`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 36
`Date: September 28, 2022
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2018-01315
`Case IPR2018-01316
`Patent 8,063,674 B21
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before TREVOR M. JEFFERSON, DANIEL J. GALLIGAN, and
`SCOTT B. HOWARD, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HOWARD, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Motions for
`Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jennifer L. Swize
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are identical in each of the above-
`identified cases. Accordingly, we exercise our discretion to issue one order
`to be filed in each case. The parties, however, are not authorized to use this
`style heading in any subsequent papers without prior authorization.
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01315, IPR2018-01316
`Patent 8,063,674 B2
`
`
`On September 20, 2022, Patent Owner filed motions for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission of Jennifer L. Swize in each of the above-identified proceedings.
`
`Paper 33 (collectively “Motions”).2 The Motion in each case is supported by
`
`a Declaration of Ms. Swize. Ex. 2008 (collectively “Declarations”).3 Patent
`
`Owner indicates that “Counsel for Petitioner has indicated that it does not
`
`plan to oppose Ms. Swize’s admission pro hac vice.” Motion 2.
`
`Upon review of the record before us, we note that a Power of Attorney
`
`in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b) has not been submitted for Ms.
`
`Swize. In view thereof, and for the reasons set forth below, the Motions are
`
`granted, and will be effective after Patent Owner files the aforementioned
`
`Power of Attorney.
`
`
`
`It is, therefore,
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion (Paper 33) for pro hac vice
`
`admission of Jennifer L. Swize is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Swize will be authorized to act only
`
`as back-up counsel in the above-identified proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Swize shall comply with the
`
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide4 (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019)),
`
`
`2 For expediency, we refer to Paper numbers filed in IPR2018-01315.
`Similar Papers were filed in IPR2018-01316.
`
`3 Patent Owner originally filed the Declarations as Papers. With our
`authorization, Patent Owner filed the updated Declarations as Exhibits.
`
`4 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01315, IPR2018-01316
`Patent 8,063,674 B2
`
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials as set forth in Part 42 of Title
`
`37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Swize shall be subject to the Office’s
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules
`
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01315, IPR2018-01316
`Patent 8,063,674 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`W. Karl Renner
`Thomas A. Rozylowicz
`Timothy W. Riffe
`David L. Holt
`Whitney A. Reichel
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`tar@fr.com
`riffe@fr.com
`holt2@fr.com
`wreichel@fr.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Joseph M. Sauer
`Matthew W. Johnson
`David B. Cochran
`Joshua R. Nightingale
`Richard A. Graham
`David M. Maiorana
`JONES DAY
`jmsauer@jonesday.com
`mwjohnson@jonesday.com
`dcochran@jonesday.com
`jrnightingale@jonesday.com
`ragraham@jonesday.com
`dmaiorana@jonesday.com
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
