throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper No. 11
`Entered: April 9, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ARM LTD. and ARM, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`COMPLEX MEMORY LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2019-00053 (Patent 5,890,195)
`Case IPR2019-00058 (Patent 6,658,576 B1)1
`____________
`
`Before KARL D. EASTHOM, DENISE M. POTHIER, and
`CHARLES J. BOUDREAU, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`POTHIER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Motion to Dismiss
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5(a), 42.71(a)
`
`1 This Decision issues in both cases as it addresses identical issues in each.
`The parties, however, must seek prior authorization to use this heading style
`for any subsequent papers.
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00053, IPR 2019-00058
`Patent 5,890,195, Patent 6,658,576
`
`
`
`With authorization from the Board, Petitioner ARM Limited and
`ARM, Incorporated and Patent Owner Complex Memory LLC filed a Joint
`Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) as Paper 9 and a Joint
`Request to File Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential Information
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)2 as Paper 8 in each of the above-captioned
`cases. The parties represent that they have reached agreement in the form of
`a “Patent License Agreement,” which is in writing and a true copy of which
`has been filed in conjunction with the above motions as required under 37
`C.F.R. § 42.74(b) as Exhibit 1019 in IPR2019-00053 and as Exhibit 1010 in
`IPR2019-00058. Paper 9, 2.
`At this early stage, we determine that dismissal is warranted in light of
`the parties’ joint request and their settlement agreement. See 37 C.F.R.
`§§ 42.5(a), 42.71(a). We further determine that the settlement agreement
`filed by the parties constitutes business confidential information. Therefore,
`the parties’ joint motions discussed above are granted.
`This paper does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`
`ORDER
`
`It is
`ORDERED that the parties’ joint motions to dismiss in the
`above-captioned cases are granted, and the petitions are dismissed;
`
`
`2 The parties mistakenly refer to paragraph (a). Paper 9, 1.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00053, IPR 2019-00058
`Patent 5,890,195, Patent 6,658,576
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Requests to File
`Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential Information Pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 317 in the above-captioned petitions are granted, and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibit 1019 in Case IPR2019-00053 and
`Exhibit 1010 in Case IPR2019-00058 each shall be kept separate from the
`pertinent files of the involved patents, consistent with 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b)
`and (c).
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00053, IPR 2019-00058
`Patent 5,890,195, Patent 6,658,576
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Kevin Anderson
`kpanderson@duanemorris.com
`
`Scott Felder
`sfelder@wileyrein.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jeffrey Toler
`jtoler@tlgiplaw.com
`
`Daniel Ford
`dford@tlgiplaw.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket