`
`NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
`
`United States Court of Appeals
`for the Federal Circuit
`______________________
`
`CUSTOMPLAY, LLC,
`Appellant
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC.,
`Appellee
`
`ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE
`FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER
`SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR
`INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF
`THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK
`OFFICE,
`Intervenor
`______________________
`
`2020-2209
`______________________
`
`Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-
`01498.
`
`______________________
`
`JUDGMENT
`______________________
`
`JOHN C. CAREY, Carey Rodriguez Milian Gonya, LLP,
`Miami, FL, argued for appellant. Also represented by
`
`
`
`Case: 20-2209 Document: 64 Page: 2 Filed: 02/15/2022
`
`
`
`NICHOLAS J. DOYLE.
`
` COLIN B. HEIDEMAN, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear,
`LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for appellee. Also represented
`by CHRISTIE R.W. MATTHAEI; JOSEPH R. RE, Irvine, CA.
`
` MCKAYE LEA NEUMEISTER, Appellate Staff, Civil Divi-
`sion, United States Department of Justice, Washington,
`DC, argued for intervenor. Also represented by BRIAN M.
`BOYNTON, DANIEL TENNY; KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, MAI-TRANG
`DUC DANG, MICHAEL S. FORMAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE,
`ROBERT J. MCMANUS, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, Office
`of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Of-
`fice, Alexandria, VA.
` ______________________
`
`THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
`
` PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit
`Judges).
`
`AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
`
`
` ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
`
`
`
`February 15, 2022
`Date
`
`/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
`Peter R. Marksteiner
`Clerk of Court
`
`
`
`