`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 30
`
` Entered: June 18, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`KOKUSAI ELECTRIC CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ASM IP HOLDING B.V.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-01151
`Patent 7,537,662 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
`DONNA M. PRAISS, and CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PRAISS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`Austin Zuck
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01151
`Patent 7,537,662 B2
`
`
`On June 13, 2019, Petitioner filed a Motion for Admission Pro Hac
`Vice of Austin Zuck. Paper 29 (“Motion”). The Motion is supported by a
`Declaration of Mr. Zuck. Ex. 1028. Petitioner represents that Patent Owner
`does not oppose the Motion. Paper 29, 3.
`Upon review of the record before us, we determine that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`admit Mr. Zuck pro hac vice.
`It is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s unopposed motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Mr. Zuck is conditionally granted, provided that within ten
`(10) business days of the date of this order, Petitioner must submit a Power
`of Attorney for Mr. Zuck in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b);
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Zuck is authorized to represent
`Petitioner only as back-up counsel in the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must file an updated
`mandatory notice identifying Mr. Zuck as back-up counsel in accordance
`with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3);
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Zuck is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, including the August 2018 Update, 83 Fed. Reg.
`39,989 (Aug. 13, 2018), and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set
`forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01151
`Patent 7,537,662 B2
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Zuck is to be subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq.1
`
`
`1 Mr. Zuck declares he will be “subject to the USPTO Code of Professional
`Responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 10.20 et seq.,” rather than the USPTO
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. Ex.
`1028 ¶ 9. We deem this to be harmless error.
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01151
`Patent 7,537,662 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Dion M. Bregman
`Michael J. Lyons
`Jason E. Gettleman
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`dion.bregman@morganlewis.com
`michael.lyons@morganlewis.com
`jason.gettleman@morganlewis.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Kerry S. Taylor
`Adeel S. Akhtar
`Nathanael R. Luman
`Carol Pitzel Cruz
`Nathaniel R. Luman
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2kst@knobbe.com
`2asa@knobble.com
`2nrl@knobbe.com
`2cmp@knobbe.com
`2ndr@knobbe.com
`BoxASMMCL@knobbe.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
