`
`
`
`
`PRIME WIRE & CABLE, INC.
`
` Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CANTIGNY LIGHTING
`CONTROL, LLC.
`
` Patent owner
`
`JASCO PRODUCTS, INC.
`
` Licensee
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1030 VIDEO FILE FOR PRIME’S PETITION FOR INTER
`PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,320,122
`UNDER 35 U.S.C. §§311-319 AND 37 C.F.R. 42.100 et seq.
`PRIME Wire & Cable, Inc. (hereinafter “PRIME”) submitted its petition for
`
`Case: IPR2018-1030
`Patent No.: 9,320,122
`
`
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 9,320,122 under 35 U.S.C. §§ 311-319 and
`
`37 C.F.R. 42.100 et seq. on Aug. 27, 2018. At the time of submission, the video
`
`file that defines Ex. 1030 failed to upload and as a result was not included in
`
`documents submitted and served on Respondents CANTIGNY Lighting Control,
`
`LLC and JASCO Products, Inc. Additionally, a printout of an email that was
`
`referenced to be included with Ex. 1057 failed to attach to the uploaded exhibit and
`
`as a result was also not included in the documents submitted and served on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respondents. That video file defining Ex. 1030 and the email printout referenced
`
`by Ex. 1057 is also now being uploaded and served on respondent. A filing date
`
`has not yet been accorded for PRIME’s petition and PRIME is not up against any 1
`
`year filing bars for at least six months. So, PRIME respectfully requests that its
`
`petition be accorded the filing date of the submission for Ex. 1030 and the
`
`inadvertently omitted part of Ex. 1057.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 4, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BUCHE & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
`
`
`/John K. Buche/
`John K. Buche
`Reg. No. 46,584
`
`/Bryce A. Johnson/
`Bryce A. Johnson
`Reg. No. 74,733
`
`
`Buche & Associates, P.C.
`875 Prospect Suite 305
`La Jolla, CA 92037
`Tel: 858.459.911
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE RE: CANTIGNY
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing:
`EXHIBIT 1030 VIDEO FILE FOR PRIME’S PETITION FOR INTER
`PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,320,122 UNDER 35 U.S.C.
`§§311-319 AND 37 C.F.R. 42.100 et seq.
`has been served in its entirety on the patent owner as provided in 37 C.F.R.
`§1.33 by being deposited on this date with the U.S. Postal Service:
`
`
`
`
`_X_ Mailed via US certified mail,
`___ Mailed regular U.S. mail;
`___ Sent via facsimile; and/or
`___ Delivered via courier service
`_X Delivered email PDF;
`_X_ Uploaded via PTAB E2E
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To the following counsel for the patent applicant on September 4, 2018:
`
`Attorney of Record
`
`John J. King (Reg. No. 35,918)
`
`Correspondence & Fee Address
`
`The Law Office of John J. King, P.C.
`P.O. Box 1555
`Wheaton, IL 60187-1555
`
`Customer No. 62081
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`__/ Bryce A. Johnson/___
`Bryce A. Johnson
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE RE: JASCO
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing:
`EXHIBIT 1030 VIDEO FILE FOR PRIME’S PETITION FOR INTER
`PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 9,320,122 UNDER 35 U.S.C.
`§§311-319 AND 37 C.F.R. 42.100 et seq.
`has been served in its entirety on the patent owner as provided in 37 C.F.R. §1.33
`by being deposited on this date with the U.S. Postal Service:
`
`
`
`
`_X _ Mailed via US certified mail,
`___ Mailed regular U.S. mail;
`___ Sent via facsimile; and/or
`___ Delivered via courier service
`_X Delivered email PDF;
`_X_ Uploaded via PTAB E2E
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To the following counsel for the patent applicant on September 4, 2018:
`
`Attorney for JASCO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`__/ Bryce A. Johnson/___
`Bryce A. Johnson
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
