throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_________________
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`HYPERMEDIA NAVIGATION LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`_________________
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN REGARDING
`U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; AND 9,772,814
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page(s)
`INTRODUCTION AND ENGAGEMENT .................................................... 4
`I.
`BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS ................................................. 5
`II.
`III. MATERIALS CONSIDERED AND INFORMATION RELIED UPON ...... 6
`IV. THE CHALLENGED PATENTS, SKILL IN THE ART, AND RELATED
`TECHNOLOGY .............................................................................................. 8
`A.
`Exemplary Preexisting Web Solutions, Such As Footsteps And
`Guided Paths ........................................................................................14
`Person Of Ordinary Skill In The Art (“POSITA”) .............................24
`B.
`V. MEANING OF CERTAIN CLAIM TERMS................................................28
`VI. SPECIFIC PRIOR ART DESCRIPTIONS AND TEACHINGS .................32
`A. Guided Paths ........................................................................................33
`1.
`’523 Claim 6 And Guided Paths ...............................................38
`2.
`’523 Claim 7 And Guided Paths ...............................................50
`3.
`’523 Claim 11 And Guided Paths .............................................51
`4.
`’523 Claim 12 And Guided Paths .............................................52
`5.
`’672 Claim 14 / ’814 Claim 14, And Guided Paths ..................53
`6.
`’672 Claim 15 / ’814 Claim 15, And Guided Paths ..................65
`7.
`’672 Claim 18 / ’814 Claim 18 And Guided Paths ...................67
`8.
`’672 Claim 19 And Guided Paths .............................................69
`9.
`’814 Claim 16 And Guided Paths .............................................72
`10.
`’814 Claim 17 And Guided Paths .............................................76
`11.
`’814 Claim 20 And Guided Paths .............................................76
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`B.
`
`Richardson ...........................................................................................79
`1.
`’523 Claim 6 And Richardson ..................................................85
`2.
`’523 Claim 7 And Richardson ..................................................99
`3.
`’523 Claim 11 And Richardson ..............................................100
`4.
`’523 Claim 12 And Richardson ..............................................101
`5.
`’672 Claim 14 / ’814 Claim 14, And Richardson ...................102
`6.
`’672 Claim 15 / ’814 Claim 15, And Richardson ...................111
`7.
`’672 Claim 18 / ’814 Claim 18 And Richardson ....................114
`8.
`’814 Claim 16 And Richardson ..............................................117
`9.
`’814 Claim 17 And Richardson ..............................................120
`10.
`’814 Claim 20 And Richardson ..............................................121
`C. Modifying Guided Paths In View of Footsteps ................................122
`D. Modifying Richardson In View of Torres .........................................127
`1.
`Torres And Its Earlier Applications ........................................127
`E. Modifying Richardson In View of Guided Paths ..............................155
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`I, Loren Terveen, do hereby declare as follows:
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION AND ENGAGEMENT
`
`1.
`
`I have been retained as an independent expert on behalf of Microsoft
`
`Corporation in connection with Inter Partes Reviews (“IPRs”) of the above-
`
`identified patents and specifically in order to provide my analyses and opinions on
`
`certain technical issues related to U.S. Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and
`
`9,772,814 (the “’523 patent,” “’672 patent,” and “’814 patent,” respectively and,
`
`collectively, the “challenged patents”).
`
`2.
`
`I am being compensated at my usual and customary rate for the time I
`
`spent in connection with this IPR. My compensation is not affected by the outcome
`
`of this IPR.
`
`3.
`
`Specifically, I have been asked to provide my opinions regarding
`
`whether claims 6-7 and 11-12 of the ’523 patent; claims 14, 15, 18, and 19 of the
`
`’672 patent; and claims 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 20 of the ’814 patent (each a
`
`“Challenged Claim” and collectively the “Challenged Claims”) would have been
`
`found in the prior art or obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art
`
`(“POSITA”) as of October 1998. It is my opinion that each Challenged Claim
`
`would have been found in the cited prior art or at least obvious to a POSITA after
`
`reviewing the prior art discussed herein.
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`II. BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS
`
`4.
`
`I am a professor in the Department of Computer Science and
`
`Engineering at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities. I hold 10 patents on a
`
`broad variety of topics in web search, information management, intelligent
`
`interfaces, and graphical user interfaces; my specialties include Human-Computer
`
`Interaction, Social Computing, Recommender Systems, Online Communities, User
`
`Interface Design, Graphical User Interfaces, Location-Based Systems, and Web
`
`search and information management. I consider myself an expert in these areas. In
`
`formulating my opinions, I have relied upon my training, knowledge, and
`
`experience in the relevant art. A copy of my curriculum vitae is appended to this
`
`declaration as Appendix A and provides a description of my professional
`
`experience, including my academic and employment history, publications,
`
`conference participation, awards and honors, and more.
`
`5.
`
`I received my Ph.D. in Computer Sciences from the University of
`
`Texas, Austin, in 1991, and then worked at AT&T Bell Labs from 1991-2002, as
`
`first a member and then a principal member of the technical staff. During my time
`
`at Bell Labs I worked on numerous software systems with graphical user
`
`interfaces. Beginning by 1995, I spent a number of years developing web-based
`
`systems and user interfaces. In all these projects, I was involved with all aspects of
`
`the system, from overall design and architecture, to interface design and
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`implementation, and system development, including algorithms, databases, etc.
`
`PHOAKS (Terveen et al. 1997; Terveen & Hill 1997; U.S. Patent No. 6,029,192)
`
`was one representative system that I created and implemented. PHOAKS was one
`
`of the earliest recommender systems. It automatically identified and mined
`
`recommendations of web resources from Usenet messages. The system stored
`
`these recommendations in a database and generated HTML pages for thousands of
`
`Usenet newsgroups, which corresponded to topics of interest, for example, popular
`
`TV shows, musical groups, technical and scientific topics, etc. These pages were
`
`served from the phoaks.com website, which we created and maintained. Users
`
`could browse and search to find items of interest.
`
`6.
`
`In a subsequent project, I created a web search system that followed
`
`links and analyzed web page and title text to identify pages relevant to a specified
`
`topic of interest. The results were stored as rich site profiles in a database. I
`
`designed several graphical user interfaces, including one implemented as a Java
`
`applet, to allow users to visualize, search, and interact with the results. (Terveen et
`
`al. 1999; U.S. Patent No. 6,256,648.)
`
`III. MATERIALS CONSIDERED AND INFORMATION RELIED UPON
`In preparing this declaration, I have reviewed the following materials.
`7.
`
`I also considered other background materials that are referenced in this declaration.
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`Ex. No. Description
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,424,523 (“’523 patent”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,083,672 (“’672 patent”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,772,814 (“’814 patent”)
`
`Shipman et al., Using Networked Information to Create
`Educational Guided Paths, Int’l Journal Educ. Telecomms. 3(4),
`383-400 (1997) (“Guided Paths”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,809,247 (“Richardson”)
`
`Nicol et al., Footsteps: Trail-blazing the Web, Computer
`Networks and ISDN Systems 27, 879-885 (1995) (“Footsteps”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,155,451 (“Torres”)
`
`U.S. Patent Application No. 08/922,063 (“’063 Application”)
`
`Furuta et al., Hypertext Paths and the World-Wide Web:
`Experiences with Walden’s Paths, Association for Computing
`Machinery – Hypertext 97 (July 1997) (“Hypertext Paths”)
`
`Shipman et al., Generating Web-Based Presentations in Spatial
`Hypertext, Association for Computing Machinery – Intelligent
`User Interfaces (January 1997) (“Web-Based Presentations”)
`
`1013
`
`John, et al., HTML & CGI UNLEASHED, Sams.net Publishing
`(1995) (“HTML&CGI”)
`
`1017
`
`N/A
`
`File History of U.S. Patent No. 6,145,000
`John R. Smith, Shih-Fu Chang, “Image and video search engine
`for the World Wide Web,” Proc. SPIE 3022, Storage and
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`Ex. No. Description
`Retrieval for Image and Video Databases V, (15 January 1997)
`(“Smith & Chang”)
`Loren Terveen, Will Hill, and Brian Amento. 1999.
`Constructing, organizing, and visualizing collections of topically
`related Web resources. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 6, 1
`(March 1999), 67-94.
`DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/310641.310644 (“Terveen
`1999”)
`Terveen et al. 1997 – Loren Terveen, Will Hill, Brian Amento,
`David McDonald, and Josh Creter. 1997. PHOAKS: a system for
`sharing recommendations. Commun. ACM40, 3 (March 1997),
`59-62. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/245108.245122
`(“PHOAKS”)
`William C. Hill and Loren G. Terveen. 1997. Involving remote
`users in continuous design of web content. In Proceedings of the
`2nd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes,
`practices, methods, and techniques (DIS '97), Susan Coles (Ed.).
`ACM, New York, NY, USA, 137-145.
`DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/263552.263596 (“Terveen &
`Hill”)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,029,192
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,256,648
`
`
`
`IV. THE CHALLENGED PATENTS,
`SKILL IN THE ART, AND RELATED TECHNOLOGY
`The Challenged Patents all are titled System And Method For
`8.
`
`Creating And Navigating A Linear Hypermedia Resource Program. I note that,
`
`aside from the claims, there are no material differences between the three patents.
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`For example, the description and figures for all three challenged patents appear to
`
`all be identical or nearly identical. Accordingly, when I refer to the descriptions or
`
`figures provided in one of the challenged patents, those same description or figures
`
`can be found in the other patents.
`
`9.
`
`The Challenged Patents are directed to the problem of how to navigate
`
`through the vast amount of unorganized, densely interconnected information on the
`
`World Wide Web (“WWW”) in 1998. In particular, they speak about the need to
`
`“filter out unwanted information and present desired information”. (’523, 2:34-37.)
`
`As described in the following paragraphs, by 1998 many others had already tackled
`
`this problem as part of the natural development of the WWW.
`
`10. The World Wide Web is one embodiment – by far the most successful
`
`and popular – of the much older idea of Hypertext. Hypertext consists of
`
`electronically stored documents (more generally, any media objects, including
`
`images, audio files, and video files) with ‘links’ between them, thus enabling a
`
`reader/viewer to go directly from one document to another as their interest guides
`
`them. To take one simple example from Wikipedia, the article (document) for the
`
`University of Minnesota (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Minnesota)
`
`contains links to many other Wikipedia articles – for example, Minneapolis
`
`(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minneapolis) and Bob Dylan
`
`(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Dylan) – as well as links to many Web pages
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 9
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`(documents) from other Web sites, for example, concerning the University’s men’s
`
`hockey team (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=6287694) and the
`
`University’s Public Health program
`
`(https://web.archive.org/web/20110726181630/http://grad-
`
`schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-health-
`
`schools/public-health-rankings).
`
`11. The original vision for Hypertext goes back to the 1940s, first
`
`appearing in an influential article by Vannevar Bush, the Director of the US Office
`
`of Scientific Research and Development, titled “As We May Think”
`
`(https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1945/07/as-we-may-
`
`think/303881/). He described a system based on the technologies of microfilm,
`
`viewers, and cameras for recording the (as he already saw it then) huge and ever
`
`growing body of useful knowledge, enabling better access and thus better
`
`professional decision making, government policy, scientific discovery, etc. He also
`
`described the basic idea of hypertext – that is, linking documents together: “at any
`
`time, when one of these items is in view, the other can be instantly recalled merely
`
`by tapping a button below the corresponding code space. Moreover, when
`
`numerous items have been thus joined together to form a trail, they can be
`
`reviewed in turn, rapidly or slowly, by deflecting a lever like that used for turning
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 10
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`the pages of a book. It is exactly as though the physical items had been gathered
`
`together from widely separated sources and bound together to form a new book.”
`
`12. Moreover, the key part of Bush’s vision was that people would create
`
`useful trails (paths) through the repository of knowledge: “When the user is
`
`building a trail, he names it, inserts the name in his code book, and taps it out on
`
`his keyboard. Before him are the two items to be joined, projected onto adjacent
`
`viewing positions. At the bottom of each there are a number of blank code spaces,
`
`and a pointer is set to indicate one of these on each item. The user taps a single
`
`key, and the items are permanently joined…. There is a new profession of trail
`
`blazers, those who find delight in the task of establishing useful trails through the
`
`enormous mass of the common record. The inheritance from the master becomes,
`
`not only his additions to the world's record, but for his disciples the entire
`
`scaffolding by which they were erected.” (Italics added) To emphasize, these trails
`
`would be useful to other people as well, as they navigate the knowledge repository:
`
`“The lawyer has at his touch the associated opinions and decisions of his whole
`
`experience, and of the experience of friends and authorities. The patent attorney
`
`has on call the millions of issued patents, with familiar trails to every point of his
`
`client's interest. The physician, puzzled by a patient's reactions, strikes the trail
`
`established in studying an earlier similar case, and runs rapidly through analogous
`
`case histories, with side references to the classics for the pertinent anatomy and
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 11
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`histology. The chemist, struggling with the synthesis of an organic compound, has
`
`all the chemical literature before him in his laboratory, with trails following the
`
`analogies of compounds, and side trails to their physical and chemical behavior.
`
`The historian, with a vast chronological account of a people, parallels it with a skip
`
`trail which stops only on the salient items, and can follow at any time
`
`contemporary trails which lead him all over civilization at a particular epoch.”
`
`13. Thus, from the beginning, the concept of Hypertext included the idea
`
`of people curating trails – or paths – through vast knowledge repositories that
`
`would aid those who followed them in finding useful information on topics of
`
`interest.
`
`14.
`
`Implementations of Hypertext appeared as early as the 1960s, notably
`
`in the NLS system (Douglas C. Engelbart and William K. English. 1968. A
`
`research center for augmenting human intellect. In Proceedings of the December 9-
`
`11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part I (AFIPS '68 (Fall, part I)). ACM,
`
`New York, NY, USA, 395-410.), but in the 1980s, the widespread penetration of
`
`personal computers equipped with graphical user interfaces and pointing devices
`
`led to greatly increased deployment of hypertext systems, for example, the
`
`HyperCard and NoteCards systems on the Apple Macintosh.
`
`15. By the late 1980s, the difficulties of navigating through large
`
`hypertext repositories had become a central issue for research and innovation in the
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 12
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`area. Work attacking this problem explicitly referred back to Bush’s vision for
`
`inspiration. TEXTNET (Trigg & Weiser 1986) created a technique for users to
`
`author paths through hypertext – “ordered lists of nodes [objects, documents]”
`
`which users could step through by following links from one object to the next.
`
`Guided Tours (Trigg 1989) addressed the problem of easing users’ burden of
`
`navigating through complex hypertext networks, preventing them from getting lost
`
`or confused. Authors were enabled to create a curated path through a hypertext
`
`network: “with a few clicks, they can link their tabletops [each tabletop is a set of
`
`hypertext documents] together to form the paths (actually an arbitrary graph
`
`structure) making up a guided tour.” Zellweger (1989) attacked the same problems
`
`in hypertext navigation: “user disorientation” and the “cognitive overhead needed
`
`to create, manage and choose among links”. She too based her approach on Bush’s
`
`vision: “The concept of a path, or ordered traversal of some links in a hypertext,
`
`can help solve these problems. Users are less likely to feel disoriented or lost when
`
`they are following a pre-defined path rather than browsing freely, and their
`
`cognitive overhead is reduced because the path either makes or narrows their
`
`choices. Paths allow authors to determine an appropriate order of presentation for a
`
`given audience.” Zellweger’s implementation of paths was called Scripted
`
`Documents; authors selected items to include and arranged them in a path. Her
`
`implementation worked with multimedia objects including images and audio files,
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 13
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`and thus supported creation and navigation of paths through hypermedia
`
`repositories.
`
`16. Of course, the World Wide Web is the most widely known and widely
`
`used hypertext system ever. Invented in 1989 at CERN in Switzerland by Tim-
`
`Berners Lee as a way for scientists to share knowledge, by 1993 it had moved
`
`beyond the borders of CERN and transcended the original purpose of supporting
`
`scientists. The Web inherited the well-known problems of navigational difficulty
`
`and getting lost in hyperspace – by 1997 there were well over a million websites
`
`linked together through hundreds of millions of connections, creating a seemingly
`
`infinite number of paths and possibilities – and these problems only gained in
`
`urgency as the user population of the Web increased. By 1997 an estimated 25
`
`million US households had Internet access, with the Web being the primary
`
`destination.
`
`A. Exemplary Preexisting Web Solutions,
`Such As Footsteps And Guided Paths
`17. There was significant innovation and development to address these
`
`issues prior to 1998. Notably, several efforts adapted and implemented the existing
`
`notion of a path to guide users through the Web.
`
`18. Footsteps: Nicol, Smeaton, and Slater (1995) implemented the
`
`Footsteps guided tour mechanism for the Web to “aid novice users navigate
`
`through information spaces” and “remove the dependency on navigating through a
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 14
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`complex structure of hypertext nodes”. (Footsteps, 880.) Authors created paths by
`
`selecting documents to include and arranging them in an order. Each page on the
`
`tour contained Previous and Next buttons to allow users to step forward or
`
`backward through the tour one webpage at a time. There also was an Index button
`
`that let users see a list of all the pages on the tour. These buttons can be seen, e.g.,
`
`in Fig. 2 of Footsteps:
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 15
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`
`
`If users followed a hypertext link from a page on the tour to a page not on the tour,
`
`any page navigated to would contain a Return to Tour button to take them back to
`
`the tour. Footsteps was implemented as a CGI script that ran as an intermediary
`
`between a user and all the webservers containing the web pages on the tour.
`
`Interestingly, Footsteps was explicitly positioned as an advantageous way for
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 16
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`students to navigate the Web: “To fully exploit the Web as a vehicle for the
`
`delivery of courseware a more supportive learning environment is required which
`
`can still make use of all the power of the Web whilst still maintaining a level of
`
`control over navigation.” Nicol et al. concluded their article with a comprehensive
`
`summary of Footsteps on page 883:
`
`• Users are allowed to follow a linear path through a large information space,
`
`but they are still allowed to digress from the tour to explore other
`
`information sources with the ability to easily return back to the tour;
`
`• Tour overviews, in the form of the index document, provide extra
`
`navigational facilities;
`
`• By using Footsteps, documents can remain reusable resources and be used in
`
`more than one tour as tour information is held independently of these
`
`resources;
`
`• Using such a script, implementing meta-information such as glossaries is
`
`simplified;
`
`• Any document on the Web can be included in a tour;
`
`• The Footsteps script can be used by a client anywhere on the Web, therefore
`
`the user does not have to be using the same local file system as the Footsteps
`
`script.
`
`• The script does not require any modification to either the server or the client.
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 17
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`19. Walden’s Paths / Guided Paths: Frank Shipman and colleagues
`
`created the Walden’s Paths system in 1996 (Shipman et al. 1996) and which they
`
`continued to develop and describe in a number of articles throughout the mid-late
`
`1990s. They too were motivated by the navigational and comprehension challenges
`
`raised by the Web: “The World Wide Web provides an entirely new context for
`
`hypertext application. Although the technology of the Web is largely derivative
`
`from earlier applications, the environment that it has created is novel. Unlike its
`
`predecessors, the Web is highly heterogeneous, both in readers but also in
`
`information provided. Readers range from highly-educated academicians to
`
`elementary school students. Ages range from retirees to pre-schoolers. People
`
`make material available on the Web for all conceivable reasons—to communicate,
`
`educate, persuade, promote, defraud, and delude, to name just a few of the
`
`possibilities.” (Hypertext Paths, 167.) Their approach too was based on the concept
`
`of a curated path through a hypertext repository: “Walden's Paths are intended to
`
`be communicated from path author to path readers. The basic metaphor is that of a
`
`network-based meta-document: a document whose elements are themselves
`
`documents.” (Hypertext Paths, 168.) A major design goal of Walden’s Paths was
`
`navigational simplicity, to serve the larger goal of creating educational resources
`
`suitable for use by school-age students:
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 18
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`[T]he guided path provided the means for directing a reader’s
`traversal along a path of components extracted from a set of
`documents. The ordering of components on the path is not constrained
`by that of the source documents—in other words, the components
`encountered do not have to follow the temporal orderings of the
`source. In essence, the guided path allows creation of a presentation,
`defining a meta-structure that is layered on top of the underlying
`documents’ preexisting structures. The guided path is well-suited for
`control of presentations and for communication of relationships. It
`serves as a meta-structuring mechanism that can be used to express an
`order over a large collection of [information]…. [E]xisting web pages
`from different servers around the world are structured as simple linear
`paths.
`
`(Guided Paths, 386, 392.)
`
`20. Walden’s Path was implemented and deployed software; it consisted
`
`of:
`
`• path authoring tools to create paths: “Path authoring is frequently a process
`
`of locating sites of relevant information on the Web, selecting specific pages
`
`for inclusion in the path, and ordering and annotating the pages to provide
`
`transition and emphasis for the materials. The Path Authoring Tool (PAT)
`
`provides a single, integrated, straightforward interface to do just this.”
`
`(Guided Paths, 395.)
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 19
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`• a path server to store and serve paths to users: “We adopted a strategy of
`
`developing a “path server” that mediates between a student’s browser and
`
`the source material’s server, and a “path authoring tool” that supports
`
`teachers and media specialists during the creation of paths. The path
`
`authoring tool sends completed paths to the path server. The path server
`
`stores information specific to the path—the order of pages in the path,
`
`annotations, and the URL for the original information.” (Guided Paths, 386.)
`
`• “The path server acts as an intermediary between the student’s browser and
`
`the original source information on the Web. By leaving the content of the
`
`pages at the source Web server and retrieving it when a Web browser
`
`requests a path page, the path server can take advantage of the evolution of
`
`the preexisting Web structure and content. Once a page is retrieved, the path
`
`server adds path controls and the path-specific annotations, then returns the
`
`resulting page to the Web browser.” (Guided Paths, 387.)
`
`• a user interface for browsing and navigating paths: “the guided path
`
`provided the means for directing a reader’s traversal along a path of
`
`components extracted from a set of documents…. There are four elements of
`
`the path controls: forward and back arrows to support path traversal, a
`
`Walden’s Path logo that, when selected, returns the student to the index of
`
`available paths, and a row of numbers that both situate the student within the
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 20
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`path and permit direct access to locations on the path.” (Guided Paths, 386,
`
`389.) See also Figure 5 of Guided Paths.
`
`21.
`
`Intelligent Search Techniques: At the same time as Footsteps and
`
`Walden’s Path were being developed, there was another prominent approach to
`
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 21
`
`
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`aiding people in navigating and making sense of information on the web: using
`
`artificial intelligence techniques to create “intelligent agents” that automated
`
`significant parts of the navigation and sense making process, including finding web
`
`pages relevant to a topic or user’s interest. Shipman and colleagues (1997 –
`
`“Generating Web-Based Presentations in Spatial Hypertext,” also referred to
`
`herein as “Web-Based Presentations”) explicitly noted this as an important
`
`technique to combine with their path authoring methods: “Analysis is a necessary
`
`part of creating presentations from Web-based material. Gathering, evaluating,
`
`interpreting, and organizing the Web-derived materials are essential to reusing this
`
`sort of appropriated content. Thus, integrating analytic tools like VIKI with
`
`presentation authoring tools will better support the authoring process.”
`
`22. Automated methods for finding high-quality and topic-relevant
`
`information on the Web was the major focus of my own contemporaneous work. I
`
`developed and deployed a publicly accessible website called PHOAKS that was
`
`accessed thousands of times per day by 1996:
`
`Finding relevant, high-quality information on the world-wide Web is a
`difficult problem. PHOAKS (People Helping One Another Know
`Stuff) is an experimental system that addresses this problem through a
`collaborative filtering approach. PHOAKS works by automatically
`recognizing, tallying, and redistributing recommendations of Web
`resources mined from Usenet news messages … PHOAKs consists of
`a general architecture for filtering information from electronic
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 22
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`messages and a set of techniques for generating and managing
`dynamic Web-based interfaces. So far, we have used the PHOAKS
`architecture to recognize and process Web resource recommendations
`and FAQ messages.
`
`(PHOAKS, 59-60; Terveen et al. 1997; Terveen & Hill 1997; U.S. Patent
`No. 6,029,192). The PHOAKS system became publicly available in
`February 1996 and had 300,000 visitors by December 1996. It consisted of
`three main processes:
`
`• Search—search messages for a specified pattern (such as “http://”) and
`
`extract contextual information surrounding each instance of the pattern
`
`• Categorization—apply rules that classify each instance of the pattern (e.g.,
`
`URLs used as recommendations vs. personal home pages)
`
`• Disposition—process the categorized information in some way (e.g., store it
`
`in a database or fetch the content of a URL).
`
`(Terveen et al. 1997.)
`
`23. Other people were developing similar intelligent agents for locating
`
`relevant and high-quality information on the Web, again directed at aiding people
`
`in their navigation and sense-making tasks. Webwatcher was a “tour guide” that
`
`used machine learning techniques to highlight (Joachims, Freitag, and Mitchell
`
`1996) “interesting hyperlinks as it accompanies the user, pointing out those
`
`hyperlinks it expects will be most appropriate given the user’s stated interest.”
`
`WebSeek (Smith and Chang (1997)) consisted of “intelligent agents” that mined
`DECLARATION OF PROFESSOR LOREN TERVEEN
`’523, ’672, AND ’814 PATENTS
`
`Page 23
`
`

`

`Patent Nos. 7,424,523; 9,083,672; and 9,772,814
`
`the World-Wide Web for images and videos relevant to a specific topic: they
`
`“traverse the Web by following hyperlinks between documents. They detect
`
`images and videos, retrieve and process them, and add the new information to the
`
`catalog.”
`
`Person Of Ordinary Skill In The Art (“POSITA”)
`B.
`24. These patents fall within the general technical field of computer
`
`science / software programming, as well s

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket