`
`
`
`
`ee p-products.com
`
`
` sh
`
`
`
`2 Clamp armour
`
`3 Mix compound
`
`4 Pack cable crutch
`
`8 Pack front
`Um eal
`
`
`
`Cooper v CMP; IPR2018-00994
`CMP Ex 2009; page CMP0854
`
`
`
`Cures more than 15 times faster
`than traditional epoxy/clay
`based compound at 40ºC.
`
`Cures more than 18 times faster
`than traditional epoxy/clay
`based compound at 20ºC.
`
`30minutes 15minutes
`
`6
`
`CMP PRODUCTS CABLE GLANDS AND CONNECTOR SPECIALISTS -
`GLOBAL PRODUCTS fOR GLOBAL APPLICATIONS
`
`Epoxy/Clay Based
`Compound
`
`30
`
`90
`60
`(No of Conductors)
`
`120
`
`150
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`(Time in minutes)
`
`0
`
`Easy application
`
`This comparison shows the time
`required to mix and apply barrier
`materials on a range of multi conductor
`cables, using either Clay Based Epoxy
`Compound or RapidEx Liquid Pour
`Resin. This outlines the fact that the
`application of the RapidEx liquid pour
`resin is easier than traditional methods.
`
`faster curing
`
`One of the many advantages of using the RapidEx
`liquid pour resin is the time saved in the completion of
`the cable installation, due to the fast curing formula.
`
`This means that not only is the installation inherently
`more reliable, but an installation cost saving can also
`be made.
`
`Cures more than 15 times faster
`than traditional epoxy/clay
`based compound at 40ºC.
`
`Temperature (°C)
`
`Epoxy/Clay
`Based
`Compound
`
`Time
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`(hours)
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`Cures more than 18 times faster
`than traditional epoxy/clay
`based compound at 20ºC.
`
`Temperature (°C)
`
`Epoxy/Clay
`Based
`Compound
`
`Time
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`10
`(hours)
`
`12
`
`14
`
`16
`
`18
`
`20
`
`40
`
`35
`
`30
`
`25
`
`20
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`5
`
`40ºC
`
`In higher temperatures
`curing times are vastly
`reduced using RapidEx.
`At 40ºC this can be
`as little as 15 minutes
`compared to over 3
`hours for traditional
`epoxy/clay based
`compounds.
`
`20ºC
`
`Traditional epoxy/clay
`based compounds
`can take more than
`9 hours to cure in
`temperatures below
`20ºC. Using RapidEx
`this can be reduced
`to as little as 30
`minutes.
`
`5
`
`www.cmp-products.com
`
`www.cmp-products.com
`
`CMP RapidEx 12pp Jan 13.indd 6
`
`15/01/2013 16:12
`
`Cooper v CMP; IPR2018-00994
`CMP Ex 2009; page CMP0855
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MRRALALEY
`
`*
`28 29 30 7
`
`‘
`
`3
`
`pr ail KWAN
` BeeP|Pea
` anekeEYEat4
`
`EE
`
`atropeethangpe2tiimessiastenmthan
` GUE7<C
`
`aDOx
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a a
`
`4%
`yds
`te
`26
`’
`oy
`25
`24
`4
`
`mm|23 25 / 5
`
`~ a a 22
`a
`7
`6
`|
`7
`10
`:
`8
`9
`al
`\e
`h %
`10
`iol >
`a Va
`Xi18 15 1413 : y
`wl
`s Pile
`
`1
`ay
`a
`fh ha)
`a
`Tir
`
`20
`a
`
`1S
`
`)
`
`'
`
`)
`
`/
`
`Cooper v CMP; IPR2018-00994
`CMP Ex 2009; page CMP0856
`
`
`
`CMP PRODUCTS CABLE GLANDS AND CONNECTOR SPECIALISTS -
`GLOBAL PRODUCTS fOR GLOBAL APPLICATIONS
`
`Do all Barrier Glands provide the same function?
`Today the concept of an internal flameproof joint has
`In theory the principal of a barrier gland is the same
`been abandoned by some product designs in favour of a
`for all comparable products, in that the equipment
`‘stopper box’ that relies on a completely different principal.
`form of protection is common (e.g. Ex d), given
`With NO flameproof path incorporated into the internal
`that the certification standards used are identical.
`joint, there is a greater emphasis on the installer to create
`However in practice not all barrier glands achieve the
`a gap free, air tight joint, not only during installation,
`form of protection in the same subtle manner, even if
`but following subsequent inspection and maintenance
`the certification appears to have similarities.
`procedures. These requirements can potentially be more
`When barrier glands first came on the market it was
`onerous than the conventional task of the installation itself.
`quickly identified that they needed to have an internal
`This change in product to a ‘stopper box’ could lead
`flameproof joint in order to allow the cable to be
`to misinterpretation of the protection concept and
`easily disconnected from the equipment. This part of
`all persons responsible for selection and specification
`the explosion protection concept is clearly understood
`are well advised to thoroughly review these products
`by engineering professionals around the world who
`technically and evaluate what risks may exist.
`are involved in hazardous area decision making.
`
`flameproof Type ‘d’ (Ex d) & Class I Div. 1 / Div. 2 Barrier Gland
`
`flameproof Joint
`
`Metallic Barrier Tube
`
`flame Path
`
`PX2KX-REX
`
`flame Path
`
`Note: All CMP Barrier Glands are designed and
`certified with a flameproof labyrinth joint, suitable
`for IEC & CEC / NEC installations.
`
`Inspection requirements
`As is the case with all cable glands intended for use
`in hazardous areas, barrier glands will be subjected to
`inspection from time to time. Inspection requirements
`may vary from site to site, or territory to territory,
`but the basis for inspection is usually determined
`by standards or client policy and procedures. In IEC
`60079-17 “Electrical installations, inspection and
`maintenance” three grades of inspection exist, which
`are detailed as follows :-
`V - Visual Inspection (External visual examination),
`C - Close Inspection (Removal of shroud, if applicable,
`for external visual examination),
`D - Detailed Inspection (Opening / Disassembly of
`cable gland for internal examination).
`
`When periodic detailed inspections are carried out on
`Flameproof (Ex d) equipment, part of the inspection
`requirement is to check that the flange dimensions
`of flanged joint gaps are within maximum values
`permitted by IEC 60079-1. It is also necessary to
`check that joint surfaces are clean and undamaged.
`This inspection standard also requires that stopping
`boxes and filling boxes are checked to ensure they are
`correctly filled. It would normally be possible to check
`that a cable sealing box or stopper box was correctly
`filled via a dedicated port that was provided with
`a removable flameproof plug. The existence of this
`“stopper plug” catered for subsequent inspections.
`When it comes to barrier glands there are no
`specific checks that can be easily enacted on site
`that guarantees a compound barrier gland is filled
`correctly. The RapidEx liquid pour solution provided
`by CMP eliminates this risk and delivers a more
`reliable installation.
`
`www.cmp-products.com
`
`7
`
`CMP RapidEx 12pp Jan 13.indd 8
`
`15/01/2013 16:12
`
`Cooper v CMP; IPR2018-00994
`CMP Ex 2009; page CMP0857
`
`
`
`Class I Div 1 and 2, Groups A,B,C and D; Class II, Div 1 and 2 E,F and G; Class III, Div 1 and 2 Encl. Type 4X.
`Ex d IIC; Ex e II: Class I, Zone I, AEx d IIC; AEx e II; AEx ta IIC
`
`Cooper v CMP; IPR2018-00994
`CMP Ex 2009; page CMP0858
`
`
`
`This selection chart was
`removed upon the release of
`IEC 60079-14 : 2014 and should
`only be used as a guide
`
`4
`
`4
`
`Cooper v CMP; IPR2018-00994
`CMP Ex 2009; page CMP0859
`
`
`
`
`
`CEC / NEC Installations Requirements
`Here are the general requirements for selection of cable glands for hazardous locations :-
`These codes require that any cable for use in = Hazardous Location must firstly be permitted for Use in that
`lacation, and secondly be tested and approved or listed for the application. Consequently cable glands intended
`lor Use in Hazardous Locations, must also be tested and approved or listed for use in @ specified location, in
`conjunction with a specified and approved orlisted cable type.
`
`Cable Wiring Methods - Class |, Division 2
`& Zone 2
`
`Complete Jists of surtable cable types for use in
`hazardous areas can be found by consulting the
`current NEC and CEC handbooks, Additional
`information for camman cable types approved far
`offshore installations can be found by consulting
`section 43 of IEEE Standard 45 and API RPI 14F & 14Pe
`
`As a general rule, cables permitted and listed for
`use in Class | Division 1 and Zone 1, and listed non
`armored cables can be used in Class | Division 2 and
`fone 2 hazardous locations.eg, Type TC (Tray Catile),
`Interlacked Armor cables
`
`Cable Seals, Class | Division 2 & Zone 2
`
`Where cables enter Class! Division 2 endiosures,
`ihe cable must be sealed if the enclosure contains
`any arcing or sparking devices or if the enclosure
`is explosion proof. In such cases a sealing fitting or
`Barner gland ta UL 2225 of CSA 22.2, Class | Division
`Tor Division 2 must be used, Where the enclosure
`does not contain any arcing of sparking devices and
`the enclosure is NOT explosion proof, a cable is not
`required ta be sealed at the point of entry:
`In such
`cases 2listed cable gland or cable cannector withaul
`compound sealing function may be Used, eg. TC,
`TMC2, TSCD5 of C2KA cable connectors. Similarly for
`Class | Zone 1 & Zone 2 AEx e enclosures (Increased
`Safety), a non sealing fitting approved for use in this
`application can be used, &g. TC, TMC2, TSCDS or
`C2k% cable glands.
`
`Note: Non ‘Sealing’ type glands are restricted ta
`Diwisian 2 & Zone 2 equipment that does nat contain
`an ignition source of ta Zone 1 AEx € equipment, If the
`enclosure 6 required to be explosion proof under NEC
`conditions an approved barter seal must be used.
`
`Cable Wiring Methods
`The use of flexible cables in North America has
`provided industry with a wide choice of wiring
`methods. However, there are differences between
`the NEC and CEC for cables suitable for use ir
`Hazardous areas and extreme care should be taken
`during the selection process. e. A cable type may
`be acceptable for use in Class | Division 1
`in Canada,
`but not in the USA,
`
`that the wiring method chasei
`Ibis €ssential
`permitted far use within the area classification for the
`relevant code being utilized.
`
`Cable Wiring Methods- Class|,
`Division 1 & Zone 1
`
`Complete lists of surtable cable types for use in
`hazardous areas can be found by consulting the
`current NEC and CEC handbooss, Adartional
`information tor commen cable types approved far
`offshore installations can be found by consulting
`section 43 of IEEE Standard 45 and API/RAY T4F & 14F2
`
`As a general rule, cables for use m Class | Division |
`and Zone 1 areas must be mechanically protected by
`armor, é.g. MG-HL and Wire Braid Armor (offshore)
`Cables, In Canada, interlocked armor can be also be
`Used. €.9. Teck 90.
`
`Cable Seals, Class | Division 1 & Zone 1
`
`Where cables enter Class | Diyision 7 or Zone 1 AEX
`d enclosures, the cable must be sealed at the point
`of entry with an approved device to UL 2225 ar
`CSA 22.2, Class! Division 1 ar Zone 1 AEX d, where
`applicable. The sealing fitting ar Barrier’ gland must
`prevent the passage of gas or vapours through the
`gland by providing a compound barrier seal around
`each individual insulated conductor, e.g, CMP TMC2%
`or PXZ2KX-REX cable connectors.
`
`NEC 2014
`
`Article 501,75 (E) (1) Terminations. Cables entenng
`enclosures that are required to be explosion proot
`shall be sealed at the pointof entrance, The seal shall
`comply with 501, 1S(B)(1)
`
`NEC 2014
`
`(a) Explosian
`Article 505,16 (C) (2) Cable Seals,
`proot and Flameproaf Enclosures, Cables entering
`enclosures required to be flameproof or explosion
`proot shall be sealed at the point of entrance. The
`seal shall comply with 505.16(D)
`
`
`
`
`ees
`alaehea
`required to
`ete Letera
`Pun
`
`
`
`Selection
`of Cable
`Glands
`Class 1 Ow
`lor Diva
`fone 1 or
`
`
`
`www.cmp-products.coMooper v CMP; IPR2018-00994
`CMP Ex 2009; page CMP0860
`
`4
`
`4
`
`Cooper v CMP; IPR2018-00994
`CMP Ex 2009; page CMP0860
`
`
`
`www.cmp-products.com
`
`CMP
`
`CMP PRODUCTS
`TPC 196 - Issue 4 - 07/14
`
`NEWCASTLE (Headquarters)
`Tel: +44 (0) 191 2657411
`Fax: +44 (0) 1670 715 646
`E-Mail: customerservices@cmp-products.com
`CMP Products
`36, Nelson Way, Nelson Park East
`Cramlington, Northumberland
`NE23 1WH, United Kingdom
`
`HOUSTON (Texas Inc)
`Tel: +1 281 776 5201
`Fax: +1 281 776 5223
`E-Mail: houstonoffice@cmp-products.com
`CMP Products Texas Inc
`5222 N. Sam Houston Pkwy E.
`Houston, Texas, 77032, USA
`
`PERTH, WA
`Tel: +61 8 9249 4508
`Fax: +61 8 9249 4608
`E-Mail: perthoffice@cmp-products.com
`CMP Products Pty Ltd
`Unit 3-22 Harlond Avenue, Malaga, WA 6090
`Australia
`BRISBANE, QLD
`Tel: +61 7 3801 0301
`Fax: +61 7 3801 0300
`E-Mail: qldoffice@cmp-products.com
`CMP Products Pty Ltd
`Unit 2 / 1-5 Knobel Court, Shailer Park, QLD 4128
`Australia
`
`DUBAI
`Tel: +971 4 214 6114
`Fax: +971 4 214 6117
`E-Mail: meoffice@cmp-products.com
`CMP Products Middle East Office
`Office 6WA, Room 134, PO BOX 371725
`Dubai Airport Free Zone, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
`
`BUSAN
`Tel: +82 51 780 5300
`Fax: +82 51 780 8348
`E-Mail: busanoffice@cmp-products.com
`CMP Products (Korea) Ltd
`19F Rm1915 Centum IS Tower, #1209,
`Jaesong1-dong, Haeundae-gu, Busan,
`South Korea, 612051
`
`SINGAPORE
`Tel: +65 6466 6180
`Fax: +65 6466 9891
`E-Mail: seaoffice@cmp-products.com
`CMP Products (S.E.A) Pte Ltd.
`21 Toh Guan Road East, #09-03,
`Toh Guan Centre, Singapore 608609
`
`SHANGHAI
`Tel: +86 21 6093 2633
`Fax: +86 21 6093 2630
`E-Mail: shanghaioffice@cmp-products.com
`CMP Products Division
`Room 304, Building 7, No.1888 XinJinqiao Road
`Pudong, Shanghai 201206,
`P.R. China
`
`JOHANNESBURG
`Tel: +27 79 866 2171
`Fax: +27 86 554 3240
`E-Mail: africaoffice@cmp-products.com
`CMP Products SA Pty Ltd
`49 New Road, Block A, Ground Floor
`Midrand,1685, Johannesburg, S.A
`
`Cooper v CMP; IPR2018-00994
`CMP Ex 2009; page CMP0861
`
`