`Patent 9,247,019
`Attorney Docket No. 180531-006USIPR
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GOOGLE, LLC
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`SEVEN NETWORKS, LLC
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-01050
`Patent 9,247,019
`____________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1) and the Federal Rules of Evidence
`
`(“FRE”), Patent Owner SEVEN Networks, LLC hereby objects to the following
`
`documents submitted by Petitioner Google LLC.
`
`Nothing in this paper should be construed as an admission that any rights of
`
`Patent Owner would have been waived or forfeited had the paper or any objection
`
`herein not been filed, or that 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b) applies to any of the objections
`
`herein if § 42.64(b) would not otherwise apply. The objections herein are
`
`premised upon § 42.64 potentially being determined to apply to the document in
`
`question, and are submitted solely to preserve the rights of Patent Owner should
`
`§ 42.64(b) be determined to apply.
`
`1.
`
`Exhibit 1002
`
`Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5), and 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.51(b)(1), this document or documents are incomplete and are not a copy
`
`which accurately reproduces the original.
`
`2.
`
`Exhibit 1003
`
`Under FRE 401/402/403/702, this document or documents include
`
`testimony not relevant to the instituted review, because, among other things, it has
`
`not been shown that the purportedly expert declarant is qualified to testify
`
`competently regarding the matters the opinions are said to address, or that the
`
`declarant’s testimony is based on sufficient facts or data or arrived at by reliable
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`principles, procedures, or methods reliably applied to the facts of this case, or that
`
`the declarant’s opinion will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to
`
`determine any fact in issue and does not have a greater potential to mislead than to
`
`enlighten. Under FRE 602/701/801/802 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.61, this document or
`
`documents include testimony that is not shown to be based on first-hand
`
`knowledge including of how relied-upon data was generated, are based on
`
`speculation, and constitute and contain inadmissible hearsay. Under FRE 401/705
`
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this document or documents do not disclose underlying
`
`facts and data. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this document or
`
`documents include testimony on patent law and practice.
`
`3.
`
`Exhibit 1020
`
`Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5), and 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.51(b)(1), this document or documents are incomplete and are not a copy
`
`which accurately reproduces the original. Under FRE 801/802, this document or
`
`documents constitute and contain inadmissible hearsay. Under FRE 401/705 and
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this document or documents do not disclose underlying facts
`
`and data. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document or documents are inadmissible
`
`as irrelevant because, among other things, they do not form a basis of the instituted
`
`grounds, and their probative value is outweighed by other considerations including
`
`prejudice, confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 901, this document or
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`documents are inadmissible because they have not been shown to be authenticated
`
`or identified.
`
`4.
`
`Exhibit 1021
`
`Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5), and 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.51(b)(1), this document or documents are incomplete and not a copy which
`
`accurately reproduces the original. Under FRE 801/802, this document or
`
`documents constitute and contain inadmissible hearsay. Under FRE 401/705 and
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this document or documents do not disclose underlying facts
`
`and data. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document or documents are inadmissible
`
`as irrelevant because, among other things, they do not form a basis of the instituted
`
`grounds, and their probative value is outweighed by other considerations including
`
`prejudice, confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 901, this document or
`
`documents are inadmissible because they have not been shown to be authenticated
`
`or identified.
`
`5.
`
`Exhibit 1022
`
`Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5), and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.51(b)(1), this document or documents are incomplete and are not a copy which
`
`accurately reproduces the original. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document or documents do not disclose underlying facts and data. Under FRE
`
`401/402/403, this document or documents are inadmissible as irrelevant because,
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`among other things, they do not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and their
`
`probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 801/802, this document or documents
`
`constitutes and contains inadmissible hearsay.
`
`6.
`
`Exhibit 1023
`
`Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5), and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.51(b)(1), this document or documents are incomplete and are not a copy which
`
`accurately reproduces the original. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document or documents do not disclose underlying facts and data. Under FRE
`
`401/402/403, this document or documents are inadmissible as irrelevant because,
`
`among other things, they do not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and their
`
`probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 801/802, this document or documents
`
`constitutes and contains inadmissible hearsay.
`
`7.
`
`Exhibit 1024
`
`Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5), and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.51(b)(1), this document or documents are incomplete and are not a copy which
`
`accurately reproduces the original. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document or documents do not disclose underlying facts and data. Under FRE
`
`401/402/403, this document or documents are inadmissible as irrelevant because,
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`among other things, they do not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and their
`
`probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 801/802, this document or documents
`
`constitutes and contains inadmissible hearsay.
`
`8.
`
`Exhibit 1025
`
`Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5), and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.51(b)(1), this document or documents are incomplete and are not a copy which
`
`accurately reproduces the original. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document or documents do not disclose underlying facts and data. Under FRE
`
`401/402/403, this document or documents are inadmissible as irrelevant because,
`
`among other things, they do not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and their
`
`probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 801/802, this document or documents
`
`constitutes and contains inadmissible hearsay.
`
`9.
`
`Exhibit 1026
`
`Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5), and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.51(b)(1), this document or documents are incomplete and are not a copy which
`
`accurately reproduces the original. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document or documents do not disclose underlying facts and data. Under FRE
`
`401/402/403, this document or documents are inadmissible as irrelevant because,
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`among other things, they do not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and their
`
`probative value is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice,
`
`confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 801/802, this document or documents
`
`constitutes and contains inadmissible hearsay.
`
`10. Exhibit 1027
`
`Under FRE 602/701/801/802 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.61, this document or
`
`documents include testimony that is not shown to be based on first-hand
`
`knowledge including of how relied-upon data was generated, is based on
`
`speculation, and constitutes and contains inadmissible hearsay. Under FRE
`
`401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this document or documents does not disclose
`
`underlying facts and data. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this
`
`document or documents include testimony on patent law and practice.
`
`11. Exhibit 1040
`
`Under FRE 602/701/801/802 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.61, this document or
`
`documents include testimony that is not shown to be based on first-hand
`
`knowledge including of how relied-upon data was generated, is based on
`
`speculation, and constitutes and contains inadmissible hearsay. Under FRE
`
`401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this document or documents does not disclose
`
`underlying facts and data.
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`
`12. Exhibit 1043
`
`Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5), and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.51(b)(1), this document or documents are incomplete and are not a copy which
`
`accurately reproduces the original. Under FRE 801/802, this document or
`
`documents constitutes and contains inadmissible hearsay. Under FRE 401/705 and
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this document or documents does not disclose underlying facts
`
`and data. Under FRE 401/402/403, this document or documents are inadmissible
`
`as irrelevant because, among other things, they do not form a basis of the instituted
`
`grounds, and their probative value is outweighed by other considerations including
`
`prejudice, confusion and waste of time. Under FRE 901, this document or
`
`documents are inadmissible because they have not been shown to be authenticated
`
`or identified.
`
`13. Exhibit 1044
`
`Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this document or documents
`
`does not disclose underlying facts and data. Under FRE 401/402/403, this
`
`document or documents are inadmissible as irrelevant because, among other
`
`things, they do not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and their probative value
`
`is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice, confusion and waste of
`
`time.
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`
`14. Exhibit 1047
`
`Under FRE 801/802, this document or documents constitutes and contains
`
`inadmissible hearsay. Under FRE 401/705 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.65, this document
`
`or documents do not disclose underlying facts and data. Under FRE 401/402/403,
`
`this document or documents are inadmissible as irrelevant because, among other
`
`things, they do not form a basis of the instituted grounds, and their probative value
`
`is outweighed by other considerations including prejudice, confusion and waste of
`
`time.
`
`15. Exhibit 1048
`
`Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5), and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.51(b)(1), this document or documents are incomplete and are not a copy which
`
`accurately reproduces the original.
`
`16. Exhibit 1051
`
`Under FRE 106/1001, 35 U.S.C. § 312(a)(3) & (5), and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.51(b)(1), this document or documents are incomplete and are not a copy which
`
`accurately reproduces the original.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /
`
` Kenneth J. Weatherwax /
`Kenneth J. Weatherwax, Reg. No. 54,528
`LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX LLP
`
`Date: January 18, 2019
`
`- 8 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2018-01050
`Patent 9,247,019
`Attorney Docket No. 180531-006USIPR
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the following documents were served
`by electronic service, by agreement between the parties, on the date signed below:
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1)
`
`
`
`
`
`The names and address of the parties being served are as follows:
`
`Erika H. Arner
`Rachel L. Emsley
`Kara A. Specht
`Google-SevenNetworks-IPRs@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` / Jason Linger /
`
`Date: January 18, 2019
`
`