throbber
Apple Inc. (Petitioner)
`v.
`Qualcomm Incorporated (Patent Owner)
`Petitioner Demonstratives
`Case Nos. IPR2018-01283 and IPR2018-01452
`U.S. Patent No. 7,834,591
`
`Before Hon. Trevor M. Jefferson, Daniel J. Galligan, and Scott B. Howard
`Administrative Patent Judges
`
`1
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1066
`Apple v. Qualcomm
`IPR2018-01283
`
`1
`
`

`

`Table of Contents
`1.0: “[A]s a voltage on the battery increases” ............................................. 9
`1.1 Qualcomm’s claim construction is unjustified .................................................. 10
`1.2 Bell and Kester meet either interpretation ........................................................ 14
`1.3 Bell, Kester, and Gong meet either interpretation …………………………….. 16
`2.0: Charging current greater than input current to a switching regulator... 19
`3.0: Reducing battery charging current in a “current control mode”
`“as [a] voltage on the battery increases” ……………………………………... 27
`3.1 Bell and Kester ……………………………………………………………………. 28
`3.2 Bell, Kester, and Gong …………………………………………………………… 48
`4.0: Bell, Kester, and Gong are properly combined………………………..... 52
`4.1 Motivation for Combination………………………………………………………. 53
`4.2 Digital to Analog Converter (DAC) Operation …………………………………. 58
`4.3 The Techniques of Bell and Gong are Complementary………………………. 64
`4.4 The Techniques of Bell and Gong Co-exist As Bell Teaches………………… 68
`4.5 Determining Available Power………..…………………………………………… 72
`
`2
`
`2
`
`

`

`The ’591 Patent
`
`The ’591 Patent
`
`FISH.
`
`3
`
`3
`
`3
`
`

`

`’591 Patent Overview
`
`• U.S. Patent No. 7,834,591 (the “’591
`Patent” or “’591”) was filed Feb. 16,
`2006.
`
`• The ’591 Patent’s claims are directed
`toward, e.g., circuits that charge a
`battery from a USB source using a
`switching regulator.
`
`•
`
`•
`
`IPR2018-01283 challenges claims 1, 2,
`4, 6-9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 18-21, 23-28, 30-
`37, 39, 42, 43, and 45 for being
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
`
`IPR2018-01452 challenges claims 1-5,
`7, 8, 10-13, 15, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24, 28,
`30-32, 37, 39, 40, 41, and 44 for being
`unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
`APPLE-1001, Abstract,1:3-4; 1283 Pet. 1-3; 1452 Pet. 2-3.
`
`4
`
`APPLE-1001 (’591 Patent).
`
`4
`
`

`

`The ’591 Patent
`
`“To improve charging speed, the ’591 patent proposes charging so that
`‘input current is maintained approximately constant and the current into the
`battery is reduced as the battery voltage increases.’”
`1283 Pet. 1; 1452 Pet. 1.
`
`’591 Patent
`
`APPLE-1001, 19:30-38; 1283 Pet. 1; 1452 Pet. 1;
`1283 Reply 16-17; 1452 Reply 13.
`
`5
`
`5
`
`

`

`Overview of the Grounds
`
`Overview of the Grounds
`
`FISH.
`
`6
`
`6
`6
`
`6
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01283: Bell-Kester Grounds
`
`Ground
`
`’591 Patent Claims
`
`Basis for Rejection
`
`Ground 1A
`
`Ground 1B
`
`Ground 1C
`
`Ground 1D
`
`1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 11, 15,
`16, 18-21, 23-28,
`30-37, 39, 42, 43, 45
`
`§103 – Bell in view of Kester
`(and optionally Martin)
`
`6, 9
`
`4, 13
`
`14
`
`§103 – Bell in view of Kester and Sherman ’172
`(and optionally Martin)
`
`§103 – Bell in view of Kester and Hatular
`(and optionally Martin)
`
`§103 – Bell in view of Kester, Hatular, and Sherman ’172
`(and optionally Martin)
`
`1283 Pet. 2-3.
`
`7
`
`7
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01452: Bell-Kester-Gong Grounds
`
`Ground
`
`’591 Patent Claims
`
`Basis for Rejection
`
`Ground 2A
`
`1-5, 7, 8, 10-12, 15,
`18, 21, 23, 24, 28,
`30-32, 37, 39, 40,
`41, 44
`
`§103 – Bell in view of Kester and Gong
`(and optionally Martin)
`
`Ground 2B
`
`4, 5, 13, 17
`
`§103 – Bell in view of Kester, Gong, and Hatular
`(and optionally Martin)
`
`1452 Pet. 2
`
`8
`
`8
`
`

`

`increases”
`
`1.0 “[A]s a voltage on the battery
`1.0 “[A]s a voltage on the battery
`increases”
`
`FISH.
`
`9
`
`9
`9
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`1.0: “[A]s a voltage on the battery increases” ............................................. 91.0: “[A]s a voltage on the battery increases” ............................................. 9
`1.1 Qualcomm’s claim construction is unjustified .................................................. 10
`
`1.2 Bell and Kester meet either interpretation ........................................................ 141.2 Bell and Kester meet either interpretation ........................................................ 14
`
`1.3 Bell, Kester, and Gong meet either interpretation …………………………….. 161.3 Bell, Kester, and Gong meet either interpretation …………………………….. 16
`
`2.0: Charging current greater than input current to a switching regulator... 192.0: Charging current greater than input current to a switching regulator... 19
`
`3.0: Reducing battery charging current in a “current control mode” 3.0: Reducing battery charging current in a “current control mode”
`
`“as [a] voltage on the battery increases” ……………………………………... 27“as [a] voltage on the battery increases” ……………………………………... 27
`
`3.1 Bell and Kester ……………………………………………………………………. 283.1 Bell and Kester ……………………………………………………………………. 28
`
`3.2 Bell, Kester, and Gong …………………………………………………………… 483.2 Bell, Kester, and Gong …………………………………………………………… 48
`
`4.0: Bell, Kester, and Gong are properly combined………………………..... 524.0: Bell, Kester, and Gong are properly combined………………………..... 52
`
`4.1 Motivation for Combination………………………………………………………. 534.1 Motivation for Combination………………………………………………………. 53
`
`4.2 Digital to Analog Converter (DAC) Operation …………………………………. 584.2 Digital to Analog Converter (DAC) Operation …………………………………. 58
`
`4.3 The Techniques of Bell and Gong are Complementary………………………. 644.3 The Techniques of Bell and Gong are Complementary………………………. 64
`4.4 The Techniques of Bell and Gong Co-exist As Bell Teaches………………… 68684.4 The Techniques of Bell and Gong Co-exist As Bell Teaches…………………
`
`
`4.5 Determining Available Power………..…………………………………………… 72724.5 Determining Available Power………..……………………………………………
`
`
`
`10
`
`10
`
`

`

`1.1 Qualcomm’s claim construction is unjustified
`
`’591 Patent Claim 1
`
`APPLE-1001, 25:41-61; 1283 Pet. 37; 1452 Pet. 43.
`
`Qualcomm’s Position
`
`“[A] POSITA would understand ‘as a
`voltage on the battery increases’ in the
`claims of the ’591 Patent to mean
`‘in response to a sensed increase in
`in response to a sensed increase
`battery voltage.’”
`
`1283 POR 17; 1283 Reply 2.
`1452 POR 16; 1452 Reply 10.
`
`11
`
`11
`
`

`

`1.1 Qualcomm’s claim construction is unjustified
`
`Qualcomm’s Construction:
`• Does not meet the BRI standard
`• Violates the claim differentiation doctrine
`•
`Imports a single embodiment into the claims
`• Reads the Sensed Input Current embodiment
`out of the claims
`
`1283 Reply, 1, 4, 12.
`
`1283 Reply, 8.
`
`1283 Reply, 4.
`
`1283 Reply, 4.
`
`Dr. Lall’s Claim Construction Opinion Is Incomplete and Not
`Credible:
`“Q…So you didn’t consider whether a second embodiment was incorporated into
`the claims?
`
`[A.] Well, I think I’ve considered the second embodiment. Of course, I’ve
`described it to you in enough amount of detail that I would have considered it. But
`what I’m trying to tell you is it’s not a part of my scope of my assignment where
`I would have been asked whether certain embodiments and what claims do
`they correspond to. That’s not a mapping I have done.”
`Ex.1052, 96:8-20 (emphasis added); 1283 Reply 11.
`
`12
`
`12
`
`

`

`1.1 Qualcomm’s claim construction is unjustified
`
`Preliminary Patent Owner Response
`
`1283 POPR 25.
`
`13
`
`13
`
`

`

`
`1.0: “[A]s a voltage on the battery increases” ............................................. 91.0: “[A]s a voltage on the battery increases” ............................................. 9
`
`1.1 Qualcomm’s claim construction is unjustified .................................................. 101.1 Qualcomm’s claim construction is unjustified .................................................. 10
`1.2 Bell and Kester meet either interpretation ........................................................ 14
`
`1.3 Bell, Kester, and Gong meet either interpretation …………………………….. 161.3 Bell, Kester, and Gong meet either interpretation …………………………….. 16
`
`2.0: Charging current greater than input current to a switching regulator... 192.0: Charging current greater than input current to a switching regulator... 19
`
`3.0: Reducing battery charging current in a “current control mode” 3.0: Reducing battery charging current in a “current control mode”
`
`“as [a] voltage on the battery increases” ……………………………………... 27“as [a] voltage on the battery increases” ……………………………………... 27
`
`3.1 Bell and Kester ……………………………………………………………………. 283.1 Bell and Kester ……………………………………………………………………. 28
`
`3.2 Bell, Kester, and Gong …………………………………………………………… 483.2 Bell, Kester, and Gong …………………………………………………………… 48
`
`4.0: Bell, Kester, and Gong are properly combined………………………..... 524.0: Bell, Kester, and Gong are properly combined………………………..... 52
`
`4.1 Motivation for Combination………………………………………………………. 534.1 Motivation for Combination………………………………………………………. 53
`
`4.2 Digital to Analog Converter (DAC) Operation …………………………………. 584.2 Digital to Analog Converter (DAC) Operation …………………………………. 58
`
`4.3 The Techniques of Bell and Gong are Complementary………………………. 644.3 The Techniques of Bell and Gong are Complementary………………………. 64
`
`4.4 The Techniques of Bell and Gong Co-exist As Bell Teaches………………… 684.4 The Techniques of Bell and Gong Co-exist As Bell Teaches………………… 68
`
`4.5 Determining Available Power………..…………………………………………… 724.5 Determining Available Power………..…………………………………………… 72
`
`14
`
`14
`
`

`

`1.2 Bell and Kester meet either interpretation
`
`“The ’591 patent
`explains that
`increases in battery
`voltage can be
`sensed indirectly,
`so that sensing
`input current—as
`Bell does—is
`equivalent to
`sensing battery
`voltage.”
`
`1283 Reply 13.
`
`’591 Patent
`“[T]he switching regulator may detect the rise in the
`battery voltage by sensing either the battery voltage
`directly, the input current, or other related
`parameters.”
`
`Ex.1001, 18:61-63 (emphasis added);
`1283 Reply 13.
`
`Bell
`“According to the principles of the present invention, a
`third feedback loop is provided that monitors the
`current being drawn from input power converter 18.
`… Thus, when the current through resistor 50 is too
`high, the output of current sense amplifier 54 will be
`high relative to the reference level. Error amplifier 52 will
`in turn generate a control signal causing DC/DC
`converter 32 to lower the charging current, thereby
`lowering the current drawn from power converter
`18.”
`
`Ex.1001, 18:61-63 (emphasis added);
`1283 Reply 13.
`
`15
`
`15
`
`

`

`Table of Contents
`
`1.0: “[A]s a voltage on the battery increases” ............................................. 91.0: “[A]s a voltage on the battery increases” ............................................. 9
`
`1.1 Qualcomm’s claim construction is unjustified .................................................. 101.1 Qualcomm’s claim construction is unjustified .................................................. 10
`
`1.2 Bell and Kester meet either interpretation ........................................................ 141.2 Bell and Kester meet either interpretation ........................................................ 14
`1.3 Bell, Kester, and Gong meet either interpretation …………………………….. 16
`
`2.0: Charging current greater than input current to a switching regulator... 192.0: Charging current greater than input current to a switching regulator... 19
`
`3.0: Reducing battery charging current in a “current control mode” 3.0: Reducing battery charging current in a “current control mode”
`
`“as [a] voltage on the battery increases” ……………………………………... 27“as [a] voltage on the battery increases” ……………………………………... 27
`
`3.1 Bell and Kester ……………………………………………………………………. 283.1 Bell and Kester ……………………………………………………………………. 28
`
`3.2 Bell, Kester, and Gong …………………………………………………………… 483.2 Bell, Kester, and Gong …………………………………………………………… 48
`
`4.0: Bell, Kester, and Gong are properly combined………………………..... 524.0: Bell, Kester, and Gong are properly combined………………………..... 52
`
`4.1 Motivation for Combination………………………………………………………. 534.1 Motivation for Combination………………………………………………………. 53
`
`4.2 Digital to Analog Converter (DAC) Operation …………………………………. 584.2 Digital to Analog Converter (DAC) Operation …………………………………. 58
`
`4.3 The Techniques of Bell and Gong are Complementary………………………. 644.3 The Techniques of Bell and Gong are Complementary………………………. 64
`
`4.4 The Techniques of Bell and Gong Co-exist As Bell Teaches………………… 684.4 The Techniques of Bell and Gong Co-exist As Bell Teaches………………… 68
`
`4.5 Determining Available Power………..…………………………………………… 724.5 Determining Available Power………..…………………………………………… 72
`
`16
`
`16
`
`

`

`1.3 Bell, Kester, and Gong meet either interpretation
`
`Gong
`
`“The combination
`… senses battery
`voltage (VB) and
`reduces charging
`current based on
`the sensed battery
`voltage (VB)....”
`
`1452 Reply 11.
`
`Ex.1008, Fig. 9; 1452 Pet. 73.
`
`17
`
`17
`
`

`

`1.3 Bell, Kester, and Gong meet either interpretation
`
`Gong
`
`“The combination
`… senses battery
`voltage (VB) and
`reduces charging
`current based on
`the sensed battery
`voltage (VB)....”
`
`APPLE-1008, 9:35-42; 1452 Reply 11.
`
`1452 Reply 11.
`
`APPLE-1008, 10:14-17; 1452 Reply 11.
`
`APPLE-1008, 6:25-40; 1452 Pet. 43-45; 1452 Reply 9.
`
`18
`
`18
`
`

`

`2.0 Battery charging current greater than input
`current to a switching regulator
`
`19
`
`19
`
`19
`
`

`

`2.0 Battery charging current greater than input current to a
`switching regulator
`
`“Bell uses a switching Buck regulator”
`
`1283 Pet. 21.
`
`Bell
`
`APPLE-1005, 6:58-63;
`1283 Pet. 25; 1452 Pet. 40.
`
`20
`
`20
`
`

`

`2.0 Battery charging current greater than input current to a
`switching regulator
`“Kester explains that Buck regulators
`step down voltage and increase current”
`
`1283 Pet. 11-12; 1452 Pet. 15.
`
`Kester
`
`APPLE-1007, 3.3; 1283 Pet., 11-12, 21, 35; 1452 Pet., 40.
`
`21
`
`21
`
`

`

`2.0 Battery charging current greater than input current to a
`switching regulator
`
`“In the combination,
`Bell’s switching
`regulator … would
`provide filtered
`output current …
`that is greater than
`the input current.”
`
`1283 Pet., 39.
`1452 Pet., 40-41.
`
`Dr. Phinney
`“[I]t is obvious for Bell’s switching regulator
`… to provide filtered output current … that is
`greater than the input current …, since this
`is common, well-known behavior of a Buck
`regulator. “
`
`APPLE-1003, ¶ 221; 1283 Pet., 25;
`APPLE-1003, ¶ 501; 1452 Pet., 39.
`
`Dr. Phinney
`“This relationship between input current and
`output current is a fundamental property of
`Buck regulators that would be known to a
`POSITA. . . . Indeed, no modification of
`Bell’s circuitry is needed for Bell’s switching
`DC/DC converter 32 to be able to provide
`greater output current than input current as
`Kester describes.”
`
`APPLE-1003, ¶ 190; 1283 Pet., 25.
`APPLE-1003, ¶ 483; 1452 Pet., 24-25.
`
`22
`
`22
`
`

`

`2.0 Battery charging current greater than input current to a
`switching regulator
`
`“The particular type of switching DC/DC converter 32
`Bell uses for battery charging, identified by Bell as a
`‘Buck’ stepdown converter, is the same type used in
`the ’591 patent.”
`
`1283 Pet., 10; 1452 Pet., 11.
`
`’591 Patent
`
`APPLE-1001, 17:41-43; 1283 Pet., 10; 1452 Pet., 11.
`
`23
`
`23
`
`

`

`2.0 Battery charging current greater than input current to a
`switching regulator
`
`“Kester explains
`that Buck
`regulators step
`down voltage
`and increase
`current”
`
`1283 Pet. 11-12; 1452 Pet. 15.
`
`APPLE-1007, 3.11; 1283 Pet., 21; 1452 Pet., 40.
`1283 Pet., 11-12 (citing APPLE-1003, ¶ 134).
`24
`
`24
`
`

`

`2.0 Battery charging current greater than input current to a
`switching regulator
`“Even in discontinuous mode,
`a Buck regulator typically provides
`higher output current than input current.”
`
`1283 Reply, 23;
`1452 Reply. 4.
`
`APPLE-1007, 3.11; 1283 Reply, 24; 1452 Reply, 5.
`
`25
`
`25
`
`

`

`2.0 Battery charging current greater than input current to a
`switching regulator
`“the average output current will be less than the input current across a range
`of values” 1283 POR, 49.
`
`Rebuttal to:
`
`Dr. Phinney:
`“6. The fact that the output current “may take a range of values” (Ex.2007,
`¶138) does not mean that output current can be less than input current as Dr.
`Lall asserts. Input current is not fixed across the range of a regulator’s output.
`Input current is not fixed across the range of a regulator’s output.
`As noted above, output power is nearly equal to the input power. . . . Given a
`voltage step-down, various different output currents could be provided
`without changing the input voltage VIN and output voltage VOUT. But
`because output power (VOUT x IOUT) must remain nearly equal to input power
`(VIN x IIN), the voltage step-down (e.g., VIN < VOUT) means that even a buck
`regulator providing a low output current IOUT must draw an input current IIN that
`is still lower than the output current IOUT.”
`
`APPLE-1056, ¶6 (emphasis added); 1283 Reply 22-23
`
`26
`
`26
`
`

`

`3.0: Reducing battery charging current in a
`“current control mode” “as [a] voltage on the
`battery increases”
`
`27
`
`27
`
`27
`
`

`

`
`1.0: “[A]s a voltage on the battery increases” ............................................. 91.0: “[A]s a voltage on the battery increases” ............................................. 9
`
`1.1 Qualcomm’s claim construction is unjustified .................................................. 101.1 Qualcomm’s claim construction is unjustified .................................................. 10
`
`1.2 Bell and Kester meet either interpretation ........................................................ 141.2 Bell and Kester meet either interpretation ........................................................ 14
`
`1.3 Bell, Kester, and Gong meet either interpretation …………………………….. 161.3 Bell, Kester, and Gong meet either interpretation …………………………….. 16
`
`2.0: Charging current greater than input current to a switching regulator... 192.0: Charging current greater than input current to a switching regulator... 19
`
`3.0: Reducing battery charging current in a “current control mode” 3.0: Reducing battery charging current in a “current control mode”
`
`“as [a] voltage on the battery increases” ……………………………………... 27“as [a] voltage on the battery increases” ……………………………………... 27
`3.1 Bell and Kester ……………………………………………………………………. 28
`
`3.2 Bell, Kester, and Gong …………………………………………………………… 483.2 Bell, Kester, and Gong …………………………………………………………… 48
`
`4.0: Bell, Kester, and Gong are properly combined………………………..... 524.0: Bell, Kester, and Gong are properly combined………………………..... 52
`
`4.1 Motivation for Combination………………………………………………………. 534.1 Motivation for Combination………………………………………………………. 53
`
`4.2 Digital to Analog Converter (DAC) Operation …………………………………. 584.2 Digital to Analog Converter (DAC) Operation …………………………………. 58
`
`4.3 The Techniques of Bell and Gong are Complementary………………………. 644.3 The Techniques of Bell and Gong are Complementary………………………. 64
`4.4 The Techniques of Bell and Gong Co-exist As Bell Teaches………………… 68684.4 The Techniques of Bell and Gong Co-exist As Bell Teaches…………………
`
`
`4.5 Determining Available Power………..…………………………………………… 72724.5 Determining Available Power………..……………………………………………
`
`
`
`28
`
`28
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`“Bell’s circuit 70 has three feedback loops, which regulate
`output current, input current, and output voltage, respectively.”
`1283 Pet., 39.
`
`APPLE-1005, Fig. 4B; 1283 Pet., 11; 1452 Pet., 13.
`
`29
`
`29
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`“The input current
`feedback loop operates
`… [to] keep input current
`within the limits of the
`power source.”
`
`1283 Pet., 40.
`
`Bell
`“The third feedback loop adjusts the output
`voltage and current of battery charger DC/DC
`converter 32 to limit the total current through
`current sensing resistor 50. … The input
`current feedback loop … causes battery
`charger DC/DC converter 32 to reduce the
`o reduce the
`
`battery charging current, thereby reducing the battery charging current, thereby reducing the
`
`power demand of DC/DC converter 32, and power demand of DC/DC converter 32, and
`bringing current supplied by power converter
`bringing current supplied by power converter
`18 within limits.”
`18 within limits.”
`
`APPLE-1005, 6:35-51; 1283 Pet., 17, 38, 42-43.
`
`Bell
`
`APPLE-1005, 6:25-30; 1283 Pet., 42.
`
`30
`
`30
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`“The combination operates in a ‘current control mode’”
`1283 Pet., 39.
`
`“The output current feedback loop and
`the input current feedback loop operate
`together to set the charging current to
`the battery in a current control mode.”
`
`1283 Pet. 39.
`
`31
`
`31
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`“The combination maximizes charging
`power within a power constraint.”
`Bell
`“It is a further object of the invention to provide
`circuitry and methods to continuously vary the
` maximize
`power used for battery charging to maximize
`utilization of the power handling capacity of an
`utilization of the power handling capacity
`t
`l
`t
`”
`external power converter.”
`
`1283 Pet., 41.
`
`APPLE-1005, 2:57-60; 1283 Pet., 41.
`
`Bell
`“… [I]t would be advantageous to vary the
`charging rate of the battery during a charge to
`best utilize a power converter's capacity
`best utilize a power converter's capacity without
`di
`ti
`f th
`l
`”
`exceeding a rating of the power supply.”
`APPLE-1005, 2:41-45; 1283 Pet., 1.
`
`32
`
`32
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`APPLE-1005, Fig. 2C; 1283 Pet., 41.
`
`“battery charger 20 may use any or all of the excess power”
`APPLE-1005, 4:67-5:2 (emphasis added); 1283 Pet., 41.
`
`33
`
`33
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`1283 Pet., 41.
`
`“The combination maximizes charging
`power within a power constraint.”
`Bell
`“For example, in FIG. 2C, the power used by
`device circuitry 13 (region 15) is effectively
`subtracted from the power capacity of AC/DC
`power converter 18. The area below power limit 23
`and also below region 15 is available for use by
`battery charger
`battery charging circuitry 20. Since battery charger
`20 may use any or all of the excess power, the
`20 may use any or all of the excess power, the
`power handling capacity of AC/DC converter 18
`power handling capacity of AC/DC converter 18
`may be used more effectively, and AC/DC
`may be used more effectively,
`converter 18 may therefore be smaller, lighter, and
`less costly than known prior art designs.”
`APPLE-1005, 4:63-5:4 (emphasis added);
`1283 Pet., 41.
`
`34
`
`34
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`“Voltage on the battery increases during
`charging”
`
`1283 Pet., 40.
`
`APPLE-1007, Fig. 5.11; 1283 Pet., 40.
`
`35
`
`35
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`“…[I]ncreasing battery voltage increases power
`demand, which causes the input current feedback
`loop to decrease charging current.”
`
`1283 Pet., 42
`(emphasis added).
`
`“…The electrical power (P) demand is a
`function of current (I) and voltage (V), in
`particular, P = I * V. Increasing battery
`voltage (V) increases the power required
`for charging (P), unless charging current
`(I) is reduced to compensate.”
`
`1283 Pet., 42.
`
`36
`
`36
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`“…[I]ncreasing battery voltage increases power
`demand, which causes the input current feedback
`loop to decrease charging current.”
`
`1283 Pet., 42.
`
`Bell
`
`APPLE-1005, 6:25-30; 1283 Pet., 42.
`
`“Regardless of the reason for excessive power demand, the
`input current feedback loop would ‘reduce the battery
`charging current’ when excessive power demand is
`detected, to ‘bring[] current supplied by power converter 18
`within limits.’”
`
`1283 Pet. 43 (quoting APPLE-1005, 5:5-14, 6:48-51).
`
`37
`
`37
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`“Thus, as battery voltage and charging voltage increase
`during charging, charging current decreases to avoid
`exceeding the maximum limits of the power source.”
`1)
`“The combination maximizes charging power
`within a power constraint.”
`
`1283 Pet., 42
`(emphasis added).
`
`1283 Pet., 41.
`
`2)
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`“Voltage on the battery increases during
`charging.”
`
`“The electrical power (P) demand is a function
`of current (I) and voltage (V), in particular, P = I
`* V”
`
`1283 Pet., 40.
`
`1283 Pet., 42.
`
`“…[I]ncreasing battery voltage increases power
`demand, which causes the input current
`feedback loop to decrease charging
`current.”
`
`1283 Pet., 42
`(emphasis added).
`
`38
`
`38
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`“Not only is input current limiting the reason for the ’591 patent reducing
`charging current, in some instances (e.g., the Sensed Input Current
`embodiment) input current limiting is also the mechanism the patent
`uses for doing so. … So too in Bell.”
`1283 Reply 17.
`
`’591 Patent
`
`APPLE-1001, 19:18-38; 1283 Reply 17.
`
`39
`
`39
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`Bell
`
`Bell
`
`APPLE-1005, 5:4-13; 1283 Pet. 43.
`
`APPLE-1005, 6:47-51; 1283 Pet. 17, 38, 43.
`
`40
`
`40
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`Rebuttal to:
`
`“Bell’s input current feedback loop is intended to reduce the
`amount of power being used for battery charging as system power
`demands increase.” 1283 POR, 50.
`
`1283 Petition (quoting Bell)
`“Regardless of the reason for excessive power
`demand, the input current feedback loop would
`‘reduce the battery charging current’ when excessive
`power demand is detected, to ‘bring[] current
`supplied by power converter 18 within limits.’”
`
`1283 Pet. 43 (quoting APPLE-1005, 5:5-14, 6:48-51).
`
`41
`
`41
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`Rebuttal to: “[E]ven if natural increases in battery voltage during charging were to
`cause Bell’s input current feedback loop to reduce charging current, that
`reduction would only be incidental to Bell’s reduction of the amount of
`power available to the battery charger.” 1283 POR, 45-46.
`
`“Bell’s current reductions are active, not incidental.”
`
`1283 Reply 14.
`
`Bell
`
`Bell
`
`APPLE-1005, 5:4-13; 1283 Pet. 43; 1283 Reply 14.
`
`42
`
`42
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`Rebuttal to: “Second, even if natural increases in battery voltage during charging
`were to cause Bell’s input current feedback loop to reduce charging
`current, that reduction would only be incidental to Bell’s reduction of the
`amount of power available to the battery charger.” 1283 POR, 45-46.
`
`Dr. Phinney
`“240. … As discussed above, Bell’s input current feedback loop is
`
`designed to decrease in charging current to stay within power g g y p
`
`
`
`constraints. … It is important to note that the reduction of charging … It is important to note that the reduction of charging
`
`current, which is updated to decrease as battery voltage increases, current, which is updated to decrease as battery voltage increases,
`is not merely incidental but controlled.
`is not merely incidental but controlled. I.e., Bell’s regulator
`’
`produces a decreasing charge current under current control since
`d
`d
`i
`h
`t
`the input-current feedback loop adjusts the charging current
`regulated by the output-current feedback loop. . …”
`APPLE-1003, ¶ 240; 1283 Pet. 41-43; 1283 Reply 14.
`
`43
`
`43
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`Rebuttal to: “[E]very reference Petitioner cites for support that a POSITA would have
`found it obvious to use a buck regulator utilizes the
`constant current charging that was well-known
`in the prior art.” 1283 POR, 51.
`
`“Bell departs from constant-
`current, constant voltage
`(CCCV) in the same way
`the ’591 patent does.”
`
`“Input current regulation is
`precisely how Bell’s system
`departs from CCCV
`charging.”
`
`1283 Reply 15-17.
`
`Bell
`
`
`“It is an additional object of the invention “It is an additional object of the invention j
`to vary the charging rate of a battery
`to vary the charging rate of a battery to
`prevent the total power drawn from a
`power converter from exceeding a rating
`of the power converter.”
`APPLE-1005, 2:61-64; 1283 Pet. 43.
`
`44
`
`44
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`Rebuttal to:
`
`“[E]very reference Petitioner cites for support that a POSITA would
`have found it obvious to use a buck regulator utilizes the constant
`current charging that was well-known in the prior art.” 1283 POR, 51.
`
`Bell
`
`“Bell departs from constant-
`current, constant voltage
`(CCCV) in the same way
`the ’591 patent does.”
`
`“Input current regulation is
`precisely how Bell’s system
`departs from CCCV
`charging.”
`
`1283 Reply 15-17.
`
`APPLE-1005, 5:4-13; 1283 Pet. 43; 1283 Reply 14.
`
`Bell
`
`APPLE-1005, 6:47-51; 1283 Pet. 17, 38, 43.
`
`45
`
`45
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`Rebuttal to:
`
`“[A] POSITA would not size a charger to violate power limits in the
`course of performing constant current charging.” 1283 POR, 43.
`
`“First among Bell’s stated objectives is the desire to provide charging
`circuitry ‘whereby a smaller, lighter, and less costly external power
`converter may be used.’”
`
`1283 Reply 18 (quoting APPLE-1005, 2:48-51).
`
`Bell
`“Over-designing power converter 18 ensures its
`ratings will not be exceeded; however, it also
`ensures that its power handling capacity will be
`under-utilized much of the time. It would therefore
`be advantageous to provide a means of actively
`limiting the power drawn by battery charger to
`whatever remaining power capacity is not currently
`being used by device circuitry 13.”
`Ex.1005, 4:56-63 (emphasis added);
`1283 Reply 17, 19.
`
`46
`
`46
`
`

`

`3.1 Bell and Kester
`
`Rebuttal to:
`
`“[A] POSITA would not size a charger to violate power limits in the
`course of performing constant current charging.” 1283 POR, 43.
`
`•
`
`•
`
`Bell’s Fig. 2A
`“[P]ower handling limit 23 is set high
`enough to accommodate the maximum
`load”
`“However, as shown by region 25 of
`FIG. 2A, much of the capacity of AC/DC
`converter 18 goes unused.”
`
`Bell’s Fig. 2C
`“[B]attery charger 20 may
`use any or all of the excess
`power”
`“power handling capacity …
`used more effectively”
`
`•
`
`•
`
`APPLE-1005, Fig. 2C, 4:63-5:4;
`1283 Reply 18-19
`
`APPLE-1005, Fig. 2C, 4:63-5:4;
`1283 Pet., 41; 1283 Reply 18-19.
`
`47
`
`47
`
`

`

`
`1.0: “[A]s a voltage on the battery increases” ............................................. 91.0: “[A]s a voltage on the battery increases” ............................................. 9
`
`1.1 Qualcomm’s claim construction is unjustified .................................................. 101.1 Qualcomm’s claim construction is unjustified .................................................. 10
`
`1.2 Bell and Kester meet either interpretation ........................................................ 141.2 Bell and Kester meet either interpretation ........................................................ 14
`
`1.3 Bell, Kester, and Gong meet either interpretation …………………………….. 161.3 Bell, Kester, and Gong meet either interpretation …………………………….. 16
`
`2.0: Charging current greater than input current to a switching regulator... 192.0: Charging current greater than input current to a switching regulator... 19
`
`3.0: Reducing battery charging current in a “current control mode” 3.0: Reducing battery charging current in a “current control mode”
`
`“as [a] voltage on the battery increases” ……………………………………... 27“as [a] voltage on the battery increases” ……………………………………... 27
`
`3.1 Bell and Kester ……………………………………………………………………. 283.1 Bell and Kester ……………………………………………………………………. 28
`3.2 Bell, Kester, and Gong …………………………………………………………… 48
`
`4.0: Bell, Kester, and Gong are properly combined………………………..... 524.0: Bell, Kester, and Gong are properly combined………………………..... 52
`
`4.1 Motivation for Combination………………………………………………………. 534.1 Motivation for Combination………………………………………………………. 53
`
`4.2 Digital to Analog Converter (DAC) Operation …………………………………. 584.2 Digital to Analog Converter (DAC) Operation …………………………………. 58
`
`4.3 The Techniques of Bell and Gong are Complementary………………………. 644.3 The Techniques of Bell and Gong are Complementary………………………. 64
`4.4 The Techniques of Bell and Gong Co-exist As Bell Teaches………………… 68684.4 The Techniques of Bell and Gong Co-exist As Bell Teaches…………………
`
`
`4.5 Determining Available Power………..…………………………………………… 72724.5 Determining Available Power………..……………………………………………
`
`
`
`48
`
`48
`
`

`

`3.2 Bell, Kester, and Gong
`
`“The combination uses Gong’s constant power control,
`so that a microprocessor causes a regulator to reduce
`charging current as battery voltage increases.”
`
`1452 Pet. 43.
`
`’591 Patent
`
`. . .
`
`Gong
`
`Gong
`
`APPLE-1001, 25:41-61; 1283 Pet. 37; 1452 Pet. 43.
`
`APPLE-1008, 4:46-60; 1452 Pet. 43-45; 1452 Reply 9.
`
`49
`
`49
`
`

`

`3.2 Bell, Kester, and Gong
`
`APPLE-1001, Fig. 10B; 1452 Reply 9.
`
`APPLE-1008, Fig. 4; 1452 Pet. 43-45; 1452 Reply 9.
`
`50
`
`50
`
`

`

`3.2 Bell, Kester, and Gong
`
`Rebuttal to:
`
`“[A] POSITA would understand that [Gong’s] Figure 4 does not represent a
`‘charging profile’ but a conceptual representation of instantaneous behavior
`for a given available power level.” 1452 POR, 34.
`
`“Gong’s technique
`reduces current over
`time as a voltage on
`the battery changes,
`just as recited in the
`’591 patent claims.”
`
`1452 Reply 9.
`
`Gong
`
`APPLE-1008, 4:57-60; 1452 Pet. 28.
`Gong
`
`APPLE-1008, Abstract; 1452 Pet. 43; 1452 Reply 9.
`
`Gong
`
`APPLE-1008, 10:14-17; 1452 Pet. 22.
`
`51
`
`51
`
`

`

`4.0: Bell, Kester, and Gong are properly
`combined
`
`52
`
`52
`
`52
`
`

`

`
`1.0: “[A]s a voltage on the battery increases” ............................................. 91.0: “[A]s a voltage on the battery increases” ............................................. 9
`
`1.1 Qualcomm’s cl

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket