`571-272-7822
`
`
`
` Paper 11
`
`Entered: October 10, 2018
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`EDGE ENDO, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MICHAEL SCIANAMBLO,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-01320 (Patent 8,882,504 B2)
`Case IPR2018-01321 (Patent 8,932,056 B2)
` Case IPR2018-01322 (Patent 9,351,803 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`Before BART A. GERSTENBLITH, ROBERT A. POLLOCK, and
`RICHARD J. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Motions For Pro Hac Vice Admission
`Of Steven Lieberman and Rachel M. Echols
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are the same in all identified cases. We exercise
`our discretion to issue one order to be filed in each case. The parties are not
`authorized to use this style heading in subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01320 (Patent 8,882,504 B2)
`IPR2018-01321 (Patent 8,932,056 B2)
`IPR2018-01322 (Patent 9,351,803 B2)
`
`
`Patent Owner submitted Motions for pro hac vice admission of Steven
`Lieberman (Paper 6) and Rachel M. Echols (Paper 8).2 The Motions are supported
`by the Declarations of Mr. Lieberman (Paper 7) and Ms. Echols (Paper 9).3
`Petitioner has not opposed the Motions.
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to admit
`Mr. Lieberman and Ms. Echols pro hac vice.
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motions for admission of Steven Lieberman
`and Rachel M. Echols pro hac vice are granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Lieberman and Ms. Echols are authorized
`to represent Patent Owner only as back-up counsel in the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a registered
`practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the instant proceeding;
`FURTHERED ORDERED that, within seven (7) business days of the date
`of this Order, Patent Owner shall submit Powers of Attorney for Mr. Lieberman
`and Ms. Echols in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b);
`FURTHER ORDERED that, within seven (7) business days of the date of
`this Order, Patent Owner shall file an updated mandatory notice identifying
`
`
`2 Paper numbers refer to Case IPR2018-01320. Corresponding Motions and
`Declarations were filed in each of IPR2018-01321 and IPR2018-01322.
`3 Patent Owner filed the Declarations as Papers. Patent Owner is reminded that
`affidavits and declarations must be filed as exhibits so that they may be referenced
`individually by exhibit number. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.63.
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01320 (Patent 8,882,504 B2)
`IPR2018-01321 (Patent 8,932,056 B2)
`IPR2018-01322 (Patent 9,351,803 B2)
`
`Mr. Lieberman and Ms. Echols as back-up counsel in accordance with 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.8(b)(3);
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Lieberman and Ms. Echols each shall
`comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of
`Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations,
`as updated by the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, August 2018 Update, 83
`Federal Register 39,989 (Aug. 13, 2018); and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Lieberman and Ms. Echols each shall be
`subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the
`Office’s Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101–11.901.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01320 (Patent 8,882,504 B2)
`IPR2018-01321 (Patent 8,932,056 B2)
`IPR2018-01322 (Patent 9,351,803 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`Jeffrey S. Ginsberg
`Abhishek Bapna
`Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
`jginsberg@pbwt.com
`abapna@pbwt.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Joseph Hynds
`Eric Blatt
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`jhynds@rfem.com
`eblatt@rfem.com
`litigationparalegals@rothwellfigg.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
