Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 30
`Entered: November 18, 2019
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`RIMFROST AS,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`AKER BIOMARINE ANTARCTIC AS.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2018-01730
`Patent 9,072,752 B2
`
`
`Before TINA E. HULSE, and JOHN E. SCHNEIDER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SCHNEIDER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 30
`Entered: November 18, 2019
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`RIMFROST AS,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`AKER BIOMARINE ANTARCTIC AS.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2018-01730
`Patent 9,072,752 B2
`
`
`Before TINA E. HULSE, and JOHN E. SCHNEIDER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SCHNEIDER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01730
`Patent 9,072,752 B2
`
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner both request an oral hearing pursuant to
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Papers 28 and 29. The requests are granted to the extent
`set forth below and subject to the following conditions.
`Oral argument shall commence at 1:00 PM Central Time on
`December 9, 2019, in the Texas Regional Office, Terminal Annex Federal
`Building, 207 S. Houston Street, Dallas Texas 75202.
`Petitioner and Patent Owner both request sixty minutes for argument.
`Papers 26 and 28. Accordingly, the Board determines that each party shall
`be allotted sixty (60) minutes of total time to present argument. Petitioner
`bears the ultimate burden of proof that the patent claims at issue are
`unpatentable. Therefore, Petitioner will open the hearing by presenting its
`case regarding the challenged claims for which we instituted trial. Petitioner
`may reserve some of its argument time for rebuttal. Absent special
`circumstances, a petitioner will not be permitted to reserve for rebuttal more
`than half the total time allotted for argument. Thereafter, Patent Owner will
`respond to Petitioner’s presentation and present its argument regarding its
`motion to amend. Patent Owner also may reserve some of its argument time
`for a brief sur-rebuttal.
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the
`reporter’s transcript shall constitute the official record of the hearing. The
`hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance that will be
`accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. If the parties have any
`concern about disclosing confidential information during the hearing, they
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00295
`Patent 9,320,765 B2
`
`are requested to contact the Board by December 1, 2019, to request a
`conference call to discuss the matter.
`The Board’s August 2018 Trial Practice Guide Update (“TPGU”)
`provides an opportunity for the parties to request a pre-hearing conference.
`See TPGU 19 (“The purpose of the pre-hearing conference is to afford the
`parties the opportunity to preview (but not argue) the issues to be discussed
`at the oral hearing, and to seek the Board’s guidance as to particular issues
`that the panel would like addressed by the parties.”). If either party desires a
`pre-hearing conference, the parties should jointly contact the Board by
`March 5, 2019 to request a conference call for that purpose.
`Demonstrative exhibits used at the final hearing are aids to oral
`argument and not evidence, and should be clearly marked as such. For
`example, each slide of a demonstrative exhibit may be marked with the
`words “DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE” in the footer.
`Demonstrative exhibits must not include new evidence and each must
`include citations to the record sufficient to establish that the exhibit contains
`no new argument or evidence not already of record in the proceeding(s) in
`which it is offered. The parties are directed to serve demonstrative exhibits
`on opposing counsel at least seven (7) days before the hearing date. Please
`also provide a courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the Board at
`least seven (7) days prior to the hearing by emailing them to
`Trials@uspto.gov. Notwithstanding 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), the parties shall
`not file any demonstrative exhibits in the record of this proceeding without
`prior authorization from the Board.
`The Board expects that the parties will meet and confer in good faith
`to resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits, but if such objections
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00295
`Patent 9,320,765 B2
`
`cannot be resolved, the parties may file any objections to demonstrative
`exhibits with the Board at least four (4) days before the hearing. Any
`objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be
`considered waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`demonstratives are subject to objection and include a short (one sentence or
`less) statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and
`schedule a conference call if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will
`reserve ruling on the objections until the oral argument. The parties are
`directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of
`Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB January 27,
`2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content of
`demonstrative exhibits.
`Two members of the panel will attend the hearing electronically from
`remote locations and will not be able to view the projection screen in the
`hearing room. If a demonstrative exhibit is not made available prior to the
`hearing so that a judge appearing remotely has access to the demonstrative,
`that demonstrative may not be presented at the hearing. Counsel must
`identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or
`page number) referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and
`accuracy of the reporter’s transcript and for the benefit of the judge(s)
`presiding over the hearing remotely.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person
`at the oral hearing. However, any counsel of record may present the party’s
`argument. If either party expects that its lead counsel will not attend the oral
`hearing, the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference with the
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00295
`Patent 9,320,765 B2
`
`Board no later than two (2) days prior to the oral hearing to discuss the
`matter.
`The parties may request permission to use certain audiovisual
`equipment to display exhibits during the oral hearing. Papers 26 and 28.
`Those requests, and any other special requests for audiovisual equipment,
`should be directed to Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for special equipment
`will not be honored unless presented in a separate communication not
`less than three days before the hearing, directed to the above email
`address.
`It is ORDERED that the parties’ requests for oral hearing (Papers 28
`and 29) are granted subject to the conditions set forth in this Order; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that oral hearing, conducted pursuant to the
`procedures outlined above, shall commence at 1:00 PM Central Time on
`December 9, 2019.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`IPR2018-00295
`Patent 9,320,765 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`James F. Harrington
`Michael I. Chakansky
`Ronald J. Baron
`John T. Gallagher
`HOFFMANN & BARON, LLP
`jfhdocket@hbiplaw.com
`mchakansky@hbiplaw.com
`rbaron@hbiplaw.com
`jgallagher@hbiplaw.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`David A. Casimir
`J. Mitchell Jones
`CASIMIR JONES S.C.
`dacasimir@casimirjones.com
`jmjones@casimirjones.com
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
