throbber
Petitioner: Haag-Streit AG
`Petitioner: Haag-Streit AG
`
`Ex. 1007
`
`EX. 1007
`
`

`

`United States Patent
`
`[19]
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`4,995,716
`
`Warnicki et al.
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Feb. 26, 1991
`
`[54] METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR
`OBTAINING THE TOPOGRAPHY OF AN
`OBJECT
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors:
`
`Joseph W. Warnicki, Pittsburgh; Paul
`G. Rehkopf, Murrysville, both of Pa;
`James L. Cambier, Rome; Salvins J.
`Strods, Waterville, both of NY.
`
`[73] Assignee:
`
`Par Technology Corporation, New
`Hartford, NY.
`
`[211 App]. No.: 321,252
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Mar. 9, 1989
`
`
`[51]
`Int. Cl.5 .............................. A61B 2/10
`[52] US. Cl. ..................................... 351/212; 351/247
`[58] Field of Search ................ 351/212, 247: 356/395,
`356/396
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Marco S. Caceci and William P. Cacheris, "Fitting
`Curves to Data,“ Byte, (May, 1984), pp. 340—357.
`J. James Rowsey, M.D., A. E. Reynolds, Ph.D., Randy
`Brown. “Corneal Topography," Arch Opltt/zalmol. vol.
`99, (Jun. 1981), pp. 1093—1100.
`M. S. Moreland, M.D., C. A. Barce. B.A.. M. 11. Pope.
`Ph.D., “Moire Topography in Scoliosis: Pattern Recog-
`nition and Analysis,” Aloire Fringe Topography and Spi-
`nal Deformity, Pergamon Press. (1981), pp. 171—185.
`Marius C. VanWijk, “Accuracy of Moire Topogra-
`phy." Moire Fringe Topography Spinal Deformity, Perga-
`mon Press, (1981).
`J. D. Doss et al., “Method for Calculation of Corneal
`Profile and Power Distribution", Arch Ophthalmol.
`1261 (1981).
`T. Yatagai. M. Idesawa, H. Ohshima. and M. Suzuki,
`"Automatic Measurement of 3—D Shapes Using Scan-
`ning Moire Method, " Moire Fringe Topography. pp.
`249—257.
`
`(List continued on next page.)
`
`3.169.459 '2/1965 Friedberg ....................... 351/212 X
`4.685.140
`8/1987 Mount
`351/212 X
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Primary Examiner—Rodney B. Bovernick
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Arnold B. Silverman;
`Suzanne Kikel
`
`Joseph W. Warnicki, Paul G. Rehkopf, Diane Y. Cur-
`tin, Stephen A. Burns, Robert C. Arffa, and John C.
`Stuart, “Corneal Topography Using Computer Ana-
`lyzed Rasterstereographic Images,” in Applied Optics.
`vol. 27, No. 6, (Mar. 15, 1988), pp. 1135—1140.
`Thomas Olsen, “On the Calculation of Power from
`Curvature of the Cornea," British Journal of Ophthal-
`mology, (1986), vol. 70, pp. 152-154.
`Carsten Edmund and Erik Sjontoft, "The Central—Peri-
`pheral Radius of the Normal Corneal Curvature,"Acta
`Ophthalmologica, (1985), vol. 63, pp. 670—677.
`Joseph W. Warnicki and Paul G. Rehkopf, “Develop-
`ment of an Imaging System for Ophthalmic Photogra-
`phy," Journal of Biological Photography. vol. 53, No. 1,
`(Jan. 1985), pp. 9-18.
`Stephen P. Klyce, “Computer—Assisted Corneal To-
`pography,” Investigative Opthalmology and Visual Sci-
`ence. vol. 25, (1984), pp. 1426-1435.
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A system. method, and apparatus for obtaining the cor-
`neal topography of an Object using computer analyzed
`rasterstereographic images. The object may be non-
`transparent and diffusing. or it may be transparent and
`nondiffusing, such as a cornea. Rasterstereographic
`images of a cornea are produced by staining the cornea
`with a fluorescein solution which projects a light and
`dark line pattern onto the cornea through a grid. When
`obtaining the topography of a cornea. several different
`filters are used for producing and obtaining a grid im—
`age. An image processor uses unique software to store
`and analyze data extracted from the grid pattern. A
`video camera, an illuminator, the filters. and the grid
`may be mounted on a microscope.
`
`50 Claims, 10 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`

`

`4,995,716
`
`Page 2
`
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`E. Hierholzer and W. Frobin, “Rasterstereographic
`Measurement and Curvature Analysis of the Body Sur-
`face of Patients with Spinal Deformities", Moire Fringe
`Topography. pp. 267—276.
`N. Ikeda, “Perspective Correction of the Moire Photo—
`graph,“ Journal of the Biological Photographic Associa-
`tion, vol. 47, No. 3, (Jul, 1979), pp. 107—110.
`M. S. Karlan, M.C., M. Madden, M.A., and M. 13. Ha-
`bal, M.D., “Biostereometric Analysis in Plastic and
`Reconstructive Surgery,” Plastic and Reconstructive
`Surgery, vol. 62, No. 2 (Aug, 1978), pp. 235—239.
`T. W. Smith, M.D., “Corneal Topography," Docu-
`menta Opthalmologica 43.2 (1977), pp. 249—276.
`
`S. Wittenberg and Wm. M. Ludlam. “Planar Reflected
`Imagery in Photokeratoscopy," Journal of the Optical
`Society of America, vol. 60, No. 7.
`(Jul., 1970), pp.
`981—985.
`
`H. Takasaki, "Moire Topography," Applied Optics, vol.
`9, No. 6. (Jun. 1970), pp. 1467—1472.
`Wm. M. Ludlam and S. Wittenberg. “Measurements of
`the Ocular Dioptric Elements Utilizing Photographic
`Methods,“ American Journal of Optometry Publishing
`Association, (Apr., 1966), pp. 249—267.
`S. Wittenberg and Wm. W. Ludlam. “Derivation of a
`System for Analyzing the Corneal Surface
`from
`Photokeratoscopic Data." Journal of the Optical Society
`ofAmerica. vol. 56, No. ll. (Nov., 1966). pp. 1612—1615.
`‘
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 26, 1991
`
`Sheet 1 of 10
`
`4,995,716
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 26, 1991
`
`Sheet 2 Br 10
`
`4,995,716
`
`
`
`FIG- 3
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 26, 1991
`
`Sheet 3 of 10
`
`4,995,716
`
`64
`
`
`
`
`CORRECT:
`correct for
`
`
`
`
`distortion in
`
`the optics
`
`and projection
`
`grid.
`
`68
`
`46
`
`SO
`
`54
`
`GET DATA
`
`48
`
`DET EDGES:
`
`tines.
`
`find the edges
`of the imaged
`
`52
`
`construct
`
`
`
`LINE SEGS:
`
`
`
`
`tine segments
`from the edge
`points.
`
`S6
`
`58
`
`BUILD MAT:
`
`
`
`tink the line
`
`
`
`segments to
`form a matrix
`
`
`
`of contiguous
`tines.
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`O
`
`74
`
`COMP ELEV:
`compute
`elevation
`
`information
`
`from the tine
`
`positions.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`72
`
`COMP CU RV:
`
`comp curve
`
`compute
`curvature
`
`information
`
`elevation data.
`
`from the
`
`76
`
`return
`
`78
`
`FIG.4
`
`6O
`
`REF LINE:
`
`find the
`
`
`
` 62
`
`
`
`
`
`reference tine
`in the
`
`projection
`
`space.
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 26, 1991
`
`Sheet 4 of 10
`
`4,995,716
`
`
`
`114
`
`DET EDGES
`
`50
`
`82
`
`84 IMG AVG:
`
`standard
`
`
`
`
`
`
`image
`averaging
`using 3X3
`convolution
`kernel
`
`86
`
`
` pixel is not
`
`an edge
`
`point.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`edge points
`
`
`in the tempor—
`
`ary array
`
`center lXN
`
`
`window on
`
`next pixel
`
`in image
`
`
`
`
`determine
`range of
`
`Dixel inten-
`
`sities in
`window
`
`
`
`pixel is an
`
`
`
`
`pixel in
`edge point,
`Upper halt
`
`
`
`
`add 10
`of intenSIty
`
`
`
`
`1erTlDorary
`range
`
`
`?
`point array
`
`
`116
`
`118
`
`
`
`124
`
`Yes
`
`126
`
`
`
`
`
`EDG APEX:
`find the
`center of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lines by fit-
`ting curve to
`
`
`
`
`
`Dixel intensities
`
`
`
`128
`
`130
`
`
`
`
`
`add center point
`to line point
`array and remove
`edge points FROM
`temDOr‘ary array
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`132
`
`have
`all the
`
`134
`
`Pixels in the
`
`image been
`examine.
`?
`
`.
`
`136
`
`Yes
`
`FIG. 5
`
`return
`
`138
`
`.
`
`

`

`
`
`check the
`length of the
`
`line segment
` formed by the
`
`found line
`
`
`
`all unlinked
`
`146
`
`Yes
`
`‘44
`
`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 26, 1991
`
`Sheet 5 of 10
`
`4,995,716
`
`54
`
`LINE 515
`
`l40
`
`l76
`
`points
`
`
`line points in
`remove all
`
`the image
`the line
`
`
`
`been
`points in the
`
`
`se ment lon
`.
`
`
`examined
`9
`9
`line segment
`
`
`
`
`7
`form the
`
`
`line point
` array
`
`
` search vertically
`
`
`within lXM
`
`
`line segment
`window for line
`
`
`
`as already
`
`
`included.
`
`148
`
`mark the line
`
`points in the
`
`
`add line
`
`segment to
` line point
`
`
`
`array or
`found
`
`
`line segments
`7
`
`
`
`163
`
`164
`
`
`'
`
`
`add the line
`
`
`
`point to a
`temporary line
`point array
`
`
`
`
` position over
`newly found
` FIG.6
`line point
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 26, 1991
`
`Sheet 6 of 10
`
`4,995,716
`
`BUILD MAT
`
`190 222
`
`192
`.
`is
`
`
`the end of
`the line met
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`find the longest
`line segment
`found and label
`as the
`
`58
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reference line
`Yes
`228
`
`194
`195
`remove any
`
`
`search in
`line points in
`
`
`
`the found line
`214
`specified direction
`
`
`
`that produce
`of the line
`
`
`spikes intheline
`withina lXN search
`
`
`
`window for a
`
`
`230
`label the area
`neighboring
`
`
`
`232
`has
`line segment.
`as a hole and
`
`
`
`
`the margin
`advance down
`
`
`the line one
`
`of the image
`point
`
`
`
`been met
` is a
`
`
`?
`
`line segment
`
`found
`
` Yes
`1;
`
`240
`
`is
` 244
`
`YES
`the margin
`
`
`return
`the right
`
`
`
`advance down
`
`
`margin
`’?
`
`line by length
`
`
`of found
`
`
` No
`line segment.
`
` change the
`specifed search
`
`
`direction
`from
`
`242
`
`250
`
`left to right.
`
`
`
`F107
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 26, 1991
`
`Sheet 7 of 10
`
`4,995,716
`
`7O
`
`COMP ELEV
`
`272
`
`252
`
`
`
`find the reference
`line of the
`projection space
`
`in the image
`
`2‘54
`
`256
`
`for each
`
`vertical
`
`gridline
`
`258
`
`260
`
`
`compute the
`
`simulataneous
`
`solution to
`the ray and
`plane equation
`to get the
`elevation at
`
`274
`
`276
`
`
`
`
`the point.
`
`
`
`
`
`has
`
`
`elevation
`
`278
`
`
`for all points
`
`
`in the grid
`
`line been
`
`found
`262
`equation for the
`
`?
` plane formed by
`
`the projected grid
`
`line.
`
`calculate the
`
`
`
`
`286
`
`282
`
`Yes
`
`
`
`for each point
`
`in the vertical
`
`grid line
`
`No
`
`
`
`
` has
`284
`elevation
`
`
`for all
`the grid
`
`lines been
`
`
` found
`
`?
`
`
` compute the
`equationfor
`
`the ray formed
`
`by the point
`on the line in
`
`
`288
`
`
`
`the image.
`
`YES
`
`290
`
`return
`
`FIG. 8
`
`

`

`U.S.' Patent
`
`Feb. 26, 1991
`
`Sheet m 10
`
`4,995,716
`
` ELEVATIO N ->
`
`~PROJECTEDCRID UNS—
`
`-Flé_q
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 26, 1991
`
`Sheet 9 of 10
`
`4,995,716
`
`_ (111.-..-
`‘II'.....
`
`.Hl'l...
`
`HIIIII
`'XIIIIIL'
`III.II
`l-IQII
`I
`“IIIII.
`{HIIII
`i i‘lltlllll
`i‘ullllll
`2! I‘lllll
`{Hil’ll'i
`SSIHIIIIK
`§IHOIIIII
`EIHIIICH
`HHIIIH
`‘HHIIIIH
`HIISIII‘
`I
`'“XIIII
`
`'
`I
`
`. nun:
`' mu.”
`H ""u
`
`1'
`
`tn! -----
`.n‘\‘. “--
`
`-HIIIIII.
`
`I] C) E)
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Feb. 26, 1991
`
`Sheet 10 of 10
`
`4,995,716
`
`
`
`

`

`1
`
`4,995,716
`
`2
`
`METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OBTAINING
`THE TOPOGRAPHY OF AN OBJECT
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`This present invention relates to a system, method,
`and associated apparatus for enabling the use of raster-
`stereographical principles for determining the curva-
`ture and surface detail across the surface of an object by
`using a computer analyzed rasterstereographic tech-
`nique. More specifically, a projected light and dark
`pattern on the object is picked up by a video camera and
`the image is digitized by an image processor which
`calculates the surface detail by evaluating the distortion
`of the grid lines.
`2. Description of the Prior Art
`In recent years there has been increased interest in
`both qualitative and quantitative measurements of an
`object by topography. Particularly this increased inter-
`est has been in regard to corneal topography especially
`relating to keratorefractive procedures. Since keratore-
`fractive procedures correct the refractive error of the
`eye by altering the curvature of the corneal surface,
`topographic measurements of the corneal curvature are
`important in planning, performing, and assessing the
`effect of these procedures.
`Corneal topography has been proven of value for
`numerous uses including predicting the result of radial
`keralotomy, evaluating the design of epikeratophakia
`for myopia, diagnosis and staging of ke'ratoconus, and
`guiding suture removal after corneal transplantation.
`There have been previously reported photographic
`methods based on the keratoscopic disk system. (See
`“Corneal Topography,” J. J. Rowsey, et al., Arch.
`Ophthalmol, Vol. 99, 1093 [1981]). This keratoscopic
`system consists of a series of black and white concentric
`rings on a circular disk. When this disk is placed in front
`of the eye, the rings are reflected by the corneal surface
`and their position, size, and spacing in the reflected
`image are determined by the corneal shape.
`Current commercial systems utilizing illuminated
`concentric circular rings surrounding a viewing port
`through which photographs are taken have been
`known. If the cornea is spherical,
`the rings appear
`round and regularly spaced. If the cornea is oval or
`astigmatic, the rings are oval and the spacing varies in
`different axes. This is known as the placido disk tech-
`nique.
`These techniques, while providing a visual represen-
`tation of the corneal surface, do not provide quantita-
`tive information. Computer programs have been devel-
`oped which calculate the corneal profile and the optical
`power distribution on the corneal surface from placido
`disk images. See “Method for Calculation of Corneal
`Profile and Power Distribution,” J. D. Ross, et al., Arch
`Ophthalmol., 1261 (1981).
`Computer analyzing techniques have been developed
`for deriving quantitative information about the corneal
`shape from keratoscope photographs and displaying the
`results both numerically and graphically in easily under—
`stood forms. See “Computer-Assisted Corneal Topog-
`raphy, High Resolution Graphic Presentation and Anal-
`ysis of Keratoscopy,” S. D. Klyce, et al., Investigative
`Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 25, 1426
`(1984).
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`3O
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Placido disk techniques for recording and quantifying
`the corneal surface have inherent
`limitations which
`reduce their clinical usefulness.
`There are three main factors which limit the useful-
`ness of the placido disk system. These factors are as
`follows: (1) The most central portion of the cornea is
`not imaged. This is due in part to the fact that there is a
`hole in the central portion of the placido disk through
`which the optical system for this technique views the
`cornea. This viewing port is devoid of any lighted spots
`or rings, and therefore there can be no reflected images
`on the cornea in this area. (2) The diameter of the pla-
`cido disk determines how much of the corneal surface is
`covered by the reflected images. The smaller the diame-
`ter, the smaller the area of the cornea. The larger the
`diameter, the larger the area of the cornea that will be
`covered extending more toward the limbus or periph-
`ery of the cornea. (3) The distance between the cornea
`and the placido disk system also determines how much
`of the cornea is covered. The farther away the disk is
`from the cornea, the less the corneal coverage will be.
`The closer the disk is to the cornea, the greater the
`corneal coverage will be.
`Other limitations of the placido disk techniques are
`that they do not extend to the corneal limbus due in part
`to shadows being cast from the eye lashes, brow and
`nose of the patient, nor do they work on corneas which
`do not have the necessary qualities to reflect an image
`of the disk due to conditions such as epithelial defects,
`scarring, or highly irregular shape.
`Current computer methods being used to obtain
`quantitative measurements have been known to utilize
`photographic images acquired with the commercially
`available placido disk keratoscopes and are, therefore,
`subject to the same limitations discussed hereinbefore.
`In some such systems the data are entered into the com-
`puter by hand digitizing from these photographs, re-
`quiring a considerable amount of time, and the possible
`introduction of error during the digitization process.
`While hand digitizing with some manually manipu-
`lated device is still being practiced, there is also known
`at
`least
`two systems for direct digitizing purposes,
`which systems have imaging cameras attached to the
`optics which, in turn, view through the central portion
`of the placido disk. These images are then taken directly
`into the computer for manipulation in calculating the
`corneal curvature and for determining the diopter pow-
`ers.
`‘
`
`These systems with direct digitization are still subject
`to the same problems as the placido disk systems having
`hand digitization. Although several attempts have been
`made to extend farther out into the limbus or periphery
`of the cornea, none of these systems have achieved this
`capability. These systems still inadequately handle cor-
`neas with very steep curvature or with a highly irregu-
`lar surface.
`It has been known to employ a rasterstereography
`method for measuring large body surfaces, curvature of
`the back, and reconstructive plastic surgery. Raster-
`stereography is an intermediate between stereography
`and moire topography and is a method of obtaining
`contour or topographic information where one of the
`cameras in a stereogrammetric pair is replaced with a
`light source which projects a grid of vertical parallel
`lines Onto a subject.
`One type of rasterstereographic system employs an
`electronic camera with a linear sensor, an x-y translator
`for image shifting, and a light source or projector. The
`
`

`

`3
`camera and translator are connected to an on-line com-
`puter which produces an image scan of the large sur-
`face. See “Rasterstereographic Measurement and Cur-
`vature Analysis of the Body Surface," E. Hierholzer, et
`al., Biol. Photogr., Vol. 51, 11 (Jan. 1, 1983).
`It has been known to employ a Rhonchi ruling in
`moire technique, which is normally a technique used for
`measuring the topography of a solid, nontransparent
`object. In moire topography a light source illuminates
`the Rhonchi ruling to cast shadows on the object to be
`measured. These shadows and the lines of Rhonchi
`
`ruling when viewed by either the eye or a camera inter-
`fere to produce contour lines of the object. See “Bios-
`tereometric Analysis in Plastic and Reconstructive Sur-
`gery,” M. S. Karlan, et al., Plastic and Reconstructive
`Surgery, Vol. 62, (1978).
`It has been known to attempt to determine corneal
`topography including moire techniques. A drawback is
`the low reflectivity of the cornea in that the cornea is a
`transparent, nondiffusing member, which does not
`allow for a good image of the grid to be formed on it.
`It has been known to employ a microscope with a
`reticule referred to as a toposcope which uses the moire
`technique. A recticule is a grid or scale that is a standard
`piece of equipment in the moire technique. A series of
`straight parallel lines is imaged on the object. In the
`eyepiece of the microscope there is a reticule with the
`same number of lines. The two patterns interfere to
`produce the contours This instrument has been used to
`analyze contact lenses, but there is no evidence of using
`it
`to determine the contour of an eye. A drawback
`would be the low reflectivity of the cornea.
`It has been known to use a fluorescein solution on a
`the eye, and a contact lens to determine the topography
`of a cornea. The fluorescein solution is placed on the
`eye followed by the placement of a contact lens. Blue-
`violet radiation produces a fluorescence pattern which
`gives an indication of the variable clearance between
`the known surface of the contact lens and the unknown
`cornea. For the measurements to be valid, the lens must
`be kept stationary, and in practice, diagnostic contact
`lenses are used to verify ‘K’ readings in conjunction
`with refractive findings. See “Corneal Topography,” T.
`W. Smith, M.D., Documenta Opthalmologica 43.2, pg.
`262 (1977).
`It has been known to determine corneal topography
`by stereographic techniques, in addition to holographic
`interferometric, and profile techniques See “Corneal
`Topography,” pg. 263 cited in the preceding paragraph.
`As the cornea is a transparent member which is non-
`diffusing to light, a grid projected onto the cornea is not
`visible unless a diffusing material is used to provide a
`surface on which an image can be visualized. It has been
`known to spray talcum powder on anesthetized corneas
`to obtain stereo photographs of the cornea.
`Stereophotography is traditionally used to obtain the
`topography of a solid, nontransparent light diffusing
`object that has some texture. Stereophotography may
`utilize two cameras which view an object of interest
`from two different angles relative to a fixed center line
`between them. Stereophotography can also be accom-
`plished by taking two sequential images with one cam-
`era. This is accomplished by focusing the camera on a
`fixed point and taking an exposure. The camera is then
`moved laterally a fixed distance, again focusing on the
`same point previously used in the first image and an—
`other exposure is made.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`4,995,716
`
`4
`The two stereo photos are analyzed and one of the
`images is chosen as a reference image. Some object of
`interest is chosen and the displacement of the object in
`the opposite stereo image can be measured. From this
`displacement and the angle between the two shots, an
`elevation of an object can be calculated.
`As the Stereophotography method is used on solid
`objects, it has not been known to adequately obtain the
`topography of a cornea in that sufficient topographic
`detail of the cornea cannot be extracted.
`
`It has been known to use an image processing system
`with a video camera, flash unit, and computer and dis-
`play units in the field of opthalmology where the eye
`images are handled electronically. However, most of
`the study in the ophthalmology field has been in evalu-
`ating the optic nerve, retina, and corneal surface de-
`fects, and not for determining the curvature and related
`topographic details of the cornea. See “Development of
`An Imaging System for Ophthalmic Photography,” J.
`W. Warnicki, et al., J. Biol. Photog. 53, 9 (1985).
`is
`it
`In the holographic interferometric technique,
`known to use a beam splitter to direct the laser beam in
`one direction toward a camera and in the other direc-
`tion toward an object. See “Corneal Topography,” pg.
`264 cited hereinbefore.
`
`‘
`
`In spite of these known systems, methods, and instru-
`ments, there remains a very real and substantial need for
`a system, method, and device which more accurately
`and quickly determine quantitatively and qualitatively
`the contour of both a light diffusing, nontransparent
`object and a light nondiffusing, transparent object, such
`as a cornea.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention has met the above-described
`needs. A system, a method, and an apparatus of the
`present
`invention provide more accurate and easily
`obtainable means for determining the topography of an
`object particularly that of a cornea as defined hereinaf-
`ter.
`
`The apparatus may provide a support means with
`built-in optical means and a beam splitter along a center-
`line of the support means. The apparatus and associated
`method may involve providing an illuminator/flash
`unit, a grid, a cobalt blue filter, and an infrared cutoff
`filter on one side of the support means, and a video
`camera, and a yellow barrier filter on the other side of
`the support means.
`If the topography of a cornea is to be obtained, fluo—
`rescein solution is applied onto the tear film of the cor-
`nea so that the grid pattern created through the grid of
`a Ronchi ruling becomes fluorescent when excited by
`light passing through the cobalt blue filter. The yellow
`barrier filter is employed to increase the contrast of the
`grid image by the video camera. When the topography
`of an object, other than that of a cornea is to be deter—
`mined, the filters preferably are not used. The recorded
`image of the object is used to identify the central area of
`the lines of the grid pattern, to calculate the elevation of
`the lines of the grid pattern, and to display the eleva-
`tional results in a contour plot representative of the
`topography of the object.
`The apparatus preferably comprises a microscope
`with two beam splitters, a video camera and optics
`along a centerline in line with a support for resting and
`placement of an object, which in the instance of the
`cornea is the head of a patient. A video camera and the
`yellow barrier filter are located at an angle relative to
`
`

`

`4,995,716
`
`6
`
`5
`and along the centerline of the apparatus, and an illumi-
`uating source, a grid, and the cobalt blue and infrared
`cutoff filters are located in a line relative to each other
`
`and at an angle relative to the centerline opposite to that
`of the video camera. An image processor is employed to
`determine the topography of the object through the use
`of software which identifies, and calculates the eleva-
`tion of the grid lines, and displays the results in a con-
`tour plot representing the topography of the object.
`The system, method, and apparatus may be used for
`obtaining the topography of an object which is trans-
`parent and nondiffusing to light, such as a cornea, or
`which is nontransparent and diffusing to light.
`It is a broad object of the invention to provide a
`system, an apparatus, and a method for quickly and
`efficiently determining" the topography of an entire
`surface of an object, which object is transparent and
`nondiffusing to light, such as a cornea, or which is non-
`transparent and diffusing to light.
`It is a further object of the present invention to pro—
`vide a system, an apparatus, and a method for quickly
`and efficiently determining the topography of an entire
`cornea of a patient, which is a member of the animal
`kingdom particularly a human.
`It is a further object of the present invention to pro-
`vide a system, a method, and an apparatus for achieving
`the preceding objective by obtaining information on
`curvature and surface detail across the full cornea sur-
`face including the central optical axis and the periphery
`beyond the limbus.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`system, a method, and an apparatus for effectively pro-
`jecting a grid onto the object and shortening the com-
`puter time by digitizing a video image of the grid by an
`image processor which calculates surface detail by eval-
`uating the distortion of the grid lines.
`It is another object of the invention to provide such a
`system which attaches to an examination slit lamp mi-
`croscope and which is compact, economical, providing
`valid clinical information regarding curvature and to-
`pography, particularly of a cornea, and which is easily
`operated by medical personnel.
`It is yet another object of the invention to provide
`such a system which attaches to a microscope which is
`used in an operating room.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`system, an apparatus, and a method for quickly and
`efficiently determining the topography of an entire
`surface of an object and reproducing the results, and
`which system and apparatus are easy to operate, are
`inexpensive to buy and operate, and which system,
`apparatus and method are harmless to the object, espe-
`cially a cornea, and are generally not unpleasant for the
`patient.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`system, a method and an apparatus for obtaining the
`topography of a cornea which enables a grid image to
`be reflected from the cornea.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`system, an apparatus, and a method whereby digital
`imaging processing techniques are used to find eleva-
`tion information, from which, in turn, curvature infor-
`mation is extracted.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`3O
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`system, an apparatus, and a method relative to the pre-
`ceding objective whereby from the extracted data, an
`assessment of the shape of the object and the refractive
`power of the front surface of a cornea can be made.
`
`65
`
`A further object of the invention is to provide such a
`system which is compact, economical, and together
`with computer hardware and appropriate software is
`capable of making calculations in an operating room
`where time is of the essence.
`
`It is therefore an object of the present invention to
`more effectively and efficiently obtain the topography
`of an object, such as a cornea, and to achieve this
`through a rasterstereographic technique.
`It is a further object of the invention to project a grid
`image onto a transparent, nondiffusing object, such as a
`cornea rather than have the grid image reflected by the
`cornea, so that the projected image is not affected by
`surface defects and irregularities.
`It is a further object of the invention to electronically
`acquire the image of an object, electronically digitize
`and analyze the imaging system, and display the data
`obtained from the analysis of these images in easily
`understood formats.
`
`It is a further object of the invention to apply a digital
`image processing technique to the projected image in
`order to find the projected lines and to convert the lines
`into elevation information.
`It is a further object of the invention to extract curva-
`ture information and in the instance where the cornea is
`being examined, diopter powers from the curvature
`information.
`It is a still further object of the invention to use the
`elevation and curvature information to obtain an intu-
`itive and quantitative assessment of the shape and re-
`fractive power of the front surface of the cornea.
`A further object is to utilize computer processing
`techniques including a main program with a number of
`subroutines including an edge determining subroutine, a
`line segment constructing subroutine, a matrix building
`subroutine, an elevation computing subroutine, and a
`curvature computing subroutine.
`It is a further object of the invention to adapt a Zeiss
`or a Topcon exam slit lamp microscope, which may
`generally have been used in stereophotographic tech-
`niques for obtaining the topography of a cornea, to a
`rasterstereographic method for obtaining the topogra-
`phy of a cornea.
`A still further object of the invention is to adapt a
`Zeiss or a Topcon exam slit lamp microscope to a ras-
`terstereographic method for obtaining the topography
`of any object.
`'
`It is a further object of the invention to provide in a
`rasterstereographic technique a cornea surface with a
`grid image projected thereon.
`It is a further object to achieve the immediately pre-
`ceding objective by applying a fluorescein solution onto
`the surface of the eye.
`These and other objects of this invention will be more
`fully understood from the following description of the
`invention on reference to the illustrations appended
`hereto.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. la is an illustration of a normal spherical cornea
`with a placido disk used in the prior art;
`FIG. 1b is an illustration of a corneal transplant pa-
`tient with astigmatic central cornea using the placido
`disk technique of the prior art;
`FIG. 2 is an illustration of an image of a vertical grid
`projected onto the eye obtained by the present inven-
`tion;
`
`

`

`4,995,716
`
`7
`FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a microscope with
`beam splitter and projection system employed in the
`present invention;
`FIG. 4 is a logic flow diagram of the main program
`for digitizing the image on the cornea of FIG. 2 by a
`computer;
`FIGS. 5, 6, 7, and 8 are logic flow diagrams of sub-
`routines utilized in the main program of FIG. 4 includ-
`ing respectively a determination of the edges subrou-
`tine; a construction of the line segments subroutine a
`forming of a matrix subroutine; and a computation of
`the elevation in formation subroutine;
`FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram showing grid lines
`displaced on the cornea from an assumed normal posi-
`tion and a trigonometric solution for elevation em-
`ployed by the present invention;
`FIG. 10 is an illustration showing on the left hand
`side an orthogonal view of a normal cornea, and on the
`right hand side the same cornea with the common curve
`removed which are derived by the display methods
`used in the present invention; and
`FIGS. 11, 12, and 13 are illustrations of contour plots
`of the cornea derived by the display methods employed
`in the present invention.
`
`DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENT
`
`The invention may be used to obtain through raster-
`stereographical techniques the topography of an object
`which is nontransparent and diffusing to light or which
`is transparent and nondiffusing to light, such as a cor-
`nea. The invention has particular application but is not
`limited as a clinical tool for the evaluation of topo-
`graphic abnormalities of the corneal surface of a patient
`being a member of the animal kingdom, particularly a
`human. The invention will be described in terms of
`obtaining the topography of the cornea of a human, but
`is not limited thereto, and may be employed to deter-
`mine the surface features or surface contour of an exter-
`nal body portion. The invention may also be used in
`dentistry, particularly in surgery, and also in plastic
`surgery practices.
`Eyes that are emmetropic and eyes with keratoconus
`and severe astigmatism can be detected, analyzed and
`corrected through surgery and contact lenses. The in-
`vention can be easily used in an examination room or in
`an operating room.
`As used herein, “limbus” is the border or edge of the
`cornea or clear optical zone and the sclera portion of
`the eye. The sclera is the white, fibrous outer envelope
`of tissue surrounding the cornea.
`As used herein, “cornea” is the transparent anterior
`portion of the outer fibrous tunic of the eye, a uniformly
`thick, nearly circular convex structure covering the
`lens.
`
`As used herein, a pixel is an individual picture ele-
`ment constituting a matrix used in a digital computer
`system for the resolution of images.
`As used herein, the term “search window” applies to
`a size dimension which denotes how far from a refer-
`ence line a search for a line segment will take place.
`Increasing or decreasing a “search window” means to
`look within a larger or smaller area abo

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket