throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`__________________
`
`ERICSSON INC. AND TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`__________________
`
`Case IPR2018-01694
`U.S. Patent No. 8,897,828
`
`__________________
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2018-01694
`Patent 8.897,828
`
`Petitioners Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson and Ericsson Inc. and Patent
`
`Owner Intellectual Ventures II LLC have reached a settlement agreement and
`
`jointly request termination of IPR2018-01694 under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). The
`
`Board authorized the filing of this motion on June 12, 2019.
`
`I.
`
`Statement of Relief Requested
`Due to a settlement, Petitioners and Patent Owner jointly request termination
`
`of IPR2018-01694 under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a).
`
`II.
`
`Statement of Facts
`Petitioners and Patent Owner have reached an agreement to settle this inter
`
`partes review proceeding. Petitioners and Patent Owner are filing the settlement
`
`agreement concurrently with this motion, along with a “Joint Request That the
`
`Settlement Agreement Be Treated as Business Confidential and Key Separate
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b).” A joint motion to terminate generally must “(1)
`
`include a brief explanation as to why termination is appropriate; (2) identify all
`
`parties in any related litigation involving the patents at issue; (3) identify any
`
`related proceedings currently before the Office; and (4) discuss specifically the
`
`current status of each such related litigation or proceeding with respect to each
`
`party to the litigation or proceeding.” Heartland Tanning, Inc. v. Sunless, Inc.,
`
`IPR2014-00018, Paper 26 at 2 (P.T.A.B. July 28, 2014).
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2018-01694
`Patent 8.897,828
`
`(1) Brief Explanation.
`Termination is appropriate in this case because the parties have settled their
`
`dispute. A “Joint Request That the Settlement Agreement Be Treated as Business
`
`Confidential and Kept Separate Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)” is being filed
`
`concurrently with this motion.
`
`(2) Related Litigation.
`
` The ’828 Patent is subject to pending lawsuits entitled Intellectual Ventures
`
`II LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:17-cv00661-JRG (E.D. Tex.) and
`
`Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P., Case No. 2:17-cv-662-JRG
`
`(E.D. Tex.) (the “Litigation”).
`
`(3) Related Proceedings Before the Office.
`
`Petitioners and Patent Owner are aware of the following pending inter partes
`
`review proceedings involving the ’828 Patent: T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al. v.
`
`Intellectual Ventures II LLC, IPR2018-01773 (P.T.A.B.).. ) Status of Related
`
`Litigation and Proceedings Before the Office.
`
`The related district court proceeding awaits trial but is stayed pending
`
`settlement between the parties. The Board has instituted trial in all of the above-
`
`referenced inter partes review proceedings.
`
`III. Argument
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2018-01694
`Patent 8.897,828
`
`The Board should terminate this inter partes review for the following
`
`reasons.
`
`First, Petitioners and Patent Owner have met the statutory requirement that
`
`they file a “joint request” to terminate before the Office “has decided the merits of
`
`the proceeding.” 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). Under § 317(a), an inter partes review
`
`“shall” be terminated up a joint request “unless the Office has decided the merits of
`
`the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” There are no other
`
`preconditions of § 317(a).
`
`Second, the parties have reached a settlement as to all the disputes in this
`
`proceeding. A true copy of the settlement agreement is filed concurrently
`
`herewith. See Paper No. 14. The parties request that the settlement agreement be
`
`treated as business confidential information and be kept separate from the files of
`
`this proceeding in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). No other such
`
`agreements, written or oral, exist between or among the parties.
`
`Accordingly, the parties in the present proceeding jointly certify that there
`
`are no other written or oral agreements or understandings, including any collateral
`
`agreements, between them, including but not limited to licenses, covenants not to
`
`sue, confidentiality agreements, payment agreements, or other agreements of any
`
`kind, that are made in connection with or in contemplation of, the termination of
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2018-01694
`Patent 8.897,828
`
`this proceeding.
`
`Third, a termination of this proceeding will conserve the Board’s resources
`
`and obviate the need for any more Board involvement in this matter.
`
`IV. Conclusion
`For these reasons, Petitioners and Patent Owner respectfully request
`
`termination of this inter partes review of the ’828 Patent.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Dated: June 13, 2019
`
`Date: June 13, 2019
`
`Case No. IPR2018-01694
`Patent 8.897,828
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
` /s / Chad C. Walters
`Chad C. Walters (Reg. No. 48,022)
`Baker Botts L.L.P.
`2001 Ross Avenue, Ste 900
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Phone: (214) 953-6511
`Facsimile: (214) 661-4511
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONERS
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX
`P.L.L.C.
`/Byron L. Pickard/
`
`Byron L. Pickard, Reg. No. 65,172
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`

`

`Case No. IPR2018-01694
`Patent 8.897,828
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on June 13, 2019, pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`
`§§ 42.6(e) and 42.105(b), a copy of this Joint Motion to Terminate was served on
`
`Patent Owner’s counsel via email at the following correspondence addresses:
`
` ptab@sternekessler.com
`
`Dated: June 13, 2019
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
` /s / Chad C. Walters
`Chad C. Walters (Reg. No. 48,022)
`Baker Botts L.L.P.
`2001 Ross Avenue, Ste 900
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`Phone: (214) 953-6511
`Facsimile: (214) 661-4511
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONERS
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket