`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`OXFORD NANOPORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2018-01785
`Patent 9,738,929
`
`____________
`
`MOTION TO WITHDRAW PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The Board authorized Petitioner Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Inc.
`
`(“Oxford” or “Petitioner”) to file a motion to withdraw its petition for inter partes
`
`review and thereby terminate IPR2018-01785 directed to U.S. Patent No. 9,738,929
`
`(“the ’929 Patent”) on January 2, 2019. Oxford now so moves. IPR2018-01785 is
`
`in its preliminary phase and Patent Owner Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
`
`(“PacBio” or “Patent Owner”) does not oppose this motion. To preserve the Board’s
`
`and parties’ resources and to achieve a just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution to
`
`this dispute, Oxford requests the Board withdraw this petition for inter partes review
`
`and thereby terminate IPR2018-01785.
`
`II. RELATED PROCEEDINGS
`
`The ’929 Patent is subject to a pending lawsuit entitled Pacific Biosciences of
`
`California, Inc., v. Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Inc., which was consolidated
`
`into actions 1:17-cv-00275-LPS, 1:17-cv-01353-LPS (D. Del.), in which Petitioner
`
`is a defendant. The ’929 Patent is also the subject of Oxford Nanopore Technologies,
`
`Inc. et al v. Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc., IPR2018-01792. IPR2018-01792
`
`was filed on September 25, 2018 and is currently in its pre-institution phase.
`
`III. ARGUMENT
`
`Good cause exists to withdraw Oxford’s petition for inter partes review and
`
`thereby terminate IPR2018-01785 pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(a) and § 42.72.
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2018-01785 is in its preliminary stage as the Patent Owners have not yet filed a
`
`Preliminary Response and the Board has not yet reached the merits or issued a
`
`decision on institution. Accordingly, withdrawal at this time would preserve both
`
`the Board’s and the parties’ resources in accordance with the intent of 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.1(b) “to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution every proceeding.”
`
`Withdrawal of Oxford’s petition for inter partes review is also a just
`
`resolution as Patent Owner will not be prejudiced by such withdrawal and
`
`subsequent termination of IPR2018-01785. The lack of any such prejudice is
`
`evidenced by Patent Owner’s agreement that it does not object to the filing of this
`
`motion. Further, to the extent Patent Owner wishes to address any issues raised in
`
`the instant petition, ample opportunity to do so is available in connection with
`
`IPR2018-01792.
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`Petitioner respectfully requests withdrawal of the instant Petition for inter
`
`partes review and that the thereby Board terminate IPR2018-01785.
`
`
`
`Date: January 11, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Steven P. Lendaris/____________
`Steven P. Lendaris (Reg. No. 53,202)
`Carolyn M. Pirraglia (Reg. No. 75,365)
`30 Rockefeller Plaza, 45th Floor
`New York, NY 10112-4498
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Phone: 212-408-2500
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner,
`Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e) and 42.105, the undersigned certifies
`
`that on January 11, 2019, a complete and entire copy of the foregoing was provided
`
`by electronic service to counsel retained by Patent Owner in the Related Matters
`
`identified herein:
`
`
`
`PacBio.Oxford.Delaware@weil.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Steven P. Lendaris/____________
`Steven P. Lendaris (Reg. No. 53,202)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: January 11, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`