`571.272.7822 Filed: August 6, 2019
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MOBILE TECH, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INVUE SECURITY PRODUCTS INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-01138
`Patent 9,659,472 B
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JUSTIN T. ARBES, STACEY G. WHITE, and
`DANIEL J. GALLIGAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WHITE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Petitioner’s Motion to Seal
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14, 42.54
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01138
`Patent 9,659,472 B2
`
`
`On April 17, 2019, we granted Patent Owner’s Motion to Seal and for
`entry of a Protective Order. See Papers 15, 16; Ex. 2038 (the protective
`order entered in this proceeding). Before us now is Petitioner’s Motion to
`Seal, which seeks to seal Exhibit 1038. Paper 18 (“Motion” or “Mot.”).
`Exhibit 1038 is a Supplemental Declaration of Christopher Remy. Petitioner
`submitted a proposed redacted version of the Declaration (Ex. 1040) and
`seeks to seal only the redacted information. Mot. 3.
`When determining whether good cause exists for sealing the evidence,
`we balance the parties’ needs in protecting confidential information and the
`public’s interest in maintaining a complete and understandable record. Here,
`Christoper Remy, Chief Executive Officer of Petitioner, was deposed in a
`related proceeding and during that deposition he provided information that
`Petitioner considers to be of a sensistive nature to its business. Mot. 2–3.
`We previously sealed the transcript of Mr. Remy’s deposition along with
`certain other exhibits. See Paper 14, 16. Now, Petitioner seeks to seal
`portions of a supplemental declaration from Mr. Remy that provides updated
`information with respect to his previous testimony. Mot. 1–2. We note that
`the parties conferred and this Motion is unopposed. Id. at 4. We find that
`the information redacted is confidential business information, and given that
`Petitioner redacted the confidential business information, rather than seeking
`to seal the documents in their entirety, we find good cause to seal the
`redacted information.
`
`ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Seal (Paper 18) is granted.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01138
`Patent 9,659,472 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Alan Norman
`Anthony Blum
`David Jinkins
`Matthew Braunel
`Robert Gerlach
`THOMPSON COBURN LLP
`anorman@thompsoncoburn.com
`ablum@thompsoncoburn.com
`djinkins@thompsoncoburn.com
`mbraunel@thompsoncoburn.com
`rgerlach@thompsoncoburn.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Gregory Carlin
`David Moreland
`Warren Thomas
`MEUINER CARLIN & CURFMAN LLC
`gcarlin@mcciplaw.com
`dmoreland@mcciplaw.com
`wthomas@mcciplaw.com
`
`Trent Kirk
`INVUE SECURITY PRODUCTS INC.
`trentkirk@invue.com
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
