throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 57
`Date: December 11, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`DIRECTSTREAM, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2018-01594 (Patent 6,434,687 B2)
`IPR2018-01599 (Patent 6,076,152)
`IPR2018-01600 (Patent 6,247,110 B1)
`IPR2018-01601 (Patent 7,225,324 B2)1
`IPR2018-01604 (Patent 7,421,524 B2)
`IPR2018-01605 (Patent 7,620,800 B2)2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before KALYAN K. DESHPANDE, JUSTIN T. ARBES, and
`CHRISTA P. ZADO, Administrative Patent Judges.
`ARBES, Administrative Patent Judge.
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motions to Withdraw
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(e)
`
`
`1 Cases IPR2018-01602 and IPR2018-01603 have been consolidated with
`Case IPR2018-01601.
`2 Cases IPR2018-01606 and IPR2018-01607 have been consolidated with
`Case IPR2018-01605. This Order addresses issues pertaining to both cases.
`Therefore, we exercise our discretion to issue a single Order to be filed in
`each case. The parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any
`subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01594 (Patent 6,434,687 B2)
`IPR2018-01599 (Patent 6,076,152)
`IPR2018-01600 (Patent 6,247,110 B1)
`IPR2018-01601 (Patent 7,225,324 B2)
`IPR2018-01604 (Patent 7,421,524 B2)
`IPR2018-01605 (Patent 7,620,800 B2)
`
`
`Patent Owner filed, in each of the instant proceedings, a motion for
`withdrawal of back-up counsel Christopher L. Evans pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.10(e). Paper 45.3 Patent Owner states that it will continue to be
`represented by lead counsel Alfonso Chan and multiple other back-up
`counsel, and that the motion is unopposed. Id. at 2.
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motion to withdraw in each of the
`instant proceedings is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Christopher L. Evans shall be considered
`withdrawn from the instant proceedings; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that, within five business days of this Order,
`Patent Owner shall file, in each of the instant proceedings, updated
`mandatory notice information pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8 reflecting the
`change in counsel.
`
`
`
`
`3 Patent Owner filed substantially the same motion in each proceeding. See
`IPR2018-01594, Paper 45; IPR2018-01599, Paper 47; IPR2018-01600,
`Paper 47; IPR2018-01601, Paper 45; IPR2018-01604, Paper 48;
`IPR2018-01605, Paper 45. We refer to the motion filed in
`Case IPR2018-01594 for convenience.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2018-01594 (Patent 6,434,687 B2)
`IPR2018-01599 (Patent 6,076,152)
`IPR2018-01600 (Patent 6,247,110 B1)
`IPR2018-01601 (Patent 7,225,324 B2)
`IPR2018-01604 (Patent 7,421,524 B2)
`IPR2018-01605 (Patent 7,620,800 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Joseph A. Micallef
`Jason P. Greenhut
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`jmicallef@sidley.com
`jgreenhut@sidley.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Alfonso Chan
`Joseph DePumpo
`SHORE CHAN DePUMPO LLP
`achan@shorechan.com
`jdepumpo@shorechan.com
`
`Sean Hsu
`G. Donald Puckett
`Rajkumar Vinnakota
`JANIK VINNAKOTA LLP
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket