throbber
TFS1065 BD00033053
`
`‘ =>(elle)c=
`thermofisher.com/attun
`
`4
`
`igTaerwainhereat
`e NxT | invitrogen
`
`TFS1065
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`A Brilliant New Addition to the Fiuorescent Probe
`Toolbox
`
`Stephen C. De Rosa’?"*
`
`%
`
`Key terms
`fluorescent probe; quantum yield; extinction coefficient;
`violet
`
`laser;
`
`FLUORESCENT probesarecritical for flow cytometry and flu-
`orescent microscopy. Although new probes are developed and
`introduced commercially each vear, there are only a selected
`few that are exceptional in what we commonly refer to as
`brightness. One such probe, phycoerythrin (PE), was first
`reported 30 years ago in 1982 for use in cell analysis as an anti-
`body conjugate (1). The use of a second probe, allophycocya-
`nin (APC), was reported a year later (2). It was not until 1998
`that another probe of comparable brightness,
`the quantum
`dot, was reported. Unique from all others, the quantum dotis
`inorganic (3). Quantumdot probes have been especially useful
`because they are optimaily excited by ultraviolet and violet
`light, a spectral region with limited coverage from other bight
`fluorescent probes. Now, a new probe (Brilliant Violet, BV) of
`a different class but of comparable brightness and excited by
`violet light has heen developed as reported by Chattopadhyay
`et al. in this issue (page 456).
`Although just 10 years ago flow cytometry experiments
`measuring more than six parameters or four “colors” were
`limited to relatively few advanced laboratories, this capability
`is now much more widely distributed, including even some
`
`resource limited settings. One reason for this increased accessi-
`bility is introduction of off-the-shelf and customm-modified
`instrumentation with greater capacity for multicolor detection
`
`Dapartnent-of Laboratery Medicine-University-of Washington:
`seacte, Washingion $8195:
`NWaccine and intestous Disease Dansion Fred Hishinson Cancer
`Research Center Seattle: Wiashingtor: 98104
`
`SHIN Vacsing THals:N ebork (EVEN) Seatve: Washington: Sb1ng
`
`Raceived 10 Februgry 2012; Accepted 14 Pe aruary 2042
`
`Grant saonsor HAE Vaccme: tials Network Laooratory: Progra:
`Grant number UME Algsed 1a.
`Grant sponsor: universiy of Washington Canter tor AIDS Research:
`Grantnuimber PSo Algaera?
`
`Cytometry Part A @ 81A: d45--446, 2012
`
`and another reason is the growing commercial availability of
`reagents consisting of conjugates to less common fhrorescent
`probes. The expansion of multicolor technology makes use of
`fhaorescent probes that are excited at a variety of wavelengths,
`and to allowfor this, instrumentation has been modified by add-
`ing additional lasers of different colors. In addition to the nearly
`universal blue and red lasers, a viclet laser exciting at about 405
`ont is now commonlyincluded in manyinstruments (4).
`Luitially, there were very few fluorescent probes excited by
`the violet laser and they were disrnal
`in terms of brightness.
`Soon, better probes and commercial conjugates became avail-
`able although none rivaled the brightness of PE and APC.
`Therefore, the introduction of quantum dots caused a great
`amount of excitement not only because of their brightness, but
`also because of the selection ofdifferent colors all excited by the
`violet laser. Although quantum dots continue to he extremely
`useful, the initial enthusiasm has been tempered by some prac-
`tical issues such as shelflife
`sensitivity to heavy metal contami-
`nants, tendency to form aggregates, and cross-laser compensa-
`tion requirements that became more evident as they were
`included in multicolor panels (3). Thus, alternate violet-excited
`bright fluorescent probes are kely to be of benefit to many
`researchers (6).
`The intrinsic brightness of a fluorescent compound is a
`function of the quantumyield and the molar extinction coefii-
`cient. The quantum vield is the probability of emitting a pho-
`ton once a photon of light is absorbed and thus is a measure
`of the efficiency of energy conversion. High quantum yields
`are optimal and the quantum yield for BV is comparable to
`manyother bright fluorochromes (Table 1). The molar extinc-
`
`“Corrasnondenee to: Stephen ff De Rosa: Pred: Hutchinson Cancer
`Research: Genter: 168 Falivisw Ave: NE CE200) Beathe AAOH OS:
`LSA:
`
`f-maik sderosa@iicraiorg
`
`Puoiished online 6 Aonk 2012 in Witey:-Oniing Liorary
`iwiteyontinelheary.cam)
`
`DOE HO 106/ogty.3 20036
`
`©: 212 international Society for Advancennnt of Gytameatry
`
`BD00033054
`
`2
`
`

`

`RCPS RE leee
`
`Table 1. Quantum yield and extinction coefficient for commonly-usad fluorescent probes
`
`FLUOROCHROME
`QUANTUMYIELD
`MOLAR EXTINCTION COFFFICIENT*
`EXCITATION/ABSORBANCE
`
`Brilliant Violet
`R-PE
`APC
`Quantum Dot 655
`Quantum Dot 5&5
`AlexaFluor 660
`Fluorescein
`AlexaFlior 488
`Pacific Blue
`
`0.69
`O.82
`9.608
`ae. 3"
`‘
`
`
`
`0.78
`
`2,506,000
`1,960,000
`700,000
`5,700,000
`2,200,000
`132,000
`86,000
`71,000
`46,000)
`
`Violet (405 nm)
`Blue (496 nm}
`Red (656 nm}
`Violet (405 nm)
`Violet (405 nm)
`Red (663 nm}
`Blue (488 nm)
`Blue (495 nm)
`Violet (405 nm)
`
`“Moasured at the indicated excitation/absorbance wavelength (cm
`bouantum yields generally increase for larger quantum dots (14).
`
`mo),
`
`tion coefficient is a measure of the probability of absorbing a
`photon oflight at the wavelength of excitation and this is the
`measure that is exceptional for PE, APC, the quantum dots,
`and now BV. Other factors also affect the brightness of anti-
`body conjugates such as the number of fluorophores conju-
`gated to each antibody, but these intrinsic factors have a domi-
`nant effect (7}.
`The newfluorescent probe reported in this issue of Cyto-
`metry is a unique type offluorescent compound with a fasci-
`
`nating pedigree stemming from a discovery that earned the
`
`Nobel Prize in chemistry in 2000. The discovery and de
`Lop-
`ment of conductive polymers has yielded many applications
`already in use in commercial products. The BV fluorescent
`probe resulted from chemical modifications to a polymer that
`yielded the appropriate excitation spectrum, water solubility,
`conjugation ability, and minimal nonspecific binding. Addi-
`tional violet-exctted fluorescent probes with differing emission
`spectra have been developed bycreating tandem dyes of BV
`conjugated with more traditional fluorophores such as Cy3
`(the BV570 tandem dye reported in this issue).
`In this issue, Chattopadhyay and colleagues report on the
`use of these new dyes as antibody conjugates and as a strepta-
`vidin conjugate used with pMHCI multimers. The compari-
`son of the BV421 conjugates with the Pacific Blue conjugates
`demonstrates their remarkable brightness, with the CD8 con-
`
`jugate about 10-fold brighter as quantified by the stain index.
`Thus,
`the exceptional molar extinction coefficient translates
`into bright cell staining reagents. The authors also demon-
`strate suitable photostability and utility in fluorescence mi-
`croscopy. Although onky one tandem dye was tested, it is likely
`that a series of bright tandemdyes based on the Brilliant Vio-
`let backbone are forthcoming and will be a welcome addition
`to the ever-growing arsenal of fluorescent probes available to
`cytometrists.
`Multicolor flow cytometry continues to be a cornerstone
`of inumunological and celbular proGling. Althoughit is inevita-
`
`ble that newtechnologies will enter the field, such as nonfluor-
`escent based flow cytometry (CyTOF) using mass spectrome-
`try, where reagent labels are distinguished by mass and there is
`much less expertise required to assemble and optimize cell
`staimng panels exarnining large numbers of markers (8),
`it is
`unlikely that they will replace fluorescent-based flow cytome-
`try, at least in the near future. Thus, the art and science of
`creating staining panels remain important (9,10) and Brilliant
`Violet and its tandem dyes are useful additions to the toolbox
`of fluorescent probes. Indeed, there is a bright future for Brilli-
`ant Violet.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`The author thanks Stephen Voght for help with editing.
`
`LITERATURE CITED
`
`i,
`O81 VT, Glazer AN, §
`L. Fluorescent phyocbiliprotein conjugates for analyses of
`cells and reolecules. J
`Biol 1982;93:981--986,
`
`nson L, Withams 'M. Strom TB. Laumanciluores-
`
`2. Shapiro HM, Glazer AN, Ch:
`cence measurement ina flo
`neter using low-power helinm-neon laser excita -
`
`tion. Cytometry 1983;4:27
`
`
`isatos AP. Semiconductor nanccrys-
`3. Bruchez M, Jr, Moronne M, Gin P, Weiss &, Ali
`
`4:2013-Z016,
`
`
`cence 1998;
`tals as fiuorescent biclegical fa
`4. Shapiro HM, Perlniatter NG. Violet laser diedes as light sources for cytometry. Cyto-
`metry 200154.
`3-136.
`
`wa
`
`
`Chattopad
`°K. Quantumdot technology in flow cytoaetry, Methods Cell Biel
`2014;102
`7,
`ited fluorochromes by
`6. Telford WG, Hawley
`
`
`S4A48-55,
`flow cytometryusing a violet laser diode.
`
`
`
`ILougda
`d RP.The Landbwok: A Guide to Fluorescent Probes and Labeling Technolo-
`
`enc, OR: Invitrogen Corporalion; 2005.
`gies. £
`
`7.
`
`
`
`
`of differential
`Single-cell mass cytemeiry
`amed &, Treio A, Ormatsky O], et al.
`iramune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science
`32:6R7-696,
`
`9. Maboke Y
`
`atlopadhivay B, Roederer
`M. Publication of upiimrized mrakticolor im-
`
`munofluor
`~ytometry Part A 2010;77A:814--818.
`
`
`10. Matike YD, Re
`¢ M, Optimizing a multicolor inmunophenotyping assay. Clin
`
`Lab Med 200
`69-485, v.
`
`
` enger O, Deter-
`il. Grabolle M, Spieles M, Le.
`kV, Gaponik. N, Eychraulter A, Resch
`
`
`minalion of the fluorescence
`quantum yield of quantum dois:
`lable procedures
`and achievable uncertainties. Anal Chem 2009;81:6285-6294.
`
`446
`
`Fluorescent Probe Toalbox
`
`BD00033055
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket