throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`
` Paper No. 10
` Entered: October 15, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC., AND
`DIAMOND OFFSHORE COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2018-01174 (Patent 6,047,781)
`IPR2018-01175 (Patent 6,068,069)
`IPR2018-01176 (Patent 6,085,851)
`IPR2018-01177 (Patent 6,056,071)
`____________
`
`Before WILLIAM V. SAINDON and TIMOTHY J. GOODSON,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PER CURIAM.
`
`ORDER
`Granting Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding Due to
`Settlement before Institution and
`Granting Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement as
`Business Confidential Information
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01174 (Patent 6,047,781)
`IPR2018-01175 (Patent 6,068,069)
`IPR2018-01176 (Patent 6,085,851)
`IPR2018-01177 (Patent 6,056,071)
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`Petitioner and Patent Owner (collectively referred to as “the Parties”)
`have requested that the above-identified inter partes review proceedings be
`terminated pursuant to a settlement. On September 27, 2018, we authorized
`the Parties to file joint motions to terminate the proceedings. On September
`27, 2018, the Parties filed Joint Motions to Terminate the above-identified
`proceedings (collectively “Joint Motions”). Paper 9.1 Along with the Joint
`Motions, the Parties filed copies of a Confidential Settlement and License
`Agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) (Ex. 1061),2 as well as Joint Requests
`to Treat the Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential Information
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (collectively “Joint
`Requests”) (Paper 10).3
`
`DISCUSSION
`II.
`In the Joint Motions, the Parties represent that they have reached an
`agreement to jointly seek termination of the above-identified inter partes
`review proceedings, and that the filed copies of the Settlement Agreement
`are true and complete copies. Paper 9, 2. The Parties further represent that
`their Settlement Agreement resolves all currently pending Patent Office and
`District Court proceedings between the Parties involving the above-
`
`1 For purposes of expediency, we cite to the paper filed in IPR2018-01174.
`Similar papers were filed in IPR2018-01175 (Paper 8), IPR2018-01176
`(Paper 6), and IPR2018-01177 (Paper 6).
`2 The Parties also filed copies of the Settlement Agreement in IPR2018-
`01175 (Ex. 1061), IPR2018-01176 (Ex. 1061), and IPR2018-01177
`(Ex. 1061).
`3 The Parties filed similar Joint Requests in IPR2018-01175 (Paper 9),
`IPR2018-01176 (Paper 7), and IPR2018-01177 (Paper 7).
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01174 (Patent 6,047,781)
`IPR2018-01175 (Patent 6,068,069)
`IPR2018-01176 (Patent 6,085,851)
`IPR2018-01177 (Patent 6,056,071)
`
`identified patents at issue. Id.
`These proceedings are at an early stage, and we have not yet decided
`whether to institute a trial in any of these proceedings. In view of the early
`stage of these proceedings and the settlement between the Parties, we
`determine that good cause exists to terminate these proceedings with respect
`to the Parties.
`The Parties also filed Joint Requests that the Settlement Agreement be
`treated as business confidential information and be kept separate from the
`file of the respective patents involved in these inter partes proceedings.
`Paper 10, 2. After reviewing the Settlement Agreement between Petitioner
`and Patent Owner, we find that the Settlement Agreement contains
`confidential business information regarding the terms of settlement. We
`determine that good cause exists to treat the Settlement Agreement between
`Petitioner and Patent Owner as business confidential information pursuant to
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`This Order does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to 35
`U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`III. ORDER
`Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, it is:
`ORDERED that the Joint Motions to Terminate are granted, and
`IPR2018-01174, IPR2018-01175, IPR2018-01176, and IPR2018-01177 are
`terminated;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Requests to Treat the Settlement
`Agreement as Business Confidential Information are granted, and the
`Settlement Agreement shall be kept separate from the files of Patent
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01174 (Patent 6,047,781)
`IPR2018-01175 (Patent 6,068,069)
`IPR2018-01176 (Patent 6,085,851)
`IPR2018-01177 (Patent 6,056,071)
`
`6,047,781, Patent 6,068,069, Patent 6,085,851, and Patent 6,056,071 and
`made available only to Federal Government agencies on written request, or
`to any person on a showing of good cause, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Matthew Reeves
`mreeves@lockelord.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Dion Bregman
`dion.bregman@morganlewis.com
`
`Bradford Cangro
`bradford.cangro@morganlewis.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket