throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 14
`Entered: May 14, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`GOOGLE LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SPEAKWARE, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2019-00340
`Patent 6,397,186 B1
`_______________
`
`
`Before DEBRA K. STEPHENS, DAVID C. MCKONE, and
`ROBERT J. WEINSCHENK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WEINSCHENK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00340
`Patent 6,397,186 B1
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`Patent Owner filed a motion for pro hac vice admission of Mr. Simon
`Franzini in this proceeding. Paper 6 (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Petitioner did
`not file an opposition to the Motion. For the following reasons, the Motion
`is granted.
`
`II. ANALYSIS
`Counsel may be admitted pro hac vice upon a showing of good cause,
`subject to the condition that lead counsel is a registered practitioner. 37
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c). Specifically, if lead counsel is a registered practitioner,
`back-up counsel may be permitted to appear pro hac vice “upon showing
`that counsel is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding.” Id. For the
`reasons set forth in the Motion and the accompanying affidavit of Mr.
`Franzini,1 good cause exists to admit Mr. Franzini pro hac vice in this
`proceeding.
`
`III. ORDER
`
`It is hereby
`ORDERED that the Motion is granted, and Mr. Simon Franzini is
`authorized to represent Patent Owner as back-up counsel in the above-listed
`proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that a registered practitioner will continue to
`represent Patent Owner as lead counsel in the above-listed proceeding; and
`
`1 Mr. Franzini’s affidavit does not comply with 37 C.F.R. § 1.68. Because
`Petitioner does not oppose the Motion and we discern no prejudice to
`Petitioner, we do not deny the Motion for that reason. However, all future
`affidavits or declarations submitted in this case and other matters before the
`Board must include a statement that complies with 37 C.F.R. § 1.68.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00340
`Patent 6,397,186 B1
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Franzini is to comply with the
`Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of
`Federal Regulations, and the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, and is
`subject to the USPTO’s Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R.
`§§ 11.101 et seq., and to the USPTO’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37
`C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00340
`Patent 6,397,186 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Erika H. Arner
`Daniel C. Tucker
`Jency Mathew
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT, & DUNNER LLP
`erika.arner@finnegan.com
`daniel.tucker@finnegan.com
`jency.mathew@finnegan.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Sean A. Luner
`DOVEL & LUNER, LLP
`sean@dovel.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket