throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
` Paper: 60
`Entered: February 14, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`MMODAL LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-01435
`Patent 6,999,933 B2
`____________
`
`Before KEN B. BARRETT, NEIL T. POWELL, and
`CHRISTA P. ZADO, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ZADO, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`NOTICE
`Final Written Decision, Motion To Seal
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a)
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a)
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01435
`Patent 6,999,933 B2
`
`
`NOTICE OF FINAL WRITTEN DECISION
`I.
`Today, we issued a non-public version of a Final Written Decision
`(“Decision”) determining that MMODAL LLC has demonstrated, by a
`preponderance of the evidence, that claims 9–11 of U.S. Patent No.
`6,999,933 B2 are unpatentable. In the Decision, we also: 1) grant Patent
`Owner’s Motion to Seal and Entry of a Protective Order (Paper 20, “Motion
`to Seal”) and Petitioner’s Supplemental Motion to Seal (Paper 34,
`“Supplemental Motion to Seal”), and 2) order entry of a protective order—
`namely, the Board’s default protective order— in this proceeding. A public
`version of the Decision will issue in due course.
`II. ORDER CONCERNING THE PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF
`THE FINAL WRITTEN DECISION
` The Final Written Decision has been entered as a non-public version
`because it may refer to information that is the subject of the Motion to Seal
`and Supplemental Motion to Seal. No later than ten (10) business days after
`entry of the Final Written Decision, the parties may identify which portions
`of the Final Written Decision, if any, should be redacted from a public
`version. To that end, the parties may make such an identification by jointly
`submitting via email a single PDF document containing all proposed
`redactions. The parties shall not file their proposed redactions in the dockets
`of these proceedings.
`If the parties agree that the Final Written Decision may be made
`publicly available without any redactions, the parties may notify the Board
`via email stating such within the same time frame. In the absence of a
`communication from the parties about any alleged confidentiality of the
`Final Written Decision during the ten-day period set forth above, the Board
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01435
`Patent 6,999,933 B2
`
`will issue a public version of the Final Written Decision as originally
`entered.
`It is so ORDERED.
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Jon Strang
`Inge Osman
`David K. Callahan
`Kevin C. Wheeler
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`jonathan.strang@lw.com
`inge.osman@lw.com
`david.callahan@lw.com
`kevin.wheeler@lw.com
`
`Patrick McPherson
`Patrick Muldoon
`Jarrad Gunther
`D. Joseph English
`Anthony J. Fitzpatrick
`Allison H. Hutton
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`pdmcpherson@duanemorris.com
`pcmuldoon@duanemorris.com
`jmgunther@duanemorris.com
`djenglish@duanemorris.com
`ajfitzpatrick@duanemorris.com
`AHHutton@duanemorris.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Brian E. Ferguson
`Robert Magee
`Anish R. Desai
`Sudip Kundu
`Stephen Bosco
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01435
`Patent 6,999,933 B2
`
`Amanda Branch
`WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
`Nuance.MModal.IPR@weil.com
`Brian.Ferguson@weil.com
`Robert.Magee@weil.com
`Anish.Desai@weil.com
`Sudip.Kundu@weil.com
`Stephen.Bosco@weil.com
`Amanda.Branch@weil.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket