`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`R2-061152
`
` (Draft 0) minutes of the RAN1-RAN2 joint meeting, 29th March 2006
` (during RAN1-44bis and RAN2-52, Athens, Greece)
`Approval
`3GPP support team
`
`
`
`(TSG-RAN WG2 53 meeting
`08-12 May, Shanghai, China)
`
`
`
`
`
`Title:
`
`Document for:
` Source:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`30th March 2006
`Claude Arzelier
`ETSI Mobile Competence Centre
`F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex
`Tel: +33 4 92 94 42 61
`Email: Claude.Arzelier@etsi.org
`
`
`
`Intellectual Ventures II LLC Ex. 2002
`Ericsson Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures
`IPR2018-01380
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE Joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`
` 1
`
`Opening of the meeting ............................................................................................................................ 3
`
`Call for IPR ............................................................................................................................................................ 3
`1.1
`Approval of the agenda ............................................................................................................................ 3
`2
`Aspects to be discussed (during the joint meeting) .................................................................................. 3
`3
`Paging/Broadcast Control Information ................................................................................................................. 4
`3.1
`Random Access ...................................................................................................................................................... 8
`3.2
`TrCH multiplexing ............................................................................................................................................... 10
`3.3
`HARQ operation (Sync/Async, variable TTI, etc...) .......................................................................................... 11
`3.4
`Control signalling messages ................................................................................................................................ 13
`3.5
`L1 mesurements for Mobility (cell re-selection and handover) ......................................................................... 14
`3.6
`Physical layer model ............................................................................................................................................ 14
`3.7
`Other ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15
`3.8
`Liaisons and outputs to other groups ...................................................................................................... 16
`4
`Any other business ................................................................................................................................. 16
`5
`Closing of the meeting ........................................................................................................................... 16
`6
`Annex A: List of delegates (attendees) ......................................................................................................... 16
`Annex B: List of documents ......................................................................................................................... 16
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`
`1
`
`Opening of the meeting
`
`Call for IPR
`
`1.1
`
`The Chairmen (Dirk Gerstenberger from Ericsson and Denis Fauconnier from Nortel Networks) made the following IPR call:
`
`
`The attention of the delegates of this Working Group was drawn to the fact that
`3GPP Individual Members have the obligation under the IPR Policies of their
`respective Organizational Partners to inform their respective Organizational
`Partners of Essential IPRs they become aware of.
`The delegates were asked to take note that they were hereby invited:
`
`to investigate whether their organization or any other organization owns IPRs
`which were, or were likely to become Essential in respect of the work of the
`work of 3GPP.
`to notify their respective Organizational Partners of all potential IPRs, e.g., for
`ETSI, by means of the IPR Statement and the Licensing declaration forms
`(http://webapp.etsi.org/Ipr/).
`
`
`
`
`
` 2
`
`
`
` 3
`
`NOTE: IPRs may be declared to the Director-General or Chairman of the SDO, but not to the RAN WG Chairmen.
`
`
`
`Approval of the agenda
`
`WG Chairmen
`
`Agenda of the RAN1-RAN2 joint session
`R2-060816
`The Chairmen proposed the agenda for the meeting.
`Decision: The agenda was approved.
`
`
`
`Aspects to be discussed (during the joint meeting)
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`3.1
`Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`
`
`
`RAN1 Status for Joint Meeting
`R2-061072
`This document was presented by the RAN WG1 Chairman.
`Discussion:
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`RAN1 Chairman
`
`RAN2 Chairman
`
`RAN2 Chairman summary (Broadcast/Paging) (RAN2 Status)
`R2-061073
`This document was presented by the RAN WG2 Chairman.
`Discussion:
`It was clarified (by the presenter) that the "wake-up" procedure may be the same than the paging (with regards to the initial precedure, not to the messages).
`However, details have not been discussed.
`It was clarified that for the monitoring of the scheduler, there may be different DRX periods. For the long DRX periods, uplink synchronisation may not be
`kept (to allow low battery consumption).
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`
`NTT DoCoMo- Fujitsu, Mitsubishi Electric,
`NEC, Sharp, Toshiba Corporation
`Broadcast Channel Structure for E-UTRA Downlink
`R2-060836
`This document was presented by Kenichi Higuchi from NTT DoCoMo.
`Discussion:
`It was clarified that the same information bit was assumed between the 5 MHz and 1.25 MHz transmission. The total transmission power is the same
`between the two cases.
`It was clarified that the BCCH bit rate is still to be decided.
`It was clarified that interferences from other cells was not assumed in the simulations.
`It was clarified that re-use patterns were not excluded.
`It was highlighted that by comparing figures 1a with 3a, the gain (from 1 to 2 transmissions) appears to be 2 dB.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`
`BCH transport channel
`R2-060864
`This document was presented by Mr. Erik Dahlman from Ericsson.
`Discussion:
`It was clarified that the intention was to have a predetermined transport format ("low fixed data rate" for the BCH, re-using the Rel-6 terminology).
`It was clarified that one idea here was that less critical information (second set of information) could be sent in a dedicated way rather than broadcast
`continuously. Finding a goodd trade-off would be important : A capacity cost versus bit rate figure (for the BCH) would be useful.
`
`Ericsson
`
`4
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`There is a need to assess if having quick feedback from the neighbour cells would be useful (introducing this this may also impact the scheduling).
`It was clarified that (for example) the PMN Id would be sent in macro diversity.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`
`Flexible rate transmission of BCCH
`R2-060887
`This document was presented by Dr. Konstantinos Dimou from Panasonic.
`Discussion:
`It was clarified that the fixed rate part would be sent on the fixed part broadcast channel. All information may be received by all UEs on downlink shared
`channels.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`Panasonic
`
`Motorola
`Paging/Broadcast Control
`R2-060942
`This document was presented by Mr Ravi Kuchibhotla from Motorola (focusing on the bradcast part).
`Discussion:
`Question was raised if the whole part of the subframe would be used.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`
`Qualcomm
`Europe
`
`Considerations on BCH and 20 MHz system BW
`R2-060903
`This document was presented by Mr. Patrick Fischer from LG Electronics.
`
`LG Electronics
`
`5
`
`Broadcast Control Information
`R2-060995
`This document was presented by Mr Juan Montojo from Qualcomm
`Discussion:
`It was commented that the distinction (of information) should be more on static versus semi static, rather than on system specific versus cell specific. The
`former already exists today (by using different value tags).
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`Samsung
`
`Principles of scalable bandwidth scenarios
`R2-061001
`This document was presented by Mr. Jeong, Kyeong in from Samsung.
`Discussion:
`It was clarified (by the presenter) that there may be a need of two BCHs (duplicate BCH transmissions), because of MBMS. It was replied that this is in fact
`a BCH in two cells.
`It was commented that another solution would be to deliver MBMS in less than 10 MHz.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`Discussion:
`It was clarified that in the information split, information would be split in two code blocks.
`All UEs in active mode would have to read the BCH.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`Summary on Broadcast proposals and decisions (RAN WG2 Chairman) (new document, after discussions):
`R2-061074
`Broadcast Summary
`RAN2 Chairman
`This document was presented by the RAN2 Chairman.
`Discussion:
`It was clarified that MCH (Multicast Channel) is similar to the MCCH, a logical channel carried on the FACH transport channel and introduced in the Rel-6
`for MBMS.
`Decision:
`RAN WG2 to study ways to reduce BCH load based on BCCH content delivery mechanism.
`RAN WG1 to provide a capacity cost versus bit rate figure.
`
`
`
`NTT DoCoMo, Fujitsu, Mitsubishi Electric,
`NEC, Toshiba Corporation
`Paging Channel Structure for E-UTRA Downlink
`R2-060837
`This document was presented by Kenichi Higuchi from NTT DoCoMo.
`Discussion:
`It was clarified that independant paging indicators were proposed in order to achieve also soft combining.
`Question on whether different SFNs would be used between paging and broadcast. It was clarified that soft combining for paging channels is limited to cells
`within the same Node-B.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`Philips
`
`Evolved Paging for LTE
`R2-060849
`This document was presented by Mr Paul Bucknell from Philips.
`Discussion:
`It was clarified that the paging would be for mobiles in idle mode. Question on the associated increased resource load (only one mobile would benefit from
`it).
`Question on when the UE would acquire the uplink sync. Answer that the UE would perform a RACH as normally.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`PCH transport channel
`R2-060865
`This document was presented by Mr. Erik Dahlman from Ericsson.
`Discussion:
`
`Ericsson
`
`6
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`It was clarified that downlink shared channels are similar to e.g. HS-DSCH, or HS-SCCH.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`Motorola
`Paging/Broadcast Control
`R2-060942
`This document was presented by Mr Ravi Kuchibhotla from Motorola (focusing on the paging part).
`Discussion:
`Last bullet point of option 1 should be ignored following the discussions.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`Qualcomm
`Europe
`
`Paging Procedure
`R2-060994
`This document was presented by Mr Juan Montojo from Qualcomm
`Discussion:
`It was clarified that this concept is a concept of indicator that does not include ressource assignment.
`It was commented that the chosen identity should still not conflict with the identity chosen for the HS-SCCH.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`LG Electronics
`Inc.
`
`Discusion on LTE Paging and DRX
`R2-061014
`This document was presented by (...) from LG Electronics
`Discussion:
`It was reminded that the PICH was needed in WCDMA because the paging was long. But is it needed if it is shorter ? Answer that there may still be gains
`linked with decoding simplicity.
`It was clarified that long (respectively: short) identities could be used for idle mode (respectively: active) UEs.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`Proposals/Way forward for Paging: See R2-061075 (new document, after discussions):
`
`R2-061075
`Paging summary
`
`Way forward (taken from R2-061075):
`PCH is a separate transport channel:
`
`- Used for idle mode.
`RAN2 to define procedure/message.
`RAN1 to study PCH design, Paging Indicator need, etc..:
`
`- Maximise commonalities in PHY layer with DL-SCH operation i.e. RRC IDLE and RRC CONNECTED.
`
`
`RAN2 Chairman
`
`7
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`
`
`Cell code allocation and neighbour list broadcasting
`R2-060838
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`Random Access
`3.2
`RAN1 Chairman
`R2-061072
`RAN1 Status for Joint Meeting
`This document was presented by the RAN WG1 Chairman (focusing on the RACH part, e.g. slide 3).
`Discussion:
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`NTT DoCoMo
`
`Nokia
`
`RACH Content
`R2-060821
`This document was presented by Mr. Benoist Sébire from Nokia.
`Discussion:
`It was commented that shorter random accesss would also lead to less collisions.
`It was clarified that the 30 bits would be associated with 2 ms.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`General comments:
`Approach 1 from R1-060885 is a "one step approach". Approach 2 is a "two steps approach".
`It was reminded that the longer the random access, the more seldom it can be sent.
`What is the bandwidth associated with the Async Access burst delay figures (e.g. 0.5 ms, 2 ms) ? It was clarified that this was based on link budget and
`hence independent on the bandwidth.
`
`
`Way forward on the RACH (work split between RAN1 and RAN2):
`(See R2-061076 (new document), that also includes a summary of proposals/figures).
`RAN2 to study content of the first message (including Id), and one versus two step access.
`RAN2 to study how to make scheduling request (scheduled/allocated access versus random request).
`RAN1 to study signatures/sequences.
`RAN1 to look at collision probability in random access case.
`RAN1 to study best way/cost to keep L1 sync:
`
`- At which point should we leave the mobile go to async ?
`RAN1 to confirm message size.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`R2-060832
`Prioritizing Non-synchronized Random Access in E-UTRA Uplink
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Random Access for LTE
`R2-060850
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Random Access usage for RRC state transitions and mobility support
`R2-060852
`The document was revised before presentation into R2-061071:
`
`
`
`Random Access usage for RRC state transitions and mobility support
`R2-061071
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Random Access procedures for LTE
`R2-060866
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Text Proposal on Random Access for TR 25.813
`R2-060867
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`RACH message performance
`R2-060873
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`LTE Random Access Use Cases
`R2-060890
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Access procedure for TDD
`R2-060905
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`User ID Assignment during Initial Access
`R2-060913
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Access Procedures
`R2-060996
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Resource Request in Synchronized Case
`R2-061018
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`9
`
`ITRI
`
`Philips
`
`Texas
`Instruments
`
`Texas
`Instruments
`
`Ericsson
`
`Ericsson
`
`Nortel
`
`LG Electronics
`
`CATT- RITT
`
`IPWireless
`
`Qualcomm
`Europe
`
`LG Electronics
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`
`
`UL timing sync procedure
`R2-061006
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`TrCH multiplexing
`
`Random Access Channel Structure for E-UTRA Uplink (=R1-060786)
`R2-061064
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`3.3
`
`
`Samsung
`
`NTT DoCoMo
`
`Samsung
`
`Motorola
`
`Qualcomm
`Europe
`
`Need for mux3 and mux4 ?
`R2-060926
`This document was presented by Mr. Gert-Jan van Lieshout from Samsung.
`Discussion:
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`Transport Channel Multiplexing
`R2-060943
`This document was presented by Ravi Kuchibhotla from Motorola.
`Discussion:
`It was clarified that slide 11 (transport channel multiplexing) was more applicable to the downlink. It was clarified that there are independent information for
`the two transport channels: the resources are not shared.
`In slide 7, it was clarified that a transport block may be mapped to one group of resource blocks.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`LTE TrCH Multiplexing
`R2-060997
`This document was presented by Etienne Chaponniere from Qualcomm.
`Discussion:
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`Transport Channel Multiplexing and Mapping of Transport Channels to Physical
`Channels
`R2-060851
`This document was presented by Mr Paul Bucknell from Philips.
`Discussion:
`It was clarified that the proposal was primarily intended for the downlink.
`Question was raised on how could this be applicable to the uplink. Resources are not independently accessible.
`It was clarified that this could be applicable to the uplink, but mapped to the same resources.
`
`Philips
`
`10
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`General comment/question:
`What is the maximum TTI assumed ? (especially in the uplink): 2 ms ? For longer TTIs, additional procedures may be needed (e.g. flush the buffer).
`
`
`See the L1 Multiplexing summary/outcome in R2-061077.
`
`
`
`Channel Coding Structure for LTE downlink
`R2-060902
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`R2-060839 Multiplexing structure
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Panasonic
`
`NTT DoCoMo
`
`Orange, France
`Telecom
`
`CATT
`
`CATT
`
`Nokia
`
`Transport channel for MBMS support
`R2-060847
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`
`
`HARQ operation (Sync/Async, variable TTI, etc...)
`
`R2-060985 MAC multiplexing and scheduling
`This document was revised before presentation into R2-061055:
`R2-061055 MAC multiplexing and scheduling
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`3.4
`
`
`HARQ Operation for E-UTRAN
`R2-060822
`This document was presented by Mr. Benoist Sébire from Nokia.
`Discussion:
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`NTT DoCoMo, Fujitsu, Mitsubishi Electric,
`NEC, Sharp, Toshiba Corporation
`Hybrid ARQ Scheme for E-UTRA Downlink
`R2-060840
`This document was presented by Mr. Kenichi Higuchi from NTT DoCoMo.
`Discussion:
`
`11
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`It was clarified that the removal of the user Id field may change the format of the signalling.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`Ericsson
`
`Synchronous vs. Asynchronous HARQ
`R2-060869
`This document was presented by Mr. Henrik Enbuske from Ericsson.
`Discussion:
`There is a typo of 3 bits in the table.
`Question was raised if the impact on synchronous HARQ operation had been assessed (TTM/FDM).
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`Siemens
`
`HARQ operation
`R2-060916
`This document was presented by Mr. Burghard Unteregger from Siemens.
`Discussion:
`It was clarified that this was proposed for the downlink only. The TTI size is however for both the uplink and downlink.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`Motorola
`
`HARQ Operation
`R2-060944
`This document was presented by Mr Ravi Kuchibhotla from Motorola.
`Discussion:
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`HARQ operation
`R2-061000
`This document was presented by Juho Lee from Samsung.
`Discussion:
`It was clarified that this scheme was proposed for both the uplink and the downlink.
`Decision: The document was noted.
`
`
`See the HARQ conclusions (e.g. Sync versus Async) (new document following discussions), in R2-061078.
`
`
`
`Samsung
`
`Ericsson
`
`Increased TTI Length
`R2-060868
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Text proposal to TR25.814 on synchronous/asynchronous hybrid ARQ
`R2-060870
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`Ericsson
`
`12
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`
`
`Physical Layer Processing of Large Transport Blocks
`R2-060876
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`HARQ Operation
`R2-060998
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`3.5
`
`
`Control signalling messages
`
`RAN1 Status for Joint Meeting
`R2-061072
`Slides 9, 10 and 11 from this document were presented by the RAN WG1 Chairman.
`Discussion:
`For the uplink signalling, question was raised on why no headroom had been considered.
`Decision: The document was noted. This will be studied in RAN WG2.
`
`
`
`E-UTRA Uplink Control Signaling
`R2-060853
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`E-UTRA Downlink Control Signaling
`R2-060854
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Uplink TFC selection in E-UTRA
`R2-060871
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`R2-060919 OFDM Downlink Signalling
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Control Signaling
`R2-060945
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`PCH mapping and Paging control
`R2-060988
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`13
`
`HUAWEI
`
`Qualcomm
`Europe
`
`RAN1 Chairman
`
`Intel
`
`Intel
`
`Ericsson
`
`Alcatel
`
`Motorola
`
`CATT
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`
`Control Signaling Messages
`R2-060999
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`3.6
`
`
`L1 mesurements for Mobility (cell re-selection and handover)
`
`Clarifications on different UE measurement types
`R2-060823
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`L1 UE measurement to support intra E-UTRA mobility
`R2-060834
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`UE Measurement for Dynamic Camped Frequency Allocation
`R2-060835
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Inter-frequency/RAT Measurement Gap Control
`R2-060841
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Scheduling Scheme for Inter-frequency/RAT Measurements
`R2-060986
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Scheduling of measurements in LTE
`R2-060987
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`A generic association procedure to improve handover process
`R2-060874
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`3.7
`
`
`Physical layer model
`
`Functions of the Physical Layer
`R2-060824
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`R2-060842 Mappings between Transport Channels and Physical
`
`Qualcomm
`Europe
`
`Nokia
`
`NEC Group
`
`NEC Group
`
`NTT DoCoMo
`
`CATT- RITT
`
`QUALCOMM
`Europe
`
`ITRI
`
`Nokia
`
`NTT DoCoMo, Fujitsu, Mitsubishi
`14
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`Channels for E-UTRA Uplink
`
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`E-UTRA Physical Layer Model
`R2-060872
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`PHY Layer Models
`R2-060946
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`LTE Physical Layer Model
`R2-061038
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`3.8
`
`
`Other
`
`Link adaption for EMBMS
`R2-060955
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`R2-060957 Modelling of the LTE RRC Active state
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`R2-060958 MBMS Radio Link Design for LTE
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`E-MBMS Structure
`R2-060993
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Cell switching in LTE_Active state
`R2-061036
`The document was not presented during the meeting.
`
`
`Electric, NEC, Sharp, Toshiba
`Corporation
`
`Ericsson
`
`Motorola
`
`Qualcomm
`Europe
`
`Motorola
`
`Vodafone Group
`PLC
`
`Vodafone Group
`PLC
`
`Qualcomm
`Europe S.A.R.L.
`
`Qualcomm
`Europe
`
`15
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`4
`Liaisons and outputs to other groups
`There was no input under this agenda item.
`
`Any other business
`5
`There was no input under this agenda item.
`
`Closing of the meeting
`6
`(There was no input under this agenda item).
`
`List of delegates (attendees)
`Annex A:
`See the list of delegates from RAN1-44bis and RAN2-52.
`
`
`List of documents
`Annex B:
`(Ordered per agenda item).
`
`
`Doc. Name
`R2-060816
`
`Title
`Agenda of the RAN1-RAN2 joint session
`
`R2-060836
`
`Broadcast Channel Structure for E-UTRA Downlink
`
`R2-060837
`R2-060838
`R2-060849
`R2-060864
`R2-060865
`
`Paging Channel Structure for E-UTRA Downlink
`Cell code allocation and neighbour list broadcasting
`Evolved Paging for LTE
`BCH transport channel
`PCH transport channel
`
`16
`
`Source
`WG Chairmen
`NTT DoCoMo-
`Fujitsu, Mitsubishi
`Electric, NEC,
`Sharp, Toshiba
`Corporation
`NTT DoCoMo,
`Fujitsu, Mitsubishi
`Electric, NEC,
`Toshiba
`Corporation
`NTT DoCoMo
`Philips
`Ericsson
`Ericsson
`
`Allocations
`Joint02: Approval of the agenda
`
`Note
`
`
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`R2-060942
`Paging/Broadcast Control
`R2-060994
`Paging Procedure
`R2-060995
`Broadcast Control Information
`R2-061001
`Principles of scalable bandwidth scenarios
`R2-061014
`Disucssion on LTE Paging and DRX
`R2-061029
`Discussion on LTE Paging and DRX
`R2-061072
`RAN1 Status for Joint Meeting
`R2-061073
`RAN2 Chairman summary (Broadcast/Paging) (RAN2 Status)
`R2-061074
`Broadcast Summary
`R2-061075
`Paging Summary
`
`Flexible rate transmission of BCCH
`R2-060887
`RACH Content
`R2-060821
`Prioritizing Non-synchronized Random Access in E-UTRA Uplink
`R2-060832
`Random Access for LTE
`R2-060850
`Random Access usage for RRC state transitions and mobility support
`R2-060852
`Random Access procedures for LTE
`R2-060866
`Text Proposal on Random Access for TR 25.813
`R2-060867
`LTE Random Access Use Cases
`R2-060890
`Considerations on BCH and 20 MHz system BW
`R2-060903
`Access procedure for TDD
`R2-060905
`User ID Assignment during Initial Access
`R2-060913
`Access Procedures
`R2-060996
`UL timing sync procedure
`R2-061006
`Resource Request in Synchronized Case
`R2-061018
`Resource Request in synchronized case
`R2-061033
`Random Access Channel Structure for E-UTRA Uplink (=R1-060786)
`R2-061064
`Random Access usage for RRC state transitions and mobility support
`R2-061071
`RACH Summary
`R2-061076
`RACH message performance
`R2-060873
`R2-060839 Multiplexing structure
`
`R2-060847
`
`R2-060851
`R2-060902
`R2-060920
`
`Transport channel for MBMS support
`Transport Channel Multiplexing and Mapping of Transport Channels to
`Physical Channels
`Channel Coding Structure for LTE downlink
`Need for Mux3 and Mux4 ?
`
`17
`
`Motorola
`Qualcomm Europe
`Qualcomm Europe
`Samsung
`LG Electronics Inc.
`LG Electronics
`RAN1 Chairman
`RAN2 Chairman
`RAN2 Chairman
`RAN2 Chairman
`
`Panasonic
`Nokia
`ITRI
`Philips
`Texas Instruments
`Ericsson
`Ericsson
`LG Electronics
`LG Electronics
`CATT- RITT
`IPWireless
`Qualcomm Europe
`Samsung
`LG Electronics Inc.
`LG Electronics
`NTT DoCoMo
`Texas Instruments
`RAN2 Chairman
`Nortel
`NTT DoCoMo
`Orange, France
`Telecom
`
`Philips
`Panasonic
`Samsung
`
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`Joint03.1: Paging/Broadcast Control Information
`- 06.1: RRC and MAC protocol States and State
`transitions- split between MAC and RRC
`functions
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.2: Random Access
`Joint03.3: TrCH multiplexing
`
`Joint03.3: TrCH multiplexing
`
`Joint03.3: TrCH multiplexing
`Joint03.3: TrCH multiplexing
`Joint03.3: TrCH multiplexing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`R2-060922
`Need for Mux3 and Mux4 ?
`R2-060924
`Need for Mux3 and Mux4 ?
`R2-060926
`Need for mux3 and mux4 ?
`R2-060943
`Transport Channel Multiplexing
`
`R2-060985 MAC multiplexing and scheduling
`R2-060997
`LTE TrCH Multiplexing
`
`R2-061055 MAC multiplexing and scheduling
`R2-061077
`L1 Multiplexing Summary
`
`R2-060822
`
`HARQ Operation for E-UTRAN
`
`R2-060840
`
`Hybrid ARQ Scheme for E-UTRA Downlink
`
`R2-060868
`
`Increased TTI Length
`
`R2-060869
`
`Synchronous vs. Asynchronous HARQ
`
`R2-060870
`
`Text proposal to TR25.814 on synchronous/asynchronous hybrid ARQ
`
`R2-060876
`
`Physical Layer Processing of Large Transport Blocks
`
`R2-060916
`
`HARQ operation
`
`R2-060944
`
`HARQ Operation
`
`R2-060998
`
`HARQ Operation
`
`R2-061000
`
`HARQ operation
`
`R2-061078
`
`HARQ Conclusions
`
`R2-060853
`
`E-UTRA Uplink Control Signaling
`
`R2-060854
`R2-060871
`
`E-UTRA Downlink Control Signaling
`Uplink TFC selection in E-UTRA
`
`18
`
`Samsung
`Samsung
`Samsung
`Motorola
`
`Joint03.3: TrCH multiplexing
`Joint03.3: TrCH multiplexing
`Joint03.3: TrCH multiplexing
`Joint03.3: TrCH multiplexing
`
`CATT
`Qualcomm Europe
`
`Joint03.3: TrCH multiplexing
`Joint03.3: TrCH multiplexing
`
`CATT
`RAN2 Chairman
`
`Nokia
`NTT DoCoMo,
`Fujitsu, Mitsubishi
`Electric, NEC,
`Sharp, Toshiba
`Corporation
`
`Ericsson
`
`Ericsson
`
`Ericsson
`
`HUAWEI
`
`Siemens
`
`Motorola
`
`Qualcomm Europe
`
`Samsung
`
`RAN2 Chairman
`
`Intel
`
`Intel
`Ericsson
`
`Joint03.3: TrCH multiplexing
`Joint03.3: TrCH multiplexing
`Joint03.4: HARQ operation (Sync/Async...)-
`(Variable TTI...)
`
`Joint03.4: HARQ operation (Sync/Async...)-
`(Variable TTI...)
`Joint03.4: HARQ operation (Sync/Async...)-
`(Variable TTI...)
`Joint03.4: HARQ operation (Sync/Async...)-
`(Variable TTI...)
`Joint03.4: HARQ operation (Sync/Async...)-
`(Variable TTI...)
`Joint03.4: HARQ operation (Sync/Async...)-
`(Variable TTI...)
`Joint03.4: HARQ operation (Sync/Async...)-
`(Variable TTI...)
`Joint03.4: HARQ operation (Sync/Async...)-
`(Variable TTI...)
`Joint03.4: HARQ operation (Sync/Async...)-
`(Variable TTI...)
`Joint03.4: HARQ operation (Sync/Async...)-
`(Variable TTI...)
`Joint03.4: HARQ operation (Sync/Async...)-
`(Variable TTI...)
`Joint03.5: Control Signalling messages (e.g.
`equiv. to HS-SCCH- AGCH)
`Joint03.5: Control Signalling messages (e.g.
`equiv. to HS-SCCH- AGCH)
`Joint03.5: Control Signalling messages (e.g.
`
`
`
`
`
`Revised
`in R2-
`061055
`
`Revision
`of R2-
`060985
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Draft Report of the RAN1-RAN2 LTE joint session (Athens, 29th March 2006)
`
`R2-060919 OFDM Downlink Signalling
`
`R2-060945
`
`Control Signaling
`
`R2-060988
`
`PCH mapping and Paging control
`
`R2-060999
`
`Control Signaling Messages
`
`R2-060823
`
`Clarifications on different UE measurement types
`
`R2-060834
`
`L1 UE measurement to support intra E-UTRA mobility
`
`R2-060835
`
`UE Measurement for Dynamic Camped Frequency Allocation
`
`R2-060841
`
`Inter-frequency/RAT Measurement Gap Control
`
`R2-060986
`
`Scheduling Scheme for Inter-frequency/RAT Measurements
`
`R2-060987
`
`Scheduling of measurements in LTE
`
`R2-060874
`R2-060824
`
`A generic association procedure to improve handover process
`Functions of the Physical Layer
`
`R2-060842
`R2-060872
`R2-060946
`R2-061038
`R2-060955
`
`Mappings between Transport Channels and Physical Channels for E-UTRA
`Uplink
`E-UTRA Physical Layer Model
`PHY Layer Models
`LTE Physical Layer Model
`Link adaption for EMBMS
`
`R2-060993
`R2-061036
`
`E-MBMS Structure
`Cell switching in LTE_Active state
`
`R2-060957 Modelling of the LTE RRC Active state
`
`R2-060958 MBMS Radio Link Design for LTE
`
`19
`
`Alcatel
`
`Motorola
`
`CATT
`
`Qualcomm Europe
`
`Nokia
`