`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 7
`Entered: August 27, 2018
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`TRICAM INDUSTRIES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`WING ENTERPRISES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-01070
`Patent 7,364,017 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Vice Chief Administrative Patent
`Judge, CARL M. DEFRANCO, and JOHN P. PINKERTON, Administrative
`Patent Judges.
`
`DEFRANCO, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DISMISSAL OF PETITION
`37 C.F.R. § 42.71(a)
`
`On August 2, 2018, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate this
`
`proceeding. Paper 5. Along with the motion, the parties filed a copy of a
`written settlement agreement (Ex. 1010) and a request to treat the settlement
`agreement as business confidential (Paper 6).
`This proceeding is in a preliminary stage. The patent owner has yet to
`file a preliminary response to the petition, and we have yet to issue a
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01070
`Patent 7,364,017 B2
`
`decision on whether to institute inter partes review. The parties represent
`that they have resolved all disputes between them relating to the challenged
`patent, including “all patent-related claims and counterclaims” in the co-
`pending district court action, Wing Enterprises, Inc. dba Little Giant Ladder
`Systems v. Tricam Industries, Inc., Case No. 0:17-cv-01769 (D. Minn.).
`Paper 5, 2. The district court dismissed the patent-related claims and
`counterclaims “with prejudice” on July 30, 2018. Id. The parties further
`represent that “no other party’s rights will be prejudiced by the termination
`of this proceeding.” Id. Under these circumstances, we determine that it is
`appropriate to dismiss the petition. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(a). This paper
`does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate this proceeding is
`granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for inter partes review of the
`challenged patent is dismissed; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint request for the settlement
`agreement (Ex. 1010) to be treated as business confidential information and
`to be kept separate from the patent files is granted.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01070
`Patent 7,364,017 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Mike P. Gates
`Eric H. Chadwick
`PATTERSON THUENTE PEDERSEN, P.A.
`gates@ptslaw.com
`chadwick@ptslaw.com
`TricamIPR20181070@ptslaw.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Mark A. Miller
`Bradley B. Jensen
`DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
`miller.mark@dorsey.com
`jensen.brad@dorsey.com
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`